FDI水平溢出、自主研发对工业产出的影响——基于粤港澳大湾区面板数据的多维门槛效应检验

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20211221.012

资源与产业 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 108-118.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20211221.012

FDI水平溢出、自主研发对工业产出的影响——基于粤港澳大湾区面板数据的多维门槛效应检验

周璇¹，谭建华¹，郭丕斌 ²，杜苇¹

（1. 中北大学经济与管理学院，山西太原 030051；
2. 太原学院经济系，山西太原 030032）

收稿日期:2021-06-24 修回日期:2021-09-15 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-04-23
通讯作者: 谭建华，硕士生，主要从事国际贸易与投资风险管理研究。836972052@qq.com
作者简介:周璇，博士、副教授，主要从事区域经济与环境经济研究。E-mail：nuceducn0351@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71874119）；山西省哲学社会科学规划课题（2021YY158，2021YJ028）。

IMPACTS OF FDI OVERFLOWING, INDEPENDENT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ON INDUSTRIAL OUTPUTS BASED ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL THRESHOLD EFFECTS OF GUANGDONG-HONGKONG-MACAO GREATER BAY AREA PANEL DATA

ZHOU Xuan ¹, TAN Jianhuan¹, GUO Pibin ², DU Wei ¹

（1. School of Economics and Management, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China;
2. Department of Economics, Taiyuan College, Taiyuan 030032, China）

Received:2021-06-24 Revised:2021-09-15 Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-23
Contact: TAN Jianhuan
About author:E-mail：nuceducn0351@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 充分利用技术溢出效应对激发粤港澳大湾区工业增长新动能具有重要意义。利用2008—2018年湾区工业指标数据，基于知识溢出模型和门槛效应模型，分析FDI水平溢出、自主研发及对湾区工业产出的影响及其门槛特征，并进一步探讨自主研发与水平溢出交互效应对产出增长的影响。研究结果表明：自主研发和FDI对人力资本流动、示范模仿、竞争的促进作用与工业产出均呈正相关，而传统生产要素对产出增长的贡献较弱；交互效应方面，自主研发对示范模仿效应表现出正向协同效应，对人力资本流动效应表现出负向调节作用；门槛特征方面，示范模仿效应、竞争效应为单一门槛，分阶段影响系数分别为0.257、0.240和1.369、0.366，自主研发为双重门槛，分阶段影响系数分别为0.278、0.247、0.264。在跨越门槛值后，竞争效应对产出增长的贡献率下降明显，示范模仿效应和自主研发则发生轻微调整。在经济高质量发展的背景下，应进一步鼓励人力资本投入和企业自主研发，提升外资规模和质量。

关键词: 粤港澳大湾区, 工业经济, 技术溢出效应, 门槛回归, 自主研发

Abstract: Use of technical overflowing is key to Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area's industrial growth. This paper uses Bay's 2008 to 2018 industrial data, uses knowledge overflowing model and threshold effect model to analyze FDI overflowing, independent research & development and impacts of independent research & development on Bay's industrial outputs and its threshold, and studies the impacts of interactive independent research & development and technical overflowing on outputs. Independent research and development is positively correlated with human capital flowing, demonstrating mimic, competitiveness, but the traditional production elements have a less contribution to the production growth. Regarding interactive effect, independent research & development shows a positive co-integrated effect on demonstrating mimic, negative on human capital flowing. As for threshold, demonstrating mimic effect and competition effect have single threshold with staged impacting coefficients at 0.257 and 0.240 &1.369 and 0.366, while independent research & development has dual threshold at 0.278, 0.247 and 0.264. Over the threshold values, competition effect exerts a less contribution to output growth, while demonstrating mimic effect and independent research & development slightly adjust the output growth. A quality economic development should encourage human capital inputs and independent research & development, and increase foreign capital size and quality.

Key words: Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area, industrial economy, technical overflowing effect, threshold regression, independent research &, development

中图分类号:

F270

周璇, 谭建华, 郭丕斌, 等. FDI水平溢出、自主研发对工业产出的影响——基于粤港澳大湾区面板数据的多维门槛效应检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 108-118.

