资源与产业 ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 103-109.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.2016.04.020

• 资源经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于DEA模型的水公用事业上市公司绩效评价

阮丹枫,韩丽红   

  1. 中国地质大学 人文经管学院,北京100083
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-07 修回日期:2016-05-22 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF LISTED WATER UTILITIES ' COMPANIES BASED ON DEA MODEL

RUAN Dan-feng, HAN Li-hong   

  1. School of Humanities and Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2016-04-07 Revised:2016-05-22 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

摘要:

基于搜集的13家水公用事业上市公司2012—2014年经营绩效评价的相关指标数据,构建了数据包络分析(DEA)模型,对水公用事业行业的技术有效性和规模有效性进行分析,对企业的绩效进行评价。研究表明,阳晨B股、江南水务、国中水务、锦龙股份这4家公司3年来各项效率均处于较高水平,达到DEA有效;重庆水务、创业环保、洪城水业、首创股份的纯技术效率较高但规模效率相对较低,祥龙电业、钱江水利的规模效率较高但纯技术效率相对较低,瀚蓝环境、武汉控股、中山公用的各项效率均较低。最后对水公用事业上市公司提出了加强内部管理控制、提高经营管理效率、利用产业优势做大做强企业、立足主营业务提升竞争能力的建议。

关键词: DEA模型, 水公用事业, 绩效评价, 技术效率, 规模效率

Abstract:

This paper, based on 13 listed water utilities companies' performance from 2012 to 2014, establishes DEA model to analyze their technical and scale validation and to evaluate their performance. Results show that Yangchen B, Jiangnan Water, Guozhong Water and Jinlong are of higher technical and scale efficiency, an effective DEA; Chongqing Water, Chuangye Environmental Protection, Hongcheng Water and Shouchuang are high in pure technical efficiency but low in scale efficiency; Xianglong Electrics and Qianjiang Water are high in scale efficiency but low in pure technical efficiency; Hanlan Environment, Wuhan Holdings, and Zhongshan Public are low in both. This paper presents suggestions for listed water utilities companies in boosting internal management, increasing operation efficiency, intensifying industrial advantages and promoting competitiveness based on leading business.

Key words: DEA model, water utilities, performance evaluation, technical efficiency, scale efficiency

中图分类号: