资源与产业 ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 89-94.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20151126.011

• 资源评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

澳中两国矿产资源评估准则的比较研究

杨铮*   

  1. (中国地质大学 地球科学与资源学院,北京 100083)
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-06 修回日期:2015-09-16 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-20

COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALASIAN AND CHINESE MINERAL RESOURCE EVALUATION CODES

YANG Zheng*   

  1. (School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)
  • Received:2015-07-06 Revised:2015-09-16 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-20

摘要: 矿产资源评估准则在涉及矿资产的经济活动中扮演着极其重要的角色。文章旨在通过对世界上最早的矿产资源评估准则——澳大利亚VALMIN准则和中国的矿业权评估准则(CMVS)的比较研究,阐释两个准则的基本概念和主要定义的异同,从准则的整体要求、应用和技术规范3个大的方面,编制原则、制定机构、适用领域、应用范围、评估者资质、评估途径、参数和结果等8个小点分析两者之间的区别并发现值得互相借鉴之处,并给出完善两个准则的具体建议。同时,通过对这些差异的进一步分析,探讨这些差异的形成原因和相应的结论,也为中国乃至全球矿产资源评估准则的制定和改进提供参考。

关键词: CMVS, VALMIN, 矿资产评估, 准则, 矿业权评估

Abstract: Mineral resource evaluation code plays a key role in mineral asset transactions. This paper compares Australasian VALMIN, the world’s earliest code, and CMVS in their concepts and definition,analyses their difference from general requirements, application and technical code in principal, organization, field, application limit, evaluator’s qualification, evaluation path, parameters and results, and gives suggestions optimizing the two codes. This paper also discusses the causes of difference and provides references for China and the world’s mineral resource evaluation code.

Key words: CMVS, VALMIN, mineral resource valuation, standard, mining rights valuation