基于知识图谱的CO2地质封存研究脉络、演进和趋势分析

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20260305.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由CO₂等温室气体排放引发的气候变化与环境污染，是当今人类面临的最严峻且紧迫的全球性挑战之一。CO₂地质封存作为应对气候变化、实现碳中和目标的关键技术，涉及多源、异构且复杂的数据体系。知识图谱能够有效整合上述数据，为系统化知识管理提供支撑，有助于科研人员深化理解与应用。以Web of Science核心合集数据库为数据源，结合CiteSpace可视化工具与文献计量方法，系统梳理CO₂地质封存领域的研究进展，挖掘基础知识和研究热点，揭示其发展趋势。结果表明：1）2020年以来，该领域发文量保持高位，但增速略有放缓，标志着研究进入成熟阶段，正从理论探索转向实际应用。中国近年来发文量增长迅速，已位居世界前列，研究内容覆盖从基础理论到现场试验的各个方面；2）研究主要聚焦于化学、微生物、地球科学及生态、地球、海洋等领域，深度融合的多学科协同创新研究成为必然选择；3）研究机构类型多样，但跨学科、跨区域合作仍显不足，核心作者群尚未形成，需加强协作以提升学术创新力与影响力；4）随着碳捕集、利用与封存（CCUS）技术的不断进步，在全球气候治理、能源结构转型与资源安全保障等多重需求驱动下，非常规能源的开发与利用、CO₂地质封存过程中的取热-储能利用及微生物转化日益成为研究焦点。同时，不同储层条件下CO₂注入引发的压力抬升与流体迁移的大尺度模拟研究，已成为国际共同关注的热点。此外，结合数值模拟与地球物理技术，实现碳封存工程中CO₂运移规律的科学与精准预测，也是未来重要研究方向。建议各国将CCUS明确纳入国家碳中和政策体系，构建可持续商业模式与激励机制，完善法律法规与标准体系，布局“碳捕集—运输—封存”产业集群，培育专业化技术服务与装备制造产业，并推动透明化沟通与公众参与。科研人员应打破学科壁垒，构建深度融合的研究范式，通过数据共享、模型耦合与共识决策，提升学科整体影响力，推动CCUS技术向规模化、商业化与社会化方向发展。

关键词: CO₂捕集与封存, 知识图谱, CiteSpace, 合作网络, 可视化分析, 知识挖掘

Abstract: Global climate change and environmental pollution caused by greenhouse gas emissions, such as CO₂, represent one of the most severe and urgent global challenges today. As a key technology for addressing climate change and achieving carbon neutrality goals, CO₂ geological storage involves multi-source, heterogeneous, and complex data systems. Knowledge graphs can effectively integrate the aforementioned data, providing support for systematic knowledge management and helping researchers deepen their understanding and application. Using the Web of Science Core Collection database as the data source, combined with the CiteSpace visualization tool and bibliometric methods, this study systematically reviewed the research progress in the field of CO₂ geological storage, uncovered foundational knowledge and research hotspots, and revealed its development trends. The results indicate that the annual number of publications in this field has remained high since 2020, but the growth rate has slightly slowed, marking the field's entry into a mature stage, transitioning from theoretical exploration to practical application. In recent years, China's publication output has grown rapidly, ranking among the top globally, with research content covering various aspects from fundamental theory to field trials. Research primarily focuses on fields such as chemistry, microbiology, geosciences, ecology, earth science, and oceanography, making deeply integrated multidisciplinary collaborative innovation an inevitable choice. While there is a diverse range of research institutions, interdisciplinary and cross-regional cooperation remains insufficient, and a core group of authors has not yet formed. Strengthening collaboration is necessary to enhance academic innovation and influence. With the continuous advancement of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technologies, driven by multiple demands including global climate governance, energy structure transformation, and resource security assurance, the development and utilization of unconventional energy sources, as well as heat extraction-energy storage utilization and microbial transformation during CO₂ geological storage, are increasingly becoming research hotspots. Large-scale simulation studies of pressure buildup and fluid migration induced by CO₂ injection under different reservoir conditions have become a shared international research hotspot. Furthermore, achieving scientific and accurate prediction of CO₂ migration patterns in carbon storage projects by combining numerical simulation with geophysical techniques represents another important future research direction. It is recommended that countries explicitly incorporate CCUS into their national carbon neutrality policy frameworks, establish sustainable business models and incentive mechanisms, improve relevant laws, regulations, and standards, plan “carbon capture-transport-storage” industrial clusters, cultivate specialized technical services and equipment manufacturing industries, and promote transparent communication and public participation. Researchers should break down disciplinary barriers, construct deeply integrated research paradigms, and enhance the overall impact of the discipline through data sharing, model coupling, and consensus decision-making, thereby promoting the development of CCUS technology towards large-scale, commercial, and socialized implementation.

