资源与产业 ›› 2010, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 167-172.

• 资源经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

探矿权“招拍挂”出让制度引发的问题及政策建议

罗小南1,2,岑 况1   

  1. (1中国地质大学 地球科学与资源学院,北京 10083;
        2河南省有色地质矿产局,河南 郑州 450016)
  • 收稿日期:2010-05-15 修回日期:2010-09-15 出版日期:2010-12-20 发布日期:2010-12-20
  • 作者简介:罗小南(1964— ), 男, 博士生、 高级工程师, 主要从事资源产业经济研究。E-mail:13523097766@139.com

ISSUES AND SUGGESTIONS OF EXPLORATION RIGHTS TRANSFER VIA“BIDDING, AUCTION AND LISTING”

LUO Xiao-nan1, 2, CEN Kuang1   

  1. (1. School of the Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; 
      2. Henan Bureau of Nonferrous Metallic Geology and Minerals, Zhengzhou 450016, China)
  • Received:2010-05-15 Revised:2010-09-15 Online:2010-12-20 Published:2010-12-20

摘要:

本文从探矿权出让制度形成背景,探矿权所具有的高风险高利润特征,及探矿权存在有很强的正外部效应和信息不对称性,论证了采用“招拍挂”方式出让探矿权的不合理性,并对其引发而导致探矿权生产不足、加大了探矿权二级市场的炒作行为、造成政府管理被动等问题进行了讨论和分析。认为“招拍挂”出让探矿权追求的是形式上的公平,实际却违背了探矿权市场自身发展规律,在实践过程中时常导致资源配置无效率,阻碍了国家出让探矿权根本目的的实现。国家出让探矿权根本目的是为了吸引更多的投资者,投入到找矿事业,为国家找到更多更富的矿藏,从而提高矿产资源的保障程度,矿业权市场的发展不能脱离这个根本目的。文章最后给出了几点政策建议。

关键词: 探矿权, 招拍挂, 出让

Abstract:

This paper, based on exploration rights transfer background, high risk and high profit characteristics, and strong positive externalities and anisomerous information, demonstrates the bidding, auction and listing system to be fallacious, which leads to a short in exploration rights and a gambling in exploration rights market, making a problem for government. The bidding, auction and listing system aims to be fair formally, but breaks the market rules, always results in a low efficiency in resources allocation in practice and blocks the nation’s target in transferring exploration rights, which shall attract more investors into mining, finding more deposits and increasing a guarantee of mineral  resources. Exploration rights market can not develop in deviation. This paper presents some suggestions and policies as well.

Key words: exploration rights, bidding, auction and listing, transfer

中图分类号: