破解大气污染协同治理难题的产业协同路径研究——以长江三角洲地区为例

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230717.009

资源与产业 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 67-77.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230717.009

破解大气污染协同治理难题的产业协同路径研究——以长江三角洲地区为例

苗圃¹,张宁²,田泽³,丁晨辉³

(1.常州工业职业技术学院旅游与康养学院,江苏常州 213000；2.常州工业职业技术学院数字商务学院,江苏常州 213000；3.河海大学商学院,江苏南京 210000)

收稿日期:2022-11-09 修回日期:2023-03-31 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-09-13
通讯作者: 张宁,硕士、讲师,主要从事技术创新研究。E-mail:502332960@qq.com
作者简介:苗圃,硕士、讲师,主要从事技术创新研究。E-mail:miaopuxuzhou@126.com
基金资助:
江苏省社会科学基金项目(22EYC013)；江苏省科技计划专项资金(创新支撑计划软科学研究)项目〖JP3〗(BR2022017)；江苏省高校哲学社会科学项目(2020SJA1298)；常州大学高等职业教育研究院项目(CDGZ2021043)。

RESEARCH ON INDUSTRIAL COLLABORATIVE PATH TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION COLLABORATIVE CONTROL——TAKE THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA AS AN EXAMPLE

MIAO Pu¹, ZHANG Ning², TIAN Ze³, DING Chenhui³

(1.School of Tourism and Cuisine, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Industry Technology, Changzhou 213000, China;
2.School of Digital Business, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Industry Technology, Changzhou 213000, China;
3.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 210000, China)

Received:2022-11-09 Revised:2023-03-31 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-09-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当前,长江三角洲地区的大气污染协同治理模式面临着陷入集体行动困境和逐底竞争困境的难题,归根结底是个体利益与集体目标冲突、区域协同与区域竞争冲突所导致的结果。为了解决长三角地区大气污染协同治理难题,就必须要协调好大气污染治理与经济发展之间的关系,通过实现产业协同以达到二者之间的平衡。本文选取2014—2019年长江三角洲地区41个设区城市的样本数据,运用个体时间固定效应模型，从产业规模扩张、产业技术创新、产业结构优化3个方面综合论证产业协同路径在抑制大气污染、促进经济增长中发挥的实际作用,并对如何通过产业协同路径以破解大气污染协同治理难题进行深入研究。研究结果表明:1)产业规模扩张促进了大气污染排放,而产业技术创新与产业结构优化均能够抑制大气污染排放,且产业技术创新和产业结构优化可以抑制因产业规模扩张而产生的大气污染排放。此外,产业规模扩张、产业技术创新、产业结构优化均有利于促进国民经济的增长。2)产业规模扩张对二氧化硫排放的促进作用最强,其余依次是PM2.5排放、二氧化氮排放；产业技术创新对二氧化硫排放的抑制作用最强,其余依次是二氧化氮排放、PM25排放；产业结构优化同样对二氧化硫排放的抑制作用最强,其余依次是PM2.5排放、二氧化氮排放。3)产业结构优化对经济增长的促进作用最强,其余依次是产业规模扩张、产业技术创新。产业结构优化对经济增长发挥促进作用由强至弱的区域依次为浙南、苏北、安徽、核心；产业规模扩张对经济增长发挥促进作用由强至弱的区域依次为苏北、核心、浙南、安徽；产业技术创新对经济增长发挥促进作用由强至弱的区域依次为安徽、浙南、核心。

关键词: 大气污染, 产业协同路径, 产业规模扩张, 产业技术创新, 产业结构优化

Abstract: Atmospheric pollution collaborative harness in Yangtze River Delta is facing collective action plight and race to the bottom plight, mostly contributed by conflicts between single interests and collective objectives, regional collaboration and regional competition. Its solution must rely on the coordination between atmospheric pollution control and economic development, which can be balanced via industrial collaboration. This paper, by means of 41 cities' 2014 to 2019 data in Yangtze River Delta, uses single time fixed effect model to study the actual effects of industrial collaboration approaches in depressing atmospheric pollution and advancing economy from industrial scale expansion, industrial technical innovation and industrial structural optimization. Results show that industrial scale expansion boosts atmospheric pollution, but industrial technical innovation and industrial structural optimization work reversely, and industrial technology innovation and industrial structure optimization can suppress air pollution emissions caused by industrial scale expansion. The three factors can promote economy. Industrial scale expansion strongly boosts the sulfur dioxide emission, followed by PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide. Industrial technical innovation strongly depresses the sulfur dioxide emission, followed by nitrogen dioxide and PM2.5, so does industrial structural optimization on the sulfur dioxide, followed by PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide. Industrial structural optimization mostly enhances the economy, then industrial scale expansion and industrial technical innovation. The regions where industrial structure optimization plays a promoting role in economic growth from strong to weak are southern Zhejiang, northern Jiangsu, Anhui, and core. The regions in which industrial scale expansion plays a promoting role in economic growth from strong to weak are northern Jiangsu, core, southern Zhejiang and Anhui. The regions where industrial technology innovation plays a promoting role in economic growth from strong to weak are Anhui, southern Zhejiang, and the core.

Key words: atmospheric pollution, industrial collaboration path, industrial scale expansion, industrial technology innovation, industrial structure optimization

中图分类号:

X51
F127

苗圃, 张宁, 田泽, 丁晨辉. 破解大气污染协同治理难题的产业协同路径研究——以长江三角洲地区为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 67-77.

参考文献

陈诗一, 武英涛, 2018. 环保税制改革与雾霾协同治理:基于治理边际成本的视角[J]. 学术月刊, 50(10): 39-57, 117.〔CHEN S Y, WU Y T, 2018. Reform of environmental tax and the collaborative〖JP〗 governance of haze: based on the marginal cost of governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 50(10): 39-57, 117.〕

戴亦欣, 孙悦, 2020. 基于制度性集体行动框架的协同机制长效性研究: 以京津冀大气污染联防联控机制为例[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 9(4): 15-26.〔DAI Y X, SUN Y, 2020. A study on the long-term effectiveness of collaborative mechanism based on ICA framework: using collaborative air pollution control in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei as a case[J]. Public Administration and Policy Review, 9(4): 15-26.〕

付丽娜, 彭真善, 张爱群, 2020. 新型城镇化与产业结构的交互影响: 以环长株潭城市群为例[J]. 经济地理, 40(11): 95-104.〔FU L N, PENG Z S, ZHANG A Q, 2020. Interaction between new urbanization and industrial structure: taking the city group around

Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan as an example[J]. Economic Geography,40(11): 95-104.〕

胡一凡, 2020. 京津冀大气污染协同治理困境与消解: 关系网络、行动策略、治理结构[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 41(2): 48-56.〔HU Y F, 2020. Difficulties of air pollution cooperative governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the solution paths: relation network , action strategy and governance structure[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences), 41(2): 48-56.〕

景熠, 杜鹏琦, 曹柳, 2021. 区域大气污染协同治理的府际间信任演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 30(5): 110-115.〔JING Y, DU P Q, CAO L, 2021. Evolutionary game on trust among local governments in collaborative governance of regional air pollution[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 30(5): 110-115.〕

李春顶, 2011. 中国对外反倾销措施的产业救济效果研究(1997—2007)[J]. 南方经济(5): 3-16.〔LI C D, 2011. Industrial remedy effects of Chinese antidumping measures[J]. South China Journal of Economics(5): 3-16.〕

李珒, 包晓斌, 2021. 京津冀地区大气污染协同治理的实践困境及其破解路径[J]. 改革(2): 146-155.〔LI J, BAO X B, 2021. The practical dilemma and solution path of collaborative governance of air pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Reform(2): 146-155.〕

刘华军, 雷名雨, 2018. 中国雾霾污染区域协同治理困境及其破解思路[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 28(10): 88-95.〔LIU H J, LEI M Y, 2018. The dilemma of the regional collaborative governance of haze pollution and its solution ideas in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(10): 88-95.〕

刘华军, 彭莹, 2019. 雾霾污染区域协同治理的“逐底竞争”检验[J]. 资源科学, 41(1): 185-195.〔LIU H J, PENG Y, 2019. “Race to the bottom” test of collaborative management in haze pollution area[J]. Resources Science, 41(1): 185-195.〕

柳卸林, 2014. 技术创新经济学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.〔LIU X L, 2014. Economics oftechnological innovation[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.〕

刘晓玉, 2021. 走向协同的基层环境治理: 以A县大气污染防治为例[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(5): 39-51, 167-168.〔LIU X Y, 2021. Towards collaborative grassroots environmental governance: a case study based on air pollution prevention and control in county A[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)(5): 39-51, 167-168.〕

马骏, 胡博文, 2019. 东部沿海地区环境污染与产业结构升级的关系: 基于环境库兹涅茨曲线假说的检验[J]. 资源与产业, 21(1): 39-44.〔MA J, HU B W, 2019. Relation between environmental pollution and industrial structure upgrade in east coastal area based on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis[J]. Resources & Industries, 21(1): 39-44.〕

聂丽, 张宝林, 2019. 大气污染府际合作治理演化博弈分析[J]管理学刊, 32(6): 18-27.〔NIE L, ZHANG B L, 2019. An analysis of inter-government cooperative governance of air pollution based on the evolutionary game theory[J]. Journal of Management, 32(6): 18-27.〕

任亚运, 张广来, 2020. 城市创新能够驱散雾霾吗: 基于空间溢出视角的检验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 30(2): 111-120.〔REN Y Y, ZHANG G L, 2020. Can city innovation dispel haze?: evidence from the perspective of spatial spillover[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 30(2): 111-120.〕

申伟宁, 夏梓莹, 苏爽, 2022. 大气污染治理政策文本量化研究: 以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 资源与产业, 24(1): 65-72.〔SHEN W N, XIA Z Y, SU S, 2022. Quantitative research on air pollution control policy texts based on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(JJJ) city cluster[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(1): 65-72.〕

史梦昱, 沈坤荣, 2021. 人才集聚、产业集聚对区域经济增长的影响: 基于非线性、共轭驱动和空间外溢效应的研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 42(7): 94-107.〔SHI M Y, SHEN K R, 2021. The influence of talent agglomeration and industrial agglomeration on regional economic growth: research on nonlinear, conjugation-driven and spatial spillover effects[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 42(7): 94-107.〕

锁利铭, 阚艳秋, 2019. 大气污染政府间协同治理组织的结构要素与网络特征[J]. 北京行政学院学报(4): 9-19.〔SUO L M, KAN Y Q, 2019. Structural elements and network features of intergovernmentally collaborative governance organizations on atmospheric pollution[J]. Journal of Beijing Administration Institute(4): 9-19.〕

锁利铭, 2020. 区域战略化、政策区域化与大气污染协同治理组织结构变迁[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 22(4): 55-68.〔SUO L M, 2020. Strategic change in the region, policy regionalization and changes in the structure of the collaborative governance organization for air pollution[J]. Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute, 22(4): 55-68.〕

锁利铭, 阚艳秋, 2021a. 理解中国大气污染协同治理组织的多样性: 类型差异与选择逻辑[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)(3): 113-127, 207.〔SUO L M, KAN Y Q, 2021a. Understanding the diversity of collaborative organizations for air pollution control in China: type differences and selection logic[J]. Journal of South China Normal University(Social Science Edition)(3): 113-127, 207.〕

锁利铭, 李雪, 2021b. 从“单一边界”到“多重边界”的区域公共事务治理: 基于对长三角大气污染防治合作的观察[J]. 中国行政管理(2): 92-100.〔SUO L M, LI X, 2021b. Regional governance: beyond the limits of single administrative boundary: a case study on interlocal collaboration in air pollution control in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Chinese Public Administration(2): 92-100.〕

苏东水, 2015. 产业经济学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.〔SU D S, 2015. Industry economics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.〕

陶长琪, 彭永樟, 2018. 从要素驱动到创新驱动: 制度质量视角下的经济增长动力转换与路径选择[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 35(7): 3-21.〔TAO C Q, PENG Y Z, 2018. From factors driven to innovation driven: switch of economic growth impetus and selection of pathway based on the perspective of institutional quality[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 35(7): 3-21.〕

王婷婷, 王丽艳, 2014. 我国大气污染防治法律制度评析及其完善[J]. 资源与产业, 16(2): 32-36.〔WANG T T, WANG L Y, 2014. Analysis and optimization of China's air pollution laws[J]. Resources & Industries, 16(2): 32-36.〕

王延杰, 2015. 京津冀治理大气污染的财政金融政策协同配合[J]. 经济与管理, 29(1): 13-18.〔WANG Y J, 2015. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei's air pollution control in fiscal and monetary policy coordination[J]. Economy and Management, 29(1): 13-18.〕

吴建南, 刘仟仟, 陈子韬, 等, 2020. 中国区域大气污染协同治理机制何以奏效?来自长三角的经验[J]. 中国行政管理(5): 32-39.〔WU J N, LIU Q Q, CHEN Z T, et al, 2020. How does the regional collaborative governance mechanism of air pollution in China operate well? evidence from the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Chinese Public Administration(5): 32-39.〕

邢华, 邢普耀, 姚洋涛, 2019. 京津冀区域大气污染的纵向嵌入式治理机制研究: 交易成本的视角[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 21(1): 3-11.〔XING H, XING P Y, YAO Y T, 2019. The vertical embedded governance mechanism of air pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: from the perspective of transaction cost[J]. Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute, 21(1): 3-11.〕

许堞, 马丽, 2020. 粤港澳大湾区环境协同治理制约因素与推进路径[J]. 地理研究, 39(9): 2165-2175.〔XU D, MA L, 2020. Restrictive factors and promoting approaches on collaborative ecological environment governance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Geographical Research, 39(9): 2165-2175.〕

杨立华, 张柳, 2016. 大气污染多元协同治理的比较研究: 典型国家的跨案例分析[J]. 行政论坛, 23(5): 24-30.

原毅军, 谢荣辉, 2012. 工业结构调整、技术进步与污染减排[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 22(S2): 144-147.〔YUAN Y J, XIE R H, 2012. Industrial structure adjustment, technological progress and pollution abatement[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment 22(S2): 144-147.〕

GROSSMAN G M, KRUEGER A B, 1995. Economic growth and the environment[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353-377.

LINDMARK M, 2002. An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emissions, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden 1870-1997[J]. Ecological Economics, 42(1): 333-347.

OMRI A, BELHADJ T, 2020. Foreign investment and air pollution: do good governance and technological innovation matter?[J]. Environmental Research, 185: 109469.

[1]	高孝伟, 张颖昆, 李华, 等. 基于改进Theil指数和Shift-Share模型的2012-2021年中国产业偏离分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 15-24.
[2]	庞庆华, 向敏, 周未沫. 淮河生态经济带PM_2.5的时空演变特征[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 55-64.
[3]	申伟宁, 夏梓莹, 苏爽. 大气污染治理政策文本量化研究——以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 65-72.
[4]	张露, 宋媛. 京津冀产业结构优化对碳排放的影响研究——基于动态面板的系统GMM模型和VAR模型[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 18-28.
[5]	王婷婷，王丽艳. 我国大气污染防治法律制度评析及其完善[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(2): 32-36.
[6]	马强, 林文. 基于DEA的江苏省产业结构优化分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(1): 158-162.

破解大气污染协同治理难题的产业协同路径研究——以长江三角洲地区为例

RESEARCH ON INDUSTRIAL COLLABORATIVE PATH TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION COLLABORATIVE CONTROL——TAKE THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA AS AN EXAMPLE

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics