浙江省科技创新与水资源环境耦合协调度分析与预测

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20211221.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究浙江省科技创新和水资源环境耦合协调关系，预测两者的耦合协调趋势，为实现浙江省科技绿色发展、水资源环境保护和高质量发展目标提供参考。基于2010—2019年浙江省11个城市科技创新和水资源环境相关数据，建立综合指标评价体系，利用熵值法、层次分析法和最小相对信息熵原理确定各指标权重，分别计算科技创新系统和水资源环境系统的综合评价值，并分析其变化情况。运用耦合协调度模型计算并分析两系统的耦合协调度，最后采用GM（1，1）灰色模型预测未来6年的协调度发展趋势。研究发现：1）2019年浙江省科技创新与水资源环境系统发展水平分别为0.398 1和0.458 7，年均增速分别为14.62%和3.94%，相比水资源环境，科技创新总体水平更低，但其发展速度更快，同时两个系统均存在地区差异；2）11个城市科技创新与水资源环境的耦合协调关系表现出上升态势，浙江省整体耦合协调度由从0.411 3上升至0.636 8，2010—2013年为濒临失调，2014—2017年为勉强协调，2018—2019年实现初级协调；预测结果显示6年后科技创新和水资源环境系统处于良好协调阶段，但年均增速放缓，由4.98%下降至4.58%；3）浙江省科技创新与水资源环境的耦合协调度在空间上表现出北高南低、东高西低的格局，而且在未来6年内未发生显著变化。2010—2019年浙江省高度重视科技创新工作，优化水资源环境，促进了科技创新与水资源环境的协同发展，但11个城市之间存在空间差异，未来科技创新和水资源环境仍将朝着更加协调的方向发展。基于此，提出了增强科技创新和改善水资源环境、预防未来耦合协调度增速放缓、缩小地区差异等政策建议，以期更好地实现科技创新与水资源环境的协调发展。

关键词: 水资源环境, 科技创新, 耦合协调度, 灰色预测模型, 浙江省

Abstract: This paper explores the coupling coordination between technical innovation and water resources environment in Zhejiang province, and forecasts its tendency so as to provide references for Zhejiang's green development, water resources environmental protection and high-quality development based on Zhejiang's 11 cities' technical innovation and water resources data from 2010 to 2019. A comprehensive evaluation index system is established with its indexes' weights determined via entropy, AHP and minimum relative information entropy, which is used to estimate the comprehensive evaluation values of technical innovation system and water resources environment system. Coupling coordination model is used to calculate the coupling coordination of the two systems. GM(1, 1) model is employed to forecast the coordination tendency in the next six years. The development levels of Zhejiang's technical innovation system and water resources system in 2019 are 0.398 1 and 0.458 7 with an annual increasing rate 14.62% and 3.94%. Technical innovation has a faster developing rate. The two systems vary with regions. The coupling coordination shows an increasing trend with Zhejiang's overall coupling coordination rising from 0.411 3 to 0.636 8, near disordered from 2010 to 2013, fairly ordered from 2014 to 2017, preliminarily ordered from 2018 to 2019, forecasted to be well ordered in next six years with a lagging annual increasing rate from 4.98% to 4.58%. The coupling coordination shows geographically a pattern of north-high-south-low, east-high-west-low, with forecasted no outstanding changes in next six years.From 2010 to 2019, Zhejiang pays much attention to technical innovation, optimizes water resources environment, and promotes a collaborative development between technical innovation and water resources environment, but spatial differences exist. This paper presents suggestions on boosting technical innovation, improving water resources environment, preventing a lagging coupling coordination, and reducing regional variance so as to reach a better coordinated development between technical innovation and water resources environment.

Key words: water resources environment, technical innovation, coupling coordination, grey forecast model, Zhejiang province

中图分类号:

F205

童纪新, 任丁维. 浙江省科技创新与水资源环境耦合协调度分析与预测[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 37-45.

TONG Jixin, REN Dingwei. ANALYSIS AND FORECAST ON COUPLING COORDINATION BETWEEN TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(1): 37-45.

参考文献

杜湘红，张涛，2015. 水资源环境与社会经济系统耦合发展的仿真模拟: 以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]. 地理科学，35(9): 1109-1115.〔DU X H, ZHANG T, 2015. The simulation to coupling development between water resource & environment and socio-economic system: Dongting lake ecological economic zone as an example[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(9): 1109-1115. 〕
廖重斌，1999. 环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系: 以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 热带地理(2): 76-82. 〔LIAO C B, 1999. Quantitative judgement and classification system for coordinated development of environment and economy: a case study of the city group in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Tropical Geography(2): 76-82. 〕
李闻起，刘宏儒，陆怡雅，等，2020. 山东省经济、人口与环境耦合协调性演化分析[J]. 资源与产业，22(1): 87-95. 〔LI W Q, LIU H R, LU Y Y, et al, 2020. Evolution of coupling coordination among Shandong's economy, population and environment[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(1): 87-95. 〕
孙爱军，胡永法，2007. 产业结构与水资源的相关分析与实证研究: 以淮安市为例[J]. 水利经济(2): 8-11, 81. 〔SUN A J, HU Y F, 2007. Correlation analysis and demonstration researches of industrial structure and water resources: take Huai'an City as an example[J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources (2): 8-11, 81. 〕
沈菊琴，裴磊，张兆方，2019. 长江经济带城镇化与水资源的耦合协调关系[J]. 资源与产业，21(1): 1-9. 〔SHEN J Q, PEI L, ZHANG Z F, 2019. Coupling coordination between urbanization and water resources in Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Resources & Industries, 21(1): 1-9. 〕
唐宏，黄凤，冉瑞平，等，2017. 干旱区绿洲城市产业结构与用水结构双向调控策略[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，31(3): 26-31. 〔TANG H, HUANG F, RAN R P, et al, 2017. Mutual optimization of industrial structure and water utilization structure in the arid oasis city[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 31(3): 26-31. 〕
谈飞，史玉莹，2019. 江苏省水资源环境与经济发展耦合协调度测评[J]. 水利经济，37(3): 8-12，19，85. 〔TAN F, SHI Y Y, 2019. Evaluation of coupling coordination degree between water resource environment and economic development in Jiangsu province[J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 37(3): 8-12, 19, 85. 〕
王保乾，杨晖，竺运，2020. 长江经济带水资源承载力综合评价研究[J]. 资源与产业，22(1): 1-11. 〔WANG B Q, YANG H, ZHU Y, 2020. Comprehensive evaluation of water resource carrying capacity of Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(1): 1-11. 〕
王君磊，王兆凯，杨晓明，2007. 基于层次分析法的经济增长质量评价模型[J]. 统计与决策(12): 49-51. 〔WANG J L, WANG Z K, YANG X M, 2007. Evaluation model of economic growth quality based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Statistics & Decision (12): 49-51. 〕
文含蕊，何大义，2020. 石油企业经济、环境和社会绩效的协调度评价研究[J]. 资源与产业，22(4): 32-40. 〔WEN H R, HE D Y, 2020. Coordination of economy, environment and social performance of petroleum companies[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(4): 32-40. 〕
向丽，2016. 中国省域科技创新与生态环境协调发展的时空特征[J]. 技术经济，35(11): 28-35. 〔XIANG L, 2016. Spatial-temporal characteristics of coordinated development between technological innovation and ecological environment at province level in China[J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 35(11): 28-35. 〕
许长新，胡丽媛，孙洋洋，2019. 安徽省城市化效率与经济发展水平的耦合协调关系研究[J]. 资源与产业，21(2): 24-33. 〔
XU C X, HU L Y, SUN Y Y, 2019. Coupled coordination between urbanization efficiency and economic development in Anhui province[J]. Resources & Industries, 21(2): 24-33. 〕
闫璐璐，王小梅，柴彦威，等，2016. 基于熵变视角的生态脆弱区城市化与生态环境交互耦合发展研究: 以西宁市为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，26(S2): 39-43. 〔YAN L L, WANG X M, CHAI Y W, et al, 2016. Study on the interaction between urbanization and ecological environment in ecologically fragile areas based on entropy change[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(S2): 39-43. 〕
严翔，成长春，周亮基，2017. 长江经济带经济发展-创新能力-生态环境耦合协调发展研究[J]. 科技管理研究，37(19): 85-93. 〔YAN X, CHENG C C, ZHOU L J, 2017. Research on coupling coordination development of regional economic growth-innovation ability-ecological environment in Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 37(19): 85-93. 〕
赵传松，任建兰，2018. 全域旅游视角下中国旅游业与区域发展耦合协调及预测研究[J]. 经济问题探索(3): 66-74. 〔ZHAO C S, REN J L, 2018. Research on coupling coordination and forecasting of tourism industry and regional development in China from the perspective of global tourism[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues (3): 66-74. 〕
郑德凤，徐文瑾，姜俊超，等，2021. 中国水资源承载力与城镇化质量演化趋势及协调发展分析[J]. 经济地理，41(2): 72-81. 〔ZHENG D F, XU W J, JIANG J C, et al, 2021. Evolutionary trend and coordinated development between water resources carrying capacity and urbanization quality in China[J]. Economic Geography, 41(2): 72-81. 〕
周雪娇，杨琳，2018. 基于创新驱动的区域经济与生态环境协调发展的研究[J]. 经济问题探索(7): 174-183. 〔ZHOU X J, YANG L, 2018. Research on the coordinated development of regional economy based on innovation-driven and ecological environment[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues(7): 174-183. 〕
BROWN C, LALL U, 2006. Water and economic development: the role of variability and a framework for resilience[J]. Natural Resources Forum, 30(4): 306-317.
FUSSLER C, JAMES P, 1996. Water and economic development: a breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability[M]. London: Pitman Publishing.
GALLAGHER L, LAFLAIVE X, ZAESKE A, et al, 2016. Embracing risk, uncertainty and water allocation reform when planning for green growth[J]. Aquatic Procedia, 6: 23-29.
REYNAUD A, 2003. An econometric estimation of industrial water demand in France[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25(2): 213-232.
SCHUMPETER J, 1912. The theory of economic development[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
ZAILANI S, GOVINDAN K, IRANMANESH M, et al, 2015. Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 1115-1122.

[1]	尹庆民, 靳婉婷. 科技创新对绿色全要素生产率的影响——基于产业集聚调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 1-10.
[2]	孙明浩, 廖秋敏. 逆全球化背景下“一带一路”沿线国家矿产资源投资风险评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 169-180.
[3]	李雪薇, 王志强. 基于GIS的乌鲁木齐市土地利用与生态环境耦合规律分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(6): 86-94.
[4]	文含蕊, 何大义. 石油企业经济、环境和社会绩效的协调度评价研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(4): 32-40.
[5]	沈薇，翁翎燕，刘柄麟，等. 浙江省土地利用碳排放效应研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(1): 61-68.
[6]	齐婧，李秀霞. 中国城市化与资源、环境发展水平的耦合协调时空格局演变[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(5): 29-36.
[7]	袁冬青，王富喜. 山东省城镇化质量与速度时空耦合关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(5): 37-43.
[8]	沈菊琴，裴磊，张兆方. 长江经济带城镇化与水资源的耦合协调关系[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21( 1): 1-9.
[9]	许玉凤，徐飞，唐稳华. 城市化与生态环境的协调发展研究——以贵州省黔南州为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(3): 79-85.
[10]	商桃桃，胡石元，唐旭. . 2005—2015年中国人口与土地城镇化耦合协调的时空特征研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2017, 19(6): 8-16.
[11]	韩笑，张楠. 我国城镇化与地质灾害耦合协调度分析 [J]. 资源与产业, 2017, 19(4): 52-56.
[12]	狄乾斌, 李霞. 环渤海地环渤海地区城市化与海域承载力协调关系评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2017, 19(4): 69-73.
[13]	吴丹丹，马仁锋，苏飞，等.. 浙江县域发展质量及其时空特征[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(5): 21-.
[14]	李继红，马洪云.. 山东省城市化与经济发展系统耦合协调性研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(5): 44-.
[15]	吕添贵,吴次芳,李冠,陈美球. 基于TOPSIS法的赣江水源区城市发展与水资源环境协调性评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(4): 83-89.