中国首位城市现代化与生态化耦合协调的时空演变分析

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20231120.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究中国首位城市现代化和生态化的作用关系，根据城市现代化和生态化系统耦合作用的原理，以2008—2017年中国31个首位城市的现代化和生态化数据为基础，通过耦合协调度模型分析了首位城市现代化子系统和生态化子系统的耦合协调关系及其空间分布特征。研究结果显示：1）首位城市现代化和生态化水平的空间分布规律迥异，现代化水平的空间转移黏性过大，生态化高水平型城市过少、中高水平城市扎堆，中高值区与中低值区的空间内部分化明显，且高水平型城市的分布具有趋同性，空间分布多集中在东部和南部区域；2）在空间格局上，现代化和生态化处于高水平耦合和高度协调的首位城市依然较少，多数城市处在高水平耦合和较高协调阶段，协调度有待提升，且北京和广州为一级核心区，耦合协调空间结构呈现出南北“两级多核”状态；3）在时间演化上，中国首位城市现代化和生态化的耦合度和协调度均呈上升态势，耦合度从磨合层级提升到高水平耦合层级，高水平耦合城市占比增加到70.97%。协调度由中度协调逐渐过渡到较高协调程度，较高协调水平的城市占比从77.42%上升至87.10%，然而整体耦合水平依然强于协调水平。

关键词: 首位城市, 城市现代化, 城市生态化, 耦合协调

Abstract:

Aiming at exploring the relation between China ‘s first city ‘s modernization and ecologicalization, this paper, in accordance with the coupling principles of urban modernization and ecologicalization, uses 2008 to 2017 modernization and ecoloigicalization in China ‘s 31 first cities to establish a coupling coordination model which is employed to study their coupling coordination and spatial distribution of modernization sub-system and ecologicalization sub-system. First cities ‘ modernization and ecologicalization level spatially distributes variably, large spatial migrating viscosity, less cities of high ecologicalization level. Cities of middle levels are clustering. High values and middle-to-low values have internal polarization. Distribution of cities with higher levels is of convergence, most concentrating in the eastern and southern. First Cities of high coupling and coordination in modernization and ecologicalization are quite limited, most at high coupling and relatively coordinating stages. Beijing and Guangzhou are in tier 1 core zone with their coupling coordination spatial structure showing “2-classes-mulitple-cores” status from south to north. The coupling and coordination of China ‘s first cities ‘ modernization and ecologicalization shows a rising trend in temporal evolution, with coupling raised to high level from bottom level, up to 70.97% in proportion, and with coupling grading to higher from intermediation, up to 87.10% to 77.42%. Its overall coupling level is still higher than coordination.

Key words:

fist city, urban modernization, urban ecologicalization, coupling coordination

中图分类号:

F062.9

刘晨跃, 董天丹, 胡昕昱. 中国首位城市现代化与生态化耦合协调的时空演变分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(5): 10-21.

Liu Chenyue, Dong Tiandan, Hu Xinyu.

TEMPORAL-SPATIAL EVOLUTION OF COUPLING COORDINATION BETWEEN CHINA’S FIRST URBAN MODERNIZATION AND ECOLOGICALIZATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(5): 10-21.

参考文献

薄立明, 2019. 武汉市城市空间生态化发展模式及规划策略探析[J]. 华中建筑, 37(2): 68-72.〔BO L M, 2019. Analysis on ecological development model and planning strategy of urban space in Wuhan [J]. Central China Architecture, 37(2): 68-72.〕

陈孝杨，严家平, 2006. 资源型城市的生态化建设与环境问题[J]. 资源与产业, 8(6): 8-10.〔CHEN X Y, YAN J P, 2006. Ecological construction and environmental problems of resource-based cities [J]. Resources and Industries, 8(6): 8-10.〕

陈彦超, 杨青雪, 2015. 资源型城市现代化面临的困境及应对策略分析[J]. 黑龙江社会科学 (2): 89-92.〔CHEN Y C, YANG Q X, 2015. Analysis of the difficulties faced by resource-based city modernization and countermeasures [J]. Heilongjiang Social Sciences (2): 89-92.〕

董明月, 2011. 中国发达城市现代化评价指标体系的建立[J]. 调研世界 (12): 45-48.〔DONG M Y, 2011. Establishment of modernization evaluation index system for China ‘s developed cities [J]. Research World (12): 45-48.〕

都沁军, 2005. 城市生态化水平评价的指标体系研究[J]. 统计与决策 (9): 30-31.〔DU Q J, 2005. Research on index system of urban ecological level evaluation[J]. Statistics and Decision (9): 30-31.〕

付光辉, 刘万山, 2021. 基于物元可拓模型的城市生态化水平评价: 以江浙两省城市群为例[J]. 生态经济, 37(11): 86-91.〔FU G H, LIU W S, 2021. Evaluation of urban ecological level based on matter-element extension model: a case study of urban agglomeration in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces [J]. Ecological Economy,37(11): 86-91.〕

黄光宇, 陈勇, 1999. 论城市生态化与生态城市[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报(社科版) (1): 59-62.〔HUANG G Y, CHEN Y, 1999. On urban ecology and eco-city [J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Civil Architecture (Social Science Edition) (1): 59-62.〕

黄金川, 方创琳, 2003.城市化与生态环境交互耦合机制与规律性分析[J]. 地理研究 (2): 211-220.〔HUANG J C, FANG C L, 2003. Analysis on the mechanism and regularity of interaction and coupling between urbanization and ecological environment [J]. Geographical Research (2): 211-220.〕

计永超，焦德武, 2015. 城市治理现代化：理念、价值与路径构想[J]. 江淮论坛 (6): 11-15.〔JI Y C, JIAO D W, 2015. Urban governance modernization: concept, value and path conception [J]. Jianghuai Forum (6): 11-15.〕

李康, 2004. 生态文明与城市生态化[J]. 城市发展研究 (5): 55-59.〔LI K, 2004. Ecological civilization and urban ecology [J]. Urban Development Research (5): 55-59.〕

刘峰, 阚瑷珂, 李国明, 等, 2012.工业园生态化推进的西部典型资源型城市可持续发展研究：以攀枝花为例[J]. 资源与产业, 14(1): 8-11.〔LIU F, KAN A, LI G M, et al, 2012. Study on sustainable development of typical resource-based cities in Western China with industrial park eco-promotion: a case study of Panzhihua [J]. Resources and Industries, 14(1): 8-11.〕

孟静,2020. 中心城市现代化的动力机制与路径探索[J]. 现代经济探讨 (12): 100-102.〔MENG J, 2020. Dynamic mechanism and path exploration of central city modernization [J]. Journal of Modern Economics (12): 100-102.〕

潘义勇, 2003. 对城市信息化与城市生态化关系的思考[J]. 学术研究 (6): 74-75.〔PAN Y Y, 2003. Thinking on the relationship between urban informatization and urban ecology [J]. Academic Research (6): 74-75.〕

潘真真,苏维词,王建伟,等, 2016. 重庆城市生态化水平评价方法及应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 33(7): 34-38, 45.〔PAN Z Z, SU W C, WANG J W, et al, 2016. Evaluation method and application of urban ecological level in Chongqing [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 33(7): 34-38, 45.〕

任致远,2014. 关于我国城市现代化发展建设问题的思考[J]. 中国城市科学研究会, 21(5) : 1-5, 19.〔REN Z Y，2014. Thoughts on China ‘s urban modernization development and construction [J]. Chinese Society for Urban Studies, 21(5): 1-5, 19.〕

汪洋, 程霖, 黄颖, 2016. 新型城市化和生态环境协调发展研究: 中部6省大中城市比较视角[J]. 环境保护科学, 42(3): 41-47.〔WANG Y, CHENG L, HUANG Y, 2016. Study on new urbanization and coordinated development of ecological environment: a comparative perspective of large and medium-sized cities in 6 provinces in Central China [J]. Environmental Protection Science, 42(3): 41-47.〕

王桂芹,郑伯红, 2016.长沙城市现代化的评价指标体系构建及比较研究[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 19(5): 117-122.〔WANG G Q, ZHENG B H, 2016. Construction and comparative study of evaluation index system of Changsha city modernization[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 19(5): 117-122.〕

王桂芹,郑伯红,周红, 2020. 长沙城市现代化的评价指标体系构建及比较研究[J]. 现代城市研究 (1): 67-73.〔WANG G Q, ZHENG B H, ZHOU H, 2020. Construction and comparative study of evaluation index system of Changsha City modernization [J]. Modern Urban Research (1): 67-73.〕

王浦劬，雷雨若,2018. 江苏省城市现代化水平评价及预测[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 35(2): 91-99, 151.〔WANG P Q, LEI Y N, 2018. Evaluation and prediction of urban modernization level in Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 35(2): 91-99, 151.〕

王艳秀, 2014. 工业集聚下的城市生态化建设[J]. 开放导报 (1): 109-112.〔WANG Y X, 2014. Urban ecological construction under industrial agglomeration [J]. Open China Herald (1): 109-112.〕

张黎明,薛冰,姜淼,等, 2014.老工业区城市功能的生态化路径评价：以沈阳为例[J]. 生态科学, 33(3): 467-473, 501.〔ZHANG L M, XUE B, JIANG M, et al, 2014. Ecological path evaluation of urban functions in old industrial areas: a case study of Shenyang [J]. Ecological Science, 33(3): 467-473, 501.〕

张学良，周加来, 2009. 安徽省城市现代化水平的综合评价[J]. 财贸研究, 20(1): 18-23.〔ZHANG X L, ZHOU J L, 2009. Comprehensive evaluation of urban modernization level in Anhui Province [J]. Finance and Trade Research, 20(1): 18-23.〕

赵先超,袁超,胡艺觉, 2019. 湖南省城市现代化与生态化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 28(6): 109-119.〔ZHAO X C, YUAN C, HU Y J, 2019. Study on the coupling and coordinated development of urban modernization and ecological development in Hunan province[J]. World Geographical Research, 28(6): 109-119.〕

左学金, 2019. 我国特大型城市生态化转型发展：如何让市场机制发挥作用？[J]. 城乡规划 (4): 30-33.〔ZUO X J, 2019. Ecological transformation and development of China ‘s super large cities: how to let the market mechanism play a role? [J]. Urban and Rural Planning (4): 30-33.〕

[1]	柯文岚, 李文慧, 闫晶晶. 京津冀城市群高质量发展测度及时空分异特征研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 1-14.
[2]	张婕, 任雨菲, 胡周汉. 南水北调平原水库服务价值与区域高质量发展耦合协调研究——以山东省德州市大屯水库为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 41-54.
[3]	田泽, 肖玲颖, 梁伟, 等. 黄河流域工业绿色低碳转型与经济高质量发展耦合协调研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 14-26.
[4]	童纪新, 任丁维. 浙江省科技创新与水资源环境耦合协调度分析与预测[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 37-45.
[5]	吴姣, 刘润, 黄敏. 长江中游城镇化与生态环境耦合协调发展的多尺度研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 73-85.
[6]	李雪薇, 王志强. 基于GIS的乌鲁木齐市土地利用与生态环境耦合规律分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(6): 86-94.
[7]	王怡, 郝秀辉, 姚丽霞. 区域经济与生态环境耦合协调发展的时空演化研究——以黑龙江省为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(5): 21-30.
[8]	文含蕊, 何大义. 石油企业经济、环境和社会绩效的协调度评价研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(4): 32-40.
[9]	齐婧，李秀霞. 中国城市化与资源、环境发展水平的耦合协调时空格局演变[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(5): 29-36.
[10]	袁冬青，王富喜. 山东省城镇化质量与速度时空耦合关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(5): 37-43.
[11]	许长新，胡丽媛，孙洋洋. 安徽省城市化效率与经济发展水平的耦合协调关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(2): 24-33.
[12]	沈菊琴，裴磊，张兆方. 长江经济带城镇化与水资源的耦合协调关系[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21( 1): 1-9.
[13]	张二超，汪松，于可昕. 河南省矿产资源产业耦合协调关系研究 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(5): 90-95.
[14]	高清，黄治化，陈鹏宇. 四川省矿产资源开发与经济发展的耦合协调关系分析 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(4): 69-74.
[15]	许玉凤，徐飞，唐稳华. 城市化与生态环境的协调发展研究——以贵州省黔南州为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(3): 79-85.