资源与产业 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 24-33.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20250126.001

• 非主题来稿选登 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字经济、创新要素流动与区域一体化发展

殷静蔚1,2,房琳1,2 ,王鑫鑫1   

  1. (1.商洛学院 经济管理学院,陕西 商洛 726000;2.陕西高校新型智库商洛发展研究院,陕西 商洛 726000)

  • 收稿日期:2024-10-22 修回日期:2024-11-28 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-20
  • 作者简介:殷静蔚,硕士、讲师,主要从事流通创新与经济增长研究。E-mail:1336330092@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省教育厅科研计划项目(22JK0061/2022HZ1145);2024年度陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项项目(2024QN223);商洛市科技局软科学项目(23SKJRK003)。

DIGITAL ECONOMY, INNOVATION ELEMENTS FLOWING AND REGIONAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT

YIN Jingyu1,2, FANG Lin1,2, WANG Xinxin1   

  1. (1.School of Economics and Management, Shangluo University, Shangluo 726000, China;2.Shangluo Development Institute, Shaanxi University New Intelligence Tank, Shangluo 726000, China)

  • Received:2024-10-22 Revised:2024-11-28 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-20

摘要: 以数字经济与一体化发展作为研究主题,在梳理数字经济影响一体化发展的理论基础上,利用各省相关数据,使用相对价格法和多元加权综合评价法,测算 2007—2022 年一体化发展指数和数字经济发展指数,运用空间杜宾、门槛效应及机制效应模型,实证检验数字经济对区域一体化发展的影响及内在作用机理。研究结果显示:1)机制模型显示,数字经济促进区域一体化发展,且这种促进作用可以通过“创新要素流动”机制来实现。2)空间计量模型显示,东部地区和中部地区的数字经济对区域一体化发展的促进效应明显大于该地区中心城市的“虹吸效应”;而东北地区和西部地区的中心城市对外围城市存在“虹吸效应”。3)门槛效应模型显示,当以数字经济作为门槛变量时,其与“创新物质要素流动”“创新人力要素流动”的协同对区域一体化发展的推动效应将有所不同。a.在创新资本要素流动下,数字经济存在双门槛效应,且随着数字经济发展水平的提升,其与创新资本要素流动的协同对区域一体化发展的推动效应会下降。b.在创新人力要素流动下,数字经济存在单门槛效应,且处于低强度的数字经济发展水平时,其与创新人力要素流动的协同会抑制区域一体化发展;但当跨过该门槛值,处于高强度的数字经济发展水平时,其与创新人力要素流动的协同会促进区域一体化发展水平的提升。

关键词: 数字经济, 创新要素流动, 一体化发展, 空间杜宾模型, 门槛效应模型, 机制效应

Abstract: This paper, based on digital economy and integrated development theory and provincial data, uses relative pricing method and multiple weighted evaluation to estimate 2007 to 2022 digital economic index and integrated development index, and applies spatial Dubin, threshold effect and mechanism effect models to verify the impacts and mechanism of digital economy on regional integrated development. Mechanism mode displays digital economy can promote regional integrated development through “innovation elements flowing”. Spatial accounting model shows digital economy plays a larger promoting role on regional integrated development in eastern and central areas than the siphon effect of central cities, but central cities in northeastern and western play siphon effect on their surrounding cities. Threshold effect model indicates that digital economy plays a different role on regional integrated development from synergy between “innovative materials flowing” and “innovative talents flowing” when digital economy serves as threshold variable. Digital economy has dual threshold effects; its synergy with innovative capital flowing plays a declining role on regional integrated development as digital economy is advancing under innovative capital flowing. Digital economy has a single threshold effect; its synergy with innovative talent flowing will limit regional integrated development if digital economy is at low intensity under innovative talent flowing, but it will be a promotion if digital economy is at high intensity.

Key words: digital economy, innovative element flowing, integrated development, spatial Dubin model, threshold effect mode, mechanism effect

中图分类号: