资源与产业 ›› 2010, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 161-166.

• 资源经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

土地市场化程度的地区差异分析

唐 鹏,李建强*,肖  君   

  1. (四川农业大学 经济管理学院,四川 雅安 625014)
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-28 修回日期:2010-11-01 出版日期:2010-12-20 发布日期:2010-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 李建强(1974— ), 男, 副教授, 主要从事土地经济与政策研究。
  • 作者简介:唐鹏(1986— ), 男, 硕士生, 主要从事土地经济与资源经济研究。E-mail: tp2han@163.com

REGIONAL DIFFERENCE OF LAND MARKETIZATION LEVEL

TANG Peng, LI Jian-qiang*, XIAO Jun   

  1. (School of Economics and Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China)
  • Received:2010-01-28 Revised:2010-11-01 Online:2010-12-20 Published:2010-12-20

摘要:

分析土地市场化程度的发展状况及其地区差异对政府更加科学的利用土地调控手段和参与宏观管理具有重要意义。本文从土地市场交易结构出发,测算了我国省级地区1999—2007年土地市场化程度,并利用聚类分析方法考察了其地区差异。研究结果表明:我国土地市场化程度总体偏低,呈现缓慢、波动上升趋势;东部地区市场化程度高于中部、西部和东北地区,但区域间差距在逐渐缩小。对全国31个省级地区差异分析表明:市场化程度最高的是黑龙江、上海、江苏等9个地区,市场化程度最低的是新疆、甘肃等5个地区。同时,天津、山东等省份虽地处东部经济发达地区,但土地市场化程度较低。西部地区的重庆、四川等地区土地市场化程度则较高。

关键词: 土地市场, 市场化程度, 差异分析

Abstract:

It is of significance to analyze the marketization level and regional difference in governmental controls on land. This paper, from land market trading structure, estimates the marketization level of China’s provincial areas during 1999 to 2007, and studies their regional difference by means of clustering method. The results indicate a gross low marketization level in China, a slow by fluctuation rising trend. The eastern areas are higher than the central, western and northeastern China, but their difference is becoming small. Based on national 31 provincial areas, 9 areas including Heilongjiang, Shanghai and Jiangsu rank the top, while other 5 areas including Xinjiang and Gansu are lowest in marketization level. At the same time, Tianjin and Shandong are low in land marketization level although they are located in eastern economic developed area, while Chongqing and Sichuan are higher in western China.

Key words: land market, marketization level, difference analysis

中图分类号: