煤层气井压裂工艺技术对比分析

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20180727.011

资源与产业 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 36-41.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20180727.011

• “煤层气资源评价与开发”主题专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

煤层气井压裂工艺技术对比分析

张永成1，2，3，白云云4，刘亮亮1，2，3，张为1，2，3，白杨1，2，3

（1 山西晋城无烟煤矿业集团有限责任公司，山西晋城 048000；

2 国家能源煤与煤层气共采技术重点实验室，山西晋城 048000；

3 易安蓝焰煤与煤层气共采技术有限责任公司，山西晋城 048000；

4 榆林学院化学与化工学院，陕西榆林 719000）

收稿日期:2018-02-08 修回日期:2018-06-03 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-10-10
通讯作者: 张永成(E-mail: 79209071@qq.com)
基金资助:
山西省煤基重点科技攻关项目(MQ2014-05)；榆林市产学研合作项目（2016CXY-01）。

COMPARISON OF FRACTURING TECHNOLOGIES IN COALBED METHANE WELLS

ZHANG Yongcheng1,2,3,BAI Yunyun4, LIU Liangliang1,2,3 , ZHANG Wei1,2,3,BAI Yang1,2,3

(1.Shanxi Jincheng Anthracite Mining Group Co. , Ltd. , Jincheng 048000, China; 

2.State Key Laboratory of Coal and Coalbed Methane Co-extraction Technology, Jincheng 048000, China; 

3.Yian Lanyan Coal and Coalbed Methane Co-extraction Technology Co. , Ltd. , Jincheng 048000, China; 
4.School of Chemistry and Chemicals Engineering, Yulin College, Yulin 719000, China)

Received:2018-02-08 Revised:2018-06-03 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-10-10
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于煤层裂隙系统连通性差，渗透率低，需要通过压裂技术改造煤层气储集层来实现增产。以晋煤集团煤层气井4类压裂技术为主要研究对象，分析水力压裂、氮气震动压裂、高能气体压裂和等离子脉冲压裂技术的优缺点，并对比各类压裂技术的改造效果，以期对压裂施工工艺的选择和压裂工艺研究方向的确定具有指导作用。研究表明，活性水压裂是煤层气井压裂增产的主要手段，但在松软低渗及深部煤层气藏改造效果方面有待继续突破；胶液和清洁压裂液压裂对不同煤层气藏的适应性有待进一步研究，同时需要降低成本，提高其性价比；氮气震动压裂目前仍处于试验研究阶段，需要继续研究压裂机理及工艺的适应性；高能气体压裂在深部煤层气藏及薄煤层气藏中的解堵增产效果不明显，还未实现工艺上的突破；等离子脉冲压裂在煤层气藏中应用于老井解堵，具有良好的效果和推广价值。

关键词: 煤层气；水力压裂；氮气震动压裂；高能气体压裂；等离子脉冲压裂

Abstract: Poor connectivity and low permeability of coal fissure system need to be modified by using fracturing technology to increase the production. This paper, based on a case study of CBM wells fracturing technologies of Jincheng anthracite mining group, analyzes the pros and cons of hydraulic fracturing, nitrogen shock fracturing, high-energy gas fracturing and plasma pulse fracturing, compares their improved effects, aiming at offering references for selection of fracturing technologies and research direction. Active hydraulic fracturing is the chief means in raising the CBM production, but needs improvement in loose low-permeability and deep coal seams. Adaptability of gel and clean fracturing fluids to variable CBM reservoirs need further studies, and cost shall be lowered. Nitrogen shock fracturing is currently in tentative stage, which requires further research study in fracturing mechanism and technical adaptability. High-energy gas fracturing is not working well in deep coal seam and thin-bedded reservoirs, needing a technical milestone. Plasma pulse fracturing works well in old wells with excellent effect and should be used widely.

Key words: CBM, hydraulic fracturing, nitrogen shock fracturing, high-energy gas fracturing, plasma pulse fracturing

中图分类号:

F206

张永成，白云云，刘亮亮，等. 煤层气井压裂工艺技术对比分析 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 36-41.

ZHANG Yongcheng, BAI Yunyun, LIU Liangliang, et al. COMPARISON OF FRACTURING TECHNOLOGIES IN COALBED METHANE WELLS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(4): 36-41.

[1]	马东民，陈跃，杨甫，等. 低阶煤储层甲烷吸附解吸过程中导电性变化规律 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 1-8.
[2]	汪万红. 低煤阶煤层含气量特征及瓦斯涌出机制探讨 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 9-12.
[3]	赵路正. 基于实物期权的煤层气利用项目投资评价研究 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 18-24.
[4]	孙晨光. 煤层气井压裂液体系优化——以彬长矿区大佛寺井田为例 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 25-30.
[5]	冯华伟，李佳. 煤层气开采产出水特征及处理措施 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 31-35.
[6]	张东亮，蒋桂林. 阳泉矿区煤层气（煤矿瓦斯）开发利用现状及展望 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 42-46.
[7]	高占胜，杨波，刘己胜. 大佛寺井田煤层气储层伤害及其原因分析 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 47-51.
[8]	吴静. 沁水煤田玉溪井田煤层气赋存特征及地面抽采潜力 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 52-55.

煤层气井压裂工艺技术对比分析

COMPARISON OF FRACTURING TECHNOLOGIES IN COALBED METHANE WELLS

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics