Resources & Industries ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 45-49.

• RESOURCES STRATEGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

OPTIMIZING CHINA’S OCEANIC ECO-COMPENSATION LAW  VIEWING FROM ECOLOGICAL ADMINISTRATION

LIU Hui   

  1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
  • Received:2012-06-06 Revised:2012-09-25 Online:2012-12-20 Published:2012-12-20

生态行政视角下完善我国海洋生态补偿法的思考

刘 慧   

  1. 中国石油大学 经济管理学院,山东 青岛 266580
  • 作者简介:刘慧(1978— ),女,硕士、讲师,主要从事生态经济和环境保护研究。E-mail: Lhuismile@163,com
  • 基金资助:

    山东省自然基金项目(ZR2012GM011);教育部高校人文社科规划项目(10YJA630038)

Abstract:

Ecological administration is a new concept of Administrative Law in the 21st century. It is a new target for government to carry out ecological laws and to construct ecological government. The ConocoPhilips oil release disaster triggered a review on China’s oceanic eco-compensation law. The administrative legislation level of China’s oceanic ecocompensation law is low, without systematic integration and partial procedure law. Immature compensation means and program, combined without clear administrative execution and accountability, largely limit the practice in China’s oceanic eco-compensation. Viewing from ecological administration, it can be helpful to promote the practice in oceanic eco-compensation if optimizing the laws and procedure and constructing a supervision mechanism.

摘要:

生态行政是21世纪行政法的新理念。推行生态法治行政理念、构建生态型政府,是当代政府改革发展的新目标。康菲石油案这一生态环境的热点事件,引发了对当前我国海洋生态补偿法律制度现状的反思。我国海洋生态补偿的行政立法层次较低,相关法律资源缺乏系统性整合与疏理,加之程序法的部分缺位,救济手段与救济程序不完备以及行政执法主体的不明确和问责制的缺乏等问题严重制约了我国海洋生态补偿的实践。为此,在生态行政的视角下进一步完善我国海洋生态补偿的实体法、程序法,并建立海洋生态补偿的监管机制,明确执法主体和严格问责制,这些措施将有助于规范和推动我国海洋生态补偿的实践。

关键词: 康菲石油, 生态行政, 海洋生态补偿, 程序