OBSTACLES AND APPROACHES TO PRODUCTIVITY ELEMENTS TO COUNTRYSIDE BASED ON COUNTY S'S PROJECT J

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20240509.005

Abstract

Abstract: Bidirectional flowing of urban-rural elements is a key to supporting urban-rural integrated development，which is based on the free bidirectional flowing of the productivity elements.Howeve，China's current urban-rural elements only show a directional flowing from rural to urban, obstacles exist from urban to rural.To further study the obstacles of productivity elements to countryside，this paper，based on a case study on County S's Project J，finds out the major obstacles.There are components unfitting modern agriculture and rural tourism in China's current rural land regime， policies and operation，resulting in obstacles in obtaining agricultural land use and rural construction land use.This paper presents the following suggestions.China should implement shareholding reform on agricultural land use based on land right determination， managing agricultural land in a whole from pieces，a path to scaled agricultural land circulation. China should reform township division to break the administrative obstacles in land circulation.China should reform rural collective operating construction land use by optimizing land-to-market mechanism，which can use rural scattering and idling land as a whole and provide spatial holding places for productivity elements to countryside.China should optimize the geographical layout of collective rural construction land use, fulfilling its functions in concentrating industries, guaranteeing social services and promoting cultural development to combine the major urban downtowns with regional towns.It serves as a path for productivity elements to countryside.

Key words: urban-rural elements flow, productivity elements to countryside, collective construction land to market, collective land circulation

摘要： 城乡要素的双向有序流动是在我国实施乡村振兴的战略背景之下，实现城乡融合发展的关键支撑，而城乡融合则是建立在生产要素双向自由流动的基础之上的，但是当前我国的城乡要素却只呈现出由乡村向城市的单向流动，从城市向乡村的流动还存在着障碍。为了深入研究生产要素下乡的障碍性因素，本文采取案例分析法，通过对S县J农业项目落地过程的考察和分析，研究发现阻碍生产要素下乡的主要障碍性因素为：由于在我国现行的农村土地制度、政策、运行机制之中均存在着与现代农业及乡村旅游业发展不相适应的成分，因而由此引发的农用地供地障碍和农村集体经营性建设用地供地障碍。为了破解生产要素下乡的障碍性因素，本文提出如下建议：1）我国应以土地确权为基础，积极开展对农用地经营权的股份化改革，从而可以将农用地经营权“化零为整”集中管理，最终以达到解决农用地规模化流转困难的目的。2）我国应通过重新研究制定乡镇的行政区划标准，来进行相应的调整改革，从而以打破土地流转的行政壁垒。3）我国应对农村集体经营性建设用地的空间置换机制进行深入改革，并完善相应的土地入市机制，从而可以将农村分散、闲置的集体经营性建设用地整合利用，并可以为生产要素下乡提供足够的空间载体。4）我国应优化农村集体建设用地的空间布局，促使其可以充分发挥出集聚产业要素、保障社会服务、促进文化发展等诸多功能，进而以形成主城区与区域中心镇相结合的空间格局，并可以为生产要素下乡提供畅通的渠道。

关键词: 城乡要素流动, 生产要素下乡, 集体建设用地入市, 集体土地流转

CLC Number:

F323

LI Jianxing, CHEN Jinfu, CHEN Zao, et al.. OBSTACLES AND APPROACHES TO PRODUCTIVITY ELEMENTS TO COUNTRYSIDE BASED ON COUNTY S'S PROJECT J[J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(3): 171-179.

李建兴, 陈锦富, 陈藻, 等. 生产要素下乡的障碍性因素及破解之策——基于S县J农业项目的调查研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(3): 171-179.

References

黄静, 李凯, 2021. 行政区划调整是否强化了土地运营？：来自长三角的政策效果检验[J].热带地理, 41（3）：554-561.〔HUANG J, LI K, 2021. Has administrative zoning adjustment strengthened land property operation? ：policy effects from Yangtze River Delta[J]. Tropical Geography, 41（3）：554-561.〕

贾莉, 米运生, 周文良, 2021. 城乡融合发展中的土地制度改革路径研究：以广清接合片区为例[J]. 规划师, 37（24）：40-45.〔JIA L, MI Y S, ZHOU W L, 2021. Innovation of land institution in urban-rural integrated development：the case Guangzhou-Qingyuan connection area [J]. Planner, 37（24）：40-45.〕

林聚任, 张小莉, 2020. 城乡空间协调发展与融合：基于胶东地区的研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 31（6）：57-64.〔LIN J R, ZHANG X L, 2020. Coordinated development and integration of urban-rural social spaces：a study of jiaodong region[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences,31（6）：57-64.〕

刘明辉, 卢飞, 2019. 城乡要素错配与城乡融合发展：基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J]农业技术经济（2）：33-46.〔LIU M H, LU F, 2019. Study on the influence of factor mismatch on urban-rural integration development：evidence from Chinese provincial panel data[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics（2）：33-46.〕

刘晴, 卢凤君, 段锐峰, 等, 2022. 乡村产业融合发展用地统筹政策创新、路径模式与保障机制：基于北京市大兴区的案例分析[J]. 中国软科学（S1）：280-288.〔LIU Q, LU F J, DUAN R F, et al., 2022. Policy innovation, path mode and guarantee mechanism of land overall planning for the integrated development of rural industries：case analysis based on Daxing district of Beijing[J]. China Soft Science（S1）：280-288.〕

刘守英, 2021. 城乡融合要实现要素的双向流动[Z]. 广州日报（百家号）, 2021-4-30.

宁志中, 张琦, 2020. 乡村优先发展背景下城乡要素流动与优化配置[J]. 地理研究39（10）：2201-2213.〔NING Z Z, ZHANG Q, 2020. Urban and rural element mobility and allocation optimization under the background of rural priority development[J]. Geographical Research 39（10）：2201-2213.〕

任路, 2020. 城乡融合发展中第三空间的崛起[J]. 学海,31（4）：113-118.〔REN L, 2020. The rise of the third space in the integration of urban and rural areas[J]. Academia Bimestris, 31（4）：113-118.〕

王向阳,申学锋,康玺, 2022. 构建城乡要素双向流动机制的实证分析与创新路径：基于以资本要素为核心的视角[J]. 财政科学,7（3）：34-48.〔WANG X Y, SHEN X F, KANG X, 2022. Empirical analysis and innovation path of constructing two-way flow mechanism of urban and rural factors：a perspective of capital factors[J]. Fiscal Science,7（3）：34-48.〕

王震, 辛贤, 2022. 土地跨村流转能否实现粮食生产率增长？：基于15省农户调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察（2）：2-18.〔WANG Z, XIN X, 2022. Can acrossvillage land transfer achieve grain productivity growth?：an empirical analysis based on rural household survey data fron fifteen provinces[J]. China Rural Survey（2）：2-18.〕

吴雷, 雷振东, 马琰, 等, 2022. 西安都市区城乡要素流动与城郊乡村地区空间治理路径研究[J]. 规划师, 38（6）：57-63.〔WU L, LEI Z D, MA Y, et al, 2022. Factor flow in the metropolitan areas and spatial governance path in the countryside, Xi'an[J]. Planner, 38（6）：57-63.〕

姚维清, 韦琦, 郑雄彬, 2021. 乡村振兴背景下村庄规划产业用地保障机制探索：以马山县乔老河片区为例[J]. 低碳世界11（6）：286-288.

于恒, 汪和建, 2022. 集体产权、关系治理与过度嵌入：文旅资本下乡的实践与困境[J]. 河北学刊, 42（2）：151-158.〔YU H, WANG H J, 2022. Collective property, relational governance and over embedding：the practice and dilemma of cultural tourism capital to the countryside [J]. Hebei Academic Journal, 42（2）：151-158.〕

余意峰, 周庆, 2017. 大城市郊区农地旅游化流转的问题与对策：以武汉市黄陂区GT村为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 45（5）：199-201.〔YU Y F, ZHOU Q, 2017. Problems and countermeasures of rural land transfer for tourism development in metropolitan suburb：the case of GT Village in Huangpi District of Wuhan City[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 45（5）：199-201.〕

张广辉, 陈鑫泓, 2020. 乡村振兴视角下城乡要素流动困境与突破[J]. 经济体制改革（3）：195-200.〔ZHANG G H, CHEN X H, 2020. The dilemmas and breakthroughs of urban and rural elements flow from the perspective of rural revitalization[J]. Reform of Economic System（3）：195-200.〕

郑文博, 孔凡文, 王英华, 2022. 论城乡土地要素流动与产业聚集的互动关系[J]. 农业经济（7）：89-90.

周芳名, 2021. 中国城乡要素配置的协调性测度与演化分析[J]. 统计与决策,2021,37（23）：54-58.

邹一南, 2020. 从二元对立到城乡融合：中国工农城乡关系的制度性重构[J]. 科学社会主义（3）：125-130.

[1]	HUA Jian, WU Yaru. TEMPORAL-SPATIAL EVOLUTION AND FACTORS OF AGRICULTURAL SOCIALIZED SERVICING LEVEL IN THE MAJOR CROP PRODUCTION AREAS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(2): 86-100.
[2]	ZHAO Min, CHU Peipei. SPATIAL CONVERGENCE AND DIFFERENTIATED CHARACTERISTICS OF CHINA'S PROVINCIAL RURAL INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION LEVEL [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(1): 51-66.
[3]	ZHANG Hengquan, GU Qianwen, ZHANG Chenjun. TEMPORAL-SPATIAL IMBALANCE OF PROVINCIAL WATER USE EFFICIENCY DYNAMIC EVOLUTION AND DRIVES BASED ON GEOGRAPHIC DETECTOR [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(3): 81-93.
[4]	LI Yun, LIU Yinbang. FARMLAND CHANGES AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODERATION IN XI'NING CITY [J]. Resources & Industries, 2020, 22(2): 12-17.
[5]	GONG Fang, HAN Qing. A CASE STUDY ON XILINGELE MENG: INFLUENCE OF GRASSLAND ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION STANDARD TO HERDSMANS INCOME [J]. Resources & Industries, 2019, 21(5): 44-51.
[6]	LI Ying-chao. A CASE STUDY ON LILIN TOWN, JIYUAN CITY, HENAN PROVINCE: DISCUSSION AND PRACTICE OF VILLAGE CONSOLIDATION IN ZHONGYUAN AREA [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(3): 153-157.
[7]	ZHAO Yu-ling, YUN Wen-ju, YANG Hong, et al.. REVIEW ON CHINA'S RURAL RESIDENTIAL AREA CONSOLIDATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(3): 76-83.
[8]	ZHONG Lan-yan. A CASE STUDY ON YANCHENG: FARMLAND PROTECTION DURING URBANIZATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(1): 26-30.
[9]	YUAN Tao, FENG Cong, ZHOU Wei. FRACTAL FEATURES OF LAND COVERAGE TYPES BASED ON QUICKBIRD DATA [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(1): 139-143.
[10]	ZENG Hui, FU Mei-chen. ADJUSTMENT AND CONTROLS OF LAND USE SECURITY LAYOUT IN MINING AREAS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(3): 94-97.
[11]	ZHOU Jing, YANG Qiang-yuan, SHEN Gui-xin, FENG Ying-bin. A CASE STUDY ON CHONGQING CITY: APPLICATION OF DIFFERENTIATED LAND UTILIZATION POLICIES IN THE NEWROUND LAND UTILIZATION PLANNING [J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(1): 78-82.
[12]	TIAN Su-juan, CHEN Wei-feng, LU Xu-yun, TIAN Su-feng, WANG Li-Li, LIU Shou-wen, GOU Min. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION MODELS AFTER LAND CONSOLIDATION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(1): 88-92.
[13]	CAO Yin-gui, ZHOU Wei, WANG Jing, YUAN Chun. OVERALL REGULATING AND PLANNING IN ECOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTIVE VILLAGES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(1): 138-141.
[14]	SONG Lei. ESTABLISHMENT AND REFERENCE OF MINE REHABILITATION DEPOSIT IN USA [J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(1): 166-172.
[15]	LIU Xiao-cui, BAI Zhong-ke, MA Xiao, WEN Liang-Liang, MENG Fan-geng. A CASE STUDY ON DONG-2 OPENCAST COAL MINE IN INNER MONGOLIA: OPENCAST MINING AND LAND REHABILITATION BASED ON SERVICE FUNCTION VALUE OF ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM [J]. Resources & Industries, 2010, 12(4): 74-78.