资源与产业 ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 101-.

• 资源评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

农户对宅基地流转响应的差异化分析:基于重庆市10个区县共896份农户问卷调查

戴佩淇,杨庆媛,鲁春阳,等   

  1. 1西南大学 KG*3 地理科学学院,重庆 400715;2河南城建学院 KG*3 测绘与城市空间信息系,河南 平顶山 467000
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-08 修回日期:2012-12-08 出版日期:2013-02-02 发布日期:2013-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 戴佩淇 (E-mail:peggie3866@yahoo.com)
  • 作者简介:重庆市社科基金项目“城乡统筹背景下重庆市农村集体建设用地流转问题研究(2009JJ29)

A CASE STUDY ON CHONGQING: DIFFERENTIATION OF FARMERSRESPONSE TO HOMESTEAD TRANSFER

Dai Peiqi, Yang Qingyuan, Lu Chunyang, et al   

  1. 1.School of Geography Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. Department of Survey and Urban Spatial Information, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan 467000, China)
  • Received:2011-11-08 Revised:2012-12-08 Online:2013-02-02 Published:2013-02-20

摘要: 在对重庆市10个区县共896户农户进行入户调查的基础上,建立Logistic模型,从农户家庭特征、农户对成本-收益-风险的评估、区域环境等方面分析农户对宅基地流转差异化响应的原因。研究结果表明,农户自身变量中,农户家庭非农收入占总收入的比重、农户社会保障状况对农户宅基地流转有显著正影响;成本-收益-风险预期评估变量中,农户宅基地及附属物价值量、农户对风险的评估对农户宅基地流转有显著负影响;区域环境变量中,村域非农就业率、政策扶持对农户宅基地流转有显著正影响,交通便利度有显著负影响;核心成员受教育年限、核心成员年龄、家庭人口数、非农劳动力工作距离对农户宅基地流转的决策影响不显著。

关键词: 农户, 宅基地流转响应, 影响因素, 正影响, 负影响

Abstract: This paper, based on Chongqing`s 896 farmers`questionnaires in ten counties, establishes a Logistic model to analyze the differentiated responses to homestead transfer from family, cost-benefit-risk, regional environment and so on. There is a positive influence from the proportion of non-agricultural income to total income, social guarantee in farmers variable, and a negative influence from homestead and its attachments values, farmers` risk self-evaluation in cost-benefit-risk variables. There is a positive influence from non-agricultural employment rate and policy support, but a negative influence from transportation in regional environment variables, and no influence from education level, ages, family members, non-agricultural distance.

Key words: farmer, response to homestead transfer, influencing factors, positive influence, negative influence

中图分类号: