A CASE STUDY ON CHANGCHUN'S JIUTAI DISTRICT: DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF ALL-FOR-ONE TOURING DESTINATION BASED ON TOURISTS' SATISFACTION

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20240613.001

Abstract

Abstract: All-for-one tourism is a new concept and mode that is presented for innovative touring destination development, which can be evaluated by tourists' satisfaction. This paper, viewing from perspective of tourists' satisfaction perception, establishes an evaluation index system for all-for-one touring destination, which is used to quantitatively evaluate all-for-one touring destination based on a case of Changchun's Jiutai district by means of questionnaire, factor analysis and IPA, aiming at a full understanding of the development of all-for-one touring destination from tourists' perspective, and exploring the gap between all-for-one tourism and tourists' expectations. Tourists' satisfaction on Jiutai district lies between generally satisfied and relatively satisfied, overall at a good level with a lower evaluation score, leaving room to be improved. Factor analysis indicates that, among 4 factors, tourist source market demand gains the highest evaluating score, followed by all-for-one touring resources and destination, all-for-one touring products are low, which needs more attention during development of all-for-one tourism. IPA suggests that among 28 evaluation indictors touring destination location, foods, accommodation, transportation, resort allocation, touring event experiences are high in their evaluation, which need to be well maintained and innovatively developed. Tourists' satisfaction indicators have lower sensitivity on diversity of touring resources and all-for-one touring destination supply, which needs to be maintained as it is. Indicators such as touring resources value, touring resources protection, local featured culture, seasonality of resources, resources distribution, product abundance, resort features, touring administration, touring advertisement, touring safety and smart tourism supporting facilities are limited in attracting tourists, needing to be improved. 9 indicators resources development extent, brand, environmental quality, resorts correlation, timelessness of touring products, prices of touring products, cost performance of touring products, integration with related industries and touring infrastructures are the weak part in Jiutai's all-for-one tourism which need to be developed with priority.

Key words: all-for-one touring, tourists' satisfaction, factor analysis, Changchun's Jiutai district

摘要： 全域旅游是为顺应全行业发展而提出的一种推动创新型旅游目的地发展的新理念与新模式，游客满意度则是衡量全域旅游目的地发展建设情况的重要指标。基于游客满意度感知的视角，构建全域旅游目的地指标评价体系，以长春市九台区为研究对象，通过问卷调查以获取相关评价数据，采用因子分析法和IPA分析法对全域旅游目的地进行定量评价，以期从游客的角度直观全面地了解全域旅游目的地的发展程度，探究其全域旅游发展与游客预期间的差距与不足，并提出相应的发展策略。研究结果表明：1）长春市九台区全域旅游的满意度评价介于一般满意与比较满意之间，整体处于良好水平，虽高于一般水平，但总体评分较低，仍有进一步发展建设空间。2）因子分析结果表明，在4个要素维度中，客源市场需求维度评价值最高，全域旅游资源与全域旅游目的地供给次之，全域旅游产品维度评价值较低，在全域旅游发展建设过程中应重点关注。3）IPA分析结果表明，在28个评价指标中，目的地地理位置、旅游餐饮质量、旅游住宿条件、交通的便捷度、景区景点配置、旅游活动体验等指标的评价较高，宜在继续保持其优势的基础上加以创新；旅游资源的多样性、全域旅游目的地供给等游客满意度指标的敏感性较低，宜保持现状不做重点考虑；旅游资源的价值、旅游资源的保护、地域文化特色、资源的季节性、资源分布、产品类型丰富度、景区景点的特色、旅游行政管理、旅游营销宣传、旅游安全保障、智慧旅游配套等指标对游客的吸引能力有限，应进行有针对性的改进以发挥其优势；资源开发利用程度、品牌形象、资源环境质量、各景区景点关联性、旅游产品的全时性、旅游产品消费价格、旅游产品性价比、与相关产业的融合、旅游基础配套设施等9个评价指标是九台区全域旅游发展的薄弱部分，应作为发展的重点。

关键词: 全域旅游, 游客满意度, 因子分析, 长春市九台区

CLC Number:

F592.3

FANG Fei, JIN Ming. A CASE STUDY ON CHANGCHUN'S JIUTAI DISTRICT: DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF ALL-FOR-ONE TOURING DESTINATION BASED ON TOURISTS' SATISFACTION[J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(4): 156-169.

方飞, 金铭. 基于游客满意度的全域旅游目的地发展策略研究——以长春市九台区为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(4): 156-169.

References

保继刚, 1992. 引力模型在游客预测中的应用[J]. 中山大学学报（自然科学版）, 31（4）: 133-136.〔BAO J G, 1992. An application of gravity model in tourist forecasting[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 31(4): 133-136.〕

常雪松, 2021. 基于游客感知大数据的全域旅游评价研究: 以常熟市为例[D]. 天津: 南开大学.〔CHANG X S, 2021. Research on all-in-one tourism evaluation based on big data perceived by tourists: the case study of Changshu[D]. Tianjin: Nankai University.〕

陈传康, 1986. 区域概念及其研究途径[J]. 中原地理研究（1）: 10-14.

陈乙滋, 2019. 基于游客满意度的伊春市全域旅游公共服务研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学.〔CHEN Y Z, 2019. Research on the all-for-one tourism public service of Yichun city based on tourist satisfaction[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University.〕

戴伟明, 2016. 全域旅游视角的大都市近郊文化休闲旅游目的地开发模式研究: 以长辛店镇为例[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学.〔DAI W M, 2016. The development models of leisure and culture tourism destination around metropolis from the angle of comprehensive tourism: an example from the town of Changxindian[D]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University.〕

邓爱民, 桂橙林, 张馨方, 等, 2016. 全域旅游理论·方法·实践[M]. 北京: 中国旅游出版社.〔DENG A M, GUI C L, ZHANG X F,

et al., 2016. Global tourism theory method practice[M]. Beijing: China Tourism Publishing House.〕

邓家磊, 张全强, 吴宗润, 等, 2020. 全域旅游背景下基于游客感知的旅游型城市旅游意象研究: 以桂林老城核心区为例[J]. 旅游纵览（22）: 92-94.

董观志, 杨凤影, 2005. 旅游景区游客满意度测评体系研究[J]. 旅游学刊（1）: 27-30.〔DONG G Z, YANG F Y, 2005. A study on the evaluation system of tourist satisfaction degree in tourist areas[J]. Tourism Tribune(1): 27-30.〕

范业正, 2000. 中国旅游业信息化发展研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学.〔FAN Y Z, 2000. The research on application of information technology in tourism industry[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University.〕

郭安禧, 郭英之, 李海军, 等, 2018. 旅游者感知价值对重游意向影响的实证研究: 旅游者满意和风险可能性的作用[J]. 旅游学刊, 33（1）: 63-73.〔GUO A X, GUO Y Z, LI H J, et al., 2018. Empirical research on tourists perceived value influence to revisit intention: the role of tourists satisfaction and risk probability[J]. Tourism Tribune, 33(1): 63-73.〕

韩志勇, 梁永国, 乌鹤, 2020. 基于不同视角的全域旅游目的地感知分析: 以秦皇岛为例[J]. 中国旅游评论（4）: 126-133.

胡晓苒, 2010. 城市旅游: 全域城市化背景下的大连全域旅游[N]. 中国旅游报. 2010-12-15(11).

黄芳铭, 2005. 结构方程模式: 理论与应用[M]. 北京: 中国税务出版社.

李华君, 2020. 基于满意度的武夷山全域旅游公共服务提升研究[D]. 泉州: 华侨大学.〔LI H J, 2020. Study on the promotion of global tourism public service based on tourist satisfaction survey in Wuyishan City[D]. Quanzhou: Huaqiao University.〕

李蕾蕾, 1999. 从区域旅游开发的演变探讨一种新的规划观念[J]. 城市规划汇刊（2）: 61-64, 82.

李文兵, 2011. 古村落游客忠诚模型研究: 基于游客感知价值及其维度视角[J]. 地理研究, 30（1）: 37-48.〔LI W B, 2011. Study on tourist loyalty model of ancient village: based on the tourist perceived value and its dimensions[J]. Geography Research, 30(1): 37-48.〕

厉新建, 张凌云, 崔莉, 2013. 全域旅游: 建设世界一流旅游目的地的理念创新: 以北京为例[J]. 人文地理, 28（3）: 130-134.〔LI X J, ZHANG L Y, CUI L, 2013. Comprehensive tourism: idea innovation on building a world-class tourism destination[J]. Human Geography, 28(3): 130-134.〕