Key words: CO₂ capture and storage, knowledge graph, CiteSpace, collaboration network, visual analysis, knowledge mining

中图分类号:

F205

何虎军, 王景昊, 张纬纬, 王兆栋, 李苗苗, 张菲霞. 基于知识图谱的CO₂地质封存研究脉络、演进和趋势分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2026, 28(2): 138-152.

HE Hujun, WANG Jinghao, ZHANG Weiwei, WANG Zhaodong, LI Miaomiao, ZHANG Feixia. Research Context, Evolution and Trend of Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage Based on Knowledge Graphs[J]. Resources & Industries, 2026, 28(2): 138-152.

参考文献

蔡博峰, 李琦, 林千果, 等, 2020. 中国二氧化碳捕集、利用与封存（CCUS）报告2019[R]. 北京: 生态环境部环境规划院气候变化与环境政策研究中心.

陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等, 2015. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 33(2): 242-253.〔CHEN Y, CHEN C M, LIU Z Y, et al., 2015. The methodology function of CiteSpace mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 33(2): 242-253.〕

刁玉杰, 2017. 神华 CCS 示范工程场地储层表征与CO₂运移规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学（北京）.〔DIAO Y J, 2017. Study on the reservoir characterization and CO₂migration underground in the Shenhua CCS demonstration project site[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology.〕

冯骁, 邓泽, 郭红光, 等, 2024. 地质封存二氧化碳微生物转化研究进展[J]. 生物工程学报, 40(9): 2884-2898.〔FENG X, DENG Z, GUO H G, et al., 2024. Research advances of microbial transformation of CO₂ in geological sequestration[J]. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 40(9): 2884-2898.〕

郭晓剑, 胡欢, 刘亦晴, 等, 2020. 基于CiteSpace的我国绿色矿山研究可视化分析[J]. 黄金科学技术, 28(2): 203-212.〔GUO X J, HU H, LIU Y Q, et al., 2020. Visual analysis of green mine research in China based on CiteSpace[J].Gold Science and Technology, 28(2): 203-212.〕

郝佳豪, 越云凯, 张家俊, 等, 2022. 二氧化碳储能技术研究现状与发展前景[J]. 储能科学与技术, 11(10): 3285-3296.〔HAO J H, YUE Y K, ZHANG J J, et al., 2022. Research status and development prospect of carbon dioxide energy-storage technology[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 11(10): 3285-3296.〕

贺炬翔, 张前龙, 许娅婷, 等, 2023. 钦杭成矿带研究进展: 基于CiteSpace社区发现结果分析[J]. 地质论评, 69(5): 1919-1927.〔HE J X, ZHANG Q L, XU Y T, et al., 2023. Research progress of Qinzhou-Hangzhou metallogenic belt: Analyzed from CiteSpace community discovery[J]. Geological Review, 69(5): 1919-1927.〕

何学秋, 田向辉, 宋大钊, 2022. 煤层CO₂安全封存研究进展与展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 50(1): 212-219.〔HE X Q, TIAN X H, SONG D Z, 2022. Progress and expectation of CO₂sequestration safety in coal seams[J].Coal Science and Technology, 50(1): 212-219.〕

蒋恕, 张凯, 杜凤双, 等, 2023. 二氧化碳地质封存及提高油气和地热采收率技术进展与展望[J]. 地球科学, 48(7): 2733-2749.〔JIANG S, ZHANG K, DU F S, et al., 2023. Progress and prospects of CO₂ storage and enhanced oil, gas and geothermal recovery[J]. Earth Science, 48(7): 2733-2749.〕

靖晶, 2021. CO₂储存过程多因素影响的数值模拟研究: 以鄂尔多斯盆地石千峰组为例[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学（武汉）.〔JING J,2021.Numerical simulation of multiple factors influence on CO₂ storage process: A case study of Shiqianfeng Formation in Ordos Basin[D].Wuhan: China University of Geosciences(Wuhan).〕

李慧敏, 代博鑫, 李锋, 等, 2024. 国内外“水-能源-粮食”纽带关系研究的发展现状与热点分析[J]. 资源与产业, 26(3): 48-61.〔LI H M, DAI B X, LI F, et al., 2024. Research advances and hotspots in “water-energy-food” nexus globally[J]. Resources & Industries, 26(3): 48-61.〕

李杰, 陈超美, 2016. CiteSpace科技文本挖掘及可视化[M]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社.〔LI J, CHEN C M, 2016. CiteSpace: Text mining and visualization in scientific literature[M]. Beijing: Capital University of Economics and Business Press.〕

李术艺, 冯旗, 董依然, 2021. 地质封存二氧化碳与深地微生物相互作用研究进展[J]. 微生物学报, 61(6): 1632-1649.〔LI S Y, FENG Q, DONG Y R, 2021. Interactions between geological sequestration of carbon dioxide and deep subsurface microorganisms[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 61(6): 1632-1649.〕

秘昭旭, 2019. 二氧化碳规模化注入及沿废弃井泄漏对储层影响的数值模拟研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学.〔MI Z X, 2019. Numerical simulation of the influence of CO₂ large-scale injection and its leakage along abandoned wells on reservoirs[D]. Changchun: Jilin University.〕

任小春, 2023. 我国编辑出版教育研究的文献知识图谱分析: 基于CiteSpace可视化视角[J]. 北京印刷学院学报, 31(1): 13-21.〔REN X C, 2023. Analysis on the knowledge graph of editing and publishing education research in China based on CiteSpace visual perspective[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, 31(1): 13-21.〕

孙腾民, 刘世奇, 汪涛, 2021. 中国二氧化碳地质封存潜力评价研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 49(11): 10-20.〔SUN T M, LIU S Q, WANG T, 2021. Research advances on evaluation of CO₂ geological storage potential in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 49(11): 10-20.〕

王建秀, 吴远斌, 于海鹏, 2013. 二氧化碳封存技术研究进展[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 9(1): 81-90.〔WANG J X, WU Y B, YU H P, 2013. Review of the technology for sequestration of carbon dioxide[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 9(1): 81-90.〕

王双明, 申艳军, 孙强, 等, 2022. “双碳”目标下煤炭开采扰动空间CO₂地下封存途径与技术难题探索[J]. 煤炭学报, 47(1): 45-60.〔WANG S M, SHEN Y J, SUN Q, et al., 2022. Underground CO₂ storage and technical problems in coal mining area under the “dual carbon” target[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 47(1): 45-60.〕

玄兆丹, 2022. 我国近20年课程领导力研究进展与未来走向: 基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 现代教育科学(4): 121-129.〔XUAN Z D, 2022. Curriculum leadership research in recent two decades of our country: Progress and trends: The visual analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. Modern Education Science(4): 121-129.〕

杨芳, 2010. 盐水层二氧化碳封存机理与地质模拟[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学（北京）.〔YANG F, 2010. Mechanisms and geological modeling of CO₂sequestration in saline aquifers[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing).〕

杨子江, 石宇, 彭俊岚, 等, 2024. CO₂地质封存过程的取热-储能利用理论与技术进展[J]. 成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）, 51(6): 913-926.〔YANG Z J, SHI Y, PENG J L, et al., 2024. Advances in theory and technology of heat extraction and energy storage utilization in CO₂ geological storage processes[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 51(6): 913-926.〕

袁汝华, 王雅平, 贾葵源, 2024. 基于CiteSpace的国内外企业绿色技术创新研究可视分析[J]. 资源与产业, 26(2): 151-163.〔YUAN R H, WANG Y P, JIA K Y, 2024. Visual analysis of green technical innovation of global enterprises based on CiteSpace[J]. Resources & Industries, 26(2): 151-163.〕

张雷, 白震宇, 2022. 思政课程与课程思政关系研究的热点、演进与趋势: 基于CiteSpace知识图谱的分析[J]. 绵阳师范学院学报, 41(10): 18-26.〔ZHANG L, BAI Z Y, 2022. The focus, evolution and trend of research on the relationship between ideological and political courses and curriculum-based ideological and political education: Analysis based on CiteSpace knowledge graph[J]. Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College, 41(10): 18-26.〕

张妮, 王婧媛, 2017. 基于CiteSpace的知识图谱国内外研究热点分析与趋势展望[J]. 情报资料工作(3): 33-41.〔ZHANG N, WANG J Y, 2017. Knowledge mapping based on CiteSpace: Research hotspots analysis at home and abroad and situation prospects[J]. Information and Documentation Services(3): 35-43.〕

张婉丽, 洪伟斌, 黄皓炫, 等, 2023. 基于CiteSpace的中外煤矿智能化研究可视化分析[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 43(9): 27-33.〔ZHANG W L, HONG W B, HUANG H X, et al., 2023. Visual analysis based on CiteSpace for coal mine intelligence research at home and abroad[J]. Mining Research and Development, 43(9): 27-33.〕

朱俊奇, 吕杨, 杨力, 等, 2019. 1983—2019 煤矿安全研究现状与热点前沿可视化分析: 基于WOS核心合集数据库的CiteSpace图谱呈现[J]. 煤炭经济研究, 39(11): 39-47.〔ZHU J Q, LU Y, YANG L, et al., 2019. Coal mine safety research status and hot spot frontal visualization analysis in 1983-2019 CiteSpace representation based on WOS core collection database[J]. Coal Economic Research, 39(11): 39-47.〕

朱希安, 汪毓铎, 2011. 国内外CO₂运移监测技术和方法研究新进展[J]. 中国煤层气, 8(5): 3-7.〔ZHU X A, WANG Y D, 2011. The new progress on movement monitoring technique and method research of CO₂in domestic and abroad[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 8(5): 3-7.〕

AJAYI T, GOMESJ S, BERA A, 2019. A review of CO₂ storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches[J]. Petroleum Science, 16(5): 1028-1063.

AKBARABADI M, PIRI M, 2013. Relative permeability hysteresis and capillary trapping characteristics of supercritical CO₂/brine systems: An experimental study at reservoir conditions[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 52: 190-206.

AMINU M D, NABAVI S A, ROCHELLE C A, et al., 2017.A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage[J]. Applied Energy, 208: 1389-1419.

CHEN L, 2021. Environmental cost of sustainable development and climate change: Can SAARC shift some liability with renewable energy and efficiency[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research(2): 1-13.

HANSON E, NWAKIL E C, HAMMED V O, 2025. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies: Evaluating the effectiveness of advanced CCUS solutions for reducing CO₂ emissions[J].Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, 18: 100381.

HUPPERT H E, NEUFELD J A, 2014. The fluid mechanics of carbon dioxide sequestration[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 46: 255-272.

LI L, ZHAO N, WEI W, et al., 2013. A review of research progress on CO₂ capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences[J]. Fuel, 108: 112-130.

MATTER J M,STUTE M, SNAEBJORNSDOTTIR S O, et al., 2016. Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Science, 352: 1312-1314.

MIDDLETON R S, CAREY J W, CURRIER R P, 2015. Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO₂[J]. Applied Energy, 147: 500-509.

MUKHERJEE M, MISRA S, 2018. A review of experimental research on enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) recovery via CO₂ sequestration[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 179: 392-410.

OOSTROM M, WHITE M D, PORSE S L,et al., 2016. Comparison of relative permeability-saturation-capillary pressure models for simulation of reservoir CO₂injection[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 45: 70-85.

SANNA A, UIBU M, CARAMANNA G, et al., 2014. A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO₂[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 43(23): 8049-8080.

SCHMIDT-HATTENBERGER C,BERGMAN N P,LABITZKE T,et al., 2014. CO₂ migration monitoring by means of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT): Review on five years of operation of a permanent ERT system at the Ketzin Pilot Site[J]. Energy Procedia, 63(1): 4366-4373.

SNAEBJORNSDOTTIR S O, SIGFUSSON B, MARIENI C, et al., 2020. Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(2): 90-102.

STEPANEK J, MINKLEY W, SYBLIK J, et al., 2024. Thermodynamic analysis of compressed CO₂ energy storage in salt caverns with gravel stabilization[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 82: 1-18.

[1]	杨宁, 刘钢, 黄晨, 王颖, 杜辉, 张永成. 面向生态文明建设的城市韧性基础设施研究知识图谱与趋势分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(6): 48-61.
[2]	申伟宁, 谷雨琪, 戴娟娟. 中国三大城市群大气环境政策的合作网络研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(5): 13-25.
[3]	张金锁, 刘金华. 高质量发展目标下中国流域生态保护研究可视化分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(5): 26-36.
[4]	李慧敏, 代博鑫, 李锋, 等. 国内外“水-能源-粮食”纽带关系研究的发展现状与热点分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(3): 48-61.
[5]	袁汝华, 王雅平, 贾葵源. 基于CiteSpace的国内外企业绿色技术创新研究可视分析 [J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(2): 151-163.
[6]	高新伟，窦倩倩. 基于文献计量的国内外环境税比较研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(5): 65-77.
[7]	田洪涛，李业锦，赵秀云，等. 基于CiteSpace分析的我国资源城市转型研究知识图谱[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(2): 1-11.
[8]	赵怡然，高湘昀. 战略性钴资源研究态势分析及展望——基于科学文献计量视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(1): 41-51.
[9]	汪群，钱慧丽. 基于可视化分析的河长制研究热点综述[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(5): 52-62.
[10]	许振亮，刘喜美，刘冬潇. 科学知识图谱视角下国际稀土研究态势分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2016, 18(5): 62-.
[11]	孙传谆, 郑新奇, 吕利娜. 基于共词分析的元胞自动机理论在土地研究领域中的可视化分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(5): 185-191.

基于知识图谱的CO₂地质封存研究脉络、演进和趋势分析

Research Context, Evolution and Trend of Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage Based on Knowledge Graphs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics