IMPACTS OF CORPORATE COLLECTIVISM CULTURE ON ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE FROM PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL NETWORK

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20240510.001

Abstract

Abstract: To further study the relation of corporate collectivism culture with organizational resilience，this paper，from perspective of social network, uses 2012 to 2021 China's A-listed companies' panel data to study the impacts of corporate collectivism culture on organizational resilience, and the mediating effect of corporate commercial social capital/political social capital on between corporate collectivism culture and organizational resilience.Impacting coefficient of corporate collectivism culture on organizational resilience is 0.513 7，outstanding above 1%, suggesting a positive promotion or corporate collectivism culture on organizational resilience.Regression coefficient of corporate collectivism culture on corporate commercial social capital is 11.941 9，outstanding above 5%, suggesting a positive relation that corporate collectivism culture promote accumulation of corporate commercial social capital.Impacts of corporate collectivism culture on organizational resilience is still obvious after adding the intermediary variable of corporate commercial social capital，with regression coefficient at 0.517 1，outstanding above 1%. Regression coefficient of corporate commercial social capital on organizational resilience is 0.000 3，outstanding above 5%，suggesting a mediating role of corporate commercial social capital between corporate collectivism culture and organizational resilience.Regression coefficient of corporate collectivism culture on corporate political social capital is 0.935 4, outstanding above 10%，suggesting a positive relation that corporate collectivism culture can promote the accumulation of corporate political social capital. Impacts of corporate collectivism culture on organizational resilience is still outstanding after the mediating variable corporate political social capital，with its regression coefficient at 0.508 7, outstanding above 1%. Regression coefficient of corporate political social capital on organizational resilience is 0.005 4, outstanding above 10%，suggesting a mediating role of corporate political social capital between corporate collectivism culture and organizational resilience.

Key words: collectivism culture, organizational resilience, social network, corporate commercial social capital, corporate political social capital

摘要： 为了深入研究企业集体主义文化与组织韧性之间的关系，本文从社会网络视角出发，以2012—2021年我国沪深A股上市公司面板数据作为样本，研究了企业集体主义文化对组织韧性的影响作用，以及企业商业社会资本、企业政治社会资本在企业集体主义文化与组织韧性之间发挥的中介效应。研究结果表明：1)企业集体主义文化对组织韧性的影响系数为0.513 7，且在1%的水平上显著，表明企业集体主义文化对组织韧性起着正向的促进作用。2) 企业集体主义文化对企业商业社会资本的回归系数为11.941 9，且在5%的水平上显著，表明企业集体主义文化与企业商业社会资本之间存在正相关关系，即企业集体主义文化能够促进企业商业社会资本的积累。企业集体主义文化对组织韧性的影响在加入中介变量企业商业社会资本后依然显著，回归系数为0.517 1，且在1%的水平上显著，而企业商业社会资本对组织韧性的回归系数为0.000 3，且在5%的水平上显著，表明企业商业社会资本在企业集体主义文化与组织韧性之间发挥着中介效应。3) 企业集体主义文化对企业政治社会资本的回归系数为0.935 4，且在10%的水平上显著，表明企业集体主义文化与企业政治社会资本之间存在正相关关系，即企业集体主义文化能够促进企业政治社会资本的积累。企业集体主义文化对组织韧性的影响在加入中介变量企业政治社会资本后依然显著，回归系数为0.508 7，且在1%的水平上显著，而企业政治社会资本对组织韧性的回归系数为0.005 4，且在10%的水平上显著，表明企业政治社会资本在企业集体主义文化与组织韧性之间同样也发挥着中介效应。

关键词: 集体主义文化, 组织韧性, 社会网络, 企业商业社会资本, 企业政治社会资本

CLC Number:

F272.9

ZHANG Yang, WANG Yuxin, TIAN Ming. IMPACTS OF CORPORATE COLLECTIVISM CULTURE ON ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE FROM PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL NETWORK[J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(3): 180-194.

张阳, 王俞欣, 田鸣. 社会网络视角下企业集体主义文化对组织韧性的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(3): 180-194.

References

白平则, 2011. 如何认识我国的社会组织[J]. 政治学研究（2）: 3-10, 2.

边燕杰, 张文宏, 程诚, 2012. 求职过程的社会网络模型: 检验关系效应假设[J]. 社会, 32 （3）: 24-37.〔BIAN Y J, ZHANG W H, CHENG C, 2012. A social network model of the job-search process: testing a relational effect hypothesis [J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 32（3）: 24-37.〕

杜兴强, 陈韫慧, 杜颖洁, 2010. 寻租、政治联系与“真实”业绩: 基于民营上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究（10）: 135-157.〔DU X Q, CHEN Y H, DU Y J, 2010. Rent-seeking, political connections and actual performance: empirical evidence underlying privately listed companies[J]. Journal of Financial Research （10）: 135-157.〕

郭江, 2023. 财税激励政策、实质性创新与上市公司价值[J]. 财会通讯（19）: 73-77.

胡冬青, 顾琴轩, 2022. 团队权力距离和集体主义对团队创造力影响: 基于共享领导视角 [J]. 管理评论, 34 （5）: 167-175.〔HU D Q, GU Q X, 2022. Effect of team power distance and collectivism on team creativity: from the perspective of shared leadership[J]. Management Review, 34（5）: 167-175.〕

胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠, 2021. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗？: 基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 37（5）: 139-156, 11, 19-21.〔HU N, XUE F J, WANG H N, 2021. Does managerial myopia affect long-term investment? based on text analysis and machine learning[J]. Journal of Management World, 37（5）: 139-156, 11, 19-21.〕

金辉, 董春燕, 刘晓彦, 2021. 领导集体主义取向对员工创新行为的跨层影响机理: 基于两类知识共享的中介效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 33（3）: 58-72.〔JIN H, DONG C Y, LIU X Y, 2021. Cross-level influence mechanism of leaders' collectivism orientation on employees' innovation behavior-based on the mediating effects of two types of knowledge sharing[J]. R&D Management, 33（3）: 58-72.〕

李兰, 仲为国, 彭泗清, 等, 2022. 新冠肺炎疫情危机下的企业韧性与企业家精神: 2021·中国企业家成长与发展专题调查报告[J]. 南开管理评论, 25（1）: 50-64.〔LI L, ZHONG W G, PENG S Q, et al., 2022. Organizational resilience and entrepreneurship under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: 2021 special report on the growth and development of Chinese entrepreneurs[J]. Nankai Business Review, 25（1）: 50-64.〕

李平, 2020. VUCA条件下的组织韧性: 分析框架与实践启示[J]. 清华管理评论（6）: 72-83.

李锐, 凌文辁, 柳士顺, 2012. 传统价值观、上下属关系与员工沉默行为: 一项本土文化情境下的实证探索[J]. 管理世界（3）: 127-140, 150, 13.

李正, 2006. 企业社会责任与企业价值的相关性研究: 来自沪市上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济（2）: 77-83, 3-4.〔LI Z, 2006. A study on relation of corporate social responsibility and corporate value: empirical evidence from Shanghai securities exchange [J]. China Industrial Economy（2）: 77-83, 3-4.〕

刘行, 赵晓阳, 2019. 最低工资标准的上涨是否会加剧企业避税? [J]. 经济研究, 54（10）: 121-135.〔LIU H, ZHAO X Y, 2019. Does increasing the minimum wage induce tax avoidance? [J]. Economic Research Journal, 54（10）: 121-135.〕

刘明宇, 芮明杰, 2012. 价值网络重构、分工演进与产业结构优化[J]. 中国工业经济（5）: 148-160.〔LIU M Y, RUI M J, 2012. Reconstruction of value network, the evolution of division and the industrial structure optimization[J]. China Industrial Economics（5）: 148-160.〕

刘松博, 李育辉, 2014. 员工跨界行为的作用机制: 网络中心性和集体主义的作用[J]. 心理学报, 46 （6）: 852-863.〔LIU S B, LI Y H, 2014. A longitudinal study on the impact mechanism of employees' boundary spanning behavior: roles of centrality and collectivism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46 （6）: 852-863.〕

刘颖琦, 陈睿君, 周菲, 2023. 组织韧性的概念结构与形成机制: 基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 16（1）: 316.〔LIU Y Q, CHEN R J, ZHOU F, 2023. The structure and formation mechanism of organizational resilience: a study based on grounded theory[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 16（1）: 3-16.〕

刘远泽, 2021. 企业变革型领导行为对人力资源管理的影响[J]. 商场现代化（4）: 73-75.

吕可夫, 于明洋, 阮永平, 2023. 兼听则明, 偏信则暗: 供应链网络中心性与企业风险承担 [J]. 管理评论, 35（7）: 266-280. 〔LV K F, YU M Y, RUAN Y P, 2023. If you listen to both sides, you will be wise: supply chain network centrality and enterprise risk-taking[J]. Management Review, 35（7）: 266-280.〕

马光荣, 杨恩艳, 2011. 社会网络、非正规金融与创业[J]. 经济研究, 46（3）: 83-94, 4-5, 9.〔MA G R, YANG E Y, 2011. Social networks, informal finance and entrepreneurship[J]. Economic Research Journal, 46（3）: 83-94, 4-5, 9.〕

潘健平, 潘越, 马奕涵, 2019. 以“合”为贵?合作文化与企业创新[J]. 金融研究（1）: 148-167.〔PAN J P, PAN Y, MA Y H, 2019. Is cooperation important? collaboration culture and innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Research（1）: 148-167.〕

单宇, 许晖, 周连喜, 等, 2021. 数智赋能: 危机情境下组织韧性如何形成？: 基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 37（3）: 84-104, 7.〔SHAN Y, XU H, ZHOU L X, et al., 2021. Digital and intelligent empowerment: how to form organizational resilience in crisis?: an exploratory case study based on Forest Cabin's turning crisis into opportunity[J]. Journal of Management World, 37 （3）: 84-104, 7.〕

田子方, 2020. 集体主义与居民家庭消费: 来自中国的经验发现[J]. 金融研究（5）: 132-150.〔TIAN Z F, 2020. Collectivism and household consumption: new empirical evidence from China[J]. Journal of Financial Research（5）: 132-150.〕

万建香, 钟以婷, 2018. 社会资本对企业绩效的影响: 基于中国经济转型阶段的研究[J]. 管理评论, 30 （1）: 60-66.〔WAN J X, ZHONG Y T, 2018. The influence of social capital on enterprise performance: based on the economic transition stage of China[J]. Management Review, 30 （1）: 60-66.〕

王国红, 林欢, 黄昊, 等, 2023. 资源保护视角下的中小企业组织韧性提升组态路径研究 [J]. 管理学报, 20（8）: 1128-1137, 1234.〔WANG G H, LIN H, HUANG H, et al., 2023. A study on the configuration path of SMEs organizational resilience improvement from the perspective of resource conservation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 20（8）: 1128-1137, 1234.〕

温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等, 2004. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报（5）: 614-620.〔WEN Z L, ZHANG L, HOU J T, et al., 2004. Testing and application of the mediating effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica（5）: 614-620.〕

吴胜涛, 茅云云, 吴舒涵, 等, 2023. 基于大数据的文化心理分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 31 （3）: 317-329.〔WU S T, MAO Y Y, WU S H, et al., 2023. The big data analysis in cultural psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 31（3）: 317-329.〕

吴晓波, 冯潇雅, 2022. VUCA情境下运营冗余对组织韧性的影响: 持续创新能力的调节作用[J]. 系统管理学报, 31（6）: 1150-1161.〔WU X B, FENG X Y, 2022. Impact of operational slack on organizational resilience in the VUCA context: the mediating role of sustainable innovation capability[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 31（6）: 1150-1161.〕

肖鹏, 王亚琪, 2023. 公共服务质量、社会信任与企业税收遵从 [J]. 现代经济探讨（9）: 1-12.〔XIAO P, WANG Y Q, 2023. Public service quality, social trust and corporate tax compliance[J]. Modern Economic Research（9）: 1-12.〕

许蓝月, 董保宝, 2021. 转换型领导与新创企业绩效: 一个跨层次的研究[J]. 南方经济（8）: 86-101.〔XU L Y, DONG B B, 2021. Transformational leadership and new venture performance: a cross-hierarchical study[J]. South China Journal of Economics（8）: 86-101.〕

杨洋, 魏江, 罗来军, 2015. 谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?: 所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界（1）: 75-86, 98, 188.〔YANG Y, WEI J, LUO L J, 2015. Who innovate from the government subsidies? the joint moderate effects of the ownership and the factor market distortions[J]. Management World（1）: 75-86, 98, 188.〕

于米, 2011. 个人/集体主义倾向与知识分享意愿之间的关系研究: 知识活性的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论（6）: 149-157.〔YU M, 2011. The study on the relationships between individualism/collectivism orientation and knowledge sharing intention: the moderating effect of affectual knowledge[J]. Nankai Business Review（6）: 149-157.〕

余明桂, 范蕊, 钟慧洁, 2016. 中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济（12）: 5-22.〔YU M G, FAN R, ZHONG H J, 2016. Chinese industrial policy and corporate technological innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics（12）: 5-22.〕

乐国林, 陈春花, 2011. 两部企业宪法蕴含的中国本土管理元素探析: 基于鞍钢宪法和华为基本法的研究[J]. 管理学报, 8（11）: 1575-1582.〔YUE G L, CHEN C H, 2011. Exploring the thinking of Chinese indigenous management through Angang steel constitution and Huawei constitution[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 8 (11): 1575-1582.〕

张公一, 张畅, 刘晚晴, 2020. 化危为安: 组织韧性研究述评与展望[J]. 经济管理, 42（10）: 192-208.〔ZHANG G Y, ZHANG C, LIU W Q, 2020. Turning danger into safety: a literature review and prospect of organizational resilience[J]. Business and Management Journal, 42 (10): 192-208.〕

郑杭生,奂平清, 2003. 社会资本概念的意义及研究中存在的问题[J]. 学术界（6）: 78-90.

诸彦含, 王政, 温馨, 等, 2020. 应激框架下组织韧性作用过程诠释[J]. 管理现代化, 40 （5）: 52-55.〔ZHU Y H, WANG Z, WEN X, et al.,2020. Interpretation of the process of organizational resilience under the stress framework[J]. Modernization of Management, 40 （5）: 52-55.〕

BANDURA A, FREEMAN W H, LIGHTSEY R, 1999. Selfefficacy: the exercise of control [J]. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13（2）158-166.

COHEN S G, BAILEY D E, 1997. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 23（3）: 239-290.

COUTU D L, 2002. How resilience works[J]. Harvard Business Review, 80（5）: 46-56, 52, 55.

DIERDORFF E C, BELL S T, BELOHLAV J A, 2011. The power of “we”: effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96（2）: 247-262.

FIORDELISI F, RICCI O, 2014. Corporate culture and CEO turnover[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28: 66-82.

GIBSON C B, 1999. Do they do what they believe they can? group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 42（2）: 138-152.

GUISO L, SAPIENZA P, ZINGALES L, 2015. The value of corporate culture[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 117 （1）: 60-76.

HAYTON J C, GEORGE G, ZAHRA S A, 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: a review of behavioral research[J]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26 （4）: 33-52.

HERING L, PONCET S, 2014. Environmental policy, and exports: evidence from Chinese cities[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 68（2）: 296-318.

HOFSTEDE G, 1985. The interaction between national and organizational value systems[1] [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 22（4）: 347-357.

HOFSTEDE G, HOFSTEDE G J, 2004. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill.

KNUTSSON D, TYREFORS B, 2022. The quality and efficiency of public and private firms: evidence from ambulance services[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137 （4）: 2213-2262.

KRUEGER A O, 1974. The political economy of the rent-seeking society[J]. The American Economic Review, 64 （3）: 291-303.

KWOK L, 1988. Some determinants of conflict avoidance[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19（1）: 125-136.

LANG G, 2009. Measuring the returns of R & D: an empirical study of the German manufacturing sector over 45 years[J]. Research Policy, 38（9）: 1438-1445.

MILLS J, CLARK M S, 1982. Exchange and communal relationships[J]. Review of personality and social psychology, 3: 121-144.

OHBUCHI K-I, FUKUSHIMA O, TEDESCHI J T, 1999. Cultural values in conflict management: goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactical decision[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30（1）: 51-71.

PANDEY J, 1996. Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology[M]. London: Sage Publications.

PAVLOU P A, EL SAWY O A, 2011. Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities[J]. Decision Sciences, 42（1）: 239-273.

PENG M W, HEATH P S, 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice[J]. Academy of Management Review, 21（2）: 492-528.

PUTNAM R D, 1993. The prosperous community: social capital and public life[J]. The American prospect, 13（13）: 35-42.

PUTNAM R D, 2000. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital[M]New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

TEECE D J, PISANO G, SHUEN A, 1986. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 18（7）: 509-533.

TRIANDIS H C, BONTEMPO R, VILLAREAL M J, et al., 1988. Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54（2）: 323-338.

UZZI B, 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect[J]. American Sociological Review, 61（4）: 674-698.

[1]	GUAN Wei, WANG Yong, XU Shuting. NETWORK STRUCTURE AND FACTORS OF CHINA’S INDUSTRIAL CARBON EMISSION [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(5): 40-49.
[2]	ZHANG Changzheng, WANG Weiqian. NETWORK FEATURES AND MEASUREMENTS OF RISKS IN GREEN CONFLICTS OF MAJOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS BASED ON BI\\|MODE NETWORK AND REFEREE VIEWING ANGLE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2021, 23(3): 60-69.
[3]	SUN Wei, YUE Jingui. SPATIAL CORRELATION OF KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE SERVICING IN LONG TRIANGLE URBAN GROUP BASED ON SOCIAL NETWORK VIEWS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2019, 21(2): 34-44.
[4]	CUI Xinlei, ZHAO Yanxia. A CASE STUDY ON HBO (HUHHOT, BAOTOU, ORDOS) CITY GROUP: ECONOMIC CONNECTION NETWORK FEATURES AND EVOLUTION OF RESOURCE-BASED CITIES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2018, 20(5): 1-8.