曹海霞, 2022. 资源租金、租金耗散与矿业规制[J].经济问题(1): 56-66.〔CAO H X, 2022. Resource rent, rent dissipation and mining regulation[J]. On Economic Problems(1): 56-66.〕
曹洪军, 王俊淇, 2022. 我国环境管理体制变迁及其经济特征分析[J].湖南社会科学(3): 58-66.
曹宇, 2023. 采矿权转让合同行政规制的制度反思与修正理路[J].中国人民大学学报,37(4): 67-79.〔CAO Y, 2023. Rethinking the system of administrative regulation the transfer contract of mining right and the way to mend it[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 37(4): 67-79.〕
曹正汉, 王宁, 2019. 从矿区政府到地方政府:中国油田地区条块关系的形成与演变[J].社会,39(5): 39-79.〔CAO Z H, WANG N, 2019. From minefield authority to local government: formation and evolution of tiao-kuai relation in China's oil field regions.[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 39(5): 39-79.〕
柴国俊, 陈艳, 2017. 征地补偿的多与寡:公平与效率视角[J].农业经济问题,38(2): 16-22.〔CHAI G J, CHEN Y, 2017. Compensation for land acquisition from the perspective of equality and efficiency[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy,38(2): 16-22.〕
常纪文, 2019. 国有自然资源资产管理体制改革的建议与思考[J].中国环境管理,11(1): 11-22.〔CHANG J W, 2019. Deepen the reform for the separation of owners and regulators of nationalized natural resources to promote the integrated protection of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes and grasslands[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 11(1): 11-22.〕
陈静, 郭志京, 2020. 自然资源资产国家所有权委托代理机制分析[J].中国土地(9): 30-32.
陈曦, 2019. 中国自然资源资产收益分配研究[J].中央财经大学学报(5): 109-120.〔CHEN X, 2019. A study on the income distribution of natural resources assets in China[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics(5): 109-120.〕
陈振明, 2020. 中国政府改革与治理的目标指向和实践进展[J].东南学术(2): 36-43.〔CHEN Z M, 2020. The goal orientation and practice progress of government reform and governance in China[J]. Southeast Academic Research,(2): 36-43.〕
成升魁, 沈镭, 封志明, 等, 2020. 中国自然资源研究的发展历程及展望[J].自然资源学报,35(8): 1757-1772.〔CHEN S K, SHEN L, FENG Z M, et al.,2020. The development history and prospect of natural resources research in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,35(8): 1757-1772.〕
程雪阳, 2020. 论集体土地征收与入市增值收益分配的协调[J].中国土地科学,34(10): 28-33.〔CHENG X Y, 2020. The coordination of distribution of incremental land revenue between collective land acquisition and marketization[J]. China Land Science,34(10): 28-33.〕
但俊, 吴军, 闫永涛, 2020. 珠三角半城市化地区土地利用困境与策略:基于佛山市南海区、深圳市土地整备实践研究[J].城市发展研究,27(1): 118-124.〔DAN J, WU J, YAN Y T, 2020. Dilemma and strategy of land use in peri-urban areas of pearl river delta: based on the study of land rearrangement practice in Nanhai, Foshan and Shenzhen[J]. Urban Development Studies ,27(1): 118-124.〕
郭恩泽, 曲福田, 马贤磊, 2023. 自然资源资产产权体系改革现状与政策取向:基于国家治理结构的视角[J].自然资源学报,38(9): 2372-2385.〔GUO E Z, QU F T, MA X L, 2023. The present situation and future policy orientation of the property right system reform of natural resources assets: From the perspective of national governance structure[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,38(9): 2372-2385.〕
何利, 沈镭, 张卫民,等, 2020. 我国自然资源核算的实践进展与理论体系构建[J].自然资源学报,35(12): 2968-2979.〔HE L, SHEN L, ZHANG W M, et al.,2020. Practical progress and theoretical system construction of natural resources accounting in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,35(12): 2968-2979.〕
何艳玲, 李丹, 2023. “体系化”:新时代机构改革的特质与逻辑转换[J].公共管理与政策评论,12(6): 3-15.〔HE Y L, LI D, 2023. “Systematization”: characteristics and logic transformation of institutional reform in the new era[J]. Public Administration and Policy Review,12(6): 3-15.〕
洪银兴, 2018. 市场化导向的政府和市场关系改革40年[J].政治经济学评论,9(6): 28-38.
黄小勇, 2018. 机构改革的历程及其内在逻辑[J].行政管理改革(5): 18-23.
姜海, 田双清, 陈乐宾, 2022. 基于共识视角的新时代土地要素市场化配置改革研究[J].农业经济问题, 43(2): 70-84.〔JIANG H, TIAN S Q, CHEN L B, 2022. Research on the reform of market-oriented allocation of land factors in the new era based on consensus perspective[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 43(2): 70-84.〕
姜闻远, 陈海嵩, 2022. 中国自然资源督察体系完善的规范路径[J].自然资源学报,37(12): 3073-3087.〔JIANG W Y, CHEN H S, 2022. On the normative path of perfecting natural resources supervision system in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,37(12): 3073-3087.〕
李刚, 栾鹏, 姚震, 2023. 新发展阶段背景下矿业权出让收益制度研究[J].地方财政研究(5): 106-112.
李明月,张志鸿,胡竹枝,2018. 土地出让金支出结构合理化研究[J].南方经济(7): 113-124.〔LI M Y, ZHANG Z H, HU Z Z, 2018. Research on rationalization of expenditure structure of land transfer revenue[J]. South China Journal of Economics(7): 113-124.〕
李松森, 夏慧琳, 2016. 自然资源资产收益分配的困境摆脱与改革取向[J].现代经济探讨(11): 30-34.
李兆宜, 苏利阳, 2019. 绩效导向的自然资源资产管理与改革[J].中国行政管理(9): 29-34.〔LI Z Y, SU L Y, 2019. Performance-oriented management and reform of natural resource assets[J]. Chinese Public Administration(9): 29-34.〕
刘伯恩, 2017. 自然资源管理体制改革发展趋势及政策建议[J].中国国土资源经济,30(4): 18-21.〔LIU B E, 2017. Trend and suggestion of natural resources management system reform[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China,30(4): 18-21.〕
刘志成,王娟, 2015. 制度框架、困境摆脱与矿产资源有偿使用的可能取向[J].改革(3): 98-109.〔LIU Z C, WANG J, 2015. Institutional framework,the way-out and possible orientation of the system of compensation for the use of mineral resources[J]. Reform(3): 98-109.〕
卢现祥,李慧, 2021. 自然资源资产产权制度改革:理论依据、基本特征与制度效应[J].改革(2): 14-28.〔LU X X, LI H, 2021. Reform of property right system of natural resources assets: theoretical basis,basic characteristics and institutional effect[J]. Reform(2): 14-28.〕
马蔡琛, 赵笛, 2022. 基于高质量发展的资源税改革研究[J].税务研究(5): 40-46.〔MA C C, ZHAO D, 2022. A research on resource tax reform based on high-quality development[J]. Taxation Research(5): 40-46.〕
邵传林, 2023. 全国统一大市场建设中的政府与市场关系再思考[J].上海财经大学学报,25(2): 3-17.〔SHAO C L, 2023. Rethinking the government-market relationship in the construction of a unified national market[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,25(2): 3-17.〕
施源, 王广洪, 夏欢, 2018. 存量发展时期深圳规划国土管理改革与实践[J].城市规划,42(S1): 12-16,41.〔SHI Y, WANG G H, XIA H, 2018. Reform and practice of planning and land management in the period of stock-based[J] City Planning Review ,42(S1): 12-16,41.〕
施志源, 李思锐, 俞虹帆, 2023. 自然资源资产所有权委托代理中的权益落实及其制度保障[J].中国人口·资源与环境,33(12): 172-183.〔SHI Z Y, LI S R, YU H F, 2023. Implementation of rights and interests and its system guarantee in the principal-agent system of natural resource asset ownership[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 33(12): 172-183.〕
苏轶娜, 2017. 中国优势矿产资源管理政策及其评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 27(S1): 164-167.〔SU Y N, 2017. Management polices of dominant mineral resources in China and the evaluation about these polices[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 27(S1): 164-167.〕
谭荣, 2021a. 探析中国土地要素市场化的治理结构[J].国际经济评论(2): 36-53.〔TAN R, 2021. The central-local governance mechanism in China's land marketization[J]. International Economic Review(2): 36-53.〕
谭荣, 2021b. 自然资源资产产权制度改革和体系建设思考[J].中国土地科学,35(1): 1-9.〔TAN R, 2021. On the reform and construction of the property right system of natural resources assets[J]. China Land Science,35(1): 1-9.〕
谭荣, 2022. 全民所有自然资源资产所有权委托代理机制解析[J].中国土地科学,36(5): 1-10,130.〔TAN R, 2022. The principal-agent mechanism of state-owned natural resource assets[J]. China Land Science,36(5): 1-10,130.〕
唐方成, 顾世玲, 辛璐, 2023. 绿色发展视角下我国自然资源资产产权制度的创新机制[J].环境保护,51(16): 59-61.〔TANG F C, GU S L, XIN L, 2023. Innovative mechanism of property right system of natural resources assets in China from the perspective of green development[J]. Environmental Protection,51(16): 59-61.〕
王克群, 2010. 我国资源税发展演进及未来改革取向[J].地方财政研究,(1): 56-59.
吴佳雨, 谭荣, 吴格非, 2023. 自然保护地委托代理机制与事权清单探索[J].中国土地科学,37(4): 43-51.〔WU J Y, TAN E, WU G F. 2023. Principal-agent mechanism and affairs list in protected area governance[J]. China Land Science,37(4): 43-51.〕
肖兴志, 李晶, 2006. 我国资源税费改革的战略选择[J].社会科学辑刊 (3): 100-105.
熊振兴, 王克强, 刘红梅, 2017. 基于自然生态空间的中国资源税费框架改革[J].资源科学,39(5): 945-953.〔XIONG Z X, WANG K Q, LIU H M. 2017. Construction of a resource tax system based on natural ecological space[J]. Resources Science,39(5): 945-953.〕
严金明, 2019. 自然资源资产产权制度改革的几个关键问题[J].中国土地(6): 8-10.
严金明, 潘瑜鑫, 夏方舟, 2023. 全民所有自然资源资产“四权分治”改革探析[J].改革(11): 144-155.〔YAN J M, PAN Y X, XIA F Z, 2023. The reform of “four rights separation and governance” for natural resource assets owned by the whole nation[J]. Reform(11): 144-155.〕
叶金育, 张祥, 2021.水资源税改革:试点文本评估与统一立法构想[J].中国人口·资源与环境,31(8): 121-136.〔YE J Y, ZHANG X, 2021. Water resource tax reform: evaluation of pilot schemes and conception of a unified legislation approach[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,31(8): 121-136.〕
袁一仁, 成金华, 陈从喜, 2019. 中国自然资源管理体制改革:历史脉络、时代要求与实践路径[J]. 学习与实践(9): 5-13.〔YUAN Y R, CHENG J H, CHEN C X, 2019. Reform of China's natural resources management system: historical context, times requirements and practical path[J]. Study and Practice(9): 5-13.〕
岳云龙, 1986. 机构改革的回顾与展望[J].管理世界(2): 39-48.
张义,王亚林,李政,等,2024. 优化全民所有自然资源资产所有权管理研究:基于区分所有权与监管权的视角[J].中国国土资源经济37(9): 55-63.〔ZHANG Y, WANG Y L, LI Z, et al.,2024. Study on Optimizing ownership management of natural resource assets owned by the whole people: based on the perspective of distinguishing ownership and regulatory power[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China,37(9): 55-63.〕
周波, 吕思锜, 2020. 资源税改革仍有待解决的三个基本问题[J].财经问题研究(5): 74-81.〔ZHOU B, LV S Q, 2020. Three basic problems to be resolved in the reform of resource tax[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues(5): 74-81.〕
周玲玲, 鲍献文, 余静, 等, 2017. 中国生态用海管理发展初探[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)(6): 24-29.〔ZHOU L L, BAO X W, YU J, et al.,2017. A study on the development of ecological marine utilization management in China[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences) (6): 24-29.〕
朱道林, 程建, 张晖, 等, 2020. 2019年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2020年展望:土地管理分报告[J].中国土地科学,34(1): 92-101.〔ZHU D L, CHENG J, ZHANG H, et al.,2020. Progress review on land science research in 2019 and prospects for 2020: the sub-report on land management[J]. China Land Science,34(1): 92-101.〕
邹旭, 马贤磊, 石晓平, 2024. 工业用地市场化配置改革的制度变迁逻辑:基于“主体互动-制度共演”框架的分析[J].公共行政评论,17(2): 176-195.〔ZOU X, MA X L, SHI X P, 2024. The institutional change logic in the market-oriented allocation reform of industrial land: based on the framework of “actor interaction and institution co-evolution”[J]. Journal of Public Administration,17(2): 176-195.〕
邹旭, 石晓平, 马贤磊, 2021. 中国共产党建党百年来的土地增值收益分配:政策演进、理论辨析与改革逻辑[J].中国土地科学,35(8): 15-22.〔ZOU X, SHI X P, MA X L, 2021. Distribution of incremental land revenue since the founding of the communist party of China(CPC): Policy Evolution, Theoretical Argument and Reform Logic[J]. China Land Science,35(8): 15-22.〕
OSTROM E, 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems[J]. American Economic Review, 100(3): 641-672.
|