环境规制下产业链区际分工演化研究：理论与实证

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220916.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在产品内分工背景下，环境规制实施是否引致产业链区际有效分工并实现产业链技术创新和升级效应，对实现跨区域产业链协同减排目标具有重要意义。本文聚焦长江经济带化工行业，基于污染天堂理论、技术创新理论和要素组合理论，构建演化理论模型和面板回归模型，研究环境规制对产业链区际分工的影响。结果如下：1）环境规制的产业链分工“污染天堂”效应短期内是存在的，但从长期来看，具有倒“U”型影响，且临界值为1.438 5，即当环境规制强度大于临界值时，将降低产业链地区专业化程度，不利于产业链区际分工；2）环境规制对地区产业链专业化分工具有技术促进效应和要素组合效应，同时，外商投资等因素也对环境规制效应的发挥产生着一定的制约作用。因此，政府应制定适度环境规制强度，加大技术创新，促进产业链绿色创新升级，注重要素区域间合理配置，并严格外商引入渠道，创造良好环境。

关键词: 环境规制, 产业链区际分工演化, 化工行业

Abstract: Whether execution of environmental regulations leads to effective regional division of industrial chain and then its technical innovation and upgrade is key to collaborative emission reduction of trans-regional industrial chain under products inner division. This paper, focusing on chemicals industry in Yangtze River economic zone, uses pollution paradise theory, technical innovation theory and element combination theory to establish an evolutionary theoretical model and panel regression model to study the impacts of environmental regulations on regional division of industrial chain. Pollution Paradise effect of industrial chain division under environmental regulations exists in a short term, but of an upsidedown “U-shaped” impacts for a long term with critical value at 1.438 5, above which industrial chain will be decreased its specialization, unfavorable for industrial chain division. Environmental regulations are of technical promotion and elemental combination effects on regional division of industrial chain. Factors such as foreign investment also limits the execution of environmental regulations. This paper suggests governments make appropriate environmental regulation intensity, boot technical innovation, promote green innovative upgrade of industrial chain, focus on a rationally regional allocation and control adopting channels of foreign investments and create a good industrial environment.

Key words: environmental regulations, regional division evolution of industrial chain, chemicals industry

中图分类号:

F427

肖雁飞, 谢仁贵, 尹慧. 环境规制下产业链区际分工演化研究：理论与实证[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 51-60.

XIAO Yanfei, XIE Rengui, YIN Hui . THEORETICAL AND CASE STUDY ON EVOLUTION OF REGIONAL DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL CHAIN UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(5): 51-60.

参考文献

高艺, 杨高升, 谢秋皓, 2020. 异质性环境规制对绿色全要素生产率的影响机制: 基于能源消费结构的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 22(3): 1-10. 〔GAO Y, YANG G S, XIE Q H, 2020. Impact mechanism of heterogeneously environmental regulations on green total factors productivity based on adjusting of energy consumption structure[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(3): 1-10.〕
华坚, 朱文静, 黄媛媛, 2021. 制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚对绿色发展效率的影响: 以长三角城市群27个中心城市为例[J]. 资源与产业, 23(2): 61-72. 〔HUA J, ZHU W J, HUANG Y Y, 2021. A case study on 27 central cities of Yangtze River Delta City Cluster: impacts of coordinated concentration of manufacturing and industrial servicing on green developing efficiency[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(2): 61-72.〕
李凯杰, 王怀民, 2021. FDI、环境规制和我国城市技术进步偏向性[J]. 上海经济研究（5）: 36-49. 〔LI K J, WANG H M, 2021. FDI, environmental regulation and the bias of technical change in China's cities[J]. Economic Study of Shanghai （5）: 36-49.〕
刘传明, 刘一丁, 马青山, 2021. 环境规制与经济高质量发展的双向反馈效应研究[J]. 经济与管理评论（3）: 111-122. 〔LIU C M, LIU Y D, MA Q S, 2021. Research on twoway feedback effect between environmental regulation and high-quality economic development[J]. Economic and Management Review（3）: 111-122.〕
刘志彪, 姚志勇, 吴乐珍, 2020. 巩固中国在全球产业链重组过程中的分工地位研究[J]. 经济学家(11): 51-57. 〔LIU Z B, YAO Z Y, WU L Z, 2020. Research on consolidating Chinas division of labor in the process of global industrial chain restructuring[J]. Economist (11): 51-57.〕
罗知, 齐博成, 2021. 环境规制的产业转移升级效应与银行协同发展效应: 来自长江流域水污染治理的证据[J]. 经济研究（2）: 174-189. 〔LUO Z, QI B C, 2021. The effects of environmental regulation on industrial transfer and upgrading and banking synergetic development-evidence from water pollution control in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Economic Study（2）: 174-189.〕
沈坤荣, 周力, 2020. 地方政府竞争、垂直型环境规制与污染回流效应[J]. 经济研究, 55(3): 37-51. 〔SHEN K R, ZHOU L, 2020. Local government competition, vertical environmental regulation and the pollution backflow effect[J]. Economic Study, 55(3): 37-51.〕
程名望, 张家平, 李礼连, 2020. 互联网发展、劳动力转移和劳动生产率提升[J]. 世界经济文汇（5）: 1-17. 〔CHENG M W, ZHANG J P, LI L L, 2020. Internet development, labor transfer and labor productivity improvement[J]. World Economic Papers（5）: 1-17.〕
王杰, 段瑞珍, 孙学敏, 2019. 环境规制、产品质量与中国企业的全球价值链升级[J]. 产业经济研究 (2): 64-75, 101. 〔WANG J, DUAN R Z, SUN X M, 2019. Environmental regulation, Product quality and Chinese firms' upgrading in global value chain[J]. Research on Industrial Economy (2): 64-75, 101.〕
张国兴, 刘薇, 保海旭, 2020. 多重环境规制对区域产业结构变动的时滞效应[J]. 管理科学学报, 23(9): 100-112. 〔ZHANG G X, LIU W, BAO H X, 2020. Study on the time-lag effect of multiple environmental regulation policies on regional industrial structure change[J]. Journal of management science, 23(9): 100-112.〕
赵霄伟, 2014. 环境规制、环境规制竞争与地区工业经济增长: 基于空间Durbin面板模型的实证研究[J]. 国际贸易问题 (7): 82-92. 〔ZHAO X W, 2014. Environmental regulation, environmental regulation competition and regional industrial economic growth: an empirical study based on spatial panel Durbin Model[J]. International Trade Issues (7): 82-92.〕
COLE M A, ELLIOTT R J R, 2003. Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3): 363-383.
COPELAND B R, TAYLOR M S, 1999. Trade, spatial separation, and the environment[J]. Journal of International Economics, 47(1): 137-168.
MANI M, WHEELER D, 1998. In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995[J]. The Journal of Environment & Development, 7(3): 215-247.
LANOIE P, PATRY M, LAJEUNESSE R, 2008. Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30(2): 121-128.
Ramanathan R, Ramanathan U, Bentley Y, 2018. The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance: a novel use of DEA[J]. Omega, 75: 131-138.

[1]	潘海英, 陈玲, 任佳佳. 数字经济发展的碳减排效应研究——兼论异质性环境规制的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(6): 1-14.
[2]	胡元林, 魏郁锬. 生态创新会影响企业实际税负吗?[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 78-92.
[3]	仇蕾, 马蓓文, 周钦, 程常高. 环境规制对重污染企业投资偏好的影响——基于我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 92-106.
[4]	韦庆明, 赵欣欣, 冯馨, 张苗苗. 环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 54-63.
[5]	万欣, 苏鹏程, 毛鹏. 异质性治理主体视角下环境规制的治污路径——基于中介效应的空间差异分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 108-116.
[6]	沈泓成, 罗婷, 叶骥 . 环境规制强度对浙江省工业绿色发展影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 61-69.
[7]	李金晶, 李君, 陈长瑶, 等. 环境规制对西南地区产业结构优化的影响效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 124-132.
[8]	陈昕, 刘媛华, 石翠翠. 基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解法的区域经济发展差异研究——从环境规制角度分析#br#[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 63-70.
[9]	宋敏, 张媛媛. 异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.
[10]	钱敏, 金小莉. “一带一路”沿线省份FDI、环境规制对能源利用效率的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(6): 79-85.
[11]	张倩, 沈菊琴, 孙付华, 等. 企业水信息披露影响因素实证研究——基于中国化工行业上市企业的数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(4): 53-62.
[12]	杨恺钧, 蔡嘉晋. FDI质量、环境规制与产业结构升级的关系——基于2008—2018年长江经济带11省市的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 12-20.
[13]	李江, 刘春学, 蒋睿. 环境规制对云南省产业结构升级的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 21-28.
[14]	陈妍，梅林，程叶青. 环境规制、资源禀赋对东北地区产业转型的影响机制研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(5): 28-36.
[15]	马骏，刘怡. 环境规制对中国房地产业绿色发展的影响分析——基于31个省份的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(4): 41-48.