资源与产业 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 159-168.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220527.007

• 非主题来稿选登 • 上一篇    下一篇

价值链视角下哈萨克斯坦农业发展影响因素组态与路径研究——基于QCA方法的组态分析

王岩阳 1,汪晶晶 1,2   

  1. (1. 新疆农业大学 经济与贸易学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052;
    2. 新疆农业大学 农林经济管理博士后流动站,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052)
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-28 修回日期:2021-07-24 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 汪晶晶,博士、副教授,主要从事农业“走出去”支持政策研究。E-mail: 499854745@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王岩阳,硕士生,研究方向为国际商务 E-mail: 1214351630@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(72003163);中国博士后科学基金第65批面上资助项目(2019M653902XB);新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划人文社科项目(XJEDU2021SY010);新疆维吾尔自治区优秀博士后普通资助项目

FACTORS CONFIGURATION AND PATH TO KAZAKHSTAN'S AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT VIEWING FROM VALUE CHAIN BASED ON QCA METHOD

WANG YanYang 1, WANG JingJing 1, 2   

  1. (1. School of Economics and Trade, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052,China; 
    2. Postdoctoral Mobile Station of Agricultural and Forestry Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052,China)
  • Received:2021-06-28 Revised:2021-07-24 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-07-21
  • Contact: WANG JingJing

摘要: 自“一带一路”倡议提出以来,中国与哈萨克斯坦农业合作更加密切,但这种合作能否在激烈的国际市场竞争环境中进一步发展,农业投资领域的合理选择意义重大。论文从价值链视角出发,将农业价值链细分为生产链、物流链、信息链、营销链、创新链5条具有代表性的链条,以2019年哈萨克斯坦17个地州市的数据为研究样本,运用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA)对哈萨克斯坦农业发展的影响因素组态与路径进行分析,研究发现:1)产销互链是形成哈萨克斯坦高水平农业价值链的主要驱动因素,该国高水平农业价值链下存在的两种条件组态分别是“生产链*营销链*(~信息链)*(~创新链)”和“生产链*物流链*营销链*(~创新链)”;2)导致哈萨克斯坦低水平农业价值链的路径则分为落后产能制约型和非农产业导向型,其中落后产能制约型的条件组态包括“(~生产链)*(~物流链)*(~信息链)”和“(~生产链)*物流链*信息链*(~营销链)*创新链”两种条件组态,非农产业导向型的条件组态则是“生产链*物流链*信息链*营销链*创新链”。结果表明:生产链和营销链是哈萨克斯坦目前农业发展的主要驱动因素,而创新链是制约该国农业高质量发展的主要瓶颈,物流链和信息链则具有发展潜力。针对以上结论提出应重点依托哈萨克斯坦部分地州市农业生产和营销方面的优势,积极发挥我国农业技术、信息技术和物流基础设施建设方面的优势,持续深化中哈双方在农业全产业链上的互补性合作,在帮助哈方摆脱“农业转型困境”的同时实现合作共赢。

关键词: 价值链, 农业, 投资领域, 组态分析, QCA方法

Abstract: China has been closely cooperating with Kazakhstan in agriculture since “the Belt and Road” initiative was put forward, but this cooperation largely depends on an appropriate selection of agricultural investment to develop in a challenging global environment. This paper uses value chain to divide agricultural value chain into five chains, production, logistics, information, sales and innovation, and applies fsQCA to analyze the factors configuration of and path to Kazakhstan's agricultural development based on its 17 states' 2019 data. Production-sales mutual chain is the major drive for Kazakhstan's high level agricultural value chain, which is composed of two configurations, “production-sales chain*(~information chain)*(~innovation chain)” and “production chain*logistics chain*sales chain*(~innovation chain)”. A path leading to Kazakhstan's lower level agricultural value chain can be attributed to lagging-producing-capacity-constraining” and “non-agricultural-industrial-oriented”, the former including “(~production chain)*(~logistics chain)*(~information chain)” and (~production chain)*logistic chain*information chain*(~sales chain)*innovation chain”, and the latter including “production chain*logistics chain*information chain*sales chain*innovation chain”. Production chain and sales chain are the main drives to Kazakhstan's agricultural development, which is limited by innovation chain, but potentially powered by logistics chain and information chain. This paper suggests that Kazakhstan fulfill its advantages in agricultural production and sales in some states, cooperate with China's agricultural technology, information technology and infrastructure, deepen both parties' complementarity in the whole agricultural production chain, getting rid of Kazakhstan's agricultural transforming dilemma along with reaching a win-win.

Key words: value chain, agriculture, investment domain, configuration analysis, QCA method

中图分类号: