生态创新会影响企业实际税负吗?

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230717.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究企业生态创新对企业实际税负的影响作用,本文从税收激励角度出发,将2010—2019年我国沪深股市A股制造业上市公司作为研究样本,通过搭建“生态创新-企业声誉-企业税负”理论框架,采用固定效应模型实证研究企业生态创新对企业实际税负的影响机制,考查企业声誉在企业生态创新与企业实际税负之间发挥的中介作用,以及环境规制在企业生态创新与企业实际税负之间发挥的调节作用,并期望以此能够为我国政府引导、激励企业开展生态创新提供科学的理论依据和政策建议。研究结果表明: 1)企业开展生态创新能够显著降低企业实际税负,企业生态创新水平每提高1%,企业实际税负水平将下降1.13%,这一效应在制造业轻度、中度污染行业企业及其非国有企业中表现得更为显著。2)企业开展生态创新有助于提高企业声誉,企业生态创新水平每提高1%,企业声誉水平将提高23.15%。企业声誉在企业生态创新与企业实际税负之间发挥着部分中介作用。引入企业声誉之后，企业开展生态创新将会使企业实际税负水平从1.13%下降为1.01%,企业声誉的中介效应占企业生态创新对企业实际税负总效应的比例为7.05%。3)环境规制在企业生态创新与企业实际税负之间发挥着负向调节作用。环境规制与企业生态创新的交互项系数为-0.5%,且在1%的水平上显著,表明环境规制强化了企业生态创新对企业实际税负的负向影响作用。

关键词: 企业生态创新, 企业实际税负, 企业声誉, 环境规制

Abstract: This paper, aiming at the impacts of ecological innovation on enterprises' actual taxing burden, uses China's A-share manufacturing enterprises' 2010 to 2019 data to construct a theoretical framework of “ecological innovation-enterprise reputation-enterprise taxing burden” from perspective of taxing stimulation, and applies fixed effect model to study the impacts of ecological innovation on manufacturing enterprises' actual taxing burden, and to analyze the mediation of enterprise reputation between ecological innovation and actual taxing burden, and the moderating role of environmental regulation between ecological innovation and actual taxing burden of the enterprise, offering references for Chinese government to guide and stimulate enterprises on ecological innovation. Enterprises can largely decrease its actual taxing burden from ecological innovation, down by 1.13% if innovative level up by 1%, especially in the enterprises in manufacturing industries with low and moderate pollution and in private sector. Enterprises can promote their reputation through ecological innovation, up by 23.15% if innovation level up by 1%.Enterprise reputation plays a partial mediating role between enterprise ecological innovation and actual tax burden. The test shows that enterprises' actual taxing burden will decrease to 1.01% from 1.13% on ecological innovation after reputation incorporated. Mediation effect of enterprises' reputation has a proportion at 7.05% to the total effect of ecological innovation to actual taxing burden. Environmental regulation plays a negative regulating role between enterprises' ecological innovation and their actual tax burden. The research shows that the interaction term coefficient between environmental regulation and enterprise ecological innovation is -0.5%, and is significant at the level of 1%, indicating that environmental regulation strengthens the negative impact of enterprise ecological innovation on the actual tax burden of enterprises.

Key words: enterprise ecological innovation, actual taxing burden of the enterprise, enterprise reputation, environmental regulation

中图分类号:

X322
F812.42

胡元林, 魏郁锬. 生态创新会影响企业实际税负吗?[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 78-92.

HU Yuanlin, WEI Yutan. DOES ECOLOGIC INNOVATION IMPACT ENTERPRISES' ACTUAL TAXING BURDEN?[J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(4): 78-92.

参考文献

曹越, 陈文瑞, 鲁昱, 2017. 环境规制会影响公司的税负吗?[J]. 经济管理, 39(7): 163-182.〔CAO Y, CHEN W R, LU Y, 2017. Does the environmental regulation influence the corporate tax burden? [J]. Business and Management Journal, 39(7): 163-182.〕

曹翠珍, 赵国浩, 2017. 资源型企业绿色创新、绿色动态能力与竞争优势的实证检验[J]. 统计与决策(6): 177-181.〔CAO C Z, ZHAO G H, 2017. The empirical test of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and competitive advantage of resource-based enterprises[J]. Statistics & Decision(6): 177-181.〕

董颖, 2011. 企业生态创新的机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学.〔DONG Y, 2011. The mechanism of corporate eco-innovation[D]. Hang Zhou: Zhejiang University.〕

范子英, 田彬彬, 2013. 税收竞争、税收执法与企业避税[J]. 经济研究, 48(9): 99-111.〔FAN Z Y, TIAN B B, 2013. Tax competition, tax enforcement and tax avoidance[J].Economic Research Journal, 48(9): 99-111.〕

龚晨, 毕克新, 2018. 低碳情境下制造企业社会责任对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 工程管理科技前沿, 37(1): 43-48.〔GONG C, BI K X, 2018. Research on the relationship between manufacturing corporate social responsibility and innovation performance under low-carbon situation[J].Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management, 37(1): 43-48.〕

郭玲, 汪洋, 陈恩霖, 2022. 纳税声誉对企业税负: 抑制还是抬升？[J]. 财政科学(1): 119-129.〔GUO L, WANG Y, CHEN E L, 2022. Taxation reputation and enterprise's tax burden: reducing or increasing? [J]. Fiscal Science(1): 119-129.〕

胡元林, 郑文, 2018. 环境规制对企业绩效的影响研究[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社.〔HU Y L, ZHENG W, 2018. The impact of environment regulation on firm performance[M]. Beijing: Economy & Management Publishing House.〕

胡元林, 宋时楠, 2019. 基于资源视角的企业生态创新研究综述[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 19(3): 46-53.〔HU Y L, SONG S N, 2019. Literature review of eco-innovation of enterprises on a resources-based theory[J].Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 19(3): 46-53.〕

胡元林, 彭羽昊, 2022. 企业生态创新的价值效应研究: 以环境规制为调节[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版), 47(4): 156-166, 182.〔HU Y L, PENG Y H, 2022. Value effect of enterprise eco-innovation moderated by environmental regulations[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 47(4): 156-166, 182.〕

蒋榕湄, 陈贵松, 2022. 政府补贴、企业 ESG 表现与绿色创新[J]. 资源与产业, 24(6): 90-102.〔JIANG R M, CHEN G S, 2022. Governmental allowance, enterprise ESG and green innovation[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(6): 90-102.〕

李建英, 陈平, 李婷婷, 2015. 我国制造业上市公司所得税税负影响因素分析[J]. 税务研究(12): 41-44.

李玲, 陶锋, 2012. 中国制造业最优环境规制强度的选择: 基于绿色全要素生产率的视角[J]. 中国工业经济(5): 70-82, 8-13, 4, 7.〔LI L, TAO F, 2012. Selection of optimal environmental regulation intensity for Chinese manufacturing industry: based on the green TFP perspective[J]. China Industrial Economics(5): 70-82, 8-13, 4, 7.〕

李世辉, 程宸, 2022. 资本性环保支出、公众环境诉求与企业价值: 来自重污染行业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 华东经济管理, 36(5): 66-78.〔LI S H, CHENG C, 2022. Capital environmental protection expenditure, public environmental demand and enterprise value: evidence from listed companies in heavy polluting industries[J]. East China Economic Management, 36(5): 66-78.〕

李胜兰, 初善冰, 申晨, 2014. 地方政府竞争、环境规制与区域生态效率[J]. 世界经济, 37(4): 88-110.

李增福, 汤旭东, 连玉君, 2016. 中国民营企业社会责任背离之谜[J]. 管理世界(9): 136-148, 160, 188.〔LI Z F, TANG X D, LIAN Y J, 2016. The puzzle of Chinese private enterprises' corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of Management World(9): 136-148, 160, 188. 〕

刘骏, 刘峰, 2014. 财政集权、政府控制与企业税负: 来自中国的证据[J]. 会计研究(1): 21-27, 94.〔LIU J, LIU F, 2014. Fiscal centralization, government control and corporate tax burden: evidence from China[J]. Accounting Research(1): 21-27, 94. 〕

刘子杨, 陈进, 2017. 碳排放视角下生态创新、高管团队异质性与经济绩效的关系研究: 以中国火力发电行业上市公司为例[J]. 软科学, 31(6): 86-90.〔LIU Z Y, CHEN J, 2017. Research on the relationship among eco-innovation, top management team heterogeneity and economic performance from the perspective of carbon emission: evidence from Chinese listed companies of thermal power industry[J]. Soft Science, 31(6): 86-90.〕

缪荣, 茅宁, 2007. 中国公司声誉测量指标构建的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论(1): 91-98.〔MIAO R, MAO N, 2007. An empirical study on the measurement index of corporate reputation in China[J]. Nankai Business Review(1): 91-98.〕

彭峰, 李本东, 2005. 环境保护投资概念辨析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 28(3): 72-74, 119.〔PENG F, LI B D, 2005. Analysis of environment protection investment[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 28(3): 72-74, 119.〕

彭雪蓉, 魏江, 2014. 生态创新、资源获取与组织绩效: 来自浙江省中小企业的实证研究[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 30(5): 60-65.〔PENG X R, WEI J, 2014. Eco-innovation and firm performance: the mediating role of resource acquisition[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 30(5): 60-65.〕

孙婷婷, 樊传浩, 2021. 基于CiteSpace的国内外绿色创新研究可视化对比分析[J]. 资源与产业, 23(6): 52-63.〔SUN T T, FAN C H, 2021. Visualized comparison of domestic & overseas green innovation research based on CiteSapce data[J].Resources & Industries, 23(6): 52-63.〕

陶东杰, 李成, 2021. 环境规制、地方财政压力与企业实际税负[J]. 经济科学, 243(3): 83-95.〔TAO D J, LI C, 2021. Environmental regulation, local fiscal pressure and effective corporate tax rate[J]. Economic Science, 243(3): 83-95〕

田彬彬, 陶东杰, 李文健, 2020. 税收任务、策略性征管与企业实际税负[J]. 经济研究, 55(8): 121-136.〔TIAN B B, TAO D J, LI W J , 2020. Tax revenue target, strategic collection and effective tax rate[J]. Economic Research Journal, 55(8): 121-136〕

汪方军, 孙俊勤, 邓杰丹, 2016. 企业社会责任与实际税负的相关性研究[J]. 税务研究(10): 87-91.

王进, 2014. 产业群聚、知识共享、生态创新与企业竞争优势关系的实证研究[J]. 软科学, 28(9): 74-77, 104.〔WANG J, 2014. Empirical research on industrial cluster, knowledge sharing, eco-innovation impact on competitive advantage[J]. Soft Science, 28(9): 74-77, 104.〕

汪明月, 张浩, 李颖明, 等, 2021. 绿色技术创新绩效传导路径的双重异质性研究: 基于642家工业企业的调查数据[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 42(8): 141-166.〔WANG M Y, ZHANG H, LI Y M, et al, 2021. Research on the dual heterogeneity of performance transmission paths of green technology innovation: based on the data of 642 industrial enterprises in China[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T. , 42(8): 141-166.〕

汪明月, 李颖明, 王子彤, 2022. 工业企业绿色技术创新绩效传导及政府市场规制的调节作用研究[J]. 管理学报, 19(7): 1026-1037, 1091.〔WANG M Y, LI Y M, WANG Z T, 2022. A study on the performance transmission of green technology innovation in industrial enterprises and the moderation effect of government market regulation[J].Chinese Journal of Management, 19(7): 1026-1037, 1091.〕

吴联生, 2009. 国有股权、税收优惠与公司税负[J]. 经济研究, 44(10): 109-120.〔WU L S, 2009. State ownership, preferential tax, and corporate tax burdens[J].Economic Research Journal, 44(10): 109-120.〕

徐建中, 贯君, 林艳, 2016. 互补性资产视角下绿色创新与企业绩效关系研究: 战略柔性和组织冗余的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 33(20): 76-82.〔XU J Z, GUAN J, LIN Y, 2016. A research on the relationship between environmental innovation and corporate performance in the complementary assets perspective: the moderating effect of strategic flexibility and organizational slack[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 33(20): 76-82.〕

杨静, 刘秋华, 施建军, 2015. 企业绿色创新战略的价值研究[J]. 科研管理, 36(1): 18-25.〔YANG J, LIU Q H, SHI J J, 2015. The value of corporate green innovation strategy[J]. Science Research Management, 36(1): 18-25.〕

杨旭东, 沈彦杰, 彭晨宸, 2020. 环保投资会影响企业实际税负吗?: 来自重污染行业的证据[J]. 会计研究(5): 134-146.〔YANG X D, SHEN Y J, PENG C C, 2020. Will environmental investment affects the firm's actual tax burden? : evidence from heavily polluting industries[J]. Accounting Research(5): 134-146.〕

张文博, 2022. 生态文明建设视域下城市绿色转型的路径研究[M]. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.〔ZHANG W B, 2022. Path analysis of urban green transition a perspective from ecological civilization construction[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press. 〕

张彦博, 李琪, 2013. 政府环保补助与环境质量改进的相关性研究[J]. 经济纵横(9): 50-53.

邹萍, 2018. “言行一致”还是“投桃报李”?: 企业社会责任信息披露与实际税负[J]. 经济管理, 40(3): 159-177.〔ZOU P, 2018. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and actual tax burden: walking the talk or logging rolling? [J]. Business and Management Journal, 40(3): 159-177.〕

AHMED U, MOZAMMEL S, ZAMAN F, 2020. Impact of ecological innovation, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial orientation on environmental performance and energy efficiency[J]. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(3): 289-295.

CAI W G, LI G P, 2018. The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 176: 110-118.

DADDI T, HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA I, MARRUCCI L, et al, 2021. The effects of green supply chain management capability on the internalisation of environmental management systems and organisation performance[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4): 1241-1253.

DARMANDIEU A, GARC S-AYERBE C, RENUCCI A, et al, 2022. How does it pay to be circular in production processes? eco-innovativeness and green jobs as moderators of a cost-efficiency advantage in European small and medium enterprises[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3): 1184-1203.〕

GAVIOUS I, LIVNE G, CHEN E, 2022. Does tax avoidance increase or decrease when tax enforcement is stronger? evidence using CSR heterogeneity perspective[J].International Review of Financial Analysis, 84: 102325.

LIN K Z, MILLS L F, ZHANG F, et al, 2018. Dopolitical connections weaken tax enforcement effectiveness?[J].Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4): 1941-1972.

NAKAO Y, AMANO A, MATSUMURA K, et al, 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(2): 106-118.

XU J, LIU F, SHANG Y, 2020. R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China[J]. Kybernetes, 50(3): 737-756.

YAO Q, LIU J X, SHENG S B, et al, 2019. Does eco-innovation lift firm value? the contingent role of institutions in emerging markets[J]. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(8): 1763-1778.

[1]	潘海英, 陈玲, 任佳佳. 数字经济发展的碳减排效应研究——兼论异质性环境规制的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(6): 1-14.
[2]	仇蕾, 马蓓文, 周钦, 程常高. 环境规制对重污染企业投资偏好的影响——基于我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 92-106.
[3]	韦庆明, 赵欣欣, 冯馨, 张苗苗. 环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 54-63.
[4]	万欣, 苏鹏程, 毛鹏. 异质性治理主体视角下环境规制的治污路径——基于中介效应的空间差异分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 108-116.
[5]	肖雁飞, 谢仁贵, 尹慧. 环境规制下产业链区际分工演化研究：理论与实证[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 51-60.
[6]	沈泓成, 罗婷, 叶骥 . 环境规制强度对浙江省工业绿色发展影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 61-69.
[7]	李金晶, 李君, 陈长瑶, 等. 环境规制对西南地区产业结构优化的影响效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 124-132.
[8]	陈昕, 刘媛华, 石翠翠. 基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解法的区域经济发展差异研究——从环境规制角度分析#br#[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 63-70.
[9]	宋敏, 张媛媛. 异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.
[10]	钱敏, 金小莉. “一带一路”沿线省份FDI、环境规制对能源利用效率的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(6): 79-85.
[11]	杨恺钧, 蔡嘉晋. FDI质量、环境规制与产业结构升级的关系——基于2008—2018年长江经济带11省市的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 12-20.
[12]	李江, 刘春学, 蒋睿. 环境规制对云南省产业结构升级的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 21-28.
[13]	田贵良，盛雨，曹酉男. 基于企业声誉传导的环境信息披露对钢铁企业价值的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 82-88.
[14]	陈妍，梅林，程叶青. 环境规制、资源禀赋对东北地区产业转型的影响机制研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(5): 28-36.
[15]	马骏，刘怡. 环境规制对中国房地产业绿色发展的影响分析——基于31个省份的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(4): 41-48.