沉淀性冗余资源对我国制造业企业技术创新绩效的影响研究

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230717.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 制造业是实体经济的重要基础,通过制造业企业开展技术创新以实现其高质量发展,是我国制造业由大变强的关键所在,而创新资源投入又是制造业企业开展技术创新活动的基础与核心要素。为了探究沉淀性冗余资源对我国制造业企业技术创新绩效的影响作用,本文以2013—2021年我国沪深股市A股制造业上市公司为研究样本,采用固定效应模型研究了沉淀性冗余资源、股权集中度与制造业企业技术创新绩效之间的关系,同时还研究产权异质性在沉淀性冗余资源与制造业企业技术创新绩效之间发挥的影响作用。研究结果表明:1)沉淀性冗余资源与制造业企业技术创新绩效之间呈现出倒“U”型关系,即沉淀性冗余资源在达到最优临界值之前能够提高制造业企业的技术创新绩效,但沉淀性冗余资源一旦超过最优临界值之后则会降低制造业企业的技术创新绩效；2)股权集中度能够强化沉淀性冗余资源与制造业企业技术创新绩效之间的倒“U”型关系,既可以增强适度的沉淀性冗余资源对制造业企业技术创新绩效的正向促进作用,也会增强过度的沉淀性冗余资源对制造业企业技术创新绩效的负向抑制作用；3)在我国不同产权性质的制造业企业中,沉淀性冗余资源对制造业企业技术创新绩效的影响作用存在着明显差异。在非国有制造业企业中沉淀性冗余资源与技术创新绩效之间存在的倒“U”型关系,要比在国有制造业企业中沉淀性冗余资源与技术创新绩效之间存在的倒“U”型关系更为显著。

关键词: 沉淀性冗余资源, 技术创新绩效 , 股权集中度, 制造业企业

Abstract: Manufacturing is a key basis for real economy, manufacturing enterprises technical innovation can reach a quality economic development and acts as a unique factor for China's manufacturing to be stronger. Innovative resource inputs are a critical factor for manufacturing enterprises to conduct technical innovation. This paper, for a purpose of studying impacts of depositional redundant resources on technical innovative performance of China's manufacturing enterprises, based on China's A-share manufacturing enterprises' 2013 to 2021 as research samples, uses fixed effect model to study their relationship among depositional redundant resources, ownership concentration and manufacturing enterprises' technical innovative performance, and to analyze the impacts of ownership heterogeneity on the relationship between depositional redundant resources and manufacturing enterprises' technical innovative performance. Depositional redundant resources shows a upside down “U-shaped” relation with technical innovative performance, meaning that depositional redundant resources can promote the technical innovative performance before reaching the premium critical value, but depress it after. This upside down “U-shaped” relation can be enhanced by ownership concentration. It can enhance the positive promoting effect of moderate depositional redundant resources on the technological innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises, and also enhance the negative inhibitory effect of excessive depositional redundant resources on the technological innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises. Impacts of depositional redundant resources on technical innovative performance vary with manufacturing enterprises' property rights in China with such a upside down “U-shaped” relation between depositional redundant resources and technical innovative performance in private enterprises more outstanding than in state-owned enterprises.

Key words: depositional redundant resources, technical innovative performance, ownership concentration, manufacturing enterprises

中图分类号:

F425

许纪校, 陆倩倩. 沉淀性冗余资源对我国制造业企业技术创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 116-126.

XU Jixiao, LU Qianqian. IMPACTS OF DEPOSITIONAL REDUNDANT RESOURCES ON TECHNICAL INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE OF CHINA'S MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES[J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(4): 116-126.

参考文献

柏群, 杨云, 2020. 组织冗余资源对绿色创新绩效的影响: 基于社会责任的中介作用[J]. 财经科学(12): 96-106.〔BAI Q, YANG Y, 2020. Research on the influence of organizational redundant resources on green innovation performance: based on the mediating role of social responsibility[J]. Finance & Economics(12): 96-106.〕

陈爽英, 杨晨秀, 井润田, 2017. 已吸收冗余、政治关系强度与研发投资[J]. 科研管理, 38(4): 46-53.〔CHEN S Y, YANG C X, JING R T, 2017. Absorbed slack, political ties strength and R&D in investment[J]. Science Research Management, 38(4): 46-53. 〕

陈欣远, 刘亚婷, 2022. 上市公司股权结构特征对企业社会责任影响的实证研究: 基于两权分离度的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 24(2): 155-166. 〔CHEN X Y, LIU Y T, 2022. Empirical study of listed companies' ownership structure on their social responsibility based on adjustment of separation of centralizing and balancing rights[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(2): 155-166.〕

曹霞, 张路蓬, 2017. 金融支持对技术创新的直接影响及空间溢出效应: 基于中国2003—2013年省际空间面板杜宾模型[J]. 管理评论, 29(7): 36-45.〔CAO X, ZHANG L P, 2017. The direct and spillover effects of financial support on technological innovation: research based on spatial panel Durbin model[J]. Management Review, 29(7): 36-45.〕

付龑钰, 彭正银, 2022. 冗余资源、联盟组合资源多样性与企业创新绩效的作用机制[J]. 中国科技论坛(1): 45-54.〔FU Y Y, PENG Z Y, 2022. Study on the mechanism of redundant resources, diversity of alliance portfolio resources and enterprise innovation performance[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China(1): 45-54.〕

葛菲, 贺小刚, 2017. 生产制造还是资本投资？中国工业企业国际创业资本的流向: 基于制度距离的解释[J]. 管理世界(11): 112-124, 157.

海本禄, 高庆祝, 尹西明, 等, 2020. 高管过度自信、研发投入跳跃与企业绩效: 来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 37(12): 136-145.〔HAI B L, GAO Q Z, YIN X M, et al, 2020. Executive overconfidence, R&D investment leap and firm performance: empirical evidence of Chinese listed firms[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 37(12): 136-145.〕

胡丹, 胡祎蝶, 梁樑, 2019. 冗余资源、财政压力与企业社会责任表现[J]. 华东经济管理, 33(6): 147-154.〔HU D, HU Y D, LIANG L, 2019. Organizational slack, financial pressure and corporate social responsibility performance[J]. East China Economic Management, 33(6): 147-154.〕

蒋丽芹, 李思卉, 2021. 沉淀冗余对企业创新绩效影响路径与作用机理研究: 基于长三角高科技企业的调研[J]. 软科学, 35(1): 95-100, 107.〔JIANG L Q, LI S H, 2021. Research on the influence path and mechanism of precipitation redundancy on enterprise innovation performance: based on the survey of high-tech companies in the Yangtze Ｒiver Delta Ｒegion[J]. Soft Science, 35(1): 95-100, 107. 〕

李健, 孙俊华, 2015. 独立董事介入对冗余资源经济效应的影响研究: 基于中国制造业企业上市公司的证据[J]. 现代管理科学(1): 48-50.

李晓翔, 刘春林, 2011. 冗余资源与企业绩效关系的情境研究: 兼谈冗余资源的数量变化[J]. 南开管理评论, 14(3): 4-14.〔LI X X, LIU C L, 2011. A contextual analysis on the relationship between slack and firms' performance: also on quantitative change of slack[J]. Nankai Business Review, 14(3): 4-14.〕

刘冠辰, 李元祯, 李萌, 2022. 私募股权投资、高管激励与企业创新绩效: 基于专利异质性视角的考察[J]. 经济管理, 44(8): 116-134. 〔LIU G C, LI Y Z, LI M, 2022. Private equity investment, executive incentive and enterprise innovation performance: on the perspective of patent heterogeneity[J]. Business and Management Journal, 44(8): 116-134.〕

刘振, 刘博, 2018. 股权集中度、管理者薪酬组合与自主创新投资[J]. 科研管理, 39(12): 95-102.〔LIU Z, LIU B, 2018. Ownership concentration, managerial compensation package and independent innovation investment[J]. Science Research Management,39(12): 95-102.〕

彭涛, 黄福广, 李娅, 2022. 国有风险投资的有效性: 认证与增值作用的比较研究[J]. 管理评论, 34(1): 26-36. 〔PENG T, HUANG F G, LI Y, 2022. The effectiveness of government-sponsored venture capital investors: a comparative study on certification and value-adding[J]. Management Review, 34(1): 26-36.〕

沈毅, 张清正, 2020. 研发补贴、股权集中度与企业研发投入[J]. 预测, 39(3): 42-49.〔SHEN Y, ZHANG Q Z, 2020. R&D subsidies, ownership concentration and firm R＆D investment[J]. Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management, 39(3): 42-49.〕

舒欢, 徐艺尹, 2022. 建筑企业社会责任对企业价值的影响机制分析: 冗余资源的调节效应[J]. 资源与产业, 24(2): 143-154.〔SHU H, XU Y Y, 2022 . Impacting mechanism of construction companies' social responsibilities on values based on adjustment of redundant resource[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(2): 143-154.〕

唐跃军, 左晶晶, 2014. 所有权性质、大股东治理与公司创新[J]. 金融研究(6): 177-192.〔TANG Y J, ZUO J J, 2014. Owner property, blockholders governance and corporate innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Research(6): 177-192.〕

王娟茹, 崔日晓, 张渝, 2021. 利益相关者环保压力、外部知识采用与绿色创新: 市场不确定性与冗余资源的调节效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 33(4): 15-27.〔WANG J R, CUI R X, ZHANG Y, 2021. Stakeholder environmental pressure, external knowledge adoption, green innovation: moderation effects of market uncertainty and slack resource[J]. R&D Management, 33(4): 15-27.〕

王宛秋, 马红君, 2020. 技术邻近性、研发投入与技术并购创新绩效: 基于企业生命周期的视角[J]. 管理评论, 32(6): 104-113.〔WANG W Q, MA H J, 2020. Technology proximity, R&D investment and innovation performance in technology mergers and acquisitions: from a perspective of corporate life cycle[J]. Management Review, 32(6): 104-113.〕

王钰, 胡海青, 2021. 冗余资源与创业导向: 制度环境的调节效应[J]. 科研管理, 42(8): 35-42.〔WANG Y, HU H Q, 2021. Slack resources and entrepreneurial orientation: the moderating effects of institutional environment[J]. Science Research Management, 42(8): 35-42.〕

王亚妮, 程新生, 2014. 环境不确定性、沉淀性冗余资源与企业创新: 基于中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科学学研究, 32(8): 1242-1250.〔WANG Y N, CHENG X S, 2014. Environmental uncertainty, absorbed slack and enterprise innovation: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises in manufacture industry[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 32(8): 1242-1250.〕

肖煜, 龚桂英, 2022a. 光伏企业研发投入强度与企业绩效的实证分析: 基于财务杠杆和股权性质的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 24(4): 21-29.〔XIAO Y, GONG G Y, 2022a. Research & development investment intensity and performance of photovoltaic companies adjusted by financial leverage and equity nature[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(4): 21-29.〕

肖煜, 陆雨杨, 2022b. 新能源行业政府补贴对企业创新绩效的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 24(3): 126-133. 〔XIAO Y, LU Y Y, 2022b. Impacts of governmental subsidiary on companies innovative performance in new energy sector[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(3): 126-133.〕

徐长生, 孔令文, 倪娟, 2018. A 股上市公司股权激励的创新激励效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 39(9): 93-101.〔XU C S, KONG L W, NI J, 2018. A research on the innovation incentive effect of equity incentives among A-share listed companies[J]. Science Research Management, 39(9): 93-101.〕

袁胜军, 李享, 吴俊, 2021. 知识搜索对企业创新质量的影响研究: 冗余资源和吸收能力的调节作用[J]. 审计与经济研究, 36(3): 99-106.〔YUAN S J, LI X, WU J, 2021. The influence of knowledge search on enterprise innovation quality: moderating effect of slack resources and absorptive capacity[J]. Journal of Audit & Economics, 36(3): 99-106.〕

张杰, 郑文平, 翟福昕, 2014. 竞争如何影响创新: 中国情景的新检验[J]. 中国工业经济(11): 56-68. 〔ZHANG J, ZHENG W P, ZHAI F X, 2014. How does competition affect innovation: evidence from china[J]. China Industrial Economics(11): 56-58.〕

张馨, 彭纪生, 涂海银, 2021. 企业创新资源配置结构对创新绩效的影响: 基于不同产权性质视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 38(8): 126-135.〔ZHANG X, PENG J S, TU H Y, 2021. Innovation research allocation structure and innovation performance: a perspective of ownership[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 38(8): 126-135.〕

赵树宽, 齐齐, 张金峰, 2017. 寻租视角下政府补助对企业创新的影响研究: 基于中国上市公司数据[J]. 华东经济管理, 31(12): 5-10, 2.〔ZHAO S K, QI Q, ZHANG J F, 2017. A study on the impact of government subsidies on corporate innovation from the perspective of rent-seeking: based on the data of China's listed companies[J]. East China Economic Management, 31(12): 5-10, 2.〕

CYERT R M, MARCH J G, 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

EDDLESTON K A, KELLERMANNS F W, SARATHY R, 2008. Resource configuration in family firms: linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 26-50.

HAANS R F J, PIETERS C, HE Z L, 2016. Thinking about U: theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7): 1177-1195.

ISLAM S M T, GHOSH R, KHATUN A, 2021. Slack resources, free cash flow and corporate social responsibility expenditure: evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(4): 533-551.

MALEN J, VAALER P M, 2017. Organizational slack, national institutions and innovation effort[J]. Journal of World Business, 52(6): 782-797.

VANACKER T, COLLEWAERT V, ZAHRA S A, 2017. Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional, context: evidence from privately held European firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6): 1305-1326.

[1]	张倩, 梅亚丽, 王奎. 环境保护税、技术创新与制造业企业绩效——有调节的中介效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 107-120.
[2]	陈欣远, 刘亚婷. 上市公司股权结构特征对企业社会责任影响的实证研究——基于两权分离度的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 155-166.