中国多区域隐含碳网络的结构特征研究

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230718.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究我国多区域隐含碳网络的结构性特征,本文首先利用环境拓展投入产出模型构建我国多区域隐含碳网络,其次应用结构路径介数中心性方法确定隐含碳网络中的二氧化碳关键传输部门,然后再运用结构路径分析方法识别二氧化碳关键传输路径,并基于2017年我国多区域投入产出表等数据对我国多区域隐含碳网络进行深入研究。研究结果表明:1)2017年在我国多区域隐含碳网络中,隐含碳传输排名前30位的省级产业部门有10个是金属冶炼和加工业部门,8个是电力热力生产和加工业部门。这18个关键传输部门由于大量使用排放密集型上游产业部门的高能耗产品作为中间投入,导致这些部门向下游产业部门传输了大量的二氧化碳。2)2017年在我国多区域隐含碳网络中，介数中心性排名前3位的省份分别为江苏省、山东省、河南省。在各省隐含碳传输供应链中,非金属矿物制品业→建筑业、电力热力生产和加工业→建筑业、电力热力生产和加工业→其他服务业是我国大多数省份隐含碳传输的关键传输路径。3)由于我国多区域隐含碳网络中的一些隐含碳关键传输部门无法使用基于生产端与消费端的传统研究方法加以识别,需要使用结构路径介数中心性方法,通过研究多区域隐含碳网络中各产业部门的介数中心性,以有效识别出多区域隐含碳网络中的隐含碳关键传输部门。

关键词: 多区域隐含碳网络, 环境拓展投入产出模型, 结构路径介数中心性方法, 结构路径分析(SPA)

Abstract: This paper, in order to study the structural features of embodied carbon network in China's multiple regions, uses environmental expansion input-output model to establish China's multiregional embodied carbon network, and applies structural path betweenness centrality to determine the key carbon dioxide transmission sectors in the embodied carbon network,identifying critical carbon dioxide transmission pathways using structural path analysis method,and in-depth research was conducted on China's multi-regional embodied carbon network based on data such as the 2017 multi-regional input-output table.Among China's multi-region embodied carbon network in 2017, the top 30 provincial industrial sectors in transmission embodied carbon include 10 metallic smelting and processing, and 8 electricity and thermal production and processing industrial sectors, who heavily use highly-energy-consuming products from the upper stream industrial sectors as middle input, leading to vast quantity of carbon dioxide transmitted to the down-stream industrial sectors. The top 3 provinces in the betweenness centrality of China's multi-regional embodied carbon network in 2017 are Jiangsu, Shandong and Henan. In the supply chain of embodied carbon transmission in various provinces, the key transmission path for embodied carbon transmission in most provinces of China is the non-metallic mineral products industry → construction industry, power and heat production and processing industry → construction industry, power and heat production and processing industry → other service industries. Some embodied carbon key transmission sectors can not be recognized by using the traditional methods based on production and consumption ends, which can be reached through structural path betweenness centrality.

Key words: multi-regional embodied carbon network, environmental expansion input-output model, structural path betweenness centrality method, structural path analysis (SPA)

中图分类号:

X321

董婷杰, 李丽, 李阿勇, 许沛丰, 欧文浩, 王震. 中国多区域隐含碳网络的结构特征研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 12-25.

DONG Tingjie, LI Li, LI Ayong, XU Peifeng, OU Wenhao, WANG Zhen. STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF CHINA'S MULTI-REGIONAL EMBODIED CARBON NETWORK[J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(4): 12-25.

参考文献

许文浩, 解玉磊, 嵇灵, 等, 2022. 基于投入产出和生态网络分析的广东省能源消费行业差异研究[J]. 资源与产业, 24(6): 44-53.〔XU W H, XIE Y L, JI L, et al, 2022. Variance study on Guangdong's energy consumption sector based on input/output & ecological network analysis[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(6): 44-53.〕

杨雪莼, 2019. 基于不同视角的城市产业能源-水-碳耦合分析框架及应用研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学.〔YANG X C, 2019. Researches on urban sectoral energy-water-carbon Nexus analysis framework and application based on different perspectives: case studies for Beijing and shanghai[D]. Jinan: Shandong University.〕

张琼晶, 田聿申, 马晓明, 2019. 基于结构路径分析的中国居民消费对碳排放的拉动作用研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 55(2): 377-386.〔ZHANG Q J, TIAN Y S, MA X M, 2019. Identifying the impetus of Chinese household consumption of carbon emissions in structural path analysis[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 55(2): 377-386.〕

张艺馨, 2021. 基于复杂网络的京津冀区域各行业CO₂排放转移研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学.〔ZHANG Y X, 2021. A study on CO₂ emission transfer of different industries in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on complex network[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University.〕

周申蓓, 钱晨, 2019. 我国电力行业碳排放责任核算及碳排放权分配研究[J]. 资源与产业, 21(5): 63-69.〔ZHOU S B, QIAN C, 2019. Responsibility accounting and rights allocation of carbon emission in China's power industry[J]. Resources & Industries, 21(5): 63-69.〕

周小栋, 沙景华, 钟帅, 等, 2016. 基于社会核算矩阵的中国煤炭产业研究[J]. 资源与产业, 18(3): 59-66.〔ZHOU X D, SHA J H, ZHONG S, et al, 2016. Research on Chinas coal industry based on social accounting matrix[J]. Resources & Industries, 18(3): 59-66.〕

朱智洺, 桂梦婷, 李红艳, 2023. “双碳”目标下江苏省碳平衡潜力预测研究[J]. 资源与产业, 25(1): 1-13.〔ZHU Z M, GUI M T, LI H Y，2023. Forecast of Jiangsu's carbon balance potention under “dual carbon”objectives[J]. Resources & Industries, 25(1): 1-13.〕

BARTHLMY M, 2004. Betweenness centrality in large complex networks[J]. European Physical Journal B, 38(2): 163-168.

BONACICH P, 1972. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification[J]. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1): 113-120.

CHANG N, 2015. Changing industrial structure to reduce carbon dioxide emissions: a Chinese application[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103: 40-48.

CHEN W, MENG Y, 2020. Research on China's embodied carbon transfer network in 2012 from the perspective of provinces and sectors[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(31): 38701-38714.

FREEMAN L C, BORGATTI S P, WHITE D R, 1991. Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow[J]. Social Networks, 13(2): 141-154.

GRUBLER A, WILSON C, BENTO N, et al, 2018. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1-5℃ target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies[J]. Nature Energy, 3: 515-527.

HANAKA T, KAGAWA S, ONO H, et al, 2017. Finding environmentally critical transmission sectors, transactions, and paths in global supply chain networks[J]. Energy Economics, 68(1): 44-52.

LENZEN M, 2006. Structural path analysis of ecosystem networks[J]. Ecological Modelling, 200(3): 334-342.

LI Y M, WANG Z H, HE W J, et al, 2021. Critical transmission sectors for CO₂emission mitigation in supply chains[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164: 120499.

LIANG S, FENG Y, XU M, 2015. Structure ofthe global virtual carbon network: revealing important sectors and communities for emission reduction[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(2): 307-320.

LIANG S, SHEN Q, XU M, 2016. Betweenness-based method to identify critical transmission sectors for supply chain environmental pressure mitigation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(3): 1330-1337.

OTHMAN J, JAFARI Y, 2016. Identification of the key sectors that produce CO₂ emissions in Malaysia: application of inputoutput analysis[J]. Carbon Management, 7(1/2): 113-124.

ROSTAS L, 1952. The structure of American economy, 1919-1939: an empirical application of equilibrium analysis[J].The Economic Journal, 62: 908-910.

SABIDUSSI G, 1966. The centrality index of a graph[J]. Psychometrika, 31(4): 581-603.

SHAN Y L, LIU J H, LIU Z, et al. 2016. New provincial CO₂ emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors[J]. Applied Energy, 184: 742-750.

SHAN Y L, GUAN D B, ZHENG H R, et al, 2018. China CO2 emission accounts 1997—2015[J]. Scientific Data, 5(1): 170201.

SHAO L, LI Y, FENG K H, et al, 2018. Carbon emission imbalances and the structural paths of Chinese regions[J].Applied Energy, 215: 396-404.

SHI J L, LI H J, AN H Z, et al, 2019. Tracing carbon emissions embodied in 2012 Chinese supply chains[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 226: 28-36.

SKELTON A, GUAN D B, PETERS G P, et al, 2011. Mapping flows of embodied emissions in the global production system[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 45(24): 10516-10523.

SONG J N, WANG B, YANG W, et al, 2020. Extracting critical supply chains driving air pollution in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 276: 124282.

WEN L, ZHANG Y X, 2020. A study on carbon transfer and carbon emission critical paths in China: I-O analysis with multidimensional analytical framework[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(9): 9733-9747.

WEN W, WANG Q, 2019. Identification of key sectors and key provinces at the view of CO₂ reduction and economic growth in China: linkage analyses based on the MRIO model[J]. Ecological Indicators, 96 (1): 1-15.

WEN W, FENG C Y, ZHOU H, et al, 2021. Critical provincial transmission sectors for carbon dioxide emissions in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 149: 111415.

WU S J, CAO Y, HE L F, 2020. Temporal changes of carbon emission transmissions in China's supply chain, 1997-2017[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269: 122367.

YANG J, DONG H H, JIANG T Y, 2022. Structural emission reduction in China's industrial systems and energy systems: an input-output analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4): 6010-6025.

YANG X C, WANG Y T, SUN M X, et al, 2018. Exploring the environmental pressures in urban sectors: An energy-water-carbon nexus perspective[J]. Applied Energy, 228: 2298-2307.

ZHAO Y H, CAO Y, SHI X P, et al, 2021. Critical transmission paths and nodes of carbon emissions in electricity supply chain[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 755(2): 142530.

ZHENG H R, ZHANG Z K, WEI W D, et al, 2020. Regional determinants of China's consumption-based emissions in the economic transition[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 15(7): 074001.

[1]	郑玉雨, 段显明. “双循环”视角下生态消耗、福利水平与环境污染的互动机制研究 [J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(5): 107-121.
[2]	宋复蓉, 曾向阳. 基于两维图论聚类的矿粮复合区“三生”空间适宜性分区——以湖北省大冶市陈贵镇为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 55-66.
[3]	马骏, 高慧娴, 石艳秋. 长江经济带碳补偿量化与时空格局研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 52-64.
[4]	张露, 宋媛. 京津冀产业结构优化对碳排放的影响研究——基于动态面板的系统GMM模型和VAR模型[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 18-28.
[5]	田泽，张怀婧，黄萌萌，等. 扬子江城市群工业能源碳排放与经济增长脱钩水平及驱动因素[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 29-36.
[6]	张勇何瑾. 陕西省矿山生态环境现状与恢复治理对策[J]. 资源与产业, 2009, 11(4): 99-103.