LITERATURE REVIEW OF DEFINITION, DILEMMA AND PATH TO QUALITY TRANSFORMATION OF CHINA'S RESOURCE-BASED CITIES

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20210622.003

Abstract

Abstract: Resource-based cities need an ecological quality developing way. This paper, in terms of CNKI's 2011 to 2020 Chinese references, uses CiteSpace to study the changes of hot research points regarding China's resource-based cities' quality development by means of visualized key word frequency with results showing "transformation", "upgrading" and "sustainable development" are the top key words, suggesting a shift in hot research points from sustainably long-term mechanism, low-carbon transformation path and modes, eco-transforming efficiency evaluation to green development. As quality development and new conception is heading its way, quality development catches much attention after 2017. This paper defines the connotation of resource-based cities' quality development from green, coordination, smart and livelihoods with objectives to ecological transformation, innovative development, smart ways and improving livelihoods. Economic quality is used to measure the urban transforming capacity. Innovative pathways to quality transformation in resource-based cities are presented from resource environment, technology, regional coordination and livelihoods. This paper concludes that construction of specific and oriented measurement will be the future research hot topics, ecological development and smart transformation is the direction. New information technology will reform the industries, ecology, management and capital supports. Smart ecological construction helps create breakthrough in resources environment, technology, regional coordination and livelihoods, favorable for resource-based cities getting out of dilemma and heading for a quality development.

Key words: resource-based cities, quality transformation, developing dilemma, developing pathway

摘要： 【目的】进入高质量发展阶段的资源型城市，如何走出一条以新发展理念引领的生态式高质量发展之路，需要进行总结和分析。【方法】以中国知网2011—2020年中文文献为研究对象，借助CiteSpace梳理了中国资源型城市高质量转型的研究热点迁移情况。【结果】结合主题词频次，采用可视化及时区分析发现：“转型”“升级”“可持续发展”方面的研究一直是学术界关注的核心问题，相关研究热点从可持续长效机制、低碳转型路径与模式、生态转型效率评价演变到绿色发展。随着高质量发展阶段的推进和新发展理念的完善，2017年后“高质量发展”受到学术界的高度关注。结合学者的研究，从绿色、协调、智慧和民生4个方面界定了资源型城市高质量发展的内涵，从生态转型、创新发展、智慧手段以及民生改善4个方面理解了高质量转型发展的目标要求，并从经济高质量角度梳理了学者对城市转型发展能力测度方面的研究；结合当前研究热点，从资源环境、技术创新、区域发展和社会环境4个方面分析了资源型城市高质量转型发展的困境；结合现代智慧技术，从资源环境、技术、区域协调和民生4个方面提出了资源型城市高质量转型发展的创新路径。【结论】研究认为构建有针对性和引导性的资源型城市高质量转型测度体系会成为未来研究的重点，新发展理念下的生态式发展、智慧式转型是实现资源型城市高质量转型发展的方向。利用新一代信息技术，对资源型城市的产业、生态、管理和资金支持进行革新；以智慧生态建设为手段，在资源环境、技术、区域协调和民生等方面进行突破性创新，有助于资源型城市摆脱现实困境，实现高质量转型发展。

关键词: 资源型城市, 高质量转型, 发展困境, 发展路径

CLC Number:

F290

YANG Hongbo, WANG Ruyi, PENG Min, WANG Jiashan. LITERATURE REVIEW OF DEFINITION, DILEMMA AND PATH TO QUALITY TRANSFORMATION OF CHINA'S RESOURCE-BASED CITIES[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(2): 10-18.

杨洪波, 王如意, 彭民, 王甲山. 我国资源型城市高质量转型发展的界定、困境与路径：文献综述[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 10-18.

References

安淑新，2018. 促进经济高质量发展的路径研究: 一个文献综述[J]. 当代经济管理，40(9): 11-17. 〔AN S X, 2018. A research on the path of promoting high-quality economic development: a literature review[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 40(9): 11-17. 〕
陈昌兵，2018. 新时代我国经济高质量发展动力转换研究[J]. 上海经济研究(5): 16-24，41. 〔CHEN C B, 2018. Research on the dynamic transformation of high quality economic development in new era[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics(5): 16-24, 41. 〕
陈强远，林思彤，张醒，2020. 中国技术创新激励政策：激励了数量还是质量[J]. 中国工业经济(4): 79-96. 〔CHEN Q Y, LIN S T, ZHANG X, 2020. The effect of China's incentive policies for technological innovation: incentivizing quantity or quality[J]. China Industrial Economics(4): 79-96. 〕
陈诗一，陈登科，2018. 雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J]. 经济研究，53(2): 20-34. 〔CHEN S Y, CHEN D K, 2018. Air pollution, government regulations and high-quality economic development[J]. Economic Research Journal, 53(2): 20-34. 〕
崔占峰，许航，刘超，2017. 技术创新对资源依赖型省域就业的影响研究：以山西为例[J]. 经济问题(10): 8-13，25. 〔CUI Z F, XU H, LIU C, 2017. Study on the impact of technological innovation on employment in resource-dependent province: based on Shanxi province[J]. On Economic Problems(10): 8-13, 25〕
崔雁冰，吴军，周继刚，2016. 资源型地区转型升级的思考[J]. 宏观经济管理(11): 56-60.
杜春丽，洪诗佳，2018. 资源枯竭型城市转型政策的绩效评价[J]. 统计与决策，34(18): 70-73.
郭淑芬，郭金花，2019. “综改区”设立、产业多元化与资源型地区高质量发展[J]. 产业经济研究(1): 87-98. 〔GUO S F, GUO J H, 2019. The establishment of "comprehensive reform zone", industrial diversification and high-quality development of resource-based regions[J]. Industrial Economics Research(1): 87-98. 〕
黄秉杰，赵洁，刘小丽，2017. 基于信息熵评价法的资源型地区可持续发展新探[J]. 统计与决策(11): 34-37. 〔HUANG B J, ZHAO J, LIU X L, 2017. New exploration on the sustainable development of resource-based regions based on the information entropy evaluation method[J]. Statistics & Decision(11): 34-37. 〕
金碚，2018. 关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J]. 中国工业经济(4): 5-18. 〔JIN B, 2018. Study on the“high-quality development”economics[J]. China Industrial Economics(4): 5-18. 〕
寇有观，2019. 在习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想指引下探索“智慧生态”发展模式[J]. 办公自动化，24(22): 8-12，38. 〔KOU Y G, 2019.  Under the guidance of Xi Jinping thought on socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era to explore the development mode of "intelligent ecology" [J]. Office Informatization, 24(22): 8-12, 38. 〕
李梦雅，严太华，2018. 基于DEA模型和信息熵的我国资源型城市产业转型效率评价：以全国40个地市级资源型城市为例[J]. 科技管理研究，38(3): 86-93. 〔LI M Y, YAN T H, 2018. Evaluation of industrial transformation efficiency of China's resource-based cities based on DEA model and information entropy： case study of 40 resource-based cities in China[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 38(3): 86-93. 〕
梁甄桥，李志，2019. 资源禀赋与社会代际流动性：资源诅咒假说的实证检验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，29(11): 158-166. 〔LIANG Z Q, LI Z, 2019. Natural resources and intergenerational social mobility： the empirical test of resource curse[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(11): 158-166. 〕
林毅夫，2020. 经济结构转型与“十四五”期间高质量发展：基于新结构经济学视角[J]. 兰州大学学报（社会科学版），48(4): 1-8. 〔LI Y F, 2020. Economic structural transformation and development of higher quality during the 14th five-year plan period： based on the theory of new structural economics[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), 48(4): 1-8. 〕
刘国斌，宋瑾泽，2019. 中国区域经济高质量发展研究[J]. 区域经济评论(2): 55-60. 〔LIU G B, SONG J Z, 2019. Research on high quality development of China's regional economy[J]. Regional Economic Review(2): 55-60. 〕
刘华军，李超，彭莹，等，2018. 中国绿色全要素生产率增长的空间不平衡及其成因解析[J]. 财经理论与实践，39(5): 116-121. 〔LIU H J, LI C, PENG Y, et al., 2018. Spatial imbalance and causes analysis of green total factor productivity growth in China[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 39(5): 116-121. 〕