刘德谦, 1993. 旅游规划刍议[J]. 旅游学刊（3）: 17-20, 61.〔LIU D Q, 1993. An initial discussion of tourism planning[J]. Tourism Tribune(3): 17-20, 61.〕

刘建国, 黄杏灵, 晋孟雨, 2017. 游客感知: 国内外文献的回顾及展望[J]. 经济地理, 37（5）: 216-224.〔LIU J G, HUANG X L, JIN M Y, 2017. Research progress and enlightenment of tourist perception[J]. Economic Geography, 37(5): 216-224.〕

吕俊芳, 2014. 城乡统筹视阈下中国全域旅游发展范式研究[J]. 河南科学, 32（1）: 139-142.〔LV J F, 2014. Development of “integral tourism” in China from the coordinated perspective of urban-rural[J]. Henan Science, 32(1): 139-142.〕

马少思, 梁永国, 2020. 基于游客感知的全域旅游评价: 以秦皇岛为例[J]. 国土与自然资源研究（3）: 82-89.〔MA S S, LIANG Y G, 2020. Evaluation on the holistic tourism based on tourist perception: a case study of Qinhuangdao[J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study(3): 82-89.〕

孟贵, 宁攸凉, 吴水荣, 等, 2021. 基于ERMP分析的贵州荔波县全域旅游发展模式研究[J]. 林业资源管理(5): 139-145.〔MENG G, NING Y L, WU S R, et al., 2021. Research on the development model of holistic tourism in Libo County of Guizhou Province based on E-RMP analysis[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research(5): 139-145.〕

桑祖南, 冯淑霞, 时朋飞, 等, 2018. 基于IPA理论的旅游民宿感知: 重要性、满意度和差异: 以湖北省恩施州为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 34（7）: 992-997.〔SANG Z N, FENG S X, SHI P F, et al.,2018. Tourism bed and breakfast perception based on IPA theory: importance, satisfaction and difference: a case study of Enshi Prefecture of Hubei Province[J]. Resource Development & Market, 34(7): 992-997.〕

石培华, 2016. 如何推进“全域旅游”[J]. 西部大开发（11）: 104-105.

石培华, 翟燕霞, 李中, 2020. 全域旅游发展的中国模式[M]. 北京: 中国旅游出版社.

宋力夫, 1980. 打开更广阔的旅游天地[J]. 地理知识（3）: 7-9.

孙九霞, 孙钢华, 2022. 旅游消费者行为学[M]. 大连: 东北财经大学出版社: 37-54.

王婧, 赵鸣晓, 2015. 基于IPA法和因子分析法的游客满意度定量评价: 以广西伊岭岩风景区为例[J]. 辽宁工业大学学报（社会科学版）, 17（4）: 25-27.

王骁驹, 2018. 县域尺度全域旅游发展潜力评价模型研究[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学.〔WANG X J, 2018. Research on the evaluation model of tourism development potential in county scale[D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University.〕

吴必虎, 1998. 旅游系统: 对旅游活动与旅游科学的一种解释[J]. 旅游学刊（1）: 21-25.

吴必虎, 2001. 区域旅游规划原理[M]. 北京: 中国旅游出版社.

吴必虎, 张栋平, 2016. 以五大理念引领全域旅游发展: 五大理念是全域旅游的引领性指针, 全域旅游是贯彻五大理念的综合载体[N]. 中国旅游报. 2016-02-13（04）.

吴明隆, 2000. SPSS统计应用实务[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社.

吴明隆, 2010. 问卷统计分析实务: SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.

徐子琳, 周彤, 2019. 体验视角下全域旅游目的地游客满意度研究: 以南京市为例[J]. 金陵科技学院学报（社会科学版）, 33（2）: 30-34. 〔XU Z L, ZHOU T, 2019. Research on tourist satisfaction degree of comprehensive tourism destinations from the perspective of experience: taking Nanjing as an example[J]. Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology (Social Sciences), 33(2): 30-34.〕

尹丽, 田良, 2019. 全域旅游目的地规模与省级单位发展水平评估初步研究: 基于国家全域旅游示范区的若干统计分析[J]. 特区经济（12）: 122-124.〔YIN L, TIAN L, 2019. A preliminary study on the scale of whole-area tourism destination and the evaluation of provincial unit development level: based on the statistical analysis of the national global tourism demonstration zone[J]. Special Zone Economy (12): 122-124.〕

张春香, 2018. 基于因子分析的屯垦博物馆游客感知评价体系研究: 以新疆兵团军垦博物馆为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 34（3）: 433-438.〔ZHANG C X, 2018. Research on evaluation system of tourist perception of military reclamation museum based on factor analysis: a case study on museum of Xinjiang Bingtuan Army Reclamation[J]. Resource Development & Market, 34(3): 433-438.〕

张宏梅, 洪娟, 张文静, 2012. 旅游目的地游客感知价值的层次关系模型[J]. 人文地理, 27（4）: 125-130.〔ZHANG H M, HONG J, ZHANG W J, 2012. The hierarchy relationship model of tourists perceived value on tourist destination[J]. Human Geography, 27 (4): 125-130.〕

张辉, 岳燕祥, 2016. 全域旅游的理性思考[J]. 旅游学刊, 31（9）: 15-17.

邹再进, 2008. 我国旅游规划思想导向的演进[J]. 旅游学刊, 23（7）: 6-7.

DE NISCO A, RIVIEZZO A, NAPOLITANO M R, 2015. An importance-performance analysis of tourist satisfaction at destination level: evidence from Campania(Italy)[J]. European Journal of Tourism Research, 10: 64-75.

HAIR J F, BLACK W C, BABIN B J, et al., 2009. Multivariate data analysis[M]. 7th ed. London: Prentice Hall．

LIKERT R, 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes[J]. Archive of Psychology, 22(140): 1-55.

SEVER I, 2015. Importance-performance analysis: a valid management tool?[J]. Tourism Management, 48: 43-53.

[1]	LIU Yanming, LI Li. A CASE STUDY ON KARAMAY CITY: EXPANSION AND DRIVING FACTORS OF RESOURCES-BASED CITIES BASED ON RS/GIS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2019, 21(3): 14-21.
[2]	ZENG Wei, CHEN Wenlu, YAN Sixiang. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF POYANG LAKE CITY CIRCLE BASED ON SYMBIOSIS THEORY [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(6): 78-85.
[3]	FU Huanlan. EVALUATION OF TRANSFORMATION CAPABILITY OF MATURE RESOURCES-BASED CITIES IN SHANXI PROVINCE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(3): 16-20.
[4]	ZHANG Xiu-ying, GAO Xiao-wei. ECONOMIC OPENNESS EVALUATION ON WESTERN PROVINCES ALONG “THE BELT AND ROAD” BASED ON FACTORS ANALYSIS AND DEA-MALMQUIST MODEL [J]. Resources & Industries, 2017, 19(2): 48-56.
[5]	Ya yun, GAO Shi-kui. CAPABILITY EVALUATION OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION OF INNER MONGOLIAS RESOURCESBASED CITIESWU [J]. Resources & Industries, 2015, 17(1): 1-5.
[6]	XI Xiao1，2，LI Yue3，*. REGIONAL VARIANCES OF CHINA’S ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION BASED ONRESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2014, 16(1): 110-116.
[7]	ZHU Guang-jiao, SHA Jing-hua. INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION COMPARISON AMONG RESOURCESBASED CITIES IN WESTERN FIVE PROVINCES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(4): 1-5.
[8]	AI Ping, SHI Xue-yi. CLASSIFICATION OF CONSOLIDATION POTENTIAL OF RURAL RESIDENTIAL LANDS IN JINCHENG CITY BASED ON FACTOR ANALYSIS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(4): 47-52.
[9]	CHU Xiao, SHA Jing-hua. COMPARISON IN INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION CAPACITY IN FIVE WESTERN PROVINCES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(2): 27-32.
[10]	ZHOU Fei, CHEN Shi-yin, ZHONG Lai-yuan, TUN Xue-biao. A CASE STUDY ON QINGYUAN CITY: ASSESSMENT OF URBAN LAND INTENSIVE UTILIZATION BASED ON FACTOR ANALYSIS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2009, 11(5): 56-60.
[11]	WANG Fang ZHAO Jun-yuan. A CASE STUDY ON FIVE CAPITALS IN NORTHWEST CHINA： QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION ON URBAN TOURISM COMPETITION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2008, 10(3): 44-48.
[12]	LIU Xiu-xia WANG Guo-liang HOU Feng-bo. STUDY ON URBANIZATION LEVEL DIFFERENCE AMONG CITIES IN SHANDONG [J]. Resources & Industries, 2008, 10(1): 97-100.