Resources & Industries ›› 2011, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 85-89.
• SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RESOURCES CITIES • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Nian-sheng
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
吴念胜
作者简介:
基金资助:
“油气藏地质及开发工程”国家重点实验室(西南石油大学)资助项目(PLN1015);四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地四川石油天然气发展研究中心重点项目(川油气科SKAN09-05)。
Abstract:
In China, the fast economic growth leads to a fast ore resources depletion, short water resource, and a severe environmental pollution arising from industry and agriculture, which has been a key point in people’s life quality and economic development. China has established relatively sound environmental protection laws, however, they are not effectively proceeded in practice. The criminal law is a last choice, but it has a big default in environmental pollution. In order to protect environment and to meet people’s human rights, it is necessary to enlarge the covers of the criminal law in environmental pollution in a right time. At the same time, the essential base is from the severe social harm of environmental pollution. “The last choice” is a precondition to make and apply the environmental criminal law.
Key words: environmental pollution, pollution control, essential concept of criminal law, social harm
摘要:
在我国,经济快速发展带来的不可再生资源迅速枯竭、水资源匮乏等环境问题日渐突出,工农业生产造成的环境污染也到了极其严重的程度,环境问题已经成为制约提高国民生活质量、经济发展进程的关键。虽然我国已经建立了较为完备的基本环境保护法律制度,但基本环境保护法律制度并未充分有效地保护环境、遏制环境的进一步恶化,强化刑法保护环境的力度是不得已的选择。我国刑法在环境污染犯罪方面的规定存在严重缺陷。为了保护环境、丰富和发展全体公民基本人权的实质需要,必须适当扩大刑法关于环境污染犯罪的覆盖面,但同时又必须坚持环境污染行为的严重社会危害性是制定、适用刑法规范的实质根据;“迫不得已”是制定、适用环境刑法规范的前提。
关键词: 环境污染, 污染控制, 实质刑法观, 社会危害性
CLC Number:
F407.1
WU Nian-sheng. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL UNDER THE ESSENTIAL CONCEPT OF CRIMINAL LAW[J]. Resources & Industries, 2011, 13(5): 85-89.
吴念胜. 实质刑法观下的环境污染控制[J]. 资源与产业, 2011, 13(5): 85-89.
0 / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.resourcesindustries.net.cn/EN/
https://www.resourcesindustries.net.cn/EN/Y2011/V13/I5/85
[1]汤因比, 池大作. 展望二十一世纪[M]. 荀春生,朱继征,陈国梁,译. 北京:国际文化出版公司, 1985: 51 [2]蒋兰香. 当前我国环境犯罪存在的问题[J]. 云南大学学报: 法学版, 2004,17(2): 48-54 [3]孟庆华,王法. 重大环境污染事故罪修改若干问题探讨[J]. 江苏技术师范学院学报, 2010,16(11):15-18 [4]吴念胜,何琰. 论破坏性采矿罪的认定[J]. 资源与产业, 2008,10(4): 136-139 [5]韩德培. 环境保护法教程[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2003 [6]国家环境保护总局. 国家环境保护“十五”计划[Z]. 环境工作通讯, 2002(2):30 [7]环保. 全国10大环境污染导致的群体性事件案例解析[EB/OL]. (2009-10-30)[2010-11-28]. http: //news. yushu. gov. cn/html/20091030094227. html [8]陈忠林. 刑法散得集 [M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2003:277 [9]乌尔里希·贝克. 世界风险社会[M]. 吴英姿,孙淑敏,译. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2004:72 [10]陈忠林. 刑法总论[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2007: 6 [11]陈忠林. 刑法: 总论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2003: 5-7 [12]乌尔里希·贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻,译. 南京:译林出版社, 2004: 15 [13]郄建荣. 环境犯罪为何游离于刑事处罚之外 [EB/OL]. (2010-5-27)[2010-11-30]. http: //news. sina. com. cn/o/2010-05-27/075317571576s. shtml [14]陈忠林. 意大利刑法纲要 [M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999:262 [15]贝卡利亚. 犯罪与刑罚 [M]. 黄风,译. 北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1993:31, 45 [16]汉斯·海因里希·耶赛克,托马斯·魏根特. 德国刑法教科书: 总论[M]. 徐久生,译. 北京:中国法制出版社,2001: 89 [17]侯艳芳. 关于我国污染环境犯罪中设置危险犯的思考[J]. 政治与法律,2009(10): 98-103 [18]高铭暄,马克昌. 刑法学(下)[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,1999
INTERACTION AMONG ECOLOGICAL CONSUMPTION, WELFARE LEVEL AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION UNDER PERSPECTIVE OF “DUAL CIRCULATION”
DOES CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN MINERALS DEMONSTRATING BASE RELIEVE ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION FROM PARA-NATURAL TESTS?