安阳市土地利用景观格局时空演变特征及驱动因素分析

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20260104.005

资源与产业 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 118-128.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20260104.005

安阳市土地利用景观格局时空演变特征及驱动因素分析

赵冬¹，郭兰博²，王业宁¹，陈心旸³，王爱国⁴，闫丽洁¹

(1.河南省科学院地理研究所，河南郑州 450052；2.河南科博信息技术服务有限公司，河南郑州 450052；3.清华大学五道口金融学院，北京 100083；4.洛阳师范学院地理与旅游学院，河南洛阳 471022)

收稿日期:2025-04-15 修回日期:2025-06-09 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-02-20
通讯作者: 郭兰博，硕士、中级工程师，主要从事区域经济开发与管理、土地可持续发展和GIS应用研究。E-mail：guolb1224@163.com
作者简介:赵冬，博士、副研究员，主要从事土壤生态学、区域研究和土地可持续发展研究。E-mail：zdong3746@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（41807018）；河南省重点研发与推广专项（252102320223）；河南省科学院基本科研费项目（240601087，20250601004）；河南省软科学项目（242400410371）；河南省自然科学基金面上项目（232300420175）。

Spatio-temporal Evolution and Drives Factors of Anyang's Land Use Landscape Pattern

ZHAO Dong¹, GUO Lanbo², WANG Yening¹, CHEN Xinyang³, WANG Aiguo⁴, YAN Lijie¹

(1.Institute of Geographical Science, Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450052 China;2.Henan Kebo Information Technology Service Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou 450052 China;3.PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China;4.College of Geography and Tourism, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471022, China)

Received:2025-04-15 Revised:2025-06-09 Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市化加速了土地利用景观格局的演变，而合理分析城市生态风险对保护城市生态环境和实现城市可持续发展具有重要意义。论文以河南省安阳市为研究区，采用土地利用转移矩阵、景观格局指数和热点分析等方法，并基于2000—2020年安阳市土地利用数据，对安阳市土地利用景观格局演变特征进行分析，并利用主成分分析方法确定演化的主要驱动因素。研究结果表明：1)2000—2020年，安阳市土地利用演变格局呈现“三增两减”的趋势，即耕地、林地减少，草地、水域、建设用地增加，以耕地与建设用地之间的相互转化最为明显；2)2000—2020年，安阳市景观生态高风险区面积增加6 170.52 km²，景观生态风险等级逐渐升级，热点区域位于安阳市市区；3)2000—2010年，景观生态低风险区转向较高风险区，而2010—2020年景观生态较高风险区转向高风险区；4)景观格局演化是城市化水平指数、经济因子指数和人口密度共同作用的结果，产业结构因子对景观格局演化也有一定的影响。建议安阳市在城市化进程中，既要重视生态保护，又要因地制宜制定适宜区域土地利用良性发展的政策。

关键词: 转移矩阵, 景观格局指数, 热点分析, 主成分分析, 安阳市

Abstract: Urbanization speeds up the evolution of land use landscape pattern, which is of significance to study ecological risks on protecting urban eco-environment and sustainable development. This paper uses land use transfer matrix, landscape pattern indicator and hotspots to study Anyang's land use landscape pattern evolution via its 2000 to 2020 land use data, and employs principle component method to determine the major drives factor of evolution. Anyang's land use pattern shows a trend of “three-increase-two-decrease” during 2000 to 2020, with increase in grassland, water and construction land uses, decrease in farmland and forest land uses, especially in the transformation between farmland and construction land uses. Anyang's scenic ecological area with high risks has increased by 6 170.52 km² during 2000 to 2020, meaning a growing risk level with the hotspot locating in Anyang city. Its scenic ecological low risks area turned to higher risks, and its higher risk areas turned to even higher. Landscape pattern evolution is a mutual result of urbanization index, economy index and population density index, also impacted by industrial structure factor. This paper presents suggestions on ecological protection and on making appropriate land use policies amid Anyang's urbanization.

Key words: transfer matrix, landscape pattern index, hotspot analysis, principal component analysis, Anyang city

中图分类号:

F061.6
F205

赵冬, 郭兰博, 王业宁, 陈心旸, 王爱国, 闫丽洁. 安阳市土地利用景观格局时空演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2026, 28(1): 118-128.

