异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应分析——以长江经济带为例

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20211221.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从时空角度研究长江经济带的水环境污染状况，探究异质性环境规制对水环境污染的影响，为促进水资源合理利用与绿色发展提供参考。基于2009—2019年长江经济带11个省市的面板数据，研究长江经济带水环境污染的时空特征，用Moran's I指数研究水环境污染的空间自相关性，再通过空间杜宾模型探究异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应。研究表明：1）总体来看，长江经济带水环境污染呈上升趋势，其中上游地区水环境污染增速较快，下游和中游地区有所放缓，水环境污染得到一定控制；2）长江经济带水环境污染严重程度具有明显的空间特征，呈现出下游＞中游＞上游的趋势；3）从异质性角度来看，命令控制型环境规制能显著抑制水环境污染，在经济矩阵下效果最为显著，市场激励型环境规制具有显著负向作用，而公众自愿型环境规制的作用并不明显；4）从溢出效应来看，命令控制型环境规制对周围省市的水环境污染具有负向的空间溢出效应，市场激励型环境规制也会减轻周围省市的水环境污染严重程度，但没有命令控制型环境规制效果明显，公众自愿型环境规制效果不显著。目前长江经济带水环境污染状况仍不容乐观，需要进一步加强管控。虽然命令控制型环境规制对水环境污染治理效果最好，但公众参与也应该提上日程。各地要因地制宜，选择合适的方式来治理，此外还需要建立空间意识，加强联合治理。

关键词: 异质性环境规制, 水环境污染, 空间溢出效应, Moran's I指数, 长江经济带

Abstract: This paper studies the current water pollution in the Yangtze River Economic Belt temporally and spatially, explores the impacts of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water environmental pollution and provides references for promoting appropriate use of water resources and green development. Based on eleven provinces' panel data from 2009 to 2019, this paper studies the temporal-spatial features of water environmental pollution, and uses Moran's Index to analyze its spatial auto-correlation, and applies spatial Dobbin model to elaborate the spatial overflowing effect of heterogeneous environmental regulations. The results show that water environmental pollution discharge is rising, faster in the upper-reach, slower in the middle- and down-reach under certain controls. The water environmental pollution is of clear spatial distribution showing a decreasing trend from down-reach to upper-reach. Command-controlling regulations can obviously restrain water environmental pollution discharge, especially under the economic matrix; however, market-stimulated environmental regulations do the contrast, and public-volunteer environmental regulations do little. Command-controlling environmental regulations have a negative spatial overflowing effect on water environmental pollution of neighboring provinces/cities; market-stimulated environmental regulations do less, and public-volunteer environmental regulations do little, which means public involvement should be intensified. It concludes that the Yangtze River Economic Belt is still not good in water environmental pollution, which needs further controls. Although command-controlling regulations are the best means to curb water environmental pollution, public involvement shall also be taken into consideration. Appropriate approaches vary with areas. This paper presents suggestions on cultivating space awareness and boosting collaborative controls.

Key words: heterogeneous environmental regulations, water environmental pollution, spatial overflowing effect, Moran's Index, the Yangtze River Economic Belt

中图分类号:

F205

宋敏, 张媛媛. 异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.

SONG Min, ZHANG Yuanyuan. SPATIAL OVERFLOWING EFFECT OF HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ON WATER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION: A CASE STUDY ON YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.

参考文献

安敏，何伟军，袁亮，等，2019. 中国地区工业及城镇水污染处理效率研究[J]. 统计与决策，35(14): 133-136.〔AN M, HE W J, YUAN L, et al, 2019. Study on treatment efficiency of industrial and urban water pollution in China[J]. Statistics and Decision, 35(14): 133-136.〕
丁绪辉，高素惠，吴凤平，2019. 环境规制、FDI集聚与长江经济带用水效率的空间溢出效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，29(8): 148-155.〔DING X H, GAO S H, WU F P, 2019. Study on environmental regulation, FDI agglomeration and spatial spillover effect of water efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(8): 148-155.〕
冯颖，李晓宁，屈国俊，等，2017. 中国水环境污染与经济增长关系研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版），17(6): 66-74.〔FENG Y, LI X N, QU G J, et al, 2017. Study on water environmental pollution and economic growth in China[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 17(6): 66-74.〕
付晓灵，翟子瑜，2021. 水环境治理PPP项目利益主体行为的演化博弈研究[J]. 资源与产业，23(3): 70-78.〔FU X L, ZHAI Z Y, 2021. Evolutionary game study on the behavior of stakeholders in water environment governance PPP project[J]. Resources and Industries, 23(3): 70-78.〕
谷继建，郑强，肖端，2020. 绿色发展背景下FDI与中国环境污染的空间关联分析[J]. 宏观经济研究(9): 119-129，175.〔GU J J, ZHENG Q, XIAO D, 2020. A spatial correlation analysis of FDI and Chinas environmental pollution under the background of green development[J]. Macroeconomics(9): 119-129, 175.〕
黄施，冷建飞，2017. 水污染变动的时空特征及其经济驱动因素: 以江苏省为例[J]. 资源与产业，19(1): 101-107.〔HUANG S, LENG J F, 2017. Temporal and spatial features and economic factors of water pollution: a case study on Jiangsu province[J]. Resources and Industries, 19(1): 101-107.〕
胡志强，苗长虹，2018. 中国污染产业转移的时空格局及其与污染转移的关系[J]. 软科学，32(7): 39-43.〔HU Z Q, MIAO C H, 2018. The spatiotemporal pattern of China's pollution industry transfer and its relationship with pollution transfer[J]. Soft Science, 32(7): 39-43.
康鹏辉，茹少峰，2020. 环境规制的绿色创新双边效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，30(10): 93-104.〔KANG P H, RU S F, 2020. Bilateral effects of environmental regulation on green innovation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30 (10): 93-104.〕
卢丽文，宋德勇，2020. 长江经济带水污染密集型产业时空格局演变及影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境，29(12): 2597-2606.〔LU L W, SONG D Y, 2020. Study on temporal and spatial pattern evolution and influencing factors of water pollution intensive industries in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 29(12): 2597-2606.〕
卢越，2019. 产业集聚对流域水污染的影响分析: 以海河流域为例[J]. 北京交通大学学报（社会科学版），18(2): 61-68.〔LU Y, 2019. Effect of industrial agglomeration on river basin water pollution: a case study of Haihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), 18(2): 61-68.〕
潘海英，陆敏，2019. 环境分权对水环境治理效果的影响: 财政分权视角下的动态面板检验[J]. 水利经济，37(3): 49-54，66，87.〔PAN H Y, LU M, 2019. Effects of environmental decentralization on water environment treatment: dynamic panel tests from the perspective of fiscal decentralization[J]. Water Resources Economy, 37(3): 49-54, 66, 87.〕
沈坤荣，周力，2020. 地方政府竞争、垂直型环境规制与污染回流效应[J]. 经济研究，55(3): 35-49.〔SHEN K R, ZHOU L, 2020. Local government competition, vertical environmental regulation and the pollution backflow effect[J]. Economic Research Journal, 55 (3): 35-49.〕
史恒通，赵敏娟，2016. 贸易开放对中国水环境污染影响的实证研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版)，22(3): 64-71.〔SHI H T, ZHAO M J, 2016. Empirical research on the influence of trade openness on water environment pollution in China[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 22(3): 64-71.〕
辛晓华，吕拉昌，2021. 中国主要城市技术创新影响环境污染的空间分异与机理[J]. 地理科学，41(1): 129-139.〔XIN X H, LV L C, 2021. Spatial differentiation and mechanism of technological innovation affecting environmental pollution in major Chinese cities[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 41(1): 129-139.〕
邢贞成，王济干，张婕，2018. 长江经济带全要素生态效率的时空分异与演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境，27(4): 792-799.〔XING Z C, WANG J G, ZHANG J, 2018. Research on spatial-temporal variation and evolution of total-factor ecological efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 27(4): 792-799.〕
杨城，2017. 水资源污染影响因素的研究: 以浙江省11个地级市为例[J]. 特区经济(7): 118-121.〔YANG C, 2017. A research on affecting factors of water pollution: based on 11 prefecture-level cities of Zhejiang province[J]. Special Zone Economic(7): 118-121.〕
尹庆民，樊梦易，2020. 双向FDI对我国碳排放影响的门槛效应分析: 基于环境规制视角[J]. 资源与产业，22(1): 24-31.〔YIN Q M, FAN M Y, 2020. Threshold effect of two-way FDI on China's carbon emissions viewing from environmental regulations[J]. Resources and Industries, 22 (1): 24-31.〕
赵玉民，朱方明，贺立龙，2009. 环境规制的界定、分类与演进研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，19(6): 85-90.〔ZHAO Y M, ZHU F M, HE L L, 2009. Definition, classification and evolution of environmental regulations[J]. China Population, Resources & Environment, 19(6): 85-90.〕
朱智洺，郭伶俐，2021. 灰水足迹测度下长三角地区水质与经济发展关系[J]. 资源与产业，23(1): 1-9.〔ZHU Z M, GUO L L, 2021. Relation of water quality and economic growth in Yangtze River Delta region under grey water footprint measurement[J]. Resources & Industries, 23 (1): 1-9.〕
CHEN X D, HUANG B H, 2016. Club membership and transboundary pollution: evidence from the European Union enlargement[J]. Energy Economics, 53(1): 230-237.
ZHAO X, SUN B W, 2016. The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 1528-1536.

[1]	杨恺钧, 曹安琪, 方慈慧. 新能源汽车产业集聚对区域绿色经济效率的影响——基于长江经济带的实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 35-49.
[2]	杨恺钧, 段婷婷. 水资源约束对长江经济带绿色发展效率的影响——基于产业结构调整的中介效应和交互效应 [J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 11-22.
[3]	及添正, 黄巧龙, 张天铃, 等. 长江经济带生产性服务业的空间格局演变与影响因素研究——基于企业进入视角 [J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 37-51.
[4]	马骏, 高慧娴, 石艳秋. 长江经济带碳补偿量化与时空格局研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 52-64.
[5]	王伟. 产业集聚、城市集聚与绿色全要素生产率——以长江经济带城市群为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 75-89.
[6]	华坚, 刘蕾, 施明月. 长江经济带水利建设投资对水资源绿色效率的影响 [J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 103-115.
[7]	张云宁, 朱红艳, 欧阳红祥, 等. 长江经济带乡村人居环境可持续发展水平评价与空间格局研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 42-54.
[8]	王保乾, 李昕燃. 基于水足迹与SBM-Malmquist模型的长江经济带工业水资源绿色效率的研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 21-31.
[9]	马骏, 伍琳玲, 卢玉钦. 碳排放视域下长江经济带绿色发展效率测度及影响因素研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 71-80.
[10]	王保乾, 范哲艳. 高技术产业集聚对绿色水资源效率的影响研究——基于空间杜宾模型[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 86-96.
[11]	曹颖, 周钦. 区域一体化、创新能力与绿色发展——基于长江经济带的实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 96-106.
[12]	宋敏, 施凯杰, 马艳霞, 李昂. 基于投入产出表的长江经济带各行业灰水足迹的测算分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(6): 13-22.
[13]	姜翔程, 赵鑫. 长江经济带农业生态效率评价及其影响因素研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(5): 41-50.
[14]	崔新蕾, 李蒙, 王丹丹. 财政压力、产业结构调整与绿色经济效率[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(5): 98-108.
[15]	杨恺钧, 熊敏敏. 长江经济带工业集聚对水环境污染的影响——基于空间计量与门槛效应的检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(4): 21-29.