A PATH TO POLLUTION CONTROL UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VIEWING FROM HETEROGENEITY GOVERNANCE BASED ON SPATIAL DIFFERENCE OF MEDIATING EFFECT

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20221009.003

Abstract

Abstract: To study role of environmental regulations on pollution emission under heterogeneity governance, this paper divides environmental regulations into two types, government-enforced and public-involved, which are used to establish a spatial Dubin model to test the pollution controls of environmental regulations. Technical innovation and gross industrial production are served as medium variables to discuss the paths to pollution of environmental regulations in difference areas. Public-involved environmental regulation in central and eastern China is closely related to pollution emission, better than government-enforced. Government-enforced environmental regulation in western China is outstandingly negative to pollution emission, with gross industrial production playing a stronger moderating role, which needs to be prevented from being asylum for eastern pollution industries. Technical innovation plays a little mediating role on environmental regulation and pollution emission, but its spatial overflow effect is great, so is public-involved environmental regulation, with a learning effect across different areas.

Key words: pollution governance, environmental regulation, industrial migration, technical innovation, mediating role

摘要： 为明晰异质性治理主体视角下环境规制对污染排放的作用机制，将环境规制工具分为政府强制型和公众参与型两种，构建空间杜宾模型验证环境规制的治污作用，并以技术创新和工业总产值为中介变量，探讨不同地区环境规制的治污路径。结果发现：1）中、东部地区公众参与型环境规制与污染排放显著负相关，比政府强制型环境规制更能起到抑制污染的作用；2）西部地区政府强制型环境规制与污染排放显著负相关，且工业总产值的中介作用显著，要防止其成为东部污染产业转入的“避难所”；3）技术创新在两种环境规制与污染排放之间的中介作用均不显著，但技术创新和公众参与的空间溢出效应显著，在地区间具有学习效应。

关键词: 污染治理, 环境规制, 产业转移, 技术创新, 中介效应

CLC Number:

F205
X829

WAN Xin, SU Pengcheng, MAO Peng. A PATH TO POLLUTION CONTROL UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VIEWING FROM HETEROGENEITY GOVERNANCE BASED ON SPATIAL DIFFERENCE OF MEDIATING EFFECT[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(5): 108-116.

万欣, 苏鹏程, 毛鹏. 异质性治理主体视角下环境规制的治污路径——基于中介效应的空间差异分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 108-116.

References

冯志军, 陈伟, 杨朝均, 2017. 环境规制差异、创新驱动与中国经济绿色增长[J]. 技术经济, 36(8): 61-69.〔FENG Z J, CHEN W, YANG C J, 2017. Differences in environmental regulations, innovationdriven and green growth of China's economy[J]. Journal of Technology Economics. 36(8): 61-69.〕
郭建斌, 2021. 公众参与环境治理：逻辑审查与实践选择[J]. 江西社会科学, 41(4): 84-95.〔GUO J B, 2021. Public participation in environmental governance: logical review and practical choices[J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 41(4): 84-95.〕
刘亦文. 基于市场的环境政策工具的认知迭代与中国实践[J]. 湖湘论坛, 2019, 32(5): 97-103.〔LIU Y W, 2019. Cognitive iteration of market-based environmental policy instruments and practice in China[J]. Huxiang Forum, 32(5): 97-103.〕
陆立军, 陈丹波, 2019. 地方政府间环境规制策略的污染治理效应: 机制与实证[J]. 财经论丛, 254 (12): 104-113.〔LU L J, CHEN D B, 2019. Pollution control effect of local government's environmental regulation strategy: mechanism and empirical test[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 254 (12): 104-113.〕
孙玉阳, 宋有涛, 2018. 环境规制对产业区域转移正负交替影响研究：基于污染密集型产业[J]. 经济问题探索 (9): 132-139.〔SUN Y Y, SONG Y T, 2018. Study on the alternating positive and negative effects of environmental regulation on industrial regional transfer: based on pollution-intensive industries[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues (9): 132-139.〕
谢乔昕, 2021. 环境规制、绿色金融发展与企业技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 42(6): 65-72.〔XIE Q X, 2021. Environmental regulation, green finance development and enterprise technological innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 42(6): 65-72.〕
谢荣辉, 2021. 绿色技术进步、正外部性与中国环境污染治理[J]. 管理评论, 33(6): 111-121.〔XIE R H, 2021. Green Technology progress, positive externality and environmental pollution control of China[J]. Management Review, 33(6): 111-121.〕
徐莉萍, 王英卓, 刘宁, 等, 2019. 地方政府强制型环境规制与企业迁移行为: 基于中国工业企业数据库样本的成本视角[J]. 财经理论与实践, 40(4): 81-87.〔XU L P, WANG Y Z, LIU N, et al, 2019. The local government environment regulation and the firm relocation from the cost perspective of Chinese industrial enterprise database[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 40(4): 81-87.〕
杨赫, 杨栋会, 刘方, 2019. 环境规制、产业转移与资源配置[J]. 资源与产业, 21(3): 38-45.〔YANG H, YANG D H, LIU F, 2020. Environmental regulations, industrial transfer and resource allocation[J]. Resources & Industries, 21(3): 38-45.〕
杨冕, 晏兴红, 李强谊, 2020. 环境规制对中国工业污染治理效率的影响研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 30(9): 54-61.〔YANG M, YAN X H, LI Q Y, 2020. Research on the impact of environmental regulation on the efficiency of industrial pollution control in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30(9): 54-61.〕
尹庆民, 樊梦易, 2020. 双向FDI对我国碳排放影响的门槛效应分析：基于环境规制视角[J]. 资源与产业, 22(1): 24-31.〔YIN Q M, FAN M Y, 2020. Threshold effect of twoway FDI on China's carbon emission viewing from environmental regulations[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(1): 24-31.〕
张国兴,雷慧敏,马嘉慧,等, 2021. 公众参与对污染物排放的影响效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 31(6): 29-38.〔ZHANG G X, LEI H M, MA J H, et al, 2021. Effect of public participation on pollutant emissions[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 31(6): 29-38.〕
赵黎明, 陈妍庆, 2018. 环境规制、公众参与和企业环境行为: 基于演化博弈和省级面板数据的实证分析[J]. 系统工程, 36(7): 55-65.〔ZHAO L M, CHEN Y Q, 2018. Environmental regulation, public participation and corporate environmental behavior: an empirical analysis based on evolutionary game and provincial panel data[J]. Systems Engineering, 36(7): 55-65.〕
赵玉民, 朱方明, 贺立龙, 2009. 环境规制的界定、分类与演进研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 19(6): 85-90.〔ZHAO Y M, ZHU F M, HE L L, 2009. Definition, classification and evolution of the environmental regulations[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 19(6): 85-90.〕
郑石明, 罗凯方, 2017. 大气污染治理效率与环境政策工具选择: 基于29个省市的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学 (9): 184-192.〔ZHENG S M, LUO K F, 2017. Air pollution abatement efficiency and selection of environmental policy tools: empirical evidence of 29 provinces or municipalities[J]. China Soft Science Magazine (9): 184-192.〕
DOU J, HAN X, 2019. How does the industry mobility affect pollution industry transfer in China: empirical test on pollution haven hypothesis and porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217: 105-115.
LIN B Q, XU M M, 2019. Does China become the “pollution heaven” in South-South trade? Evidence from Sino-Russian trade[J]. The Science of the total environment, 666：964-974.
WANG H, WEI W, 2019. Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO₂ mitigation：the optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies[J]. Energy Economy (87): 104510.
WU J N, XU M M, Zhang P, 2018. The impacts of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese provinces[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184: 227-238.

[1]	YANG Kaijun, CAO Anqi, FANG Cihui. IMPACTS OF NEW ENERGY VEHICLE INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION ON REGIONAL GREEN ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY BASED ON A CASE STUDY ON YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC ZONE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(1): 35-49.
[2]	PAN Haiying, CHEN Ling, REN Jiajia. CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION EFFECTS OF DIGITAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH ADJUSTMENT OF HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(6): 1-14.
[3]	WANG Yufang, MA Xiaomin. ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENTAL SUPERVISION UNDER POLLUTION INDUSTRIAL MIGRATION BASED ON SIGNAL GAMING OF COMPENSATION APPLICATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(6): 105-114.
[4]	HU Yuanlin, WEI Yutan. DOES ECOLOGIC INNOVATION IMPACT ENTERPRISES' ACTUAL TAXING BURDEN? [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(4): 78-92.
[5]	ZHOU Shenbei, YANG Zhe, ZHANG Guiqing. IMPACTS OF BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT ON TECHNICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA‘S MINOR ENTERPRISES FROM PERSPECTIVE OF RESOURCES-BASIS VIEW [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(4): 93-104.
[6]	QIU Lei, MA Beiwen, ZHOU Qin, CHENG Changgao. IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ON INVESTING INCLINATION OF HEAVILY POLLUTING COMPANIES: BASED ON CHINA’S A-LISTED COMPANIES’ DATA [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(3): 92-106.
[7]	ZHANG Qian, MEI Yali, WANG Kui. RELATION AMONG ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TAX, TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE UNDER MODERATED MEDIATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(3): 107-120.
[8]	GAO Zhixin, XU Jixiao. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES, EXECUTIVE INCENTIVES AND GREEN TECHNICAL INNOVATION OF HEAVY POLLUTION INDUSTRIES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(2): 88-100.
[9]	CHEN Shuwei, HAN Li. DOES GOVERNMENTAL ALLOWANCE PROMOTE ENTERPRISES' GREEN TECHNICAL INNOVATION LEVEL VIEWING FROM INFORMATION TRANSMISSION? [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(5): 98-107.
[10]	XIAO Yanfei, XIE Rengui, YIN Hui . THEORETICAL AND CASE STUDY ON EVOLUTION OF REGIONAL DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL CHAIN UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(5): 51-60.
[11]	SHEN Hongcheng, LUO Ting, YE Ji. IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS INTENSITY ON ZHEJIANG'S INDUSTRIAL GREEN DEVELOPMENT [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(5): 61-69.
[12]	LI Jinjing, LI Jun, CHEN Changyao, et al. IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ON SOUTHWESTERN INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(4): 124-132.
[13]	CHEN Xin, LIU Yuanhua, SHI Cuicui. RESEARCH ON REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIFFERENCES BY INTEGRATING OAXACA-BLINDER DECOMPOSITION METHOD FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ENVIRONMENT REGULATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(3): 63-70.
[14]	TONG Jixin, REN Dingwei. ANALYSIS AND FORECAST ON COUPLING COORDINATION BETWEEN TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(1): 37-45.
[15]	SONG Min, ZHANG Yuanyuan. SPATIAL OVERFLOWING EFFECT OF HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ON WATER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION: A CASE STUDY ON YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.