ZHAO Dong, GUO Lanbo, WANG Yening, CHEN Xinyang, WANG Aiguo, YAN Lijie. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Drives Factors of Anyang's Land Use Landscape Pattern[J]. Resources & Industries, 2026, 28(1): 118-128.

参考文献

陈斌, 徐尚昭, 周阳阳, 等, 2022.基于土地利用变化的江汉平原景观生态风险时空分异特征分析[J].水土保持研究,29(5): 228-234. 〔CHEN B, XU S Z, ZHOU Y Y, et al., 2022. Assessment of landscape ecological risk in Jianghan Plain area based on land use change[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 29(5): 228-234.〕

程严, 李伊黎, 常中兵, 等, 2022. 基于土地利用变化的景观生态风险评价: 以广东省海岸带为例[J].环境生态学, 4(11): 23-33. 〔CHENG Y, LI Y L, CHANG Z B, et al., 2022. Landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use change: A case study of coastal zone of Guangdong Province[J].Environmental Ecology, 4(11): 23-33. 〕

程子朗, 张延军, 王灵芝, 等, 2023.吉林省西部“三生”空间演化特征与驱动力研究[J].地域研究与开发, 42(2): 33-39.〔CHENG Z L, ZHANG Y J, WANG L Z, et al., 2023. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and driving forces of “production-living-ecological” spaces in western Jilin Province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 42(2): 33-39.〕

杜文涛, 李新萍, 宋佳伟, 等, 2022.黄河流域景观生态风险分析及预测[J].水土保持通报, 42(5): 105-113. 〔DU W T, LI X P, SONG J W, et al., 2022. Analysis and prediction of landscape ecological risk in Yellow River basin[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(5): 105-113.〕

郭兰博, 赵冬, 杨嗣海, 等, 2024.豫西南地区土地利用景观生态风险分析及预测[J].环境生态学, 6(11): 11-18.〔GUO L B, ZHAO D, YANG S H, et al., 2024. Analysis and prediction of landscape ecological risk of land use in southwest Henan Province[J].Environmental Ecology, 6(11): 11-18.〕

何炬, 张文忠, 2021. 城市体检背景下历史文化名城城市特色风貌感知与影响因素[J].中国名城, 35(11): 13-20.〔HE J, ZHANG W Z, 2021. Perception and influence of urban characteristics of famous historical and cultural cities under the background of city health examination[J].China Ancient City, 35(11): 13-20.〕

胡学东, 邹利林, 2020.生态优先导向下长江经济带土地利用景观格局演变及其驱动机制研究: 以武汉市为例[J].地域研究与开发, 39(3): 138-143.〔HU X D, ZOU L L, 2020. Landscape pattern evolution of land use and its driving mechanism in Yangtze River Economic Belt under the guidance of ecological priority: case study of Wuhan city[J].Areal Research and Development, 39(3): 138-143.〕

李青圃, 张正栋, 万露文, 等, 2019. 基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J].地理学报, 74(7): 1420-1437.〔LI Q P, ZHANG Z D, WAN L W, et al., 2019. Landscape pattern optimization in Ningjiang River Basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(7): 1420-1437.〕

刘焱序, 任志远, 李春越, 2013. 秦岭山区景观格局演变的生态服务价值响应研究: 以商洛市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 27(3): 109-114.〔LIU Y X, REN Z Y, LI C Y, 2013. Response of ecosystem services value to the landscape patterns change in Qinling mountains: A case of Shangluo city[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 27(3): 109-114.〕

刘珍环, 张国杰,付凤杰, 2020.基于景观格局-服务的景观生态风险评价: 以广州市为例[J].生态学报,40(10): 3295-3302.〔LIU Z H, ZHANG G J, FU F J, 2020. Assessing landscape ecological risk based on landscape pattern and services in Guangzhou during 1990-2015[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(10): 3295-3302.〕

娄妮, 王志杰, 何嵩涛, 2020. 基于景观格局的阿哈湖国家湿地公园景观生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究, 27(1): 233-239.〔LOU N, WANG Z J, HE S T, 2020. Assessment on ecological risk of AHA lake national wetland park based on landscape pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(1): 233-239.〕

马帅, 程浩, 林晨, 等, 2021. 江淮生态经济区土地利用景观格局时空变化[J].水土保持研究, 28(1): 292-299.〔MA S, CHENG H, LIN C, et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal changes of land use and landscape pattern in Jianghuai ecological economic zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 28(1): 292-299.〕

蒙吉军, 王祺, 李枫, 等, 2019. 基于空间差异的黑河中游土地多功能利用研究[J].地理研究, 38(2): 369-382.〔MENG J J, WANG Q, LI F, et al., 2019. Assessing multifunctional land use in the middle reach of the Heihe River basin based on spatial variances[J].Geographical Research, 38(2): 369-382.〕

宋敏敏, 张青峰, 吴发启, 等, 2018. 黄土沟壑区小流域景观格局演变及生态服务价值响应[J].生态学报, 38(8): 2649-2659.〔SONG M M, ZHANG Q F,WU F Q, et al., 2018. Landscape pattern changes and evaluation of ecological service values in a small watershed of the Loess Gully Region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(8): 2649-2659.〕

王劲峰, 廖一兰, 刘鑫, 2010. 空间数据分析教程[M].北京: 科学出版社.

王玲, 汪淼, 2023. 成渝城市群景观生态风险演变分析[J].长江流域资源与环境, 32(3): 626-637.〔WANG L, WANG M, 2023. Chengdu-Chongqing urban landscape ecological risk evolution analysis[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 32(3): 626-637.〕

王涛, 肖彩霞, 刘娇, 等, 2020. 云南高原湖泊杞麓湖动态演变及景观生态风险评价[J].浙江农林大学学报, 37(1): 9-17.〔WANG T, XIAO C X, LIU J, et al., 2020. Dynamic evolution and landscape ecological risks assessment of Qilu Lake in Yunnan Plateau[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 37(1): 9-17.〕

韦军, 李晓丹, 马丽娅, 等, 2021. 陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用功能时空演变及影响因素[J].水土保持研究, 28(3): 194-202.〔WEI J, LI X D, MA L Y, 2021. Spatiotemporal evolution of land use function and influencing factors in loess hilly region of Longzhong[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 28(3): 194-202.〕

谢晓彤, 李效顺, 2021. 河南省“三生”功能时空演变特征及影响因素[J].农业工程学报, 37(22): 243-252.〔XIE X T, LI X S, 2021. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of “production-living-ecological” functions in Henan Province, China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37(22): 243-252.〕

修炀景, 侯蒙京, 田骄阳, 等, 2023. 基于土地利用/覆盖的甘肃省景观生态风险时空变化特征[J].草业学报, 32(1): 1-15.〔XIU Y J, HOU M J, TIAN J Y, et al., 2023. Characteristics of temporal and spatial variation in landscape ecological risk in Gansu Province based on land use and cover[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 32(1): 1-15.〕

杨馗, 信桂新, 蒋好雨, 等, 2021. 基于最佳尺度的景观生态风险时空变化研究: 以重庆市江津区为例[J].生态与农村环境学报, 37(5): 576-586.〔YANG K, XIN G X, JIANG H Y, et al., 2021. Study on spatiotemporal changes of landscape ecological risk based on the optimal spatial scale: A Case study of Jiangjin district, Chongqing city[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 37(5): 576-586.〕

袁媛, 罗志军, 赵杰, 等, 2020. 基于景观结构和空间统计学的南昌市景观生态安全评价[J]水土保持研究, 27(3): 247-255.〔YUAN Y, LUO Z J, ZHAO J, et al., 2020. Landscape ecological security evaluation of Nanchang city based on landscape structure and spatial statistics[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(3): 247-255.〕

翟培秀, 李飞雪, 邱小倩, 等, 2023. 长三角地区景观生态风险时空演变评估[J].水土保持研究, 30(4): 245-255.〔ZHAI P X, LI F X, QIU X Q, et al., 2023. Assessment on spatial-temporal evolution of landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Delta[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 30(4): 245-255.〕

张辉, 谢涛, 杨张瑜, 等, 2024. 西安市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联分析[J].环境生态学, 6(7): 37-44.〔ZHANG H, XIE T, YANG Z Y, et al., 2024. Spatiotemporal evolution and association analysis of ecosystem service value and ecological risk in Xi'an[J].Environmental Ecology, 6(7): 37-44.〕

张建, 雷刚, 漆良华, 等, 2021. 2003—2018年土地利用变化对丹江口市景观格局与生态服务价值的影响[J].生态学报, 41(4): 1280-1290.〔ZHANG J, LEI G, QI L H, et al., 2021. The landscape pattern and ecological service value in Danjiangkou city under land use change from 2003 to 2018[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(4): 1280-1290.〕

张景奇, 陈小冬, 修春亮, 2019. 基于POI数据的城市蔓延测度研究: 以沈阳市为例[J].中国土地科学, 33(4): 93-102.〔ZHANG J Q, CHEN X D, XIU C L, 2019. Study on the measurement of urban sprawl based on the poi data: A case of Shenyang city, China[J].China Land Science, 33(4): 93-102.〕

张琨, 林乃峰, 徐德琳, 等, 2018. 中国生态安全研究进展:评估模型与管理措施[J].生态与农村环境学报, 34(12): 1057-1063.〔ZHANG K, LIN N F, XU D L, et al., 2018. Research advance on ecological security in China: Assessment models and management measures[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 34(12): 1057-1063.〕

张诗晓, 张浚茂, 张文康, 等, 2020. 泛珠江流域土地利用时空变化特征及驱动因子[J].应用生态学报, 31(2): 573-580.〔ZHANG S X, ZHANG J M, ZHANG W K, et al., 2020. Spatiotemporal variability characteristics and driving forces of land use in the Pan-Pearl river basin,China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(2): 573-580.〕

仉振宇, 朱记伟, 解建仓, 等, 2020. 近25年来大西安地区土地利用时空格局变化和热区诊断分析[J].西安理工大学学报, 36(2): 159-169.〔ZHANG Z Y, ZHU J W, XIE J C, et al., 2020. Spatial-temporal changes of land use and hot zone diagnosis analysis in the past 25 years of the Great Xi'an area[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Technology, 36(2): 159-169.〕

左岍, 周勇, 李晴, 等, 2023. 基于最优尺度的鄂西南山区景观生态风险时空变化特征[J].生态学杂志, 42(5): 1186-1196.〔ZUO Q, ZHOU Y, LI Q, et al., 2023. Spatial and temporal variations of landscape ecological risk in the mountainous region of southwestern Hubei Province based on the optimal scale[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 42(5): 1186-1196.〕

[1]	刘静，雷涯邻，杨淼. 北京市地埋管地源热泵项目应用效果评价分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2017, 19(2): 76-81.
[2]	吴丹丹，马仁锋，苏飞，等.. 浙江县域发展质量及其时空特征[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(5): 21-.
[3]	邢青. 辽宁省区域发展能力评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(5): 78-.
[4]	孙华，吴瑶，居婕. 江苏省工业化与城镇化协调发展对策研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(2): 16-22.
[5]	冉奥博,刘云,白璇. 基于主成分分析的生态产业链角色选择———以重庆市长寿经济技术开发区为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(4): 100-105.
[6]	刘春. 资源枯竭型城市可持续发展综合评价: 以湖北省黄石市为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(4): 1-5.
[7]	李福安，翁亚兰，吴威让. 资源枯竭型城市支柱产业选择研究: 以湖北大冶市为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(4): 6-9.
[8]	俞旸,沙景华,周进生. 安徽省矿业经济区可持续发展力实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(4): 116-121.
[9]	曲雯，李悦铮，江海旭. 基于主成分分析的辽宁省海洋经济实力变化研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(5): 132-137.
[10]	彭利. 基于AHP和PCA的新疆可持续发展水平评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(3): 132-138.
[11]	陶晓燕. 基于主成分分析的资源型城市产业转型能力评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(2): 1-5.
[12]	孙宝慧，张丽.. 乌鲁木齐第三产业竞争力的综合评价分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(2): 136-142.
[13]	张桂凤. 资源枯竭型城市农业可持续发展定量评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(1): 11-.
[14]	孙慧,刘媛媛，张娜娜. 基于主成分分析的煤炭产业竞争力实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2012, 14(1): 144-149.
[15]	张娜娜, 孙慧, 刘媛媛. 新疆能源产业集群显性竞争力评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(6): 135-140.

安阳市土地利用景观格局时空演变特征及驱动因素分析

Spatio-temporal Evolution and Drives Factors of Anyang's Land Use Landscape Pattern

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics