中国与“一带一路”国家能源贸易合作对能源安全的影响

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20221026.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来全球政治与经济的不确定风险逐渐加大，不利于维护产业安全和稳定的“逆全球化”思潮开始抬头。为了探讨中国与“一带一路”国家的能源合作可否对冲“逆全球化”带来的不利影响，深入分析国际能源合作对参与各国、各地区能源安全产生的作用及其背后的影响机制，本文以2000—2020年为观测期，尝试在“一带一路”合作倡议框架之下，从能源合作产业链下游的能源贸易入手，运用Tobit模型和基础回归模型，从能源消费、能源生产2个维度出发，探究中国与“一带一路”国家开展能源贸易合作对参与各国能源安全产生的影响及其影响机制，并且进行稳健性检验。研究结果表明：1)中国与“一带一路”国家开展能源贸易能够维护我国的能源消费安全和能源生产安全；2）提升中国与“一带一路”国家的能源贸易总额能够通过降低合作能源消费国的能源使用成本，提高这些国家的能源消费安全水平；3）提升中国与“一带一路”国家的能源贸易总额能够通过促进合作能源生产国的经济增长，提高这些国家的能源生产安全水平；4）受地理位置影响，中国与“一带一路”沿线亚洲国家开展能源贸易合作产生的能源安全正向效应相较于其他地区更为显著。研究结论与建议如下：1）中国与“一带一路”国家开展能源贸易合作对于推动参与各国经济可持续发展、维护能源安全、实现“一带一路”沿线共同繁荣具有正向的影响作用；2）为了维护我国与“一带一路”国家的能源安全，应当不断扩大、深化“一带一路”国家之间的能源合作，推进能源贸易多元化，并持续优化国际合作环境，为国际能源贸易创造良好的外部条件；3）为了抵御外部各种不利因素对我国参与的国际能源贸易构成的安全威胁，应不断提升我国综合实力，以保障国际间能源运输通道的安全和顺畅；4）为了保障“一带一路”参与各国能源的可持续发展，应大力推动中国与“一带一路”国家间清洁能源和新能源的国际合作，促进参与各国变革能源生产方式和能源消费方式。

关键词: “一带一路”, 国际能源贸易合作, 能源安全, 超效率DEA模型

Abstract:

As uncertain risks are rising in global politics and economy, anti-globalization which is harmful for industrial security and stability begin to arise. To discuss if China’s energy trade cooperation with “the Belt and Road” nations can offset the adverse impacts of anti-globalization and deeply analyze the role of international energy cooperation on the energy security of participating countries and regions and the underlying impact mechanism. This paper attempts to uses Tobit model and basic regression model to study the impacts of China’s energy trade cooperation with “the Belt and Road” nations on energy security during 2000 to 2020 under “the Blet and Road Proposal” from energy consumption and production with robustness tested. Results show China can guarantee itself energy consumption security and energy production security under China’s energy trades with “the Belt and Road” nations. Increasing the total energy trade between China and “the Belt and Road” nations can improve the energy consumption security level of these nations by reducing the energy use costs of cooperative energy consuming nations. Also can improve the energy production security level of these nations by promoting economic growth of cooperative energy producing nations. Constrained by the geographic location, the positive effect of energy trade cooperation between China and Asian countries along “the Belt and Road” is more significant than that of other regions. This paper concludes that China’s energy trade with “the Belt and Road” nations can positively promote their economic sustainability, guarantee energy security and reach a mutual bloom. In order to maintain the energy security of China and “the Belt and Road” nations, we should constantly expand and deepen the energy cooperation between “the Belt and Road” nations, promote the diversification of energy trade, continue to optimize the international cooperation environment, and create good external conditions for international energy trade. To resist the security threats posed by various external adverse factors to China’s participation in international energy trade, China should constantly enhance its comprehensive strength to ensure the safety and smoothness of international energy transport channels. For a sustainable energy development, China shall boost its’ international cooperation with “the Belt and Road” nations on clean and new energies and reform their energy production and consumption ways.

Key words: “the Belt and Road”, international energy trade cooperation, energy security, ultra-efficient DEA model

中图分类号:

周靖, 韩纪琴. 中国与“一带一路”国家能源贸易合作对能源安全的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 31-43.

ZHOU Jing, HAN Jiqin. IMPACTS OF CHINA'S ENERGY TRADE COOPERATION WITH “THE BELT AND ROAD” NATIONS ON ENERGY SECURITY [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(6): 31-43.

参考文献

迟春洁, 黎永亮, 2004. 能源安全影响因素及测度指标体系的初步研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 6(4): 80-84.〔CHI C J, LI Y L, 2004. Factors affecting appraising energy security and measurement indicator system[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition）, 6(4）：80-84.〕

胡剑波, 吴杭剑, 胡潇, 2016. 基于PSR模型的我国能源安全评价指标体系构建[J]. 统计与决策(8): 62-64.

李红, 智硕楠, 2020. 新常态下中国能源安全动态研究：基于灰色关联TOPSIS模型[J]. 生态经济, 36(8): 57-62, 87.〔LI H, ZHI S N, 2020. Dynamic study on China’s energy security under the new normal: based on gray correlation TOPSIS model[J]. Ecological Economy, 36(8): 57-62, 87.〕

林珏, 2014. 2000—2012年中加能源安全指标的测度及双边能源合作前景[J]. 国际经贸探索, 30(5): 29-38, 61.〔LIN J, 2014. The measurement of 2000—2012 Sino-Canadian energy security indicators and the prospect of bilateral energy cooperation[J]. International Economics and Trade Research, 30(5): 29-38, 61.〕

彭红斌, 路畅, 2016. 我国能源安全问题研究：基于模糊综合评价方法[J]. 中国能源, 38(8): 10-16.〔PENG H B, LU C, 2016. Energy security research in China based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Energy of China, 38(8): 10-16.〕

史丹, 薛钦源, 2021. 中国一次能源安全影响因素、评价与展望[J]. 经济纵横(1): 31-45, 2.〔SHI D, XUE Q Y, 2021. Influencing factors, evaluation and outlook of primary energy security in china[J]. Economic Review Journal(1): 31-45, 2.〕

石泽, 2019. 从“一带一路”能源合作看国家能源安全[J]. 国际石油经济, 27(9): 1-6.〔SHI Z, 2019. National energy security from the perspective of the Belt and Road energy cooperation[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 27(9): 1-6.〕

孙小兵, 2014. 中国的能源安全问题及相关对策[J]. 资源与产业, 16(4): 17-23.〔SUN X B. Approaches to China’s energy security[J]. Resources & Industries 16(4): 17-23.〕

孙晓艳, 段红梅, 2016. 中东乱局对中国能源安全的影响分析[J]. 资源与产业, 18(4): 7-13.〔SUN X Y, DUAN H M, 2016. Impact of Middle East’s mess on China’s energy security[J]. Resources & Industries, 18(4): 7-13.〕

王光辉, 2020. 中美贸易摩擦背景下的中国能源安全[J]. 现代管理科学(2): 9-11.

王溪薇, 2011. 基于能源安全视角的能源利用效率分析[D]. 北京：北京师范大学.〔WANG X W, 2011. Analysis of energy efficiency from the perspective of energy security [D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University.〕

魏一鸣, 吴刚, 梁巧梅, 等, 2012. 中国能源报告(2012): 能源安全研究[M]. 北京：科学出版社.〔WEI Y M, WU G, LIANG Q M, et al, 2012. China energy report(2012): Energy Security Research[M]. Beijing：Science Press.〕

谢园园, 王艳华, 邬娜, 2020. “一带一路”沿线国家能源效率与产业结构的空间耦合关系[J]. 生态经济, 36(4): 39-43, 74.〔XIE Y Y, WANG Y H, WU N, 2020. Spatial coupling relations between energy efficiency and industrial structure along“the Belt and Road”[J]. Ecological Economy, 36(4): 39-43, 74.〕

岳立, 杨玉春, 2019. “一带一路”沿线国家绿色全要素能源效率的时空分异研究：基于超效率DEA模型和GML指数法[J]. 经济问题探索(6): 111-119.〔YUE L, YANG Y C. A study on time and space disparities of green total-factor energy efficiency in the major countries of the Belt and Road：an empirical analysis based on super-efficiency DEA and GML Index [J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues(6):111-119.〕

张雷, 2001. 中国能源安全问题探讨[J]. 中国软科学(4): 7-23.〔ZHANG L, 2001. Discussion about the energy security of China[J]. China Soft Science(4): 7-23.〕

CHEN S , SONG Y , DING Y T, et al, 2021. Using long short-term memory model to study risk assessment and prediction of China’s oil import from the perspective of resilience theory[J]. Energy, 215(A): 119152.

DEESE D A, NYE J S, 1981. Energy and security[M]. Cambridge: Ballinger Pub Co.

GUPTA E, 2008. Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries[J]. Energy Policy, 36(3）: 1195-1211.

LE COQ C, PALTSEVA E, 2009 . Measuring the security of external energy supply in the European Union[J]. Energy Policy, 37(11): 4474-4481.

LIU P K, HEI Z H, 2022. Strategic analysis and framework design on international cooperation for energy transition：a perspective from China[J]. Energy Reports, 8：2601-2616.

MAULL H W, 1984 . Raw materials, energy and western security[M]. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

STIRLING A, 1994. Diversity and ignorance in electricity supply investment: addressing the solution rather than the problem[J]. Energy Policy, 22(3): 195-216.

TONE K, 2002. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1): 32-41.

VON HIPPEL D, SUZUKI T ,WILLIAMS J H, et al, 2011. Energy security and sustainability in Northeast Asia[J]. Energy Policy, 39(11): 6719-6730.

YANG B , SWE T, CHEN Y X , et al, 2021. Energy cooperation between Myanmar and China under One Belt One Road: current state, challenges and perspectives[J]. Energy, 215(A): 119130.

[1]	杨恺钧, 王文轩. 地方政府行为对工业能源环境效率的影响——以“一带一路”沿线省市区为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(6): 91-104.
[2]	周海炜, 许莹. 基于内容分析法的我国能源安全政策文本量化分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 53-68.
[3]	王宁, 李因果. 中国OFDI对“一带一路”国家GTFP的门槛效应研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 29-39.
[4]	孙才志, 张佳亮. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家农产品贸易的虚拟水流动研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 40-50.
[5]	张长征, 刘冕, 任红. 江苏“一带一路”企业金融“贫困” 评价研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(5): 31-40.
[6]	王琴, 刘冬辉, 孟令杰. “一带一路”省市制造业全要素生产率的变化及其影响因素——基于2006—2016年经验数据的分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(4): 70-77.
[7]	朱智洺, 李秀琴, 黄永春. “一带一路”沿线国家粮食虚拟水贸易网络研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(3): 31-42.
[8]	孙晓艳，段红梅. 中东乱局对中国能源安全的影响分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(4): 7-13.
[9]	阮李全, 李文海. 论地热资源开发利用中的政府职责——基于能源危机背景下的思考[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(6): 106-112.
[10]	殷建平, 孙德艳. 从力拓事件谈中国的能源安全[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(5): 21-25.
[11]	李刚. 澳大利亚能源安全政策演进研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(2): 21-25.