基于内容分析法的我国能源安全政策文本量化分析

doi:10.13776j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230427.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长期以来政策文件为能源安全保障工作提供规制基础，但随着能源安全问题不断复杂化，能源安全政策制定也面临新要求。为了明晰现有能源安全政策的关注主题、力度以及布局情况，为进一步优化能源安全政策体系提供决策参考，从政策着力点、力度和工具3个方面出发，构建“政策着力点-政策力度-政策工具”三维分析框架，运用内容分析法，对1957—2021年的270条能源安全政策进行量化分析以及时空维度分析。研究表明：1）节能是保障能源安全的第一要务，东北地区较为关注燃气和供热，中部地区关注绿色和安全，东部地区关注企业等非政府组织的作用，西部地区关注能源与用水的关系，总体看来都缺乏对环境安全以及政府考核等主题的关注。2）政策总力度随政策数量的增加而增加，“十三五”时期出台政策数量最多，达85条，政策总力度最大。3）强制型政策工具使用比例为89.07%，其中“禁止规定”类子工具使用最多，占总数的26.8%，其次为“明确职责”，占14.15%。混合型政策工具使用比例为5.51%，自愿型占5.42%。对此，提出以下建议：借鉴政策着力点分布情况，加强对考核、环境、安全等主题的关注，推动社会组织、资金等加入能源安全保障工作，丰富能源安全政策着力点的关注内容；制定能源安全战略规划，搭建能源安全政策体系，规划政策发文机构，不断修改政策缺陷，填补现实空白，提高政策稳定性、系统性；有针对性地减少强制型政策工具，创新政府管理方式，降低政府监管成本；协调混合型政策工具，充分发挥市场机制作用，扩大自愿型政策工具，加大宣传教育力度，树立能源安全意识。

关键词: 政策工具, 能源安全政策, 政策文本分析, 三维框架, 内容分析法

Abstract: Policy files have long been providing regulations for energy security. As energy security gets increasingly complicated, energy security policy making is facing new requirements. To clarify the topics, intensity and pattern of existing energy security policies, this paper sets up a 3D framework of “policy pivot point-intensity-tool” to provide reference for optimizing energy security policy system, and applies content analysis method to make quantitative and temporal-spatial analysis of 270 energy security policies from 1957 to 2021. Energy saving is the first priority to energy security. Northeastern China focuses on gas and heat supply, central China on green and security, eastern China on non-governmental organizations, and western China on the tie of energy and water, all missing environmental security and government assessment. Total intensity of policy rises with its quantity. Up to 85 pieces of policies are issued during the 13th Five-Year Plan, when the total intensity is the greatest. Mandatory policy tools are used at a rate of 89.07%, of which “prohibitionregulations” amounting to 26.8%, followed by “clarifying responsibilities” amounting to 14.15%. Hybrid and voluntary policy tools are used at a rate of 5.51% and 5.42%. This paper presents suggestions on paying more attention to assessment, environment and security,on pushing social organizations and funds into energy security, on making energy security strategies, constructing energy security policy system and planning policy issuing organizations, on deliberately reducing mandatory policy tools, improving governing methods and decreasing administrative costs. Government shall coordinate hybrid policy tools to fulfill marketing mechanism, and expand volunteer policy tools to boost advocation and intensify energy security awareness.

Key words: policy tool, energy security policy, policy text analysis, 3D framework, content analysis method

中图分类号:

F205

周海炜, 许莹. 基于内容分析法的我国能源安全政策文本量化分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 53-68.

ZHOU Haiwei, XU Ying. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF CHINA ‘S ENERGY SECURITY POLICY TEXTS BASED ON CONTENT ANALYSIS[J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(3): 53-68.

参考文献

曹玲静, 张志强, 2022. 政策信息学视角下政策文本量化方法研究进展[J]. 图书与情报(11): 1-14.〔CAO L J, ZHANG Z Q, 2022. Research progress on quantitative methods of policy texts from the perspective of policy informatics[J]. Library & Information(11): 1-14.〕

傅志华, 樊轶侠, 覃凤琴, 等, 2022. 用能约束对企业成本的影响和应对策略[J]. 财政科学(4): 91-98.〔FU Z H, FAN Y X, QIN F Q, et al, 2022. The impact of energy consumption constrains on costs and countermeasures[J]. Fiscal Science(4): 91-98.〕

顾建亚, 2006. 法律位阶划分标准探新[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 36(6): 42-50.〔GU J Y, 2006. New views on standard of the legal hierarchy[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 36(6): 42-50.〕

黄勇, 牛惠亭, 李谷成, 2021. 京津冀煤改气电政策实施效果及建议[J]. 宏观经济管理(8): 61-68, 90.〔HUANG Y, NIU H T, LI G C, 2021. The effects of and suggestions on the implementation of the policy on “replacement of coal with natural gas and electricity” in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei[J]. Macroeconomic Management(8): 61-68, 90.〕

李浩, 戴遥, 陶红兵, 2021. 我国DRG政策的文本量化分析: 基于政策目标、政策工具和政策力度的三维框架[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 14(12): 16-25.〔LI H, DAI Y, TAO H B, 2021. Text quantitative analysis of China ‘s DRG policy: a three-dimensional framework based on policy objectives, policy tools and policy strength[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 14(12): 16-25.〕

李建忠, 2019. 第四次油气资源评价[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社.〔LI J Z, 2019. Fourth assessment for oil and gas resources[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.〕

李英伟, 2015. 保障国家能源发展战略实施的税收制度研究[J]. 税务与经济(6): 90-94.〔LI Y W, 2015. On the tax system of guaranteeing the implementation of sustainable energy development strategies[J]. Taxation and Economy(6): 90-94.〕

刘戎, 吴秋昊, 2023. “十三五”期间节水政策的量化评价: 基于PMC指数模型[J]. 资源与产业, 25（1）: 40-50.〔LIU R, WU Q H, 2023. Quantitative evaluation on watersaving policies during “the 13th five-year plan” based on PMC index model[J]. Resources & Industries, 25（1）: 40-50.〕

刘文颖, 赵连荣, 吴琪, 2018. 我国砂石土类矿产管理政策量化研究: 基于政策工具视角[J]. 资源与产业, 20(1): 21-27.〔LIU W Y, ZHAO L R, WU Q, 2018. Quantization research on China ‘s sand & clay ores managing policies viewing from perspective of policy tool[J]. Resources & Industries, 20(1): 21-27.〕

刘雪鹏, 2017. 过程系统工程方法在炼油厂设计阶段节水优化中的应用[J]. 石油石化节能, 7(6): 28-30, 33.〔LIU X P, 2017. Application of process system engineering method in water saving optimization of refinery design stage[J]. Energy Conservation in Petroleum & Petrochemical Industry, 7(6): 28-30, 33.〕

卢延国, 2017. 推进能源“大监管”的新选择[EB/OL]. (2017-08-21) [2023-01-08]. https://www. china5e. comenergynews-999246-1. html.

芈凌云, 杨洁, 2017. 中国居民生活节能引导政策的效力与效果评估: 基于中国1996—2015年政策文本的量化分析[J]. 资源科学, 39(4): 651-663.〔MI L Y, YANG J, 2017. Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficacy of energy efficiency guidance policies for residential living in China: a quantitative analysis based on Chinese policy texts from 1996—2015[J]. Resources Science, 39(4): 651-663.〕

潘琳, 徐鸣, 2022. 我国社区治理领域政策分析与评价研究: 基于“过程-工具-内容”三维分析框架[J]. 理论学刊(6): 139-149.

彭川宇, 刘月, 2021. 政府数据开放政策三维分析框架构建及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 65(6): 12-22.〔PENG C Y, LIU Y, 2021. Construction and empirical study of three dimensional analysis framework of open government data policy[J]. Library and Information Service, 65(6): 12-22.〕

申伟宁, 夏梓莹, 苏爽, 2022. 大气污染治理政策文本量化研究: 以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 资源与产业, 24(1): 65-72.〔SHEN W N, XIA Z Y, SU S, 2022. Quantitative research on air pollution control policy texts based on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(JJJ) city cluster[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(1): 65-72.〕

宋伟玲, 肖汝莉, 2022. 中国光伏产业政策工具演化路径及其启示[J]. 情报杂志, 41(1): 177-184.〔SONG W L, XIAO R L, 2022. Research on the policy instruments ‘ evolution path of China ‘s photovoltaic industry and enlightenment[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 41(1): 177-184.〕

孙晓奇, 施青, 2022. 基于投入产出模型的钢铁去产能政策的节能减排效应分析[J]. 资源与产业, 24(4): 1-8.〔SUN X Q, SHI Q, 2022. Energy conservation and emission reduction effects of steel-capacity-cutting policy based on inputoutput model[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(4): 1-8.〕

唐葆君, 陈俊宇, 王崇州, 2022. 政策工具视角下能源行业发展差异分析[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 24(2): 21-27.〔TANG B J, CHEN J Y, WANG C Z, 2022. Analysis of development differences of energy industry under the perspective of policy tool[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 24(2): 21-27.〕

王红梅, 王振杰, 2016. 环境治理政策工具比较和选择: 以北京PM2.5治理为例[J]. 中国行政管理(8): 126-131.〔WANG H M, WANG Z J, 2016. The comparison and selection of policy instrument of environmental governance: in case of governance of Beijing ‘s PM2.5[J]. Chinese Public Administration(8): 126-131.〕

王云珠, 2021. “十四五”时期山西可再生能源发展政策研究[J]. 经济问题(8): 18-24.〔WANG Y Z, 2021. Research on Shanxi renewable energy development policy during the “14th five year plan” period[J]. On Economic Problems(8): 18-24.〕

魏一鸣, 吴刚, 刘兰翠, 等, 2005. 能源-经济-环境复杂系统建模与应用进展[J]. 管理学报(2): 159-170.〔WEI Y M, WU G, LIU L C, et al, 2005. Progress in modeling for energy-economy-environment complex system and its applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Management(2): 159-170.〕

韦诸霞, 吴晓琦, 2021. 基于内容分析法的政府购买服务政策分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版). doi:10.13766j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0717.〔WEI Z X, WU X Q, 2021. Government purchase service policy based on content analysis method[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(Social Sciences Edition). doi:10.13766j.bhsk.1008-2204.2021.0717.〕

肖卫国, 黎凯辕, 王怡, 2021. 构建我国能源金融体系的理论逻辑与现实路径[J]. 南京社会科学(2): 27-35.〔XIAO W G, LI K Y, WANG Y, 2021. The theoretical logic and realistic path of constructing China ‘s energy finance system[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences(2): 27-35.〕

谢小天, 张培栋, 杨艳丽, 2016. 生物质固体能源产业政策发展分析[J]. 资源开发与市场, 32(10): 1184-1187, 1268.〔XIE X T, ZHANG P D, YANG Y L, 2016. Analysis on energy policy of biomass briquette industry[J]. Resource Development & Market, 32(10): 1184-1187, 1268.〕

熊华文, 苏铭, 2018. 推动能源治理体系和方式现代化[J]. 宏观经济管理(8): 34-39.〔XIONG H W, SU M, 2018. Promote the modernization of the system and way of energy governance[J]. Macroeconomic Management(8): 34-39.〕

印玺, 胡一楠, 2017. 我国能源合作政策的发展与演变[J]. 西安财经学院学报, 30(3): 18-22.〔YIN X, HU Y N, 2017. The development and evolution of China ‘s energy cooperation policy[J]. Journal of Xi ‘an University of Finance and Economics, 30(3): 18-22.〕

余敬, 王小琴, 张龙, 2014. 2AST能源安全概念框架及集成评价研究[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 14(3): 70-77, 140.〔YU J, WANG X Q, ZHANG L, 2014. 2AST conceptual framework and integrated evaluation of energy security[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition), 14(3): 70-77, 140.〕

张鸿莹, 裴婧晶, 赵丽媛, 等, 2022. 政策工具理论视域下高校师德师风体系建设研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 42(15): 44-47.〔ZHANG H Y, PEI J J, ZHAO L Y, et al, 2022. Research on the construction of teachers ‘ ethics and style system in universities from the perspective of policy tool theory[J]. Theory and Practice of Education, 42(15): 44-47.〕

张耀坤, 王永军, 杨成, 等, 2021. 基于三维分析框架的中国碳中和政策体系研究[J]. 全球能源互联网, 4(6): 549-559.〔ZHANG Y K, WANG Y J, YANG C, et al, 2021. Research on carbon-neutral policy system based on three-dimensional analysis framework[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 4(6): 549-559.〕

张永安, 马昱, 2017. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的区域技术创新政策评价研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 37(6): 92-97.〔ZHANG Y A, MA Y, 2017. Research on regional technology innovation policy evaluation based on entropy TOPSIS method[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 37(6): 92-97.〕

张运洲, 代红才, 吴潇雨, 等, 2021. 中国综合能源服务发展趋势与关键问题[J]. 中国电力, 54(2): 1-10.〔ZHANG Y Z, DAI H C, WU X Y, et al, 2021. Development trends and key issues of China ‘s integrated energy services[J]. Electric Power, 54(2): 1-10.〕

赵新峰, 蔡天健, 2020. 政策工具有效改善了“九龙治水”困境吗?: 基于1984—2018年中国水污染治理的政策文本研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 13(4): 108-129, 208-209.〔ZHAO X F, CAI T J, 2020. Have policy instruments effectively improved the Nine Dragons Taming the Water dilemma?: research on the policy text of water pollution control in China from 1984 to 2018[J]. Journal of Public Administration, 13(4): 108-129, 208-209.〕

郑文晖, 2006. 文献计量法与内容分析法的比较研究[J]. 情报杂志(5): 31-33.〔ZHENG W H, 2006. A comparative study of bibliometric and content analysis methods[J]. Journal of Intelligence(5): 31-33.〕

周靖, 韩纪琴, 2022. 中国与“一带一路”国家能源贸易合作对能源安全的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 24（6）: 31-43.〔ZHOU J, HAN J Q, 2022. Impact of China ‘s energy trade cooperation with “the Belt and Road” nations on energy security[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(6): 31-43.〕

周云亨, 方恺, 叶瑞克, 2018. 能源安全观演进与中国能源转型[J]. 东北亚论坛, 27(6): 80-91, 126.〔ZHOU Y H, FANG K, YE R K, 2018. Evolution of the energy security concept and China ‘s energy transition[J]. Northeast Asia Forum, 27(6): 80-91, 126.〕

朱强, 郭敏, 宋亮, 2019. 生物能源政策的实施效果及其社会福利分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 40(5): 217-221.〔ZHU Q, GUO M, SONG L, 2019. Implementation effect of bioenergy policy and its social welfare analysis[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 40(5): 217-221.〕

朱永楠, 苏健, 王建华, 等, 2021. 西部地区油气资源开发与水资源协同发展模式探索[J]. 中国工程科学, 23(3): 129-134.〔ZHU Y N, SU J, WANG J H, et al, 2021. Coordinated development mode of oil and gas resources and water resources in western China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 23(3): 129-134.〕

ASIF M, MUNEER T, 2007. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7): 1388-1413.

ESFAHANI A N, MOGHADDAM N B, MALEKI A, et al, 2021. The knowledge map of energy security[J]. Energy Reports, 7: 3570-3589.

HOWLETT M, RAMESH M, 1995. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

JIANG M, HENDRICKSON C T, VANBRIESEN J M, 2014. Life cycle water consumption and wastewater generation impacts of a marcellus shale gas well[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(3): 1911-1920.

LIU J X, 2018. China ‘s renewable energy law and policy: a critical review[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 99: 212-219.

MCDONNELL L M, ELMORE R F, 1987. Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments[J]. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2): 133-152.

ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W, 1984. An assessment of government innovation policies[J]. Review of Policy Research, 3(3): 436-444．

SCHNEIDER A, INGRAM H, 1990. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools[J]. The Journal of Politics, 52(2): 510-529.

SHIN J, SHIN W S, LEE C Y, 2013. An energy security management model using quality function deployment and system dynamics[J]. Energy Policy, 54(3): 72-86.

TAN X J, XIAO Z W, LIU Y S, et al, 2022. The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: evidence from China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183: 121924.

WRIGHT P, 2005. Liberalisation and the security of gas supply in the UK[J]. Energy Policy, 33(17): 2272-2290.

WU S, 2020. The evolution of rural energy policies in China: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119: 109584.

ZHANG L, QIN Q D, WEI Y M, 2019. China ‘s distributed energy policies: evolution, instruments and recommendation[J]. Energy Policy, 125: 55-64.

ZHAO X G, MENG X, ZHOU Y, et al, 2020. Policy inducement effect in energy efficiency: an empirical analysis of China[J]. Energy, 211: 118726.

[1]	申伟宁, 夏梓莹, 苏爽. 大气污染治理政策文本量化研究——以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 65-72.
[2]	赵红梅, 李雯. 政策工具视角下资源型城市转型政策优化研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(4): 30-42.
[3]	刘文颖，赵连荣，吴琪. 我国砂石土类矿产管理政策量化研究——基于政策工具视角 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(1): 21-27.