“双循环”视角下生态消耗、福利水平与环境污染的互动机制研究

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20231017.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

加快我国高耗能、高污染产业转型升级，从需求侧保障和改善人类福祉，对于实现向外提升供给能力、对内满足消费需求的“双循环”目标，具有重要现实意义。实证考察了生态消耗、福利水平与环境污染之间的动态关系，以此来探索推动高耗能高污染产业转型、人类福祉改善的有效途径。基于2005—2019年省级面板数据，展开我国生态消耗、福利水平与环境污染的测算及分析，并运用面板向量自回归（PVAR）模型，研究三者之间的动态关系及互动机制。结果表明：1）2019年福利水平居前三的省份为北京、上海和天津，居后三的为西藏、甘肃和青海；“福利高-消耗低”“福利高-污染低”省份多位于东部，“福利低-消耗高”“福利低-污染高”省份多位于西部；历年来福利水平大体呈东部-东北-中部-西部由高到低的走势；2）福利水平和生态消耗之间在短期和长期均呈现“高福利低消耗”的正反馈模式；生态消耗与环境污染之间短期内呈现“低消耗低污染”的绿色生产模式，长期来看不稳定；3）福利水平改善是维持“高福利低消耗”正反馈模式和“低消耗低污染”绿色生产模式的关键。据此，提出加快推动高耗能高污染产业转型升级、改善人类福祉的建议。

关键词: 双循环, 生态消耗, 福利水平, 环境污染, 面板向量自回归（PVAR）

Abstract:

Speeding up transforming and upgrading China ‘s highly-energy-consuming, highly-polluting industries to improve and guarantee human ‘s welfare from demand side is of significance to increase supply capacity externally and to meet internal consumption, as “dual circulation” goal. This paper uses their interaction among ecological consumption, welfare level and environmental pollution to explore the effective approaches to transformation of highly-energy-consuming, highly-polluting industries and to human ‘s welfare. In light of 2005 to 2019 provincial panel data, this paper estimates China ‘s ecological consumption, welfare level and environmental pollution, and applies PVAR model to study their interaction. In 2019, top three in welfare level are Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin, with Tibet, Gansu and Qinghai at the bottom. “high-welfare-low-consumption” and “high-welfare-low-pollution” are most located in eastern, “low-welfare-high-consumption” and “low-welfare-high-pollution” are most in western. Historical welfare levels generally show a high to low trend from eastern, northeastern, central to western. A positive response model of “high-welfare-low-consumption” exists between welfare level and ecological consumption both in a short and long term. A green production model of “low-consumption-low-pollution” between ecological consumption and environmental pollution in a short term is not solid in a long term. Improving welfare level is key to maintain positive response mode of “high-welfare-low-consumption” and green production mode of “low-consumption-low-pollution”. This paper presents suggestions on advancing transforming/upgrading China ‘s highly-energy-consuming and highly-polluting industries.

Key words:

dual circulation, ecological consumption; welfare level, environmental pollution, PVAR

中图分类号:

F224
X321

郑玉雨, 段显明.

“双循环”视角下生态消耗、福利水平与环境污染的互动机制研究 [J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(5): 107-121.

ZHENG Yuyu, DUAN Xianming.

INTERACTION AMONG ECOLOGICAL CONSUMPTION, WELFARE LEVEL AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION UNDER PERSPECTIVE OF “DUAL CIRCULATION” [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(5): 107-121.

参考文献

东梅, 王妍璎, 于松, 等, 2021. 生态福利绩效视角下西部地区高质量发展路径研究: 基于两阶段DEA与Tobit模型[J]. 资源与产业, 23(5): 61-71.〔DONG M, WANG Y Y, YU S, et al, 2017. Quality development path for Western China under ecological welfare performance based on two-staged DEA and Tobit models [J]. Resources & Industries, 23(5): 61-71.〕

傅强, 张小漫, 张亚军, 2017. 环境污染与经济增长、能源消费、FDI和城镇化的双向耦合关系[J]. 华东经济管理, 31(1): 83-91.〔FU Q, ZHANG X M, ZHANG Y J, 2017. The two-way coupling relationship between environmental pollution and economic growth, energy consumption, foreign direct investment and urbanization[J]. East China Economic Management, 31(1): 83-91.〕

赫尔曼·E·达利, 小约翰·B·柯布, 2015. 21世纪生态经济学[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社.〔HERMAN E D, JOHN B C, 2015. For the common good: redirecting the environment and a sustainable future[M]. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press〕

李莉, 赵连荣, 魏小芳, 等, 2018. 基于VAR模型的河北省水资源利用与经济增长的动态关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 20(2): 26-32.〔LI L, ZHAO L R, WEI X F, et al, 2018. Dynamic relationship between water resource use and economic growth in Hebei Province based on VAR model [J]. Resources & Industries, 20(2): 26-32.〕

龙亮军, 2019. 基于两阶段Super-NSBM模型的城市生态福利绩效评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 29(7): 1-10.〔LONG L J, 2019. Evaluation of urban ecological well-being performance of Chinese major cities based on two-stage super-efficiency network SBM Model[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(7): 1-10.〕

龙亮军, 王霞, 2017b. 上海市生态福利绩效评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 27(2): 84-92.〔LONG L J, WANG X, 2017b. A study on Shanghai ‘s ecological well-being performance[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(2): 84-92.〕

龙亮军, 王霞, 郭兵, 2017a.基于改进DEA模型的城市生态福利绩效评价研究: 以我国35个大中城市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 32(4): 595-605.〔LONG L J, WANG X, GUO B, 2017a. Evaluation of urban ecological well-being performance based on revised DEA model: a case study of 35 major cities in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 32(4): 595-605.〕

马千里, 李倩, 2019.新能源、传统能源与中国经济增长关系的实证研究[J].资源与产业, 21(2): 85-94.〔MA Q L, LI Q, 2019. Case study on relationship between China ‘s economic growth and new/traditional energies [J]. Resources & Industries, 21(2): 85-94.〕

任栋, 吴翔, 曹改改, 2020.中国各地人类发展水平的测度与影响因素分析[J].中国人口科学 (1): 41-52, 127.〔REN D, WU X, CAO G G, 2020. Measurement of human development level in China and its influencing factors [J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science (1): 41-52, 127.〕

王保乾, 叶雯倩, 2021.长江经济带水资源福利绩效时空演变及空间效应研究[J]. 资源与产业, 23(1): 10-19.〔WANG B Q, YE W Q, 2021. Spatial-temporal evolution and spatial effects of water resources welfare performance in Yangtze River Economic Zone [J]. Resources & Industries, 23(1): 10-19.〕

王圣云, 姜婧, 2020. 中国人类发展指数（HDI）区域不平衡演变及其结构分解[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 37(4): 85-106.〔WANG S Y, JIANG J, 2020. Evolution and structural decomposition of regional differences in China ‘s human development index (HDI)[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 37(4): 85-106.〕

肖黎明, 张仙鹏, 2019. 强可持续理念下绿色创新效率与生态福利绩效耦合协调的时空特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 34(2): 312-324.〔XIAO L L, ZHANG X P, 2019. Spatial and temporal characteristics of coupling coordination between green innovation efficiency and ecological welfare performance under the concept of strong sustainability[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(2): 312-324.〕

臧漫丹, 高易, 李金, 2022. 行政等级与城市规模对生态福利绩效的影响研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 37(12): 3201-3216.〔ZANG M D, GAO Y, LI J, 2022. Effects of administrative rank and city size on ecological welfare performance[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 37(12): 3201-3216.〕

赵明轩, 吕连宏, 张保留, 等, 2021. 中国能源消费、经济增长与碳排放之间的动态关系[J]. 环境科学研究, 34(6): 1509-1522.〔ZHAO M X, LV L H, ZHANG B L, et al, 2021. Dynamic relationship among energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions in China[J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 34(6): 1509-1522.〕

钟水映, 冯英杰, 2017. 中国省际间绿色发展福利测量与评价[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 27(9): 196-204.〔ZHONG S Y, FENG Y J, 2017. Green development welfare measurement and evaluation among China ‘s provinces[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(9): 196-204.〕

诸大建, 张帅, 2014. 生态福利绩效及其与经济增长的关系研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 24(9): 59-67.〔ZHU D J, ZHANG S, 2014. Research on ecological wellbeing performance and its relationship with economic growth[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(9): 59-67.〕

诸大建, 2009. 作为可持续发展的科学与管理的生态经济学: 与主流经济学的区别和对中国科学发展的意义[J]. 经济学动态 (11): 47-53.〔ZHU D J, 2009. Ecological economics as science and management of sustainable development: the difference from mainstream economics and its significance to China ‘s scientific development[J]. Economic Perspectives (11): 47-53.〕

ARROW K J, 1952. Social choice and individual values[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press.

BERGSON A, 1938. A reformulation of certain aspects of well-being economics[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2): 310-334.

BRIONES-HIDROVO A, UCHE J, MARTINEZ-GRACIA A, 2019. Estimating the hidden ecological costs of hydropower through an ecosystem services balance: a case study from Ecuador[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233: 33-42.

COBB C, HALSTEAD T, ROWE T, 1995. The genuine progress indicator: summary of data and methodology[M]. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.

CUMMINS R A, ECKERSLEY R, PALLANT J, et al, 2003. Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: the Australian unity wellbeing index[J]. Social Indicators Research, 64(2): 159-190.

DALY H E, COBB J J B, 1989. For the common good[M]. Beacon: Beacon Press.

DAVID G S, CARVALHO E D, LEMOS D, et al, 2015. Ecological carrying capacity for intensive Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cage aquaculture in a large hydroelectrical reservoir in Southeastern Brazil[J]. Aquacultural Engineering, 66: 30-40.

GIOVANNINI E, HALL J, MORRONE A, et al, 2011. A framework to measure the progress of societies[J]. Revue d ‘conomie

Politique: 121(1). 93-118.

LI J, LUO Y, WANG S, 2019. Spatial effects of economic performance on the carbon intensity of human well-being: the environmental Kuznets curve in Chinese provinces[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233: 681-694.

LIN B, AGYEMAN S D, 2019. Assessing Ghana ‘s carbon dioxide emissions through energy consumption structure towards a sustainable development path[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238: 117941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117941.

MIRANDA R A, HAUSLER R, LOPEZ R R, et al, 2020. Testing the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in North America ‘s Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Countries[J]. Energies, 13(12): 3104. DOI: 10.3390/en13123104.

PANAIT M, APOSTU S A, VASILE V, et al, 2022. Is energy efficiency a robust driver for the new normal development model: a granger causality analysis[J]. Energy Policy, 169(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.1131.

REES W E, WACKERNAGEL M, 1999. Monetary analysis: turning a blind eye on sustainability[J]. Ecological Economics, 29(1): 47-52.

REES W E, 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2): 121-130.

SALEMI M, JOZI S A, MALMASI S, et al, 2019. A new model of ecological carrying capacity for developing ecotourism in the protected area of the North Karkheh, Iran[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 47(11): 1937-1947.

SALMAN M, LONG X, DAUDA L, et al, 2019. The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbonemissions: evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241: 118331. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118331.

SAMUELSON P A, 1947. Foundations of economic analysis[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press.

SEN A K, 1973. On economic inequality[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SONG Y, ZHOU A, ZHANG M, et al, 2019. Assessing the effects of haze Pollution on subjective well-being based on Chinese general social survey[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235: 574-582.

SUN X, ZHU B K, ZHANG S, et al, 2022. New indices system for quantifying the nexus between economic-social development, natural resources consumption, and environmental pollution in China during 1978-2018[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 804: 150180. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150180.

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 1990. Human development report 1990[M]. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2018. Human development report 2018[M]. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

WANG S, ZHANG Y, YAO X, 2021. Research on spatial unbalance and influencing factors of ecological well-being performance in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17): 9299. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179299.

WANG Q, JIANG X, GE S, et al, 2019. Is economic growth compatible with a reduction in CO2 emissions?: empirical analysis of the United States[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151: 104443. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104443.

[1]	杨子豪, 沈泓成. 城市矿产示范基地建设减轻环境污染了吗？——基于准自然实验的分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 126-137.
[2]	宋敏, 张媛媛. 异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.
[3]	陈宝东, 王颖鹏. 政府审计、媒体关注与环境治理[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(5): 89-97.
[4]	杨恺钧, 熊敏敏. 长江经济带工业集聚对水环境污染的影响——基于空间计量与门槛效应的检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(4): 21-29.
[5]	黄德春, 杨哲成. 长江经济带环境污染治理投资对生态效率的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(3): 11-19.
[6]	何艳，徐伟鹏，蔡璟姿. 长江经济带的产业转移是否夹带污染——基于107个城市的研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(5): 78-85.
[7]	马骏，胡博文. 东部沿海地区环境污染与产业结构升级的关系——基于环境库兹涅茨曲线假说的检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21( 1): 39-44.
[8]	吴瑾. 基于面板数据模型的我国能源消费特征研究 [J]. 资源与产业, 2015, 17(4): 75-81.
[9]	黄梅. 经济增长、外商直接投资与环境污染关系研究——基于2003—2012年省级面板实证分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2015, 17(1): 92-97.
[10]	康凯,宋文博，郭子龙，孟庆香. 河南省环境污染和经济增长关系实证研究:基于遗传—BP神经网络、协整分析和VAR模型[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(5): 100-106.
[11]	潘习平，沙景华，张宏亮. 铜陵市经济增长与环境污染关系研究—基于环境库兹涅茨曲线假说[J]. 资源与产业, 2014, 16(1): 121-126.
[12]	杨从明，任晓冬. 生态文明视野下矿产资源开发模式探讨[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(6): 103-108.
[13]	吴念胜. 实质刑法观下的环境污染控制[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(5): 85-89.
[14]	吴文洁, 高黎红. 能源资源开发环境代价的估算方法研究——以榆林市为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(1): 1-5.
[15]	张学敏, 徐立青. 浙江出口贸易与环境污染互动关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2010, 12(4): 138-143.