IMPACTS OF SUBSIDY REDUCTION ON NEW ENERGY COMPANIES RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT VIEWING FROM MARKET EXPECTATION ADJUSTMENT

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220422.001

Abstract

Abstract: Governmental subsidy has a close connection with new energy sectors' R&D innovation.Subsidy reduction indicates new energy sectors are at a government-oriented to market-oriented adjusting stage.Under the dual pressures of subsidy reduction and innovation upgrading, new energy companies have to switch to markets to seek new financing ways ensuring a stable R&D investment. This paper, based on China's stock-listed new energy companies' information from 2010 to 2019, uses multiple regression to study the impacts of subsidy reduction on new energy sectors' R&D, and discusses the adjustment of market expectation on the relation between governmental subsidy and companies' R&D investment. Results show that subsidy reduction plays an outstanding stimulating role on new energy sectors' R&D investment. The impact varies with natures of governmental subsidies, a little if benefits-related subsidy, but significant if assets-related. Under adjustment of market expectations, benefits-related governmental subsidy will decline or even constrain R&D investment, while assets-related subsidy will be on the contrast. Governmental subsidy shall be stably reducing, switch from all-benefits to supporting-excellence, adjust subsidy types and strength, and construct multiple subsidy mechanisms so as to help new energy sectors increase R&D investments. This paper suggests new energy companies follow the market changes, increase their innovative capacities and awareness, boost relation with financing markets, diversify financing channels, and set up a collaborative mechanism of governmental subsidy and markets on new energy companies' R&D innovation.

Key words: R&D investment, subsidy reduction, market expectation, new energy listed companies

摘要： 政府补贴与新能源产业的研发创新有着密切的联系，补贴有序退坡表明新能源产业正处在由“政府主导”转向“市场主导”的结构调整阶段，在补贴退坡和创新升级的双重压力下，新能源企业必然转向市场以谋求新的融资机会，保证稳定的研发投资。以2010—2019年我国沪深两市新能源上市公司为研究样本，采用多元回归分析方法检验政府补贴退坡政策对新能源企业研发投资的影响，探讨市场预期在政府补贴与企业研发投资关系中的调节作用。研究表明：政府补贴退坡后比退坡前对新能源企业研发投资的激励效应更加显著；不同类型的政府补贴退坡对企业研发投资效果存在差异，与收益相关的政府补贴退坡对企业研发投资的激励作用较小，而与资产相关的政府补贴退坡对企业研发投资的激励作用显著；与收益相关的政府补贴在市场预期的调节下会不断递减甚至会抑制研发投资，但随着市场预期的向好，与资产相关的政府补贴对企业研发投资的综合激励效应将不断增强。因此，政府补贴稳步退坡、补贴政策从“普惠制”向“扶优扶强”转变、及时调整政府补贴类别和力度、建立多角度的补贴机制有助于新能源企业增加研发投资。面对补贴退坡的政策调整，新能源企业要及时跟踪市场变化，提高企业创新的意识和能力，加强与金融市场的联系，拓展多元融资渠道，构建政府补贴与市场对新能源企业研发创新的协同驱动机制。

关键词: 研发投资, 补贴退坡, 市场预期, 新能源上市公司

CLC Number:

F270

LIU Surong, XIE Xiaoxiao, HUO Jianglin. IMPACTS OF SUBSIDY REDUCTION ON NEW ENERGY COMPANIES RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT VIEWING FROM MARKET EXPECTATION ADJUSTMENT[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(4): 65-76.

刘素荣, 谢笑潇, 霍江林. 补贴退坡对新能源企业研发投资的影响——基于市场预期调节视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 65-76.

References

安筱雯, 冯绪, 2020. 中国股票市场价格时滞: 二十年的变化[J]. 甘肃科学学报, 32(1): 144-152. 〔AN X W, FENG X, 2020. Time lag of Chinese stock market price: changes in 20 years[J].Journal of Gansu Sciences, 32(1): 144-152.〕
陈静, 2017. 企业获得的政府资源与研发投资效率: 基于异质性随机前沿模型的研究[J]. 财会月刊, 4(2): 66-72. 〔CHEN J, 2017. Government resources obtained by enterprises and R&D investment efficiency: a study based on heterogeneous stochastic frontier models[J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 4(2): 66-72.〕
程永伟, 穆东, 2018. 基于SD动态博弈的新能源汽车供应链补贴策略优化[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 28(12): 29-39. 〔CHENG Y W, MU D, 2018. Study on optimal subsidy strategy in new energy vehicle supply chain based on SD game model[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(12): 29-39.〕
蒋樟生, 2019. 市场预期对制造企业创新投入的影响: 机构关注和政府补助的调节作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 41(11): 57-69. 〔JIANG Z S, 2019. The impact of market expectation on manufacturing enterprises' innovation input: the moderating role of institutional coverage and government subsidies[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 41(11): 57-69.〕
亢劭毅, 2015. 论政府补助类型的差异对企业的不同财务影响[J]. 中国总会计师(7): 41-43. 〔KANG S Y, 2015. Study on the different financial impacts of different types of government subsidies on enterprises[J]. China Chief Financial Officer(7): 41-43.〕
李万福, 杜静, 张怀, 2017. 创新补助究竟有没有激励企业创新自主投资: 来自中国上市公司的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 4(10): 130-145. 〔LI W F, DU J, ZHANG H, 2017. Do R&D subsidies really stimulate firms' R&D self-financing investment: new evidence from China's listed firms[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 4(10): 130-145.〕
罗小芳, 李柏洲, 2013. 市场新产品需求对大型企业原始创新的拉动机制: 基于国内市场与国外市场比较的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 30(4): 73-76. 〔LUO X F, LI B Z, 2013. The pulling mechanism of market demand for new products to the original innovation of large enterprises: an empirical study based on the comparison of domestic and foreign markets [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 30(4): 73-76.〕
吕久琴, 郁丹丹, 2011. 政府科研创新补助与企业研发投入: 挤出、替代还是激励?[J]. 中国科技论坛, 4(8): 21-28. 〔LV J Q, YU D D, 2011. Government subsidies and enterprises' R&D investment: crowding-out, substitution or encouragement[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 4 (8): 21-28.〕
孙慧, 王慧, 2017.政府补贴、研发投入与企业创新绩效: 基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 37(12): 111-116. 〔SUN H, WANG H, 2017. Government subsidy, R&D investment and enterprise innovation performance: an empirical study based on the GEM high tech enterprises [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 37(12): 111-116.〕
孙红霞, 吕慧荣, 2018. 新能源汽车后补贴时代政府与企业的演化博弈分析[J]. 软科学, 32(2): 24-29, 49. 〔SUN H X, LV H R, 2018. Evolutionary game analysis between government and enterprise in new energy vehicles market under new subsidy policy[J]. Soft Science, 32(2): 24-29, 49.〕
唐安宝, 李凤云, 2016. 融资约束、政府补贴与新能源企业投资效率: 基于异质性双边随机前沿模型[J]. 工业技术经济, 35(8): 145-153. 〔TANG A B, LI F Y, 2016. The financial constraints, the government subsidies and the investment efficiency of new energy enterprises: based on the heterogeneity two-tier stochastic frontier model[J].Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 35(8): 145-153.〕
王刚刚, 谢富纪, 贾友, 2017. R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视: 基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J]. 中国工业经济, 4(2): 60-78. 〔WANG G G, XIE F J, JIA Y, 2017. Reconsider incentive mechanism of R&D subsidy policy: based on exploration for external financing incentive mechanism[J].China Industrial Economics, 4(2): 60-78.〕
王维, 李昊展, 乔朋华, 等, 2017. 政府补贴方式对新能源汽车企业绩效影响研究: 基于企业成长性的深入分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 34(23): 114-120. 〔WANG W, LI H Z, QIAO P H, et al, 2017. An influence study on the new energy automobile enterprise performances by government subsidies: based on the enterprise growth [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 34(23): 114-120.〕
肖兴志, 王伊攀, 2014. 政府补贴与企业社会资本投资决策: 来自战略性新兴产业的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 4(9): 148-160. 〔XIAO X Z, WANG Y P, 2014. Government subsidies and enterprise decision of social capital investment: evidence from strategic emerging industries [J]. China Industrial Economics, 4(9): 148-160.〕
肖煜, 李文强, 钱旭潮, 等, 2021. 新能源行业政府补贴对企业经营绩效的影响: 企业生命周期的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 23(5): 72 -79. 〔XIAO Y, LI W Q, QIAN X C, et al, 2021. Adjustment of enterprises life circle: impacts of governmental subsidies on commercial operating performance[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(5): 72-79.〕
解维敏, 唐清泉, 陆姗姗, 2009.政府R&D资助, 企业R&D支出与自主创新: 来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 4(6): 86-99. 〔XIE W M, TANG Q Q, LU S S, 2009. An empirical study of the effect of public R&D subsidies on firm R&D [J].Journal of Financial Research, 4(6): 86-99.〕
闫俊周, 齐念念, 童超, 2020. 政府补贴与金融支持如何影响创新效率?: 来自中国战略性新兴产业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 软科学, 34(12): 41-46. 〔YAN J Z, QI N N, TONG C, 2020. How do government subsidies and financial support influence innovation efficiency?: empirical evidence from listed companies of strategic emerging industries in China[J]. Soft Science, 34(12): 41-46.〕
姚登宝, 刘晓星, 张旭, 2016.市场流动性与市场预期的动态相关结构研究: 基于Arma-Gjr-Garch-Copula模型分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 24(2): 1-10. 〔YAO D B, LIU X X, ZHANG X, 2016. Dynamic correlation structure between market liquidity and market expectation: an analysis based on Arma-Gjr-Garch-Copula Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 24(2): 1-10.〕
易志高, 茅宁, 2009. 中国股市投资者情绪测量研究: CICSI的构建[J]. 金融研究, 4(11): 174-184. 〔YI Z G, MAO N, 2009.Research on investor sentiment measurement in Chinese stock market: the construction of CICSI[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 4(11): 174-184.〕
余桂统, 2017. 关于与资产相关政府补助确认和计量的思考[J]. 中国注册会计师, 4(11): 104-105. 〔YU G T, 2017. Reflections on the recognition and measurement of government grants related to assets[J]. The Chinese Certified Public Accountant, 4(11): 104-105.〕
喻青松, 舒建玲, 2016. 融资结构、政府补助与公司研发投入: 基于门槛回归模型的研究[J]. 南方金融, 4(1): 89-96. 〔YU Q S, SHU J L, 2016. Financing structure, government subsidy and company R&D investment: an empirical research based on threshold regression model[J]. South China Finance, 4(1): 89-96.〕
翟淑萍, 黄宏斌, 毕晓方, 2017. 资本市场业绩预期压力、投资者情绪与企业研发投资[J]. 科学学研究, 35(6): 896-906. 〔ZHAI S P, HUANG H B, BI X F, 2017. Capital market performance expectations pressure, investor sentiment and enterprises R&D investment[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 35(6): 896-906.〕
张辉, 刘佳颖, 何宗辉, 2016. 政府补贴对企业研发投入的影响: 基于中国工业企业数据库的门槛分析[J]. 经济学动态, 4(12): 28-38. 〔ZHANG H, LIU J Y, HE Z H, 2016. The impact of government subsidies on R&D investment of enterprises: based on the threshold analysis of Chinese industrial enterprise database[J]. Economic Perspectives, 4 (12): 28-38.〕
张瑞华, 韩丽红, 2021. 政府支持、内部控制与资源型企业创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 23(3): 29-37. 〔ZHANG R H, HAN L H, 2021. Relation among governmental supports, internal control and innovation performances of resource company[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(3): 29-37.〕
张宗新, 王海亮, 2013. 投资者情绪、主观信念调整与市场波动[J]. 金融研究(4): 142-155. 〔ZHANG Z X, WANG H L, 2013. Investor sentiment, subjective belief adjustment and market fluctuations[J]. Journal of Financial Research(4): 142-155.〕
张宗益, 陈龙, 2013. 政府补贴对我国战略性新兴产业内部R&D投入影响的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 32(6): 15-20,110. 〔ZHANG Z Y, CHEN L, 2013. Empirical study on impact of government subsidy on internal R&D investment of strategic emerging industry in China [J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 32(6): 15-20, 110.〕
周霞, 2014. 我国上市公司的政府补助绩效评价: 基于企业生命周期的视角[J].当代财经(2): 42-51. 〔ZHOU X, 2014. Evaluation of government subsidy performance in China's listed companies: from the perspective of enterprise life cycle [J].Contemporary Finance & Economics(2): 42-51.〕
ANTONELLI C, CRESPI F, 2013. The “Matthew effect” in R&D public subsidies: the Italian evidence[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8): 1523-1534.
ARROW K J, 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing[J]. The Reviewof Economic Studies, 29(3): 155-173.
BRONZINI R, PISELLI P, 2016. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation[J]. Research Policy, 45(2): 442-457.
CHEN K D, ZHAO F Q, HAO H, et al, 2018. Synergistic impacts of China's subsidy policy and new energy vehicle credit regulation on the technological development of battery electric vehicles[J]. Energies, 11(11): 3193. DOI:10.3390/en11113193.
SHRIEVES R E, 1978. Market structure and innovation: a new perspective[J]. Journal of Industry Economics, 26: 329-374.
WESTHEAD P, STOREY D, 1997. Financial constraints on the growth of high technology small firms in the United Kingdom[J]. Applied Financial Economics, 7(2): 197-201.

[1]	YU Sichen, TIAN Ming, ZHANG Yang, . RELATION AMONG STATEOWNED EQUITY, BOARD CHAIN AND ENTERPRISE R&D INVESTMENT BASED ON DUAL PERSPECTIVES OF RESOURCE RELIANCE AND DEPUTY [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(4): 139-149.
[2]	NIE Zhiping, FAN Xiaowen. IMPACTS OF STRATEGIC VARIANCE ON ADVANCED MANUFACTURING RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS BASED ON MEDIATION OF TRADE CREDIT FINANCING [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(1): 122-131.