刘津，李平，2020. 智慧城市建设对工业生态效率影响的实证研究：以中国地级市为例[J]. 生态经济，36(10): 92-97. 〔LIU J, LI P, 2020. An empirical study of smart city construction on industrial ecological efficiency of China's prefecture-level cities[J]. Ecological Economy, 36(10): 92-97. 〕
刘奕，夏杰长，李垚，2017. 生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级[J]. 中国工业经济(7): 24-42. 〔LIU Y, XIA J C, LI G, 2017. Producer services agglomeration and manufacturing upgrading[J]. China Industrial Economics(7): 24-42. 〕
刘志彪，2018. 理解高质量发展：基本特征、支撑要素与当前重点问题[J]. 学术月刊，50(7): 39-45，59. 〔LIU Z B, 2018. Understanding the high-quality development: basic features, supporting elements and current key-issues[J]. Academic Monthly, 50(7): 39-45， 59. 〕
罗萍嘉，刘茜，2017. 徐州市“矿·城”协同生态转型规划策略研究[J]. 中国煤炭，43(12): 5-10，15. 〔LUO P J， LIU Q, 2017. Research on planning strategies of "mining area-city" collaborative ecological transformation in Xuzhou[J]. China Coal, 43(12): 5-10， 15. 〕
马茹，罗晖，王宏伟，等，2019. 中国区域经济高质量发展评价指标体系及测度研究[J]. 中国软科学(7): 60-67. 〔MA R, LUO H, WANG H W, et al., 2019. Study of evaluating high-quality economic development in Chinese regions[J]. China Soft Science(7): 60-67. 〕
苗峻玮，冯华，2020. 区域高质量发展评价体系的构建与测度[J]. 经济问题(11): 111-118. 〔MIAO J W, FENG H, 2020. Construction and measurement of regional high-quality development evaluation system[J]. On Economic Problems(11): 111-118. 〕
裴长洪，倪江飞，2019. 论习近平新时代中国特色社会主义经济思想的主题[J]. 财贸经济，40(12): 5-19. 〔PEI C H, NI J F, 2019. Xi Jinping thought on socialist economy with Chinese characteristics for a new era[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 40(12): 5-19. 〕
任保平，文丰安，2018. 新时代中国高质量发展的判断标准、决定因素与实现途径[J]. 改革(4): 5-16. 〔REN B P, WEN F A, 2018. The criteria， determinants and ways to achieve high quality development in China in the new era[J]. Reform(4): 5-16. 〕
单东方，2020. 资源型地区创新能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 统计与决策，36(2): 38-42. 〔SHAN D F, 2020. Construction of evaluation index system of innovation ability in resource-based areas[J]. Statistics & Decision, 36(2): 38-42. 〕
孙浩进，2014. 我国资源型城市产业转型的效果、瓶颈与路径创新[J]. 经济管理，36(10): 34-43. 〔SUN H J, 2014. Industrial transformation in resource based city effect, bottleneck and path innovation[J]. Economic Management Journal, 36(10): 34-43. 〕
孙荣，彭超， 2016. 东北地区煤炭类资源型城市转型的路径探索：基于地方政府主导的视角[J]. 行政论坛，23(5): 113-116.
孙晓华，郑辉，于润群，等，2020. 资源型城市转型升级：压力测算与方向选择[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，30(4): 54-62. 〔SUN X H, ZHENG H, YU R Q, et al., 2020. The transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities： pressure measurement and direction selection[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30(4): 54-62. 〕
田洪涛，李业锦，赵秀云，等，2020. 基于CiteSpace分析的我国资源城市转型研究知识图谱[J]. 资源与产业，22(2): 1-11. 〔TIAN H T, LI Y J, ZHAO X Y, et al., 2020. Intelligence mapping of transformation research of China's resource-based cities based on CiteSpace[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(2): 1-11〕
王立韬，仇方道，郑紫颜，2019. 再生性资源型城市经济高质量发展评价及影响因素：以徐州市为例[J]. 资源开发与市场，35(7): 935-941. 〔WANG L T, QIU F D, ZHENG Z Y, 2019. Evaluation and influencing factors analysis on high-quality economic development of regenerative resource-based cities: a case of Xuzhou city[J]. Resource Development & Market, 35(7): 935-941. 〕
王毅，2017. 我国资源型城市智慧化转型路径[J]. 城市管理与科技，19(2): 34-36.
魏杰，汪浩，2018. 转型之路：新旧动能转换与高质量发展[J]. 国家治理(21): 31-38.
魏一鸣，2015. 资源型企业战略行为研究的一部力作：评《中国可耗竭资源型企业转移区位选择行为的实证研究》[J]. 经济问题(10): 129.
邬晓霞，时晨，高见，2020. 资源型经济高质量发展的科学内涵与机制创新[J]. 经济问题(12)11-17. 〔WU X X, SHI C, GAO J, 2020. A study on scientific connotation and institutional innovation of resource-based economy's high-quality development[J]. On Economic Problems(12): 11-17. 〕
谢呈阳，胡汉辉，2020. 中国土地资源配置与城市创新：机制讨论与经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济(12): 83-101. 〔XIE C Y, HU H H, 2020. China's land resource allocation and urban innovation： mechanism discussion and empirical evidence[J]. China Industrial Economics(12): 83-101. 〕
颉茂华，施诺，张婧鑫，2020. 资源型产业地理集聚的时空分化与经济效应[J]. 资源与产业，22(5): 19-27. 〔XIE M H, SHI N, ZHANG J X, 2020. Temporal-spatial differentiation and economic effect of geographic concentration of resource industries[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(5): 19-27. 〕
徐雪莲，2019. 高质量发展视角下资源型城市产业转型升级新动能培育机制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学.〔XU X L, 2019. Research on the cultivation mechanism of new driving forces for industrial transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities from the perspective of high-quality development[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology.〕
颜培霞，于宙，2019. 绿色产业：城市绿色转型的核心动力[J]. 经济动态与评论(1): 162-172，212. 〔YAN P X, YU Z, 2019. Green industry： the core power of environment-friendly transformation in cities[J]. Review of Economic Trends(1): 162-172, 212. 〕
闫涛，颜晓峰，2020. 新时代新发展理念的精准认知与践行研究[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版)，22(6): 481-488. 〔YAN T, YAN X F, 2020. Research on the accurate cognition and practice of the new development concepts for a new era[J]. Journal of Tianjin University(Social Sciences), 22(6): 481-488. 〕
阎晓，田钰，李荣杰，2020. 资源型地区工业集聚对生态效率的影响：基于我国9个典型资源型省份的实证研究[J]. 应用生态学报，31(6): 2039-2048. 〔YAN X, TIAN Y, LI R J, 2020. Impacts of industrial agglomeration on eco-efficiency in resource-based areas: an empirical study based on nine typical resource-based provinces in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(6): 2039-2048. 〕
杨丹辉，张艳芳，李鹏飞，2017. 供给侧结构性改革与资源型产业转型发展[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，27(7): 18-24. 〔YANG D H, ZHANG Y F, LI P F, 2017. Supply-side structural reform and transformation of resource-based industries in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(7): 18-24. 〕
杨怀佳，张波，2019. 开放条件下资源型地区经济转型能力影响因素研究[J]. 经济问题(10): 103-112. 〔YANG H J, ZHANG B, 2019. Research on the influential factors of economic transformation capability in resource： based regions under the condition of openness[J]. On Economic Problems(10): 103-112. 〕
曾坚，张彤彤，2017. 新常态下资源型城市经济转型问题、对策及路径选择[J]. 理论探讨(1): 81-86. 〔ZENG J, ZHANG T T, 2017. The problems, countermeasures and path selections of economic transformation of resource-based city under the new normal[J]. Theoretical Investigation(1): 81-86. 〕
赵剑波，史丹，邓洲，2019. 高质量发展的内涵研究[J]. 经济与管理研究，40(11):15-31. 〔ZHAO J B, SHI D, DENG Z, 2019. A framework of China's high-quality economic development[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 40(11): 15-31. 〕
赵莹，2020. 新时代资源型城市经济转型路径探析：基于“递进-关联”支持机制的分析[J]. 长白学刊(1): 103-111. 〔ZHAO Y, 2020. Research on the economic transformation path of resource-|based cities in the new era: analysis based on "progressive-correlation"support mechanism[J]. Changbai Journal(1): 103-111. 〕
钟太刚，2019. 资源型城市经济高质量发展评价与路径研究：以攀枝花市西区为例[D]. 成都：四川省社会科学院.
周宏浩，陈晓红，2019. 中国资源型城市精明发展与环境质量的耦合关系及响应机制[J]. 自然资源学报， 34(8): 1620-1632. 〔ZHOU H H, CHEN X H, 2019. Coupling relationship and its response mechanism between smart development and environmental quality in Chinese resource-based cities[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(8): 1620-1632.〕

[1]	CHANG Jiang, JI Zhi, ZHANG Xinlun. DEVELOPMENT, ISSUES AND TENDENCY OF CHINA'S COAL-RESOURCE-BASED CITIES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2019, 21(2): 3-11.
[2]	FAN Tiantian. RECONSTRUCTION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PATH OF RESOURCE-BASED CITIES UNDER ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2019, 21(2): 12-16.
[3]	ZHANG Erchao, WANG Song, HUANG Junchang, et al. VULNERABILITY AND COMPREHENSIVE COMPETITIVENESS OF RESOURCE-BASED CITIES IN CENTRAL PLAINS ECONOMIC REGION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(6): 1-8.
[4]	GE Wenfeng. ADVANTAGES AND STRATEGIES OF DEVELOPING TOURISM IN RESOURCES-BASED CITIES UNDER SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(6): 9-15.