Resources & Industries ›› 2009, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 113-117.

• STUDY ON PROBLEMS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES OF MINING PROPERTIES

CHEN Yi-zheng1, LIU Gang1, WU Jia-qi2

  

  1. (1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;  2. Beijing Kuangtong Resources Development Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing 100037, China)

  • Received:2009-03-02 Revised:2009-04-20 Online:2009-07-03 Published:2009-06-20

国外矿资产评估准则比较研究

陈义政1,刘 刚1吴家齐2

  

  1. (1.中国地质大学 地球科学与资源学院,北京 100083; 2.北京矿通资源开发咨询有限责任公司,北京 100037)

  • 作者简介:陈义政(1964— ),男,博士生、副教授,主要从事资源产业经济研究。E-mail:yichengchendy@126.com

Abstract:

Canada, Australia and South Africa go ahead in assess mining properties and have their own guidelines and standards, which promote greatly the development of mining properties assessment. This paper compares the Canada’s CIMVal, Australia’s Valmin and South Africa’s Samval and Code 14 of International Assessment Guideline Committee, and provides a reference for China to establish mining property assessment guidelines.

Key words:

mining properties; assessment guidelines; international comparison

摘要:

在矿资产评估领域,加拿大、澳大利亚、南非3国走在了世界前列,他们都制定了本国的矿资产评估准则,极大地规范并推动了本国矿资产评估行业的发展。本文旨在通过对比加拿大CIMVal标准和准则、澳大利亚Valmin规范、南非Samval规范以及国际评估准则委员会IVS指南14,为中国制定矿业权评估准则提供参考。

关键词: 矿资产;评估准则;国际比较

CLC Number: