环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20221101.001

资源与产业 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 54-63.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20221101.001

环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析

韦庆明¹，赵欣欣¹，冯馨²，张苗苗¹

（1.河海大学商学院，江苏常州 213022；2.西交利物浦大学国际商学院，江苏苏州 215123）

收稿日期:2021-11-10 修回日期:2022-04-22 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-02-21
通讯作者: 赵欣欣，硕士研究生，主要从事社会经济统计研究。E-mail：1774163964@qq.com
作者简介:韦庆明，博士、副教授，主要从事社会经济统计研究。E-mail：25298660@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目（71702044）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（17YJC630167）；河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项项目（B200202038）

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, GREEN INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE UPGRADING: SPATIAL DUBIN MODEL ANALYSIS BASED ON PROVINCIAL PANEL DATA

WEI Qingming¹, ZHAO Xinxin¹, FENG Xin², ZHANG Miaomiao¹

(1.Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China;2.International Business School, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China)

Received:2021-11-10 Revised:2022-04-22 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-02-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在中国着力实现绿色经济转型和促进产业结构升级的时代背景下，如何兼顾环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构三者之间的关系，以获取环境保护、绿色技术创新、产业结构升级“三重红利”，已成为当今我国学术界研究的重要课题之一。本文基于2003—2019年中国30个省、自治区、直辖市的省级面板数据，采用空间杜宾模型，在3种权重矩阵下比较环境规制、绿色创新对产业结构升级的影响，测算出主要解释变量的直接效应、间接效应、总效应，并对我国东部、中部、西部地区的环境规制和绿色创新是否推动产业结构升级进行了实证检验。研究结果表明：1）整体上环境规制与绿色创新在3种空间权重矩阵下均具有促进产业结构合理化和产业结构高级化的作用，其中环境规制强度在地理距离矩阵下每增加1%，产业结构高级化水平将提高0 065%；绿色创新对产业结构高级化的影响在地理距离矩阵下表现最为显著，影响系数达到0 066。2）从溢出效应来看，环境规制在地理距离矩阵下能够直接促进地区产业结构高级化；绿色创新则通过空间溢出效应倒逼推动地区产业结构高级化。3）在区域异质性方面，环境规制对产业结构高级化的推动作用在西部地区表现最为突出，在东部、中部地区作用并不明显；绿色创新对产业结构高级化的正向驱动作用则呈现出西部大于中部、中部大于东部的发展趋势。我国各地区应努力提升企业的绿色创新能力与城镇化水平，积极推动高污染企业的产业转型，并遵循因地制宜的原则，通过提高环境规制强度，制定和实施地区差异化政策，以避免“污染避难所效应”式的产业转移，这对于促进我国产业结构升级，实现经济高质量绿色发展具有非常重要的现实意义。

关键词:

text-align:left, "> 产业结构升级；环境规制；绿色创新；空间杜宾模型

Abstract:

China is focusing on green economic transformation and industrial structure upgrading, how to pay attention to the relationship among environmental regulation, green innovation and industrial structure, in order to obtain the triple bonus of environmental protection, green technological innovation and industrial structure upgrading, has become one of the important issues in Chinese academic circle nowadays. This paper, based on 2003 to 2019 provincial panel data of China’s 30 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, uses spatial Dubin model to compare the impacts of environmental regulation and green innovation on industrial structure upgrading under three weight matrixes, and to measure the direct, indirect and gross effects of the main explanatory variables, and empirically tests whether environmental regulation and green innovation promote industrial structure upgrading in eastern, central and western regions of China. Generally, environmental regulation and green innovation promote rationalization and upgrading of industrial structure under three spatial weight matrixes, increase by 1% of environmental regulation intensity at geographical distance matrix will lead to an increase by 0 065% in upgrading of industrial structure. The influence of green innovation on the upgrading of industrial structure is most significant in the geographical distance matrix, with the influence coefficient reaching 0 066. Viewing from overflowing effect, upgrading of industrial structure can be directly contributed by environmental regulation at geographic distance matrix, and indirectly by green innovation through spatial overflowing effect. In regional heterogeneity, environmental regulation promotes the upgrading of industrial structure most in the western, but little in the central and eastern, green innovation plays a positive role in a developing trend of in western more than central and in central more than eastern. It concludes China shall strive to improve green innovative abilities and urbanization, and promote industrial transformation of high pollution enterprises, increase environmental regulation intensity and make differentiated regional policies to prevent industrial transfer of pollution asylum effect, which is of significance in boosting China’s industrial structure upgrading and reaching a quality and green economic development.

Key words: industrial structure upgrading, environmental regulation, green innovation, spatial Dubin model

中图分类号:

韦庆明, 赵欣欣, 冯馨, 张苗苗. 环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 54-63.

WEI Qingming, ZHAO Xinxin, FENG Xin, ZHANG Miaomiao.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, GREEN INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE UPGRADING: SPATIAL DUBIN MODEL ANALYSIS BASED ON PROVINCIAL PANEL DATA [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(6): 54-63.

参考文献

顾晓燕, 朱玮玮, 符斌, 2020. 空间视角下知识产权保护、技术创新与产业结构升级[J]. 经济问题(11): 68-75.〔GU X Y, ZHU W W, FU B, 2020. Intellectual property protection, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrading: a spatial perspective[J]. On Economic Problems(11): 68-75.〕

郭然, 原毅军, 2020. 环境规制、研发补贴与产业结构升级[J]. 科学学研究, 38(12): 2140-2149.〔GUO R, YUAN Y J. 2020. Environmental regulation, R&D subsidy and industrial structure upgrading[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 38(12): 2140-2149.〕

胡晖, 朱钰琦, 方德斌, 等, 2020. 环境规制影响产业结构的路径与机制: 基于湘鄂赣皖地区城市的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 29(12): 2620-2635.〔HU H, ZHU Y Q, FANG D B, et al, 2020. The path and mechanism of environmental regulation affecting industrial structure: an empirical study of cities in Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi and Anhui[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 29(12): 2620-2635.〕

黄清煌, 高明, 2018. 环境规制对经济绩效影响的实证检验[J]. 统计与决策(2): 113-117.〔HUANG Q H, GAO M, 2018. Empirical estimation of environmental regulations’ influence on economic performance[J]. Statistics & Decision(2): 113-117.〕

李江, 刘春学, 蒋睿, 2021. 环境规制对云南省产业结构升级的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 23(3): 21-28.〔LI J, LIU C X, JIANG R, 2021. Impact of environmental regulations on upgrading industrial structure in Yunnan province[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(3): 21-28.〕

黎文靖, 郑曼妮, 2016. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?: 宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 51(4): 60-73.〔LI W J, ZHENG M N, 2016. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation?: impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 51(4): 60-73.〕

刘玉凤, 高良谋, 2020. 异质性环境规制、地方保护与产业结构升级: 空间效应视角[J]. 中国软科学(9): 84-99.〔LIU Y F, GAO L M, 2020. Heterogeneous environmental regulation, local protection and industrial structure upgrading: a spatial effect perspective[J]. China Soft Science(9): 84-99.〕

逯进, 李婷婷, 2021. 产业结构升级、技术创新与绿色全要素生产率: 基于异质性视角的研究[J]. 中国人口科学(4): 86-97, 128.〔LU J, LI T T, 2021. Industrial structure, technological innovation and green total factor productivity: research in the perspective of heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science(4): 86-97, 128.〕

毛建辉, 管超, 2020. 环境规制抑制产业结构升级吗?: 基于政府行为的非线性门槛模型分析[J]. 财贸研究, 31(3): 29-42.〔MAO J H, GUAN C, 2020. Does environmental regulation inhibit industrial structure upgrading?: analysis of nonlinear threshold model based on government behavior[J]. Finance and Trade Research, 31(3): 29-42.〕

欧阳艳艳, 黄新飞, 钟林明, 2020. 企业对外直接投资对母国环境污染的影响: 本地效应与空间溢出[J]. 中国工业经济(2): 98-121.〔OUYANG Y Y, HUANG X F, ZHONG L M, 2020. The impact of outward foreign direct investment on environmental pollution in home country: local and spatial spillover effects[J]. China Industrial Economics(2): 98-121.〕

钱丽, 王文平, 肖仁桥, 2018. 共享投入关联视角下中国区域工业企业绿色创新效率差异研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 28(5): 27-39.〔QIAN L, WANG W P, XIAO R Q, 2018. Research on the regional disparities of China’s industrial enterprises green innovation efficiency from the perspective of shared inputs[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(5): 27-39.〕

生态环境部, 2021. 2020中国生态环境状况公报[EB/OL]. (2021-5-26）[2021-10-8]. https://www. mee. gov. cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/202105/P020210526572756184785. pdf. ﹝Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2021. 2020 China ecological and environmental status bulletin[EB/OL]. (2021-5-26)[2021-10-8].https://www.mee.gov. cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/202105/P020210526572756184785.pdf.〕

孙晓华, 刘小玲, 翟钰, 2017. 地区产业结构优度的测算及应用[J]. 统计研究, 34(12): 48-62.〔SUN X H, LIU X L, ZHAI Y, 2017. The measurement and application of optimized degree of regional industrial structure[J]. Statistical Research, 34(12): 48-62.〕

汪发元, 何智励, 2022. 环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级[J]. 统计与决策, 38(1): 73-76.

徐盈之, 张瑞婕, 孙文远, 2021. 绿色技术创新、要素市场扭曲与产业结构升级[J]. 研究与发展管理, 33(6): 75-86.〔XU Y Z, ZHANG R J, SUN W Y, 2021. Green technology innovation, factor market distortion and industrial structure upgrading[J]. R&D Management, 33(6): 75-86.〕

杨恺钧, 蔡嘉晋, 2021. FDI 质量、环境规制与产业结构升级的关系: 基于 2008—2018 年长江经济带 11 省市的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 23(3): 12-20.〔YANG K J, CAI J J, 2021. FDI quality, environmental regulation and industrial structure upgrading based on 2008—2018 panel data of Yangtze river economic zone[J]. Resources ＆ Industries, 23(3): 12-20.〕

于斌斌, 2015. 产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应: 基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J]. 中国工业经济(12): 83-98.〔YU B B, 2015. Economic growth effects of industrial restructuring and productivity improvement: analysis of dynamic spatial panel model with Chinese city data[J]. China Industrial Economics(12): 83-98.〕

余泳泽, 孙鹏博, 宣烨, 2020. 地方政府环境目标约束是否影响了产业转型升级?[J]. 经济研究, 55(8): 57-72.〔YU Y Z, SUN P B, XUAN Y, 2020. Do constraints on local governments’ environmental targets affect industrial transformation and upgrading?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 55(8): 57-72.〕

DU K, CHEN Y Y, YAO X, 2021. Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: the road to the green transformation of Chinese cities[J]. Energy Economics, 98. DOI: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2021. 105247.

FU S, MA Z, NI B, et al, 2021. Research on the spatial differences of pollution-intensive industry transfer under the environmental regulation in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 12. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ecolind. 2021. 107921.

HUANG M, DING R J, XIN C H, 2021. Impact of technological innovation and industrial-structure upgrades on ecological efficiency in China in terms of spatial spillover and the threshold effect[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 17(4): 852-865.

SHAO W, YIN Y F, BAI X, et al, 2021. Analysis of the upgrading effect of the industrial structure of environmental regulation: evidence from 113 cities in China[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. DOI: 10. 3389/fenvs. 2021. 692478.

SONG Y, ZHANG X, ZHANG M, 2021. The influence of environmental regulation on industrial structure upgrading: based on the strategic interaction behavior of environmental regulation among local governments[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 170. DOI: 10. 1016/j. techfore. 2021. 120930.

YU X, WANG P, 2021. Economic effects analysis of environmental regulation policy in the process of industrial structure upgrading: evidence from Chinese provincial panel data[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 753. DOI: 10. 1016/j. scitotenv. 2020. 142004.

WU N, LIU Z K, 2021. Higher education development, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrade[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162: 120400.

[1]	潘海英, 陈玲, 任佳佳. 数字经济发展的碳减排效应研究——兼论异质性环境规制的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(6): 1-14.
[2]	田贵良, 梁岚, 吴正, 等. 我国自然资源管理制度变迁与资产产权制度优化[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 1-13.

环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, GREEN INNOVATION AND INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE UPGRADING: SPATIAL DUBIN MODEL ANALYSIS BASED ON PROVINCIAL PANEL DATA

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics