Resources & Industries ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 113-123.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220523.001

Previous Articles     Next Articles

COORDINATED DEVELOPMENT EMPIRICAL STUDY ON HUMAN CAPITAL, RESOURCES AGGLOMERATION AND INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE

WANG Fangqin   

  1. (School of Economics, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Yibin 644005, China)
  • Received:2021-02-09 Revised:2021-11-22 Online:2022-08-20 Published:2022-09-05

人力资本、资源集聚与产业结构协调发展的实证研究

王芳琴   

  1. (四川轻化工大学 经济学院,四川 宜宾 644005)
  • 作者简介:王芳琴,博士、讲师,主要从事人力资本、数量经济学、产业经济学研究。E-mail:43973158@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省社会科学重点研究基地四川县域经济发展研究中心课题(xy2021016);四川省智慧旅游研究基地规划项目(ZHZR21-01)

Abstract: This paper uses Taylor index and the third industry proportion to depict China's industrial structural rationalization degree and advanced level, applies fixed effect model to reveal the impacts of heterogenous human capital, resource agglomeration and the both coupling on industrial structural advancing, and analyzes the causes of regional variance with an attempt to provide references to optimize and upgrade industrial structure. Advanced human capital is the core factor with a contribution rate of 15.31% to industrial advancing. Manufacturing and productive servicing resource agglomeration has an impacton industrial structural rationalization with a contribution rate of up to 46.93% and 28.99%. Junior and moderate human capitals are media variables for industrial advancing. Advanced human capital promotes industrial structural rationalization in central China with an impacting power 72.99%, and moderate human capital promotes industrial structural advancing in the west with an impacting power 75.77%. Manufacturing resource agglomeration contributes to industrial structural advancing in central China at 90.73%, and to the industrial structural rationalization in the west at 80.59%. Productive servicing resource agglomeration promotes industrial structural advancing in the east and industrial structural rationalization in central China with an impacting power of 89% and 82.68% respectively. The eastern China shall use advanced human capital to develop productive servicing, and their interaction to optimize industrial structure. The central and western China shall use moderate-advanced human capital and manufacturing agglomeration supply key drives to optimize industrial structure based on a balanced match of manufacturing and human capital.

Key words: industrial structural rationalization, industrial structural advancing, human capital, resource-agglomeration

摘要: 利用泰尔指数和第三产业相对比重刻画中国产业结构合理化程度和高级化水平,运用固定效应模型揭示异质性人力资本、资源集聚及二者交叉耦合对产业结构优化升级的影响,并分析其地区差异的原因,以期为促进地区产业结构优化升级提供参考。研究表明:高级人力资本是产业结构优化的核心影响因素,其对产业结构高级化的贡献为15.31%;制造业和生产性服务业资源集聚对产业结构合理化的影响分别为46.93%和28.99%;初级、中级人力资本是生产性服务业集聚推动产业结构高级化的中介变量,高级人力资本促进中部地区产业结构合理化(影响力为72.99%),中级人力资本促进西部地区产业结构高级化(影响力为75.77%);制造业资源集聚对中部地区产业结构高级化和西部地区产业结构合理化的推动作用分别为90.73%和80.59%,生产性服务业资源集聚对东部地区产业结构高级化和中部地区产业结构合理化的贡献分别为89%和82.68%。因此,在东部区域,应借助高级人力资本积累带动生产性服务业发展和吸引集聚,同时利用生产性服务业发展优化人力资本结构,通过二者的循环因果互动为产业结构优化升级提供源源不断的能量;在中西部区域,中高级人力资本和制造业集聚的“双翼驱动”为区域产业结构优化提供核心动力,在制造业稳步发展的基础上,应侧重提升人力资本水平并引导二者协同发展,重视制造业集聚与人力资本之间的互动和匹配。

关键词: 产业结构合理化, 产业结构高级化, 人力资本, 资源集聚

CLC Number: