金融危机背景下土地资源宏观调控政策绩效评估

资源与产业 ›› 2011, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 160-165.

金融危机背景下土地资源宏观调控政策绩效评估

秦静,杜新波，张家义

(中国国土资源经济研究院，北京 101149)

收稿日期:2010-10-16 修回日期:2010-12-20 出版日期:2011-04-20 发布日期:2011-04-20
作者简介:秦静(1980— )，女，博士、助理研究员，主要从事土地评价与规划研究。E-mail: saraqj@126.com

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MACROSCOPIC CONTROLS OF LAND AND RESOURCES POLICIES UNDER GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS

QIN Jing, DU Xin-bo, ZHANG Jia-yi

(Chinese Academy of Land & Resource Economics, Beijing 101149, China)

Received:2010-10-16 Revised:2010-12-20 Online:2011-04-20 Published:2011-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在分析土地供应与宏观经济指标关系的基础上，针对2008年全球金融危机背景下的扩大内需政策，采用三级树状式指标体系结构，选取土地宏观调控政策绩效评估指标，确定指标权重，构建评估体系。结果显示：2009年第四季度绩效综合指数最高；影响“促进经济平稳增长”的土地资源宏观调控政策绩效指数大小的主要是经济效益指数和政策执行指数；除其他用地外，土地供应总量、住宅用地和工矿仓储用地都与经济效益指数强相关，而与社会效益指数强相关的只有工矿仓储用地。得出以下结论：政策实施对经济形势下滑趋势起到遏制作用，对经济和社会发展起到了“V”反弹的促进作用；政策实施效果呈边际效益递减，政策出台时机很重要；政策实施效果的时滞性明显，制定政策要有前瞻性；土地资源参与宏观调控仍需持续创新。

关键词: 绩效评估, 宏观调控, 金融危机

Abstract:

This paper, based on relation between land supply and macroscopic economic indexes, analyzes the expanding internal demand policy during 2008 global financial crisis, applies tree index structure, and selects indexes for performance evaluation of land macroscopic control policies, gives them weights to establish an evaluation system. The results show that the performance index is highest in the fourth quarter in 2009, and largely related to economic efficiency index and policy execution index. Gross land supply quantity, housing land and industrial land have a strong relation to economic efficiency index, only industrial land to social efficiency index. This paper draws a conclusion that policy execution can improve economic and social development with a descending marginal efficiency, and has an obvious time-lagging effect. Innovation is necessary for land resources to macroscopic controls.

Key words: performance evaluation, macroscopic controls, financial crisis

中图分类号:

F301.0

秦静, 杜新波, 张家义. 金融危机背景下土地资源宏观调控政策绩效评估[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(2): 160-165.

QIN Jing, DU Xin-bo, ZHANG Jia-yi. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MACROSCOPIC CONTROLS OF LAND AND RESOURCES POLICIES UNDER GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS[J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(2): 160-165.

[1]	吴文盛,史丽薇,张举钢. 矿产资源宏观调控政策微观化探析[J]. 资源与产业, 2015, 17(2): 129-133.
[2]	张举钢，周吉光，丁欣.. 低碳经济背景下矿产资源参与宏观调控的路径探讨[J]. 资源与产业, 2012, 14(6): 65-69.
[3]	孙虎，王建平，王玉峰，王雄伟. 我国锡矿开发利用现状及可持续发展建议[J]. 资源与产业, 2012, 14(4): 58-62.
[4]	胡伟伟. 浅析土地参与宏观调控的缺陷[J]. 资源与产业, 2012, 14(3): 59-65.
[5]	王兴, 杜新波, 杨景胜. 土地宏观调控的机制框架与对策研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(2): 57-62.
[6]	张所续. 我国银行信贷政策对房地产市场的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(2): 166-170.
[7]	张翠光, 姚震, 屈红刚, 杨建锋, 郝鑫萍, 张永亮, 彭强. 地质找矿问题探析及对策建议[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(5): 96-101.
[8]	张涛吴艳张德会何鸿. 浅析我国钨矿开发利用过程中存在的问题与对策[J]. 资源与产业, 2009, 11(5): 79-81.