ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION HETEROGENEITY OF
XINJIANG‘S  FARMLANDS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL
FOOTPRINT MODEL

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20230726.001

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper uses modified ecological footprint model to study farmland ecological deficit and excess in Xinjiang, estimates its ecological footprint with biological resource footprint and carbon footprint incorporated, the result has a difference with farmland ecological carrying capacity which is farmland ecological excess/deficit. This paper applies ecological servicing non-market value model, consistent with paying capability, and employs Type-S growth curve modified coefficient to quantify 2010 to 2020 farmland ecological compensation of Xinjiang ‘s 14 prefectures. Influenced by production and carbon sequestration capability, ecological footprint is higher in Tulufan, Kashi and Yili ‘s farmlands, the latter two with a larger supply capacity have a stronger ecological carrying capacity. Ecological deficit or excess exists in the southern and northern Xinjiang, where has a severer ecological deficit, most in Tulufan. Non-market values of unit farmland ecological servicing generally have a consistent trend in 2010 to 2020, declining over years. Impacted by excess/deficit area and non-market values of unit farmland ecological servicing, farmland ecological compensation has a falling-then-rising trend, 2813 million CNY needed to be paid to Tulufan in 2020, and 1303 million CNY to Yili. This paper presents suggestions on developing green agriculture to decrease carbon footprint, properly estimating farmland ecological compensation standard, and establishing a more appropriate farmland ecological compensation mechanism in terms of farmland ecological compensation standards, ways, fund sources and receivers ‘ priorities.

Key words:

farmland ecological compensation; ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity, ecological excess/deficit; Xinjiang

摘要： 文章运用修正的生态足迹模型对耕地生态赤字区和盈余区进行基础判别，将生物资源足迹和碳足迹纳入生态足迹的计算中，其结果与耕地生态承载力的差值即为耕地生态盈亏量。采用生态服务非市场价值模型，为与支付能力相吻合，借助“S型皮尔生长曲线”修正补偿系数，借此量化新疆14个地州市2010—2020年耕地生态补偿。研究结果显示：1）在产量和固碳能力等多重因素作用下，吐鲁番市、喀什地区、伊犁州直耕地生态足迹较高，喀什地区、伊犁州直两地供容能力较强，故生态承载力能力较强；2）新疆南北部都存在生态赤字或盈余的情况，北疆地区的生态赤字情况更为严峻，其中吐鲁番市是生态亏损最多的地区；3）2010—2020年单位耕地生态服务非市场价值整体波动趋势一致，且逐年递减；4）受盈余赤字面积与单位耕地生态服务非市场价值的影响，耕地生态补偿额度呈先降低后上升的趋势，经测算2020年吐鲁番市需要支付耕地生态补偿2.813亿元，伊犁州直则可获得耕地生态补偿1.303亿元。据此，提出如下政策建议：大力提倡发展绿色农业，降低碳足迹；结合当地的实际情况，合理测算耕地生态补偿标准；综合考虑耕地生态补偿标准、补偿方式、资金来源及受偿区优先级，构建更加合理的耕地生态补偿机制。

关键词:

耕地生态补偿, 生态足迹, 生态承载力, 生态盈亏量, 新疆

CLC Number:

F301.2

MA Xuemeng, ZHAO Jun. ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION HETEROGENEITY OF XINJIANG‘S FARMLANDS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT MODEL[J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(6): 138-149.

马雪梦, 赵俊. 基于生态足迹模型的新疆各地州市耕地生态补偿异质性研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(6): 138-149.

References

陈科屹, 邱胜荣, 赵晓迪, 等, 2021.北京市湿地生态补偿标准研究[J].生态学报, 41（12）: 4786-4794.〔CHEN K Y, QIU S R, ZHAO X D, et al, 2021.Study on ecological compensation standard of wetland in Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41（12）: 4786-4794.〕

崔宁波, 生世玉, 方袁意如, 2021a.粮食安全视角下省际耕地生态补偿的标准量化与机制构建[J].中国农业大学学报, 26（11）: 232-243.〔CUI N B, SHENG S Y, FANG Y R Y, 2021a.Standard quantification and mechanism construction of inter-provincial cultivated land ecological compensation from the perspective of food security[J].Journal of China Agricultural University, 26（11）: 232-243.〕

崔宁波, 生世玉, 2021b.粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究[J].浙江农业学报, 33（9）: 1759-1769.〔CUI N B, SHENG S Y, 2021b.Quantitative research on ecological compensation for cultivated land in black soil region in northeast China from perspective of food security[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 33（9）: 1759-1769.

樊鹏飞, 梁流涛, 许明军, 等, 2018.基于虚拟耕地流动视角的省际耕地生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 28（1）: 91-101.〔FAN P F, LIANG L T, XU M J, et al, 2018.Study on inter-provincial cultivated land ecological compensation from perspective of virtual cultivated land flow[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 28（1）: 91-101.〕

高标, 房骄, 何欢, 2013.吉林省生态足迹动态变化与可持续发展状况评价分析[J].农业现代化研究, 34（1）: 95-99.〔GAO B, FANG J, HE H, 2013.Analysis on dynamic change of ecological footprint and evaluation of sustainable development in Jilin province[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 34（1）: 95-99.〕

高攀, 梁流涛, 刘琳轲, 等, 2019.基于虚拟耕地视角的河南省县际耕地生态补偿研究[J].农业现代化研究, 40（6）: 974-983.〔GAO P, LIANG L T, LIU L K, et al, 2019.Study of the ecological compensation of inter-county farmland from the virtual farmland perspective: a case study of Henan Province[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 40（6）: 974-983.〕

高魏, 闵捷, 张安录, 2007.江汉平原耕地非市场价值评估[J].资源科学, 29（2）: 124-130.〔GAO W, MIN J, ZHANG A L, 2007.The application of CVM for assessment of cultivated land of non-market value in Jianghan Plain[J].Resources Science, 29（2）: 124-130.〕

胡圆昭, 朱豪, 尹明财, 等, 2023.基于水足迹理论的长江经济带水资源利用评价[J/OL].长江科学院院报.（2023-01-18）[2023-02-13].https: //kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail//42.1171.TV.20230117.1556.005.html.〔HU Y Z, ZHU H, YIN M C, et al, 2023.Evaluation of water resources utilization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on water footprint theory[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute.（2023-01-18）[2023-02-13].https: //kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail//42.1171.TV.20230117.1556.005.html.〕

靳亚亚, 柳乾坤, 李陈, 2020.基于改进三维生态足迹模型的耕地承载力评价: 以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学, 34（9）: 96-104.〔JIN Y Y, LIU Q K, LI C, 2020.Evaluation of cultivated land carrying capacity based on an improved three-dimension ecological footprint model: a case study of Jiangsu province[J].China Land Science, 34（9）: 96-104.〕

赖敏, 陈凤桂, 2020.基于机会成本法的海洋保护区生态保护补偿标准[J].生态学报, 40（6）: 1901-1909.〔LAI M, CHEN F G,

2020.Eco-compensation standard for ecological conservation of marine protected areas based on opportunity cost method[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40( 6） : 1901-1909．〕

李晓燕, 2017.基于生态价值量和支付能力的耕地生态补偿标准研究: 以河南省为例[J].生态经济, 33（2）: 151-155, 161.〔LI X Y, 2017.Study on the ecological compensation standard of cultivated land based on the ecological value and the ability of payment: taking Henan province as an example[J].Ecological Economy, 33（2）: 151-155, 161.〕

梁流涛, 祝孔超, 2019.区际农业生态补偿: 区域划分与补偿标准核算: 基于虚拟耕地流动视角的考察[J].地理研究, 38（8）: 1932-1948.〔LIANG L T, ZHU K C, 2019.Interregional agricultural eco-compensation based on virtual cultivated land flow: regional division and compensation standard accounting[J].Geographical Research, 38（8）: 1932-1948.〕

刘利花, 刘向华, 杨洁, 2020.粮食安全视角下的耕地生态补偿标准研究[J].学习与实践（8）: 38-47.

刘利花, 杨彬如, 2019.中国省域耕地生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 29（2）: 52-62.〔LIU L H, YANG B R, 2019.Research on ecological compensation of provincial cultivated land in China[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 29（2）: 52-62.〕

刘某承, 李文华, 2009.基于净初级生产力的中国生态足迹均衡因子测算[J].自然资源学报, 24（9）: 1550-1559.〔LIU M C, LI W H, 2009.The calculation of China ‘s equivalence factor under ecological footprint mode based on net primary production[J].Journal of Natural Resources, 24（9）: 1550-1559.〕

刘祥鑫, 蒲春玲, 刘志有, 等, 2018.区域耕地生态价值补偿量化研究: 以新疆为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 39（5）: 84-90.〔LIU X X, PU C L, LIU Z Y, et al, 2018.Quantitatively study on ecological value compensation of regional cultivated land: taking Xinjiang as an example[J].Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 39（5）: 84-90.〕

刘杨, 刘鸿斌, 2022.山东省农业碳排放特征、影响因素及达峰分析[J].中国生态农业学报（中英文）, 30（4）: 558-569.〔LIU Y, LIU H B, 2022.Characteristics, influence factors, and prediction of agricultural carbon emissions in Shandong province[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 30（4）: 558-569.〕

马骏, 夏正仪, 2020.长江流域重点生态功能区生态补偿研究: 基于演化博弈的博弈策略及因素分析[J].资源与产业, 22（3）: 20-30.〔MA J, XIA Z Y, 2020.Ecological compensation of key eco-functional areas in Yangtze River basin based on evolutionary gaming strategy[J].Resources ＆ Industries, 22（3）: 20-30.〕

聂承静, 刘晓成, 姜群鸥, 等, 2022.基于合作治理理论的我国区域多层次复合市场化森林生态补偿模式构建探索[J].世界林业研究, 35（6）: 120-126.〔NIE C J, LIU X C, JIANG Q O, et al, 2022.Exploration on regional multilevel compound market-oriented forest ecological compensation mode based on cooperative governance theory[J].World Forestry Research, 35（6）: 120-126.〕

欧名豪, 王坤鹏, 郭杰, 2019.耕地保护生态补偿机制研究进展[J].农业现代化研究, 40（3）: 357-365.〔OU M H, WANG K P, GUO J, 2019.Research progress on ecological compensation mechanism of farmland protection[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 40（3）: 357-365.〕

阮熹晟, 李坦, 张藕香, 等, 2021.基于生态服务价值的长江经济带耕地生态补偿量化研究[J].中国农业资源与区划, 42（1）: 68-76.〔RUAN X S, LI T, ZHANG O X, et al, 2021.A quantitative study on ecological compensation of cultivated land in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on ecological service value[J].Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 42（1）: 68-76.〕

施开放, 刁承泰, 孙秀锋, 等, 2013.基于耕地生态足迹的重庆市耕地生态承载力供需平衡研究[J].生态学报, 33（6）: 1872-1880.〔SHI K F, DIAO C T, SUN X F, et al, 2013.Ecological balance between supply and demand in Chongqing city based on cultivated land ecological footprint method[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33（6）: 1872-1880.〕

孙付华, 熊佳丽, 高鑫, 等, 2021.基于生态系统服务价值的水源地生态补偿研究: 以南水北调东线扬州市为例[J].资源与产业, 23（3）: 38-49.〔SUN F H, XIONG J L, GAO X, et al, 2021.A case study on Yangzhou city: water source ecological compensation based on ecosystem servicing values[J].Resources ＆ Industries, 23（3）: 38-49.〕

田云, 张俊飚, 2017.中国农业碳排放、低碳农业生产率及其协调性研究[J].中国农业大学学报, 22（5）: 208-218.〔TIAN Y, ZHANG J B, 2017.Agricultural carbon emission, low carbon agricultural productivity and their coordinated relation in China[J].Journal of China Agricultural University, 22（5）: 208-218.〕

汪运波, 肖建红, 2014.基于生态足迹成分法的海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 24（8）: 149-155.〔WANG Y B, XIAO J H, 2014.Research on ecological compensation standard of island tourist destination based on component method of ecological footprint[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 24（8）: 149-155.〕

王欣, 杨君, 李婷, 2019.基于生态服务价值的生态补偿: 以长沙市为例[J].江苏农业学报, 35（4）: 965-972.〔WANG X, YANG J, LI T, 2019.Study on ecological compensation based on ecological service value: a case study of Changsha city[J].Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 35（4）: 965-972.〕

吴景辉, 王耕, 于大涛, 等, 2019.基于能值-生态足迹模型的齐齐哈尔市可持续发展水平分析[J].资源与产业, 21（2）: 17-23.〔WU J H, WANG G, YU D T, et al, 2019.Sustainable development level of Qiqihaer based on energy-ecological footprint model[J].Resources ＆ Industries, 21（2）: 17-23.〕

谢高地, 曹淑艳, 2016.生态补偿机制发展的现状与趋势[J].企业经济（4）: 32-35.

谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等, 2015.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报, 30（8）: 1243-1254.〔XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al, 2015.Improvement of the evaluation method service value based on per unit area[J].Journal of Natural Resources, 30（8）: 1243-1254.〕

谢高地, 肖玉, 2013.农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报, 21（6）: 645-651.〔XIE G D, XIAO Y, 2013.Review of agro-ecosystem services and their values[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 21（6）: 645-651.〕

谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖, 等, 2005.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 13（3）: 10-13.〔XIE G D, XIAO Y, ZHEN L, et al, 2005.Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 13（3）: 10-13.〕

谢文宝, 刘国勇, 陈彤, 2019.耕地质量保护补偿标准测算及方案设计: 新疆例证[J].农村经济（6）: 32-39.

薛选登, 高佳琳, 2021.粮食主产区耕地生态足迹与粮食安全空间相关性分析[J].生态经济, 2021, 37（8）: 93-99.〔XUE X D, GAO J L, 2021.Analysis of spatial correlation between ecological footprint of cultivated land and food security in main grain production areas[J].Ecological Economy, 37（8）: 93-99.〕

杨欣, BURTON M, 张安录, 2016.基于潜在分类模型的农田生态补偿标准测算: 一个离散选择实验模型的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 26（7）: 27-36.〔YANG X, BURTON M, ZHANG A L, 2016.Estimation of farmland eco-compensation criteria based on latent class model: a case of a discrete choice experiment[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 26（7）: 27-36.〕

袁承程, 张定祥, 刘黎明, 等, 2021.近10年中国耕地变化的区域特征及演变态势[J].农业工程学报, 37（1）: 267-278.〔YUAN C C, ZHANG D X, LIU L M, et al, 2021.Regional characteristics and spatial-temporal distribution of cultivated land change in China during 2009-2018[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37（1）: 267-278.〕

郑煜, 2022.国土空间规划视角下的耕地保护: 以新疆为例[J].安徽农业科学, 50（7）: 73-77.〔ZHENG Y, 2022.Cultivated land protection from the perspective of land space planning: taking Xinjiang as an example[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 50（7）: 73-77.〕

朱智洺, 姚婷, 郭伶俐, 2022.长三角区域双向水足迹生态补偿演化博弈研究[J].资源与产业, 24（2）: 54-63.〔ZHU Z M, YAO T, GUO L L, 2022.Evolutionary gaming study on ecological compensation of bi-directional water footprint in Yangtze River Delta[J].Resources ＆ Industries, 24（2）: 54-63.〕

BOHM P, 1972．Estimating demand for public goods: an experiment［J］．European Economic Review, 3（ 2）: 111-130．

CIRIACY-WANTRUP S V, 1947.Capital returns from soil-conservation practices[J].Journal of Farm Economics, 29(4）.

COSTANZA R, D ‘ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et a, 1997.The value of the world ‘s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature, 387（6630）: 253-260.

FANG J Y, GUO Z D, PIAO S L, et al, 2007.Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981-2000[J].Science in China Series D（Earth Sciences）, 50（9）: 1341-1350.

REES W E, 1992.Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment & Urbanization, 4（2）: 121-130.

WACKERNAGEL M, ONISTO L, BELLO P, et al, 1999.National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J] Ecological Economics, 29（3）: 375-390.

[1]	QIAO Hongqiang. LAND CONSOLIDATION EFFECT ANALYSIS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT METHOD IN TIANSHUI [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(5): 39-45.
[2]	FANG Wei. A CASE STUDY ON BEIJING: RELATION BETWEEN URBAN ECONOMY AND ECOLOGICAL CARRYING CAPACITY [J]. Resources & Industries, 2016, 18(6): 81-86.

ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION HETEROGENEITY OF XINJIANG‘S FARMLANDS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT MODEL

基于生态足迹模型的新疆各地州市耕地生态补偿异质性研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics