IMPACTS OF MANUFACTURING AGGLOMERATION ON
CHINA’S GREEN TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY BASED ON ADJUSTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20240304.001

Abstract

Abstract:

To achieve sustainability of China’s manufacturing and to increase economic growth quality, this paper studies the impacts of manufacturing agglomeration on China’s green total factor productivity, and discusses the effects of different environmental regulations during the process. Based on the panel data of China’s 30 provinces from 2005 to 2018, this paper uses ultra-efficiency SBM model, which is non-desired output, non-directional and non-angular, to measure their green total factor productivity, and applies Tobit regression model to analyze the impacts of manufacturing on China’s green total factor productivity, and to verify the adjustment of market-stimulating, command controlling and public-involved environmental regulations between manufacturing agglomeration and China’s green total factor productivity. Manufacturing agglomeration is outstandingly negative to China’s green total factor productivity above 1%, suggesting China’s manufacturing still in a highly polluting and energy-consuming model. Crowding effect of industrial agglomeration is larger than economic scale effect, adversely affecting green total factor productivity. Among different environmental regulations, command-controlling and public-involving are conspicuously positive to manufacturing agglomeration above 1%, suggesting both largely constrain the adverse impacts of manufacturing agglomeration on green total factor productivity, while market-stimulating environmental regulation is negative and fails the significance test, meaning it has no adjustment function. China’s manufacturing layout needs further improvement and its industrial structure needs to be adjusted to promote a green transformation of China’s economy. Government shall optimize environmental laws and regulations to fulfill their driving roles in green development.

Key words: environmental regulations, manufacturing agglomeration, green total factor productivity; adjustment

摘要：

为了推动我国制造业的可持续发展，提高经济发展质量，对制造业集聚如何影响我国绿色全要素生产率进行探究，并梳理了不同类型的环境规制在制造业集聚影响我国绿色全要素生产率过程中所发挥的作用。以2005—2018年中国30个省份面板数据为样本，采用包含非期望产出的非径向、非角度的超效率SBM模型测算各地区的绿色全要素生产率，运用Tobit回归模型实证分析制造业对我国绿色全要素生产率的影响，同时分别检验了不同类型的环境规制，即市场激励型环境规制、命令控制型环境规制及公众参与型环境规制在制造业集聚对绿色全要素生产率影响中的调节效应。研究发现：制造业集聚与我国的绿色全要素生产率在1%的水平上呈显著的负相关关系，表明我国制造业仍处于高污染、高耗能的粗放型增长模式，产业集聚带来的拥挤效应大于规模经济效应，不利于绿色全要素生产率的提高；在不同环境规制的调节效应中，命令控制型和公众参与型环境规制与制造业集聚的交互项系数在1%的水平上显著为正，即命令控制型和公众参与型环境规制能够显著抑制制造业集聚对绿色全要素生产率的负面影响，而市场激励型环境规制与制造业集聚交互项系数为负且未通过显著性检验，即市场激励型环境规制没有显著的调节效应。我国制造业产业布局仍需进一步完善，产业结构有待进一步调整，以促进我国经济发展绿色转型，与此同时政府应完善环境规制相关法律法规，充分发挥不同环境规制在实现绿色发展目标中的积极作用。

关键词: 环境规制, 制造业集聚, 绿色全要素生产率, 调节效应

CLC Number:

F205

BIAN Yinyu, ZHANG Yongqing.

IMPACTS OF MANUFACTURING AGGLOMERATION ON CHINA’S GREEN TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY BASED ON ADJUSTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(2): 67-75.

卞寅瑜, 张永庆.

制造业集聚对我国绿色全要素生产率的影响——基于环境规制的调节效应分析

[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(2): 67-75.

References

陈超凡, 韩晶, 毛渊龙, 2018. 环境规制、行业异质性与中国工业绿色增长: 基于全要素生产率视角的非线性检验[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 40(3): 65-80.〔CHEN C F, HAN J, MAO Y L, 2018. Environmental regulation, industrial heterogeneity and industrial green growth in China: a nonlinear test from the perspective of total factor productivity[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 40(3): 65-80.〕

高艺, 杨高升, 谢秋皓, 2020. 异质性环境规制对绿色全要素生产率的影响机制: 基于能源消费结构的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 22(3): 1-10.〔GAO Y, YANG G S, XIE Q H, 2020. Impact mechanism of heterogeneously environmental regulations on green total factor productivity based on adjusting of energy consumption structure[J]. Resources & Industries, 22(3): 1-10.〕

郭宏毅, 2018. 环境规制对制造业产业集聚影响的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 34(10): 139-142.〔GUO H Y, 2018. Empirical analysis of the impact of environmental regulation on manufacturing industry agglomeration[J]. Statistics & Decision, 34(10): 139-142.〕

何凌云, 祁晓凤, 2022. 环境规制与绿色全要素生产率: 来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 经济学动态(6): 97-114.〔HE L Y, QI X F, 2022. Environmental regulation and green total factor productivity: evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises[J]. Economic Perspectives(6): 97-114.〕

侯建, 常青山, 陈建成, 等, 2020. 环境规制视角下制造业绿色转型对能源强度的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 40(9): 4155-4166.〔HOU J, CHANG Q S, CHEN J C, et al., 2020. The impact of green transformation of manufacturing industry on energy intensity: the perspective of environmental regulation[J]. China Environmental Science, 40(9): 4155-4166.〕

李卫兵, 刘方文, 王滨, 2019. 环境规制有助于提升绿色全要素生产率吗?: 基于两控区政策的估计[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 33(1): 72-82.〔LI W B, LIU F W, WANG B, 2019. Can environmental regulation promote GTFP?: evidence from the two control zones policy[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 33(1): 72-82.〕

林伯强, 2003. 电力消费与中国经济增长: 基于生产函数的研究[J]. 管理世界, 11: 18-27．〔LIN B Q, 2003. Electricity consumption and China’s economic growth: a study based on production function[J]. Journal of Management World, 11: 18-27.〕

单豪杰, 2008. 中国资本存量K的再估算: 1952—2006年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 25(10): 17-31.〔SHAN H J, 2008. Reestimating the capital stock of China: 1952-2006[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 25(10): 17-31.〕

宋晓娜, 薛惠锋, 2022. 环境规制、FDI溢出与制造业绿色技术创新[J]. 统计与决策, 38(3): 81-85.〔SONG X N, XUE H F, 2022. Environmental regulation, FDI spillovers, and green technology innovation in manufacturing industry[J]. Statistics & Decision, 38(3): 81-85.〕

王鹏, 郭淑芬, 2021. 正式环境规制、人力资本与绿色全要素生产率[J]. 宏观经济研究（5）: 155-169.〔WANG P, GUO S F, 2021. Formal environmental regulation, human capital, and green total factor productivity[J]. Macroeconomics(5): 155-169.〕

王伟, 2022. 产业集聚、城市集聚与绿色全要素生产率: 以长江经济带城市群为例[J]. 资源与产业, 24(6): 75-89.〔WANG W, 2022. Industrial agglomeration, urban agglomeration and green total factor productivity: a case study of city clusters in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(6): 75-89.〕

谢波, 李冬梅, 2020. 环境规制对制造业结构转型升级的影响: 基于要素流动配置的中介效应研究[J]. 生态经济, 36(11): 132-136, 142.〔XIE B, LI D M, 2020. Impact of environmental regulation on manufacturing structural change: based on the mediating effect of resource reallocation[J]. Ecological Economy, 36(11): 132-136, 142.〕

叶云岭, 吴传清, 周西一敏, 2022. 长江经济带制造业集聚对环境污染的门槛效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 31(6): 1282-1292.〔YE Y L, WU C Q, ZHOU X Y M, 2022. Threshold effect of manufacturing agglomeration on environmental pollution in Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 31(6): 1282-1292.〕

易宇, 陈曦, 2022. 我国制造业布局现状与优化升级[J]. 宏观经济管理(9): 8-13.〔YI Y, CHEN X, 2022. The current situation and optimization and upgrade of China’s manufacturing industry layout[J]. Macroeconomic Management(9): 8-13.〕

尹庆民, 靳婉婷, 2023. 科技创新对绿色全要素生产率的影响: 基于产业集聚调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 25(2): 1-10.〔YIN Q M, JIN W T, 2023. Impacts of technical innovation on green total factor productivity based on adjustment of industrial agglomeration[J]. Resources & Industries, 25(2): 1-10.〕

袁华锡, 封亦代, 余泳泽, 2022. 制造业集聚促进抑或阻碍绿色发展绩效?: 来自长江经济带的证据[J]. 经济地理, 42(6): 121-131.〔YUAN H X, FENG Y D, YU Y Z, 2022. Does manufacturing agglomeration promote or hinder green development performance?: evidence from the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Economic Geography, 42(6): 121-131.〕

张军, 吴桂英, 张吉鹏, 2004. 中国省际物质资本存量估算: 1952—2000[J]. 经济研究, 10: 35-44.〔ZHANG J, WU G Y, ZHANG J P, 2004. The estimation of China’s provincial capital stock: 1952-2000[J]. Economic Research Journal, 10: 35-44.〕

张瑾华, 陈强远, 2021. 碳中和目标下中国制造业绿色转型路径分析[J]. 企业经济, 40(8): 36-43.〔ZHANG J H, CHEN Q Y, 2021. Analysis of the green transformation path of China’s manufacturing industry under the carbon neutrality goal[J]. Enterprise Economy, 40(8): 36-43.〕

张平淡, 屠西伟, 2021. 制造业集聚对绿色经济效率的双边影响[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 41(11): 35-53.〔ZHANG P D, TU X W, 2021. The bilateral impact of manufacturing agglomeration on green economy efficiency[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 41(11): 35-53.〕

赵少钦, 张海军, 张潇潇, 2013. 环境规制影响中国产业集聚的效应分析[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 35(3): 115-119.〔ZHAO S Q, ZHANG H J, ZHANG X X, 2013. An analysis on the influence of environmental regulations on industrial agglomeration in China[J]. Journal of Guangxi Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 35(3): 115-119.〕

CHEN W Y, HU Z Y, LI X, et al., 2017. Strategic interaction in municipal governments’ provision of public green spaces: a dynamic spatial panel data analysis in transitional China[J]. Cities, 71: 1-10.

CICCONE A, 2002. Agglomeration effects in Europe[J]. European Economic Review, 46(2): 213-227.

DEMETRIOU M, PAPASOLOMOU I, VRONTIS D, 2010. Cause-related marketing: building the corporate image while supporting worthwhile causes[J]. Journal of Brand Management, 17: 266-278.

KRUGMAN P, 1998. Space: the final frontier[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2): 161-174.

LEVINSON A, TAYLOR M S, 2008. Unmasking the pollution haven effect[J]. International Economic Review, 49(1): 223-254.

MANDERSON E, KNELLER R, 2012. Environmental regulations, outward FDI and heterogeneous firms: are countries used as pollution havens?[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 51 (3): 317-352.

REN W, ZHONG Y, MELIGRANA J, et al., 2003. Urbanization, land use, and water quality in Shanghai: 1947-1996[J]. Environment International, 29(5): 649-659.

TONE K, 2001. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research(3): 498-509.

TONE K, 2002. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research(1): 32-41.