环境信息披露对资源型企业创新的影响——基于外部压力视角

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220816.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 深入探索环境信息披露与企业创新之间存在“倒逼效应”还是“挤出效应”，对实现环境保护与经济发展“双赢”目标具有重要意义。本文聚焦资源型企业，基于合法性理论、声誉理论、信号传递理论和利益相关者理论，研究外部压力视角下环境信息披露对资源型企业创新水平的影响。研究结果表明：1）环境信息披露可以显著提高资源型企业创新水平，且相比软披露，硬披露对创新水平的促进作用更强；2）负面媒体监督会在一定程度上抵消环境信息披露带来的企业声誉和融资优势，抑制资源型企业创新水平的提高，但其他类型媒体监督均不能对环境信息披露提高资源型企业创新水平的过程产生显著促进作用；3）政府监管和分析师关注均对环境信息披露与资源型企业创新水平之间的关系产生正向调节作用，同时分析师关注的资源型企业披露硬环境信息对其创新水平的提升作用更大。资源型企业应选择性地多披露货币性硬环境信息，将环境信息披露作为绿色创新转型的重要一环；政府需进一步完善环境信息披露制度，引导企业采用统一的环境信息披露标准，充分发挥新闻媒体的舆论监督作用以及分析师关注的社会监督作用。

关键词: 环境信息披露, 外部压力, 资源型企业, 利益相关者, 信号传递

Abstract: Study of either retroaction effect or crowding out effect between environmental information disclosure and companies’ innovation is key to reaching a win-win between environmental protection and economic development. This paper uses legality, reputation, signal transmission and stakeholder theories to study the impacts of environmental information disclosure on resource companies’ innovation. Results show environmental information disclosure can notably increases resource companies’ innovative level, hard disclosure works more compared with soft disclosure. Negative media supervision will offset companies’ reputation and financing advantage brought from environmental information disclosure to some extent, then constraining resource companies’ innovative capacity, but other media will not promote their innovative levels upon environmental information disclosure. Governmental supervision and analysts’ attention will not positively adjust the relation between environmental information disclosure and innovative level of resource companies, but analyst’s attention will work if resource companies discloses hard environmental information, which is a good practice for green innovative transformation. Governments need to further optimize environmental information disclosure system in a unified standard, and to fulfill media supervision and analysts’ social supervision.

Key words: environmental information disclosure, external pressure, resource company, stakeholder; signal transmission

中图分类号:

F270

聂志萍, 汪艺文. 环境信息披露对资源型企业创新的影响——基于外部压力视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 79-96.

NIE Zhiping, WANG Yiwen. IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ON RESOURCE COMPANIES' INNOVATION VIEWING FROM EXTERNAL PRESSURE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(1): 79-96.

参考文献

崔秀梅, 温素彬, 李冰冰, 2021. 环境信息披露与企业创新: 促进抑或挤出: 基于“波特假说”条件下的环境规制调节效应[J]. 财会通讯（18）: 30-35.

黄德春, 刘志彪, 2006. 环境规制与企业自主创新: 基于波特假设的企业竞争优势构建[J]. 中国工业经济（3）: 100-106. 〔HUANG D C, LIU Z B, 2006. Study on relationship between environmental regulation and firm independently innovation: the firm competitiveness design based on Porter hypothesis[J]. China Industrial Economy （3）: 100-106.〕

韩洁, 田高良, 封华, 2016. 分析师跟进对并购绩效的影响研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 36（2）: 400-412. 〔HAN J, TIAN G L, FENG H, 2016. The impact of analyst following on merger performance[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 36（2）: 400-412.〕

江三良, 张晨, 2020. 企业家精神、产业政策与企业绩效: 来自沪深A股制造业上市公司的证据[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 17（4）: 40-49. 〔JIANG S L, ZHANG C, 2020. Entrepreneurship, industrial policy and corporate performance: evidence from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share manufacturing listed companies[J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 17（4）: 40-49.〕

蒋琰, 王逸如, 姜慧慧, 2020. 新《环境保护法》、环境信息披露与价值效应[J]. 中国经济问题（4）: 32-46. 〔JIANG Y, WANG Y R, JIANG H H, 2020. The New Environmental Protection Law, environmental information disclosure and value effect[J]. China Economic Studies（4）: 32-46.〕

李培功, 沈艺峰, 2010. 媒体的公司治理作用: 中国的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 45（4）: 14-27. 〔LI P G, SHEN Y F, 2010. The corporate governance role of media: empirical evidence from China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 45（4）: 14-27.〕

李强, 朱杨慧, 2014. 外部压力、公司治理与环境信息披露质量: 基于煤炭行业上市公司的实证检验[J]. 经济与管理, 28（3）: 68-73. 〔LI Q, ZHU Y H, 2014. External pressure, corporate governance and the quality of environment information disclosure: based on the empirical test of the coal industry listing corporation[J]. Economy and Management, 28（3）: 68-73.〕

王锋正, 许卫华, 2017. 资源型企业低成本战略与差异化战略: 基于技术创新行为的中介作用[J]. 资源与产业, 19（2）: 9-18. 〔WANG F Z, XU W H, 2017. Low-cost and differentiation strategy of resource enterprises based on mediating role of technical innovation[J]. Resources & Industry, 19（2）: 9-18.〕

王霞, 徐晓东, 王宸, 2013. 公共压力、社会声誉、内部治理与企业环境信息披露: 来自中国制造业上市公司的证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 16（2）: 82-91. 〔WANG X, XU X D, WANG C, 2013. Public pressure, social reputation, inside governance and firm environmental information disclosure: the evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing firms[J]. Nankai Business Review, 16（2）: 82-91.〕

王晓祺, 郝双光, 张俊民, 2020. 新《环保法》与企业绿色创新: “倒逼”抑或“挤出”?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 30（7）: 107-117. 〔WANG X Q, HAO S G, ZHANG J M, 2020. New Environmental Protection Law and corporate green innovation: forcing or forcing out?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30（7）: 107-117.〕

叶陈刚, 王孜, 武剑锋, 等, 2015. 外部治理、环境信息披露与股权融资成本[J]. 南开管理评论, 18（5）: 85-96. 〔YE C G, WANG Z, WU J F, et al, 2015. External governance, environmental information disclosure and the cost of equity financing[J]. Nankai Business Review, 18（5）: 85-96.〕

许林, 林思宜, 钱淑芳, 2021. 环境信息披露、绿色技术创新对融资约束的缓释效应[J]. 证券市场导报（9）: 23-33. 〔XU L, LIN S Y, QIAN S F, 2021. Slow-release effect of environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation on financing constraints[J]. Securities Market Herald（9）: 23-33.〕

占华, 后梦婷, 2021. 环境信息披露如何影响企业创新: 基于双重差分的检验[J]. 当代经济科学, 43（4）: 53-64. 〔ZHAN H, HOU M T, 2021. How does environmental information disclosure affect corporate innovation: a difference-in-differences estimation[J]. Modern Economic Science, 43（4）: 53-64.〕

张秀敏, 马默坤, 陈婧, 2016. 外部压力对企业环境信息披露的监管效应[J]. 软科学, 30（2）: 74-78. 〔ZHANG X M, MA M K, CHEN J, 2016. Regulation effect of external pressure to the enterprise environment disclosure[J]. Soft Science, 30（2）: 74-78.〕

张哲, 葛顺奇, 2021. 环境信息披露具有创新提升效应吗?[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 37（2）: 69-82. 〔ZHANG Z, GE S Q, 2021. Does environmental information disclosure have innovation promotion effect?[J]. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 37（2）: 69-82.〕

BRUNNERMEIER S B, COHEN M A, 2003. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45（2）: 278-293.

CROPPER M L, OATES W E, 1992. Environmental economics: a survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 30（2）: 675-740.

DIBRELL C, CRAIG J B, HANSEN E N, 2011. How managerial attitudes toward the natural environment affect market orientation and innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 64（4）: 401-407.

EPSTEIN M J, FREEDMAN M, 1994. Social disclosure and the individual investor[J]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7（4）: 94-109.

HASSAN A, IBRAHIM E, 2012. Corporate environmental information disclosure: factors influencing companies’ success in attaining environmental awards[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19（1）: 32-46.

JAFFE A B, PETERSON S R, PORTNEY P R, etal, 1995. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U. S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 33（1）: 132-163.

JOSHI P L, GAO S S, 2009. Multinational corporations’ corporate social and environmental disclosures （CSED） on web sites[J]. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 19（1）: 27-44.

JIANG Z Y, WANG Z J, ZENG Y Q, 2020. Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29（2）: 390-406.

LI H, HE F, SHAO Y M, et al, 2018. The effects of environmental regulation and financial constraints on corporate R&D investment in China[J]. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 77(8): 442-446.

LONG X L, CHEN Y Q, DU J G, et al, 2017. The effect of environmental innovation behavior on economic and environmental performance of 182 Chinese firms[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166: 1274-1282.

MATHEWS M R, 1984. A suggested classification for social accounting research[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 3（3）: 199-221.

PATTEN D M, 1992. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17（5）: 471-475.

PATTEN D M, 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27（8）: 763-773.

PORTER M E, 1991. America’s green strategy[J]. Scientific American, 264（4）: 168.

PORTER M E, VAN DERLINDE C, 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9（4）: 97-118.

REN S G, LI X L , YUAN B L, et al, 2018. The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: a cross-region analysis in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173: 245-255.

YIN J H, WANG S, 2018. The effects of corporate environmental disclosure on environmental innovation from stakeholder perspectives[J]. Applied Economics, 50（8）: 905-919.

[1]	陈书伟, 韩丽. 政府创新补贴促进了企业绿色技术创新水平吗？——基于信号传递的视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 98-107.
[2]	聂志萍, 王滢. 环境信息披露、机构投资者与股价崩盘风险[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 94-105.
[3]	张瑞华, 韩丽红. 政府支持、内部控制与资源型企业创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 29-37.
[4]	田贵良，盛雨，曹酉男. 基于企业声誉传导的环境信息披露对钢铁企业价值的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 82-88.
[5]	黄恬恬，林璇，2019. 利益相关者视角下黄石国家矿山公园协同治理路径[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(4): 90-96.
[6]	谢艳. “一带一路”时期大型国有矿业资源型企业 “走出去”经营战略的研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(3): 11-15.
[7]	孙学军. 信息化对资源型企业经营绩效影响评价研究:以河南煤业化工集团公司为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(6): 125-129.
[8]	吕鹏，张志杰. 我国资源型企业困境及可持续发展研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(5): 33-37.
[9]	韩璐，费明明. 基于利益相关者理论的土地利用决策博弈关系分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(4): 143-148.
[10]	惠宁，杨杰宁，韩震. 中国资源型企业跨国并购后期运作中的问题及对策分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(3): 19-23.
[11]	边一，王浦.. 我国矿业企业对外投资中的社会责任问题研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(2): 60-63.
[12]	张念，肖荣阁. 资源型企业跨国并购中的人力资源整合策略——以五矿集团收购澳大利亚OZ矿业有限公司为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2012, 14(5): 24-29.
[13]	马天骄. 浅析私募股权投资在我国资源型企业改制上市中的作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(S1): 157-161.
[14]	曹荣, 邓珍琴, 林大超. 矿业遗迹开发利益相关者风险“致因—承担”模型[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(6): 68-72.
[15]	曹荣, 张瑞红, 郭章林. 矿业遗迹开发利益相关者风险G1模糊综合评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(4): 19-23.