资源与产业 ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 174-181.

• 资源经济 • 上一篇    

挪威、中国油气资源行业协会比较研究

张 倩*,安海忠,何 波,钟维琼,高湘昀   

  1. 中国地质大学人文经管学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-05 修回日期:2013-09-06 出版日期:2013-12-20 发布日期:2013-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 张倩(Email:zhangqian_2@sipo.gov.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目 (10YJA630001);中央高校基本科研基金(2-9-2013-04)。

COMPARISON OF OILGAS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN NORWAY AND CHINA

ZHANG Qian*, AN Hai-zhong, HE Bo, ZHONG Wei-qiong,GAO Xiang-yun   

  1. School of Humanities and Economic Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2013-06-05 Revised:2013-09-06 Online:2013-12-20 Published:2013-12-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Qian(Email:zhangqian_2@sipo.gov.cn)

摘要: 通过对挪威、中国几大油气资源行业协会的介绍,从入会条件、运营方式、政会关系、组织架构和服务领域几个方面,梳理出他们各自的管理特点。采用比较研究,总结出两国行业协会的异同:中国油气资源行业协会普遍为挂靠管理、合议参与,在入会条件上严格限制,在组织架构上加强内设。而挪威油气资源行业协会则采取独立运营与三方机制,在入会条件上广纳会员,在组织架构上关注地方。除了这些相异之处外,两国的油气资源行业协会在服务领域上则均具有广泛服务的特点。同时,以比较的结论,分析出我国油气资源行业协会未来的发展,应从扩大规模、实现自治、建立分会、加强代表、增强服务和完善规划出发的6点启示。

关键词: 挪威, 中国, 油气资源管理, 行业协会, 比较研究

Abstract: This paper gives an introduction to Norway and China's big oilgas professional associations from qualifications, operation, relation to government, structures and services, and compares their management. Chinese associations, based on a strict qualification,are common in taking names, negotiable participation, and intensifying internal organization. Norway has flexible qualification,operates independently and locally structuring. The two countries share a wide service. References for China's oil gas professional associations are presented from expanding,independence, sub association, representativeness, services and planning.

Key words: Norway, China, oilgas resource management, professional association, comparison

中图分类号: