Resources & Industries ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 124-134.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20221011.001
HE Lishi, SHAN Xiaoyu
Received:
2021-07-20
Revised:
2021-11-18
Online:
2022-10-20
Published:
2022-12-23
贺丽莳,单晓雨
通讯作者:
单晓雨,硕士生,主要从事技术经济和企业管理研究。E-mail:shanxiaoyu3708@163.com
作者简介:
贺丽莳,博士、讲师,主要从事技术经济与企业管理研究。Email:hhuhls@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
HE Lishi, SHAN Xiaoyu. IMPACTS OF INFORMATION FRAMEWORK ON GREEN CONSUMPTION BEHAVIORS UNDER SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON MEDIATING EMPATHY[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(5): 124-134.
贺丽莳, 单晓雨. 可持续发展背景下信息框架对绿色消费行为的影响研究——基于共情的中介作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 124-134.
陈武英, 刘连启, 2016. 情境对共情的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 24(1): 91-100.〔CHEN W Y, LIU L Q, 2016. The effect of context on empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(1): 91-100.〕 何利, 沈镭, 陶建格, 等, 2019. 再生资源回收利用的理论研究与实践进展综述[J]. 资源与产业, 21(4): 60-67.〔HE L, SHEN L, TAO J G, et al, 2019. Overall reviews of theoretical research and practical progress of renewable resources recycling[J]. Resources & Industries, 21(4): 60-67.〕 李利茹, 罗彪, 孙莹, 等, 2021. 绿色广告对消费者购买节能产品意图的影响机制研究: 基于SOR模型(英文)[J/OL]. (2021-06-22) [2021-07-15].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST&filename=ZKJD20210618006&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=qGCM6QLZXCm WQP3MTtMGPEo5C9-8mQi1OxkHUbiu3g5EJVJ24As3sRlJjtLY5_ub.〔LI L R, LUO B, SUN Y, et al, 2021. Research on the influence mechanism of green advertising on consumers' intention to purchase energy-saving products: based on the SOR model[J/OL]. (2021-06-22) [2021-07-15].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST&filename=ZKJD20210618006&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=qGCM6QLZXCm WQP3MTtMGPEo5C9-8mQi1OxkHUbiu3g5EJVJ24As3sRlJjtLY5_ub.〕 李倩倩, 范雅雯, 2018. 共情对公益广告说服效果的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 15(3): 420-426.〔LI Q Q, FAN Y W, 2018. A study of the influence of empathy on the persuasion of public service advertising[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 15(3): 420-426. 〕 李伟, 蒋玉石, 曹香叶, 等, 2021. 消极拟人化信息框架对居民环境行为影响研究[J].软科学, 35(2): 123-128.〔LI W, JIANG Y S, CAO X Y, et al. 2021. Research on the influence of negative anthropomorphic message framing on residents' environmental behavior[J]. Soft Science, 35(2): 123-128. 〕 李文明, 殷程强, 唐文跃,等, 2019. 观鸟旅游游客地方依恋与亲环境行为: 以自然共情与环境教育感知为中介变量[J]. 经济地理, 39(1): 215-224.〔LI W M, YIN C Q, TANG W Y, et al, 2019. Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of bird-watching tourists: taking natural empathy and perception of environmental education as mediating variables[J]. Economic Geography, 39(1): 215-224. 〕 廖纮亿, 柯彪, 2020. 基于计划行为理论和环境价值观的城市居民低碳出行行为研究[J].资源与产业, 22(4): 64-70.〔LIAO H Y, KE B, 2020. Low carbon commuting behaviors of urban residents based on planning behavior theory and environmental values[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(4): 64-70.〕 刘聪慧, 王永梅, 俞国良, 等, 2009. 共情的相关理论评述及动态模型探新[J]. 心理科学进展, 17(5): 964-972.〔LIU C H, WANG Y M, YU G L, et al, 2009.Related theories and exploration on dynamic model of empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(5): 964-972. 〕 戚海峰,于辉,向伟林,等, 2019. 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一?[J].心理科学进展, 27(7): 1307-1319.〔QI H F, YU H, XIANG W L, et al, 2019. Discussion of current theories and future research on attitudebehavior gap in green consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7): 1307-1319.〕 盛光华, 岳蓓蓓, 龚思羽, 2019. 绿色广告诉求与信息框架匹配效应对消费者响应的影响[J]. 管理学报, 16(3): 439-446.〔SHENG G H, YUE B B, GONG S Y, 2019. Impact of the matching effect between green advertising appeal and information framework on consumer responses[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 16(3): 439-446.〕 王国才,刘文静,王希凤, 2021.不同促销方式下促销购买限制的作用情境研究: 框架效应视角[J/OL]. (2021-06-30) [2021-07-16]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST&filename=LKGP20210624007&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=0gy_6gslfyTFBqQO3nnVa93L3IbZ9MhB-XfCvzdA4SIQidSscVlhXm P461s8qiDF.〔WANG G C, LIU W J, WANG X F, 2021. A situational study on the role of promotion purchase restriction under different promotion types: from the perspective of framing effect theory[J/OL]. (2021-06-30) [2021-07-16]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CAPJ&dbname=CAPJLAST&filename=LKGP20210624007&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=0gy_6gslfyTFBqQO3nn Va93L3IbZ9MhB-XfCvzdA4SIQidSscVlhXm P461s8qiDF.〕 王建明, 吴龙昌, 2015. 绿色购买的情感-行为双因素模型:假设和检验[J]. 管理科学, 28(6): 80-94.〔WANG J M, WU L C, 2015. Two-factor model of affection-behavior in green purchase: hypotheses and test[J]. Journal of Management Science, 28(6): 80-94.〕 王晓红, 胡士磊, 张雪燕, 2018. 消费者缘何言行不一:绿色消费态度—行为缺口研究述评与展望[J].经济与管理评论, 34(5): 52-62.〔WANG X H, HU S L, ZHANG X Y, 2018. Why consumer's words are not matched by their deeds: a literature review and prospects of attitude-behavior gap in green consumption[J]. Review of Economy and Management, 34(5):52-62.〕 许丽颖, 喻丰, 邬家骅, 等, 2017. 拟人化:从“它”到“他”[J]. 心理科学进展, 25(11): 1942-1954.〔XU L Y, YU F, WU J H, et al, 2017. Anthropomorphism: antecedents and consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(11): 1942-1954.〕 张惠程, 2018. 国内外资源型城市绿色转型研究综述[J]. 资源与产业, 20(5): 9-15.〔ZHANG H C, 2018. Green transformation research overview of resource-based cities domestic and overseas[J]. Resources & Industries, 20(5): 9-15. 〕 朱翊敏, 2014. 慈善营销中契合类型与信息框架对消费者响应的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 17(4): 128-139.〔ZHU Y M, 2014. The Influences of type of fit between company and cause, and information framing on consumers' responses to cause-related marketing[J]. Nankai Business Review, 17(4): 128-139.〕 ALLEN C T, KAREN A, MACHLEIT, et al, 1992.A comparison of attitudes and emotions as predictors of behavior at diverse levels of behavioral experience[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3): 493-504. BAEK T H, YOON S, 2017. Guilt and shame: environmental message framing effects[J]. Journal of Advertising, 46(3): 440-453. BAGOZZI R P, MOORE D J, 1994. Public service advertisements: emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior[J]. Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 56-70. BARTSCH A, KLOSS A, 2019. Personalized charity advertising: can personalized prosocial messages promote empathy, attitude change, and helping intentions toward stigmatized social groups? [J]. International Journal of Advertising, 38(3): 345-363. BATSON C D, 2012. Altruism in humans[J].Evol Psychol, 10(1):95-99. CHANG C, LEE Y, 2010. Framing charity advertising: influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39 (12): 2910-2935. CHEN T, RAZZAQ A, QING P, et al, 2021. Do you bear to reject them? The effect of anthropomorphism on empathy and consumer preference for unattractive produce[J]. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 61: 102556. DAVIS J L, LE B, COY A E, 2011. Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3): 257-265. DAVIS M H, 1980. Individual differences in empathy: a multi-Dimensional approach[J]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40(7-B): 3480. DING Z, SUN J, WANG Y, et al, 2021. Research on the influence of anthropomorphic design on the consumers' express packaging recycling willingness the moderating effect of psychological ownership[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 168: 105269. EPLEY N, WAYTZ A, CACIOPPO J T, 2007. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism[J]. Psychological Review, 114(4): 864-86. GRINSTEIN A, HAGTVEDT H, KRONROD A, 2019. Aesthetically (dis)pleasing visuals: a dual pathway to empathy and prosocial behavior[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 36(1): 83-99. Hoffman M L, 2001. Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. JUN S, SUNG J, GENTRY J W, et al, 2015. Effects of underdog (vs. top dog) positioning advertising[J]. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3): 495-514. KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A, 1982. The psychology of preferences[J]. Scientific American, 246(1): 160-173. KATZ N, BURCHFIELD K B, 2020. Special-needs companion animals and those who care for them: stories of identity and empathy[J]. Society & Animals: Journal of HumanAnimal Studies, 28(1): 21-40. LAKSMIDEWI D, SOELASIH Y, 2019. Anthropomorphic green advertising: how to enhance consumers' environmental concern[J]. Business & Economics Review, 29(1): 72-84. MEHRABIAN A, RUSSELL J A, 1974. An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. MOON S, BERGEY P K, BOVE LL, et al, 2016. Message framing and individual traits in adopting innovative, sustainable products (ISPs): evidence from biofuel adoption[J]. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3553-3560. PRGUDA E, NEUMANN D L. 2014. Inter-human and animal-directed empathy: a test for evolutionary biases in empathetic responding[J].Behavioural Processes, 108: 80-86. REINHART A M, MARSHALL H M, FEELEY T H, et al, 2007. The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: the mediating role of psychological reactance[J]. Communication Monographs, 74(2): 229-255. SCHWARZ N,2012. Feelings-as-information theory[M]. New York: Sage Publication. TAM K P, LEE S L, CHAO M M, 2013. Saving Mr. Nature: anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3): 514-521. TOUTAIN C M, 2010. Drawing emotion from rhetorical appeals to nature: a critical analysis of corporate green advertisements[D]. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University. YOUNG W, HWANG K, MCDONALD S, et al, 2010.Sustainable consumption: green consumerbehaviour when purchasing products [J]. Sustainable Development, 18(1): 20-31. YUE D, TONG Z, TIAN J, et al, 2021. Anthropomorphic strategies promote wildlife conservation through empathy: the moderation role of the public epidemic situation[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7): 3565. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||