基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解法的区域经济发展差异研究——从环境规制角度分析#br#

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220527.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 区域经济发展不平衡问题，一直是理论和实践工作的热点。论文基于2005—2018年上海市和安徽省的省级面板数据探究区域经济发展的差异性原因。首先通过随机森林法筛选出除环境变量外的其他重要影响因素，再通过经典门槛回归模型找到环境规制水平的分界点，然后根据该分界点将样本划分为两阶段，最后基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解法讨论不同环境规制阶段下经济发展差异的原因。研究发现:1）环境信访数为35 217件是划分环境规制水平的分界点，且安徽省和上海市目前均处于环境库兹涅茨曲线的前半段，环境规制的“创新补偿效应”起着主导作用；2）在单个变量的Oaxaca-Blinder分解结果中，人力资本和信息化水平分别在低水平子样本和全样本中成为经济发展差异的最主要原因，其特征回报差异值分别是-3.161 3和0.092 6；3）在总体Oaxaca-Blinder分解结果中，特征回报差异在全样本中的贡献比例增加了15.28%，说明在整体水平下，安徽省的经济发展水平“歧视”程度更加显著。基于以上结论，建议国家和政府在完善公众参与型环境规制相关政策的同时，还应给予青少年创新环境与创新资源、适当调整各地财政支出以缩小区域间的经济发展差异。这不仅有助于了解不同环境规制情况下省市的经济发展状况，也能从各个角度为实现地区经济发展平衡提供方向。

关键词: 经济发展差异, 环境规制, Oaxaca-Blinder分解法, 门槛回归

Abstract: Regional economic growth variance has always been a focus in theory and practice. Based on Shanghai and Anhui's 2005—2018 provincial panel data, this paper study the reason of regional economic growth variance. Random Forest Method is used to select other important factors besides environment variable, and classic threshold regression model is employed to mark the critical point between the high and low environmental regulations, which is based to divide the sample into two stages, and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition is applied to discuss the reasons of regional economic variance under different environmental regulations. Environmental petition mounts to 35 217 marking a critical point of environmental regulation level, with Anhui and Shanghai standing at the prior half of Environmental Kuznets Curve, mainly led by “innovative compensation effect” of environmental regulations. In the single decomposed Oaxaca-Blinder variable, human capital and informatization level are the major reason of regional economic variance in the low level samples and in the whole samples with their specific return variance values at -3.161 3 and 0.092 6. In the overall Oaxaca-Blinder decomposed results, contribution proportion of specific return variance in the whole samples increases by 15.28%, suggesting Anhui's economic growth level be at a more “discriminated” level under the overall level. This paper suggests that governments shall improve public-involved environmental regulation policies, and give youth an innovative environment and resource, and adjust financial expenses to minimize the regional economic growth variance, not only helpful in understanding provincial economy under different environmental regulations, but also providing guidelines to reach a balanced regional economic growth from most aspects.

Key words: economic growth variance, environmental regulation, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, threshold regression

中图分类号:

F207

陈昕, 刘媛华, 石翠翠. 基于Oaxaca-Blinder分解法的区域经济发展差异研究——从环境规制角度分析#br#[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 63-70.

CHEN Xin, LIU Yuanhua, SHI Cuicui. RESEARCH ON REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIFFERENCES BY INTEGRATING OAXACA-BLINDER DECOMPOSITION METHOD FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ENVIRONMENT REGULATION[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(3): 63-70.

参考文献

蔡海亚，赵永亮，焦微玲，2020. 环境规制对制造业价值链攀升的影响效应[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)，22(6)：11-19.〔CAI H Y, ZHAO Y L, JIAO W L, 2020. Impact effect of environmental regulation bring up the value chain of Chinese manufacturing industry[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 22(6): 11-19.〕

盖美，张福祥，2018. 辽宁省区域碳排放-经济发展-环境保护耦合协调分析[J]. 地理科学，38(5)：764-772.〔GAI M, ZHANG F X, 2018. Regional carbon emissions, economic development and environmental protection coupling in Liaoning province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(5): 764-772.〕

李江，刘春学，蒋睿，2021. 环境规制对云南省产业结构升级的影响[J]. 资源与产业，23(3)：21-28.〔LI J, LIU C X, JIANG R, 2021. Impact of environmental regulations on upgrading industrial structure in Yunnan province[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(3): 21-28.〕

刘莎，刘明，2020. 绿色金融、经济增长与环境变化：西北地区环境指数实现“巴黎承诺”有无可能?[J]. 当代经济科学，42(1)：71-84.〔LIU S, LIU M, 2020. Green finance, economic growth and environmental change: is it possible for environmental index in the northwest to fulfill the “Paris Agreement”? [J]. Modern Economic Science, 42(1): 71-84.〕

刘远书，籍国东，罗忠新，等，2020. 南水北调东线治污对山东段的环境与经济影响：基于EKC曲线理论的实证分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，30(10)：73-81.〔LIU Y S, JI G D, LUO Z X, et al, 2020. Pollution control effects of the east route of the south to North Water Diversion Project on environment and economy of Shandong: an empirical study based on EKC curve[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30(10): 73-81.〕

马勇，童昀，任洁，等，2018. 公众参与型环境规制的时空格局及驱动因子研究：以长江经济带为例[J]. 地理科学，38(11)：1799-1808.〔MA Y, TONG Y, REN J, et al, 2018. Spatial-temporal pattern and driving factors of public participation in environmental regulation: taking the Yangtze river economic belt as an example[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38(11): 1799-1808.〕

潘桔，杨丹，2019. 基于分位数回归的中国区域经济差异研究[J]. 商业经济研究，(24)：178-181.〔PAN J, YANG D, 2019. The analysis of economic differences in China based on quantile regression[J]. Journal of Commercial Economics, (24): 178-181.〕

戚昌厚，岳希明，2020. 财政支出与经济发展关系：对瓦格纳法则的新解释[J]. 经济理论与经济管理，(7)：43-57.〔QIC H, YUE X M, 2020. Structure of fiscal expenditure and economic development: a new interpretation of Wagner’s Law[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, (7): 43-57.〕

齐岳，秦阳，2020. 城市群公共服务均等化与经济发展不平衡关系研究[J]. 统计与决策，36(21)：77-81.

田志华，田艳芳，2017. 环境冲突是经济发展的副产品吗?：基于1998-2013年中国省级面板数据的分析[J]. 财经研究，43(11)：98-112.〔TIAN Z H, TIAN Y F, 2017. Are environmental Conflicts the Byproduct of Economic growth? Evidence from provincial panel Data of 1998 to 2013 in China [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 43(11): 98-112.〕

吴立元，刘研召，2018. 贸易成本、要素流动与区域经济差异[J]. 中国经济问题，(3)：12-22.〔WU L Y, LIU Y Z, 2018. Trade costs, factor flows and the difference of regional economy[J]. China Economic Studies, (3): 12-22.〕

王育宝，陆扬，王玮华，2019. 经济高质量发展与生态环境保护协调耦合研究新进展[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)，19(5)：84-94.〔WANG Y B, LU Y, WANG W H, 2019. New research progress on the coordinated coupling of high-quality economic development and ecological environmental protection[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 19(5)：84-94.〕

朱欢，郑洁，赵秋运，等，2020. 经济增长、能源结构转型与二氧化碳排放：基于面板数据的经验分析[J]. 经济与管理研究，41(11)：19-34. 〔ZHU H, ZHENG J, ZHAO Q Y, et al, 2020. Economic growth, energy structure transformation and carbon dioxide emission: empirical analysis based on panel data [J]. Research on Economics and Management, 41(11): 19-34.〕

张红霞，李猛，王悦，2020. 环境规制对经济增长质量的影响[J]. 统计与决策，36(23)：112-117.

张荐华，高军，2019. 中国改革开放40年中的区域经济发展不平衡问题与对策研究[J]. 当代经济管理，41(2)：9-14.〔ZHANG J H, GAO J, 2019. Study on the problems and the countermeasures of the unbalanced development of regional economy in 40 years of China’s reform and opening up. Contemporary Economic Management, 41(2): 9-14.〕

郑群明，姜奎，2020. 湖南省旅游经济的地区差异与动态收敛性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境，29(11)：2396-2405.〔ZHENG Q M, JIANG K, 2020. Regional differences and dynamic convergence of tourism economy in Hunan Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze River Basin, 29(11): 2396-2405.〕

赵小曼，张帅，袁长伟，2021. 中国交通运输碳排放环境库兹涅茨曲线的空间计量检验[J]. 统计与决策，(4)：23-26.

张小筠，刘戒骄，李斌，2020. 环境规制、技术创新与制造业绿色发展[J]. 广东财经大学学报，35(5)：48-57.〔ZHANG X Y, LI J J, LI B, 2020. Environmental regulation, technological innovation and the green development of manufacturing. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 35(5): 48-57.〕

EHIGIAMUSOE K U, LEAN H H, 2019. Do economic and financial integration stimulate economic growth? a critical survey[J]. Economics, 13(4): 1-27.

GARRY D B, DAVID A, CHEN J Y, 2019. China has emerged as an aspirant economy[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(1): 1-15.

Ren S G, LI X L, YUAN B L, et al, 2018. The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: a cross-region analysis in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173: 245-255.

[1]	潘海英, 陈玲, 任佳佳. 数字经济发展的碳减排效应研究——兼论异质性环境规制的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(6): 1-14.
[2]	胡元林, 魏郁锬. 生态创新会影响企业实际税负吗?[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 78-92.
[3]	仇蕾, 马蓓文, 周钦, 程常高. 环境规制对重污染企业投资偏好的影响——基于我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 92-106.
[4]	韦庆明, 赵欣欣, 冯馨, 张苗苗. 环境规制、绿色创新与产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的空间杜宾模型分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 54-63.
[5]	万欣, 苏鹏程, 毛鹏. 异质性治理主体视角下环境规制的治污路径——基于中介效应的空间差异分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 108-116.
[6]	肖雁飞, 谢仁贵, 尹慧. 环境规制下产业链区际分工演化研究：理论与实证[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 51-60.
[7]	沈泓成, 罗婷, 叶骥 . 环境规制强度对浙江省工业绿色发展影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 61-69.
[8]	李金晶, 李君, 陈长瑶, 等. 环境规制对西南地区产业结构优化的影响效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 124-132.
[9]	周璇, 谭建华, 郭丕斌, 等. FDI水平溢出、自主研发对工业产出的影响——基于粤港澳大湾区面板数据的多维门槛效应检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 108-118.
[10]	宋敏, 张媛媛. 异质性环境规制对水环境污染的空间溢出效应分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 107-114.
[11]	钱敏, 金小莉. “一带一路”沿线省份FDI、环境规制对能源利用效率的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(6): 79-85.
[12]	杨恺钧, 蔡嘉晋. FDI质量、环境规制与产业结构升级的关系——基于2008—2018年长江经济带11省市的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 12-20.
[13]	李江, 刘春学, 蒋睿. 环境规制对云南省产业结构升级的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(3): 21-28.
[14]	陈妍，梅林，程叶青. 环境规制、资源禀赋对东北地区产业转型的影响机制研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(5): 28-36.
[15]	马骏，刘怡. 环境规制对中国房地产业绿色发展的影响分析——基于31个省份的面板数据[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(4): 41-48.