IMPACTS OF GOVERNMENTAL SUBSIDIARY ON COMPANIES' INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE IN NEW ENERGY SECTOR

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20220527.002

Abstract

Abstract: Innovation and green concepts are important in “the 14^th Five-Year Plan”. Governmental subsidiary as a vital policy tool in supporting enterpries' R&D can stimulate companies to boost research inputs and increase their innovative motivation. To explore how governmental subsidiary impacts the innovative performance of new energy companies, R&D investment are used as medium variables. This paper selects 106 state-owned and no-state-owned new energy companies listed in 2015 to 2019 CSMAR database and Wind database which have high-research-inputs and low-short-term-return in new strategic industries. Explained variable as companies' innovative performance, explaining variable as governmental subsidiary, adjusting variable as property ownership, medium variable as research input intensity. Governmental subsidiary on new energy sector is used to check the impacts of its on companies' innovative performance through research input intensity as medium effect and companies' property ownership as adjustment. Results show a positive relation between governmental subsidiary and new energy sector's innovative performance, a medium effect of research input intensity between the both largely varying with companies' property ownerships. Under the marketing economy, governmental subsidiary is a direct stimulus ensuring new energy company to survive and develop. This paper suggests governments supply financial and taxation policies. However, some companies unlawfully use this subsidiary on non-research input, which needs to be regulated after companies are granted the subsidiary. Compared with state-owned companies, non-state-owned obtain less resource with a weaker ability to resist market risks. This paper suggests governments support non-state-owned more to urge them to produce a higher performance.

Key words: new energy sector, governmental subsidiary, property ownership, innovative input

摘要： “十四五”计划在原有国民经济和社会发展规划的基础上，进一步强调了创新、绿色在新发展理念中的重要地位。政府补贴，作为政府支持企业研发活动的重要政策工具之一，激励企业加大研发投入，增强企业创新动力。为探究不同产权性质调节下，政府补贴如何影响新能源企业创新绩效，以及将三者纳入同一框架下，考虑研发投入作为中介变量对企业创新绩效的影响。选取CSMAR数据库和wind数据库2015—2019年高研发投入、低短期经济效益的战略性新兴产业中的106家国有与非国有产权性质的新能源企业，进行面板数据分析。被解释变量为企业创新绩效，解释变量为政府补贴，调节变量为产权性质，中介变量为研发投入强度，通过对新能源行业政府补贴的研究，以检验在研发投入强度作为中介效应，企业产权性质作为调节作用时政府补贴对企业创新绩效的影响。研究结果显示，政府补贴与新能源行业的创新绩效呈正相关关系，研发投入强度在政府补贴与企业创新绩效之间发挥着部分中介作用，且不同企业产权性质的新能源企业，在政府补贴与企业创新绩效之间存在显著差异。根据上述结论提出：1）在市场经济下，政府补贴是保证新能源企业生存以及促进其发展的直接激励方式，因此建议政府应在合理监管下持续对新能源企业提供有效财税和金融等政策补贴；2）由于部分新能源企业违规将政府补贴转移到非研发投入中，从而使得政府补贴失灵，因此在国家后续政策法规出台后需细化新能源企业获得政府补贴后的使用路径；3）相比于国有企业非国有企业可获得的资源较少，市场风险抵御能力较弱，因此政府在进行补贴激励时可以重点倾斜给非国有企业以促进其产出更高的创新绩效。

关键词: 新能源行业, 政府补贴, 产权性质, 创新投入

CLC Number:

F273.1

XIAO Yu, LU Yuyang. IMPACTS OF GOVERNMENTAL SUBSIDIARY ON COMPANIES' INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE IN NEW ENERGY SECTOR[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(3): 126-133.

肖煜, 陆雨杨. 新能源行业政府补贴对企业创新绩效的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(3): 126-133.

References

陈玲，杨文辉，2016. 政府研发补贴会促进企业创新吗?：来自中国上市公司的实证研究[J].科学学研究，(3)：433-442.〔CHEN L, YANG W H, 2016. Do government subsidies stimulate enterprises innovation? evidence from China’s listed companies[J]. Studies in Science of Science, (3): 433-442.〕

陈婕，2021. 政府支持、企业R&D投入与技术创新绩效关系研究[J]. 预测，40(2)：40-46.〔CHEN J, 2021. Research on the relationship among government support, enterprise R&D investment and technological innovation performance[J]. Forecasting, 40(2): 40-46.〕

戴小勇，成力为，2013. 研发投入强度对企业绩效影响的门槛效应研究[J]. 科学学研究，31(11)：1708-1716.〔DAI X Y, CHENG L W, 2013. Threshold effects of R&D intensity on firm performance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 31(11): 1708-1716.〕

傅利平，李永辉，2015. 政府补贴、创新能力与企业存续时间[J]. 科学学研究，33(10)：1496-1503.〔FU L P, LI Y H, 2015. Government subsidies, innovation ability and enterprise survival time[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 33(10): 1496-1503.〕

傅利平，李小静，2014. 政府补贴在企业创新过程的信号传递效应分析：基于战略性新兴产业上市公司面板数据[J]. 系统工程，32(11)：50-58.〔FU L P, LI X J, 2014. The signaling effect of government subsidies in the corporate innovation process: evidence from strategic emerging industries’ listed companies[J]. Systems Engineering, 32(11): 50-58.〕

江涛，郭亮玺，2021. 政府研发补贴、融资约束与企业创新绩效：基于所有权性质视角[J].商业经济与管理，(2)：44-55.〔JIANG T, GUO L X, 2021. Government R&D subsidy, financing constraint and enterprise innovation performance: from the perspective of ownership nature[J]. Journal of Business Economics, (2): 44-55.〕

李雪，吴福象，竺李乐，2021. 数字经济与区域创新绩效[J]. 山西财经大学学报，43(5)：17-30.〔LI X, WU F X, ZHU L L, 2021. Digital economy and regional innovation performance[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 43(5): 17-30.〕

马文聪，侯羽，朱桂龙，2013. 研发投入和人员激励对创新绩效的影响机制：基于新兴产业和传统产业的比较研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理，34(3)：58-68.〔MA W C, HOU Y, ZHU G L, 2013. The impact of R&D investment and personnel incentive on innovative performance: a comparative study on emerging industries and traditional industries[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T, 34(3): 58-68.〕

彭龙希，李蒙，杨圆圆，等，2021. 药品生产企业核心竞争力的定义与其评价体系构建[J].中国药房，32(7)：782-787.〔PENG L X, LI M, YANG Y Y, et al, 2021. Definition of core competitiveness of drug manufacturing enterprises and construction of its evaluation system[J]. China Pharmacy, 32(7): 782-787.〕

孙莹，张仙，宋秋华，2020. 轻资产运营、股权性质与资本效率：以我国制造业上市公司为例的实证研究[J]. 商业研究，(12)：99-109.〔SUN Y, ZHANG X, SONG Q H, 2020. Asset light operation, equity nature and capital efficiency: an empirical study of listed manufacturing companies in China[J]. Commercial Research, (12): 99-109.〕

唐华，王龙梅，程慧玲，2021. 内部控制有效性、研发支出与企业创新绩效：基于高新技术企业的经验数据[J]. 会计之友，(8)：136-141.

王斌，康志勇，刘馨，2021. 出口企业拥有更低的能耗强度吗?[J]. 审计与经济研究，36(2)：95-104.〔WANG B, KANG Z Y, LIU X, 2021. Can export enterprises always keep a lower energy consumption level?[J]. Journal of Audit & Economics, 36(2): 95-104.〕

王靖宇，刘红霞，王彪华，等，2020. 外部融资依赖与企业创新：基于延付银行高管薪酬的自然实验[J]. 软科学，34(2)：8-13.〔WANG J Y, LIU H X, WANG B H, et al, 2020. External financial dependence and R＆D of enterprises：based on the natural experiment of delayed paying bank executives[J]. Soft Science, 34(2): 8-13.〕

温忠麟，叶宝娟，2014. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展，22(5)：731-745.〔WEN Z L, YE B J, 2014. Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5): 731-745.〕

邢会，王飞，郭辉丽，等，2021. 税收优惠、企业异质性与实质性创新：来自中国A股上市公司的微观数据[J]. 会计之友，(10)：22-29.

徐敏，陈媛，2020. 政府补贴、金融集聚对技术创新效率的影响：以长江经济带11省市高技术产业为例[J]. 资源与产业，22(2)：45-52.〔XU M, CHEN Y, 2020. A case study on high-tech industry of 11 provinces along Yangtze river economic zone：influence of governmental allowance and financing concentration on technical innovation efficiency[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(2): 45-52.〕

严荔，谢正娟，2021. 政府补贴对制造业企业创新效率的影响效应研究[J]. 经济体制改革， (2)：124-130.〔YAN L, XIE Z J, 2021. A research on the effect of government subsidy on innovation efficiency of manufacturing enterprises[J]. Reform of Economic System, (2): 124-130.〕

云虹，卞井春，韩佳芮，2021. 财税激励政策、R&D投入与创新绩效：基于AHP模型和中介效应检验[J]. 会计之友，(10)：16-21.

张志元，马永凡，张梁，2020. 供给侧改革视角的政府补助与企业创新[J]. 科研管理，41(8)：85-94.〔ZHANG Z Y, MA Y F, ZHANG L, 2020. Government subsidies and corporate innovation from the perspective of supply-side reform[J]. Science Research Management, 41(8): 85-94.〕

章元，程郁，佘国满，2018. 政府补贴能否促进高新技术企业的自主创新? ：来自中关村的证据[J]. 金融研究，(10)：123-140〔ZHANG Y, CHENG Y, SHE G M, 2018. Can government subsidy improve high tech firms’ independent innovation? evidence from Zhongguancun firm panel data[J]. Journal of Financial Research, (10): 123-140.〕

郑烨，刘遥，2021. 政策引导对中小企业创新绩效的影响机理研究[J]. 科研管理，42(4)：73-81.〔ZHENG Y, LIU Y, 2021. A research on the influence mechanism of policy guidance on innovation performance of SMEs[J]. Science Research Management, 42(4): 73-81.〕

周晓艳，卞元月，2018. 政府补贴真的能解决研发外部性吗? ：基于倾向得分匹配的微观证据[J]. 河北经贸大学学报，39( 3)：30-38〔ZHOU X Y, BIAN Y Y, 2018. Can government subsidies really solve R&D externalities?[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 39(3): 30-38.〕

BROWN J R，MARTINSSON G，PETERSEN B C, 2012. Do financing constraints matter for R＆D[J]. European economic review, 56(8): 1512-1529．

DEWENTER K L, MALATESTA P H, 2001. State-owned and privately owned firms: an empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity[J]. American Economic Review, 91(1): 320-334.

WU A, 2017. The signal effect of government R&D subsidies in China: does ownership matter? [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117: 339-345.