ZHOU Xuan, TAN Jianhuan, GUO Pibin, et al. IMPACTS OF FDI OVERFLOWING, INDEPENDENT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ON INDUSTRIAL OUTPUTS BASED ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL THRESHOLD EFFECTS OF GUANGDONG-HONGKONG-MACAO GREATER BAY AREA PANEL DATA[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(2): 108-118.

参考文献

陈昱婧，2020. FDI技术溢出、吸收能力对制造业产出的影响[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学. 〔CHEN Y J, 2020. The impact of FDI technology spillover and absorptive capacity on manufacturing output[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University.〕
付华英，2019. 外商直接投资、贸易开放与工业经济增长研究[J]. 工业技术经济，38(11): 123-129. 〔FU H Y, 2019. Research on foreign direct investment, trade openness and industrial economic growth[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 38(11): 123-129. 〕
傅元海，唐未兵，王展祥，2010. FDI溢出机制、技术进步路径与经济增长绩效[J]. 经济研究，45(6): 92-104. 〔FU Y H, TANG W B, WANG Z X, 2010. Mechanism of FDI spillover, path of technical progress and performance of economic growth[J]. Economic Research Journal, 45(6): 92-104. 〕
柯善咨，赵曜，2014. 产业结构、城市规模与中国城市生产率[J]. 经济研究，49(4): 76-88, 115. 〔KE S Z, ZHAO Y, 2014. Industrial structure, city size and urban productivity in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 49(4): 76-88, 115.〕
李斌，李倩，祁源，2016. FDI技术溢出对高技术产业技术进步的门槛效应研究: 基于吸收能力与金融发展视角的门限模型检验[J]. 国际商务(3): 74-84. 〔LI B, LI Q, QI Y, 2016. An analysis of the threshold effects of the FDI technology spillover on the technological progress in the high-tech industry[J]. International Business（3）: 74-84.〕
李坚青，2012. 外商直接投资对中国私营制造业的技术溢出分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学. 〔LI J Q, 2012. The analysis of technology spillover of FDI on Chinese private industry[D]. Changchun: Jilin University. 〕
刘晗，王燕，杨文举，2020. FDI能否推动长江经济带经济增长: 基于多维门槛效应的实证检验[J]. 经济理论与经济管理(4): 100-112. 〔LIU H, WANG Y, YANG W J, 2020. Can FDI promote economic growth in the Yangtze river economic belt: based on the empirical test of multidimensional threshold effect[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management(4): 100-112.〕
刘胜，顾乃华，2015. 行政垄断、生产性服务业集聚与城市工业污染: 来自260个地级及以上城市的经验证据[J]. 财经研究，41(11): 95-107. 〔LIU S, GU N H, 2015. Administrative monopoly, agglomeration of producer services and urban industrial pollution: empirical evidence from 260 cities at the prefecture level or above[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 41(11): 95-107.〕
王小鲁，樊纲，2000. 中国经济增长的可持续性: 跨世纪的回顾与展望前言[C]//中国经济改革研究基金会国民经济研究所. 中国经济增长的可持续性: 跨世纪的回顾与展望. 北京: 经济科学出版社: 11-13.
许宪春，郑学工，2016. 改革研发支出核算方法更好地反映创新驱动作用[J]. 国家行政学院学报(5): 4-12，141. 〔XU X C, ZHENG X G, 2016. Reform' research and development' expenditure accounting and better reflect the role of innovative motivation[J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance(5): 4-12, 141.〕
谢兰云，2010. 中国省份研究与开发(R&D)指数及其存量的计算[J]. 西安财经学院学报，23(4): 65-71. 〔XIE L Y, 2010. Calculating provincial R＆D index and R＆D stock in China[J]. Journal of University of Finance and Economics, 23(4): 65-71.〕
杨丽彬，李虹含，蔡东方，2016. 外商直接投资技术溢出渠道差异性研究: 基于2002—2014年中国数据的实证检验[J]. 科技进步与对策，33(4): 12-17. 〔YANG L B, LI H H, CAI D F, 2016. A study on channel differences of FDI technology spillover in China: based on the data of 2002-2014 in China[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 33(4): 12-17.〕
朱智洺，马哲，2021. 国际技术溢出对我国绿色技术创新的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业，23(2): 48-60. 〔ZHU Z M, MA Z, 2021. Impacts of global technical overflow on China's green technical innovation[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(2): 48-60.〕
ARROW K J, 1962. The economics implication of learning by doing[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3): 155-173.
DAWID H, ZOU B, 2017. Foreign direct investment with endogenous technology choice[J]. Pacific Economic Review, 22(1): 3-22.
DENG Z L, FALVEY R, BLAKE A, 2012. Trading market access for technology？: tax incentives, foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in China[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(5): 675-690.
EBGHAEI F, WIGLEY A A, 2018. The role of exports in the transmission of horizontal and vertical spillovers of foreign direct investment: the case of Turkish manufacturing industry[J]. The Developing Economies, 56(1): 35-50.
FATIMA S T, KHAN A Q, 2018. Foreign direct investment and its impact on real wages: evidence from Turkish micro-level data[J]. International Review of Applied Economics, 32(6): 732-749.
GERSL A, RUBENE I, ZUMER T, 2007. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: updated evidence from Central and Eastern Europe[R]. Prague: Czech National Bank.
GOTO A, SUZUKI K, 1989. R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4): 555-564.
GRILICHES Z, LICHTENBERG F R, 1984. R&D and productivity growth at the industry level: is there still a relationship？[M]//GRILICHES Z. R&D, patents, and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 465-502.
GRILICHES Z, 1992. The search for R&D spillovers[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(0Suppl): S29-47.
HANSEN B E, 1999. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2): 345-368.
HUANG J B, CAI X C, HUANG S, et al, 2019. Technological factors and total factor productivity in China: evidence based on a panel threshold model[J]. China Economic Review, 54: 271-285.
JONES L E, MANUELLI R, 1990. A convex model of equilibrium growth: theory and policy implications[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5)Part1: 1008-1038.
LIANG F H, 2017. Does foreign direct investment improve the productivity of domestic firms？: technology spillovers, industry linkages, and firm capabilities[J]. Research Policy, 46(1): 138-159.
LUCAS R E, 1988. On the mechanics of economic development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3-42.
ROMER P M, 1990. Endogenous technological change[J[. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5)Part2: S71-S102.
ROMER P M, 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002-1037.
SCHLEIMINGER G, 1961. The dollar problem: a reappraisal (essays in international finance, No. 35, November 1960)[J]. FinanzArchiv／Public Finance Analysis, 21(3): 769-771.
SHESHINSKI E, 1967. Tests of the "learning by doing" hypothesis[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(4): 568-578.
SALIM A, RAZAVI M R, AFSHARI-MOFRAD M, 2017. Foreign direct investment and technology spillover in Iran: the role of technological capabilities of subsidiaries[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122(1): 207-214.
TZENG C H, 2018. How domestic firms absorb spillovers: a routine-based model of absorptive capacity view[J]. Management and Organization Review, 14(3): 543-576.
WANG Y D, NING L T, LI J, et al, 2016. Foreign direct investment spillovers and the geography of innovation in Chinese regions: the role of regional industrial specialization and diversity[J]. Regional Studies, 50(5): 805-822.
YUDAEVA K, KOZLOV K, MELENTIEVA N, et al, 2003. Does foreign ownership matter？: the Russian experience[J]. Economics of Transition, 11(3): 383-409.

[1]	宋敏, 刘彬. 粤港澳大湾区外商直接投资对制造业集聚的空间溢出效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 90-97.
[2]	陈昕, 刘媛华, 石翠翠. 基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解法的区域经济发展差异研究——从环境规制角度分析#br#[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 63-70.

FDI水平溢出、自主研发对工业产出的影响——基于粤港澳大湾区面板数据的多维门槛效应检验

IMPACTS OF FDI OVERFLOWING, INDEPENDENT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ON INDUSTRIAL OUTPUTS BASED ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL THRESHOLD EFFECTS OF GUANGDONG-HONGKONG-MACAO GREATER BAY AREA PANEL DATA

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics