基于AHP-CRITIC变权物元可拓模型的南水北调东线一期工程水源地生态补偿绩效评价

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20210622.002

资源与产业 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 76-85.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20210622.002

基于AHP-CRITIC变权物元可拓模型的南水北调东线一期工程水源地生态补偿绩效评价

沈菊琴 ^1，2，3，王楠楠 ^2，3，4，孙付华 ^1，2，3，庄钧惠 ⁵

（1. 河海大学农业科学与工程学院，江苏南京 211100；
2. 河海大学长江保护与绿色发展研究院，江苏南京 210098；
3. 河海大学环境会计与资产经营管理研究所，江苏南京 211100；
4. 河海大学商学院，江苏南京 211100；
5. 江阴市重点水利工程建设管理处，江苏无锡 214400）

收稿日期:2021-04-07 修回日期:2021-05-26 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-04-23
作者简介:沈菊琴，博士、教授，主要从事水资源技术经济管理与资源环境会计研究。E-mail：jqshen@hhu.com
基金资助:
江苏省水利科技项目（2018034）。

ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SOUTH-WATER-NORTH-SHIFT PHASE I WATER SOURCE BASED ON AHP-CRITIC WEIGHT-VARIABLE MATTER-ELEMENT EXTENSION MODEL

SHEN Juqin ^{1, 2, 3,} WANG Nannan ^{2, 3 , 4}, SUN Fuhua^{1, 2, 3}, ZHUANG Junhui⁵

（1. School of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
2. Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
3. Institute of Environmental Accounting and Assets Management, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
4. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
5. Jiangyin Key Water Works Construction and Management Office, Wuxi 214400, China）

Received:2021-04-07 Revised:2021-05-26 Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-23
About author:E-mail：jqshen@hhu.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着生态环境保护意识越来越强，健全生态补偿机制的战略地位也越来越重要，其中生态补偿绩效评价体系对生态补偿标准的确定与生态补偿机制的完善具有重要的战略意义。【研究目的】通过对南水北调东线一期工程水源地当前的生态补偿绩效进行评价，并基于当前的绩效评价结果测算水源地生态补偿资金标准，为南水北调东线一期工程水源地生态补偿机制的完善提供参考。【研究方法】通过构建水源地生态补偿绩效评价指标体系，运用AHP\|CRITIC法得出综合权重，结合变权物元可拓模型，动态评价南水北调东线一期工程水源地目前的绩效结果，并运用成本法与生态服务价值法，通过水源地占比系数、供水系数与政策重要性系数进行修正，计算得出水源地生态补偿资金标准区间，并进一步进行水源地生态补偿绩效评价定性分析。【研究结果】南水北调东线一期工程水源地目前绩效评价等级变量特征值为3.699 34；生态补偿资金标准区间为[9 693.00，14 559.75]，其中分配到扬州、宿迁、淮安、徐州4市的资金标准区间分别为[2 011.50，3 368.25]、[2 787.75，3 327.75]、[3 732.75，5 157.00]、[1 161.00，2 706.75]（单位：万元）。【研究结论】水源地目前绩效评价等级为良，且偏向于优，说明江苏省水源地的生态环境保护效果较好，但仍有进步空间；水源地的生态补偿资金标准区间为0.97亿～1.46亿元，其中分配到淮安的生态补偿资金最高，分配到徐州的生态补偿资金最低；生态补偿资金的注入使得评价指标均向好发展，其生态补偿绩效结果必然优于目前的绩效结果。水源地实行生态补偿将会促进水源地生态环境保护、经济发展与民生改善，以及进一步践行“绿水青山就是金山银山”的发展理念，实现人与自然的和谐发展。

关键词: 南水北调东线一期工程, 水源地, 变权物元可拓模型, 生态补偿标准, 修正系数

Abstract: Ecological compensation performance evaluation is a key to determination of ecological compensation standard and to optimization of ecological compensation mechanism. This paper, aiming at evaluating ecological compensation performance of south-water-north-shift phase I water source, and based on the ecological compensation capital standard, provides references for improving ecological compensation mechanism. This paper uses APH-CRITIC weight-variable matter-element extension model by establishing evaluation index system of water resource ecological compensation, and studies dynamically its performance through ecological compensation standard of water source on which costs method, ecological servicing values, water source proportion coefficient, water supply coefficient, and policy importance coefficient. The typical variable value of performance evaluation level of south-water-north-shift phase I water source is 3.699 34, with standard range of ecological compensation capital [9 693.00, 14 559.75 (10 k RMB)], of which [2 011.50, 3 368.25] distributed to Yangzhou, [2 787.75, 3 327.75] to Shuqian, [3 732.75, 5 157.00] to Huaian and [1 161.00, 2 706.75] to Xuzhou. The performance level for water source is rated at good+, suggesting a good environmental protection in water source. The standard range of ecological compensation capital for water source is RMB97 to 146 million, of which Huaian receives the most, Xuzhou receives the least. Input of ecological compensation capital improves the evaluation indexes with a better performance. Ecological compensation in water source will boost eco-environmental protection, economic growth and livelihood, and further practices the concept of "green-water-green-mountain as gold-mountain-silver-mountain" to reach a harmonious development of human and nature.

Key words: south-water-north-shift east line phase I, water source, weight-variable matter-element extension model, ecological compensation standard, correctional coefficient

中图分类号:

F205

沈菊琴, 王楠楠, 孙付华, 等. 基于AHP-CRITIC变权物元可拓模型的南水北调东线一期工程水源地生态补偿绩效评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 76-85.

SHEN Juqin, WANG Nannan , SUN Fuhua , et al. ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SOUTH-WATER-NORTH-SHIFT PHASE I WATER SOURCE BASED ON AHP-CRITIC WEIGHT-VARIABLE MATTER-ELEMENT EXTENSION MODEL[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(2): 76-85.

参考文献

郭丽玲，欧阳勋志，郭孝玉，等，2015. 基于林农视角的赣江源生态公益林补偿满意度评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，25(S2): 320-323. 〔GUO L L, OUYANG X Z, GUO X Y, et al., 2015. Satisfaction evaluation of ecological forest compensation of Ganjiang river source from farmer perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(S2): 320-323.〕
胡仪元，唐萍萍，2017. 南水北调中线工程汉江水源地水生态文明建设绩效评价研究[J]. 生态经济，33(2): 176-179. 〔HU Y Y, TANG P P, 2017. Performance evaluation on water ecological civilization construction on the Hanjiang water source area of the Middle Route Project of the South-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Ecological Economy, 33(2): 176-179.〕
孔德帅，胡振通，靳乐山，2016. 草原生态补偿机制中的资金分配模式研究：基于内蒙古34个嘎查的实证分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，30(5): 1-6. 〔KONG D S, HU Z T, JIN L S, 2016. Research on the allocation model for grassland eco-compensation fund: based on the empirical analysis of 34 Gacha in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 30(5): 1-6.〕
李大标，龚笑飞，张骏，等，2015. 浙江省遂昌县生态公益林效益评价初步研究[J]. 江苏林业科技，42(1): 28-32. 〔LI D B, GONG X F, ZHANG J, et al., 2015. Eco-benefit evaluation of public welfare forest in Suichang County, Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science ＆ Technology, 42(1): 28-32.〕
李红兵，周新，曾洁，等，2018. 基于DEA模型的绿色农业生态补偿绩效评价研究：以西安市蓝田县某村落整治项目为例[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)，52(4): 532-537，543. 〔LI H B, ZHOU X, ZENG J, et al., 2018. Study on performance evaluation of green argo-ecological compensation based on DEA model: taking a village rectification project in Lantian County, Xi'an City, as an example[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 52(4): 532-537, 543.〕
李继清，薛智明，谢开杰，2021. 跨流域调水工程受水区生态补偿标准研究[J]. 水力发电，47(1): 1-6，33. 〔LI J Q, XUE Z M, XIE K J, 2021. Study on ecological compensation standards of water receiving area for trans-basin water transfer project[J]. Water Power, 47(1): 1-6， 33.〕
林爱华，沈利生，2020. 长三角地区生态补偿机制效果评估[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，30(4): 149-156．〔LIN A H, SHEN L S, 2020. Effect evaluation of the implementation of eco-compensation mechanism in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30(4): 149-156.〕
芦苇青，王兵，徐琳瑜，2020. 一种省域综合生态补偿绩效评价方法与应用[J]. 生态经济，36(4): 145149. 〔LU W Q, WANG B, XU L Y, 2020. A method and application of provincial comprehensive payments for ecosystem services performance evaluation[J]. Ecological Economy, 36(4): 145-149.〕
马骏，夏正仪，2020. 长江流域重点生态功能区生态补偿研究: 基于演化博弈的博弈策略及因素分析[J]. 资源与产业，22(3): 20-30．〔MA J, XIA Z Y, 2020. Ecological compensation of key eco-functional areas in Yangtze River basin based on evolutionary gaming strategy[J]. Resources ＆ Industries, 22(3): 20-30.〕
穆贵玲，汪义杰，李丽，等，2018. 水源地生态补偿标准动态测算模型及其应用[J]. 中国环境科学，38(7): 2658-2664. 〔MU G L, WANG Y J, LI L, et al., 2018. Development and application of the dynamic calculation model for proposing a water source eco-compensation standard[J]. China Environmental Science, 38(7): 2658-2664.〕
沈田华，龚晓丽，2018. 基于DEA二次相对效益模型的贵州省生态公益林补偿财政支出绩效评价[J]. 生态经济，34(8): 156-162，179. 〔SHEN T H, GONG X L, 2018. Study on performance evaluation of the fiscal expenditures for ecological forest compensation in Guizhou province by the binary relative effective model based on the data envelopment analysis (DEA)[J]. Ecological Economy, 34(8): 156-162, 179.〕
孙付华，熊佳丽，高鑫，等，2021a. 基于生态系统服务价值的水源地生态补偿研究: 以南水北调东线扬州市为例[J]. 资源与产业，23(3)： 38-49. 〔SUN F H, XIONG J L, GAO X, et al., 2021a. A case study on Yangzhou city: water source ecological compensation based on ecosystem servicing values[J]. Resources ＆ Industries, 23(3): 38-49.〕
孙付华，张晓杰，高鑫，等，2021b. 基于声誉效应的跨流域生态补偿演化合作机制分析[J]. 资源与产业，23(01): 8796．〔SUN F H, ZHANG X J, GAO X, et al., 2021b. Cooperative mechanism of trans-stream ecological compensation evolution based on reputation effect[J]. Resources ＆ Industries, 23(1): 87-96.〕
唐萍萍，张欣乐，胡仪元，2018. 水源地生态补偿绩效评价指标体系构建与应用: 基于南水北调中线工程汉江水源地的实证分析[J]. 生态经济，34(2): 170-174. 〔TANG P P, ZHANG X L, HU Y Y, 2018. The construction and application of ecological compensation performance evaluation system in water source area: based on empirical analysis of Hanjiang water source area in middle route of the South-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Ecological Economy, 34(2): 170-174.〕
田爽，孟全省，2018. 基于农户视角的生态补偿政策绩效评价[J]. 北方园艺(14): 191-196. 〔TIAN S, MENG Q S, 2018. Research on performance evaluation of ecological compensation policy based on farmer perspective[J]. Northern Horticulture (14): 191-196.〕
王慧杰，毕粉粉，董战峰，2020. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的新安江流域生态补偿政策绩效评估[J]. 生态学报，40(20): 7493-7506. 〔WANG H J, BI F F, DONG Z F, 2020. Evaluation of ecological compensation policy for Xin'an River Basin based on AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(20): 7493-7506.〕
王茜，2020. 基于AHP&熵权法的新疆叶城县旅游扶贫效果研究[D]. 阿拉尔市: 塔里木大学. 〔WANG Q, 2020. The effect of tourism poverty alleviation at Yecheng county in Xinjiang: based on AHP & Entropy[D]. Alar: Tarim University.〕
王新年，沈大军，2017. 基于讨价还价模型的跨省水源地保护生态补偿标准研究: 以于桥水库为例[J]. 南水北调与水利科技，15(6): 88-95. 〔WANG X N, SHEN D J, 2017. Research on eco-compensation standards of interprovincial water source protection based on bargaining model: a case study of Yuqiao reservoir[J]. South-to-north Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 15(6): 88-95.〕
熊玮，郑鹏，赵园妹，2018. 江西重点生态功能区生态补偿的绩效评价与改进策略: 基于SBM-DEA模型的分析[J]. 企业经济(12): 34-40.
杨海乐，危起伟，陈家宽，2020. 基于选择容量价值的生态补偿标准与自然资源资产价值核算: 以珠江水资源供应为例[J]. 生态学报，40(10): 3218-3228. 〔YANG H L, WEI Q W, CHEN J K, 2020. Quantifying the payments for ecosystem services and the value of natural resources based on the indicator of optional capacity value: a case study on water resources supply in Zhujiang River Basin, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(10): 3218-3228.〕
曾维忠，成蓥，杨帆，2018. 基于CDM碳汇造林再造林项目的森林碳汇扶贫绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，42(4): 9-17. 〔ZENG W Z, CHENG Y, YANG F, 2018. A evaluation index system of forest carbon sequestration poverty alleviation performance based on the CDM Forest Carbon Sequestration Project[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science edition), 42(4): 9-17.〕
张国兴，徐龙，千鹏霄，2020. 南水北调中线水源区生态补偿测算与分配研究[J]. 生态经济，36 (2): 160-166. 〔ZHANG G X, XU L, QIAN P X, 2020. Study on ecological compensation fund calculating and allocation of the middle route of the South-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Ecological Economy, 36(2): 160-166.〕
GANG H, XING Q F, 2021. Assessment of ecological compensation information ethics in China: a case study of the Huainan city mining area in China[J]. GeoJournal, 86(5): 2297-2304.
GAO X, SHEN J Q, HE W J, et al., 2019. Changes in ecosystem services value and establishment of watershed ecological compensation standards[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16): 2951.
MENG Y, LIU M, GUAN X J, et al., 2019. Comprehensive evaluation of ecological compensation effect in the Xiaohong River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8): 7793-7803.
PÖLL C, WILLNER W, WRBKA T, 2016. Challenging the practice of biodiversity offsets: ecological restoration success evaluation of a large-scale railway project[J]. Landscape & Ecological Engineering, 12(1): 85-97.
YANG W, LU Q L, 2018. Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review[J]. Ecosystem Health & Sustainability, 4(3): 73-84.
ZHAO Y, WU F P, LI F, et al., 2021. Ecological compensation standard of trans-boundary river basin based on ecological spillover value: a case study for the Lancang-Mekong river basin[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3): 1251.

[1]	白景锋蒋国富. 南水北调中线水源地循环经济评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2009, 11(5): 51-55.
[2]	格日勒. 我国饮用水源保护的现状及立法建议[J]. 资源与产业, 2008, 10(1): 80-82.

基于AHP-CRITIC变权物元可拓模型的南水北调东线一期工程水源地生态补偿绩效评价

ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SOUTH-WATER-NORTH-SHIFT PHASE I WATER SOURCE BASED ON AHP-CRITIC WEIGHT-VARIABLE MATTER-ELEMENT EXTENSION MODEL

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics