煤炭资源型城市生态足迹的空间分布及影响因素分析

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20241008.001

资源与产业 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 1-12.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20241008.001

• 非主题来稿选登 • 下一篇

煤炭资源型城市生态足迹的空间分布及影响因素分析

罗正茂¹，高红贵¹，万华炜²，陈洋³

(1.中南财经政法大学经济学院，湖北武汉 430073；2.湖北工业大学马克思主义学院，湖北武汉 430068； 3.武汉生物工程学院管理学院，湖北武汉 430415）

收稿日期:2023-12-27 修回日期:2024-06-07 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-10-20
通讯作者: 高红贵，博士、教授，主要从事生态文明建设、生态经济与可持续发展研究。E-mail:gaohg1964@126.com
作者简介:罗正茂，博士生，主要从事乡村振兴研究。E-mail:luozmao@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目（21YJA790051）；资源枯竭型城市转型与发展研究中心开放基金项目（KF2022Y09）；中央高校教育教学改革项目（BJ20220213）。

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND FACTORS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS IN COAL RESOURCE BASED CITIES

LUO Zhengmao¹, GAO Honggui¹, WAN Huawei², CHEN Yang³

(1.School of Economics,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China; 2.School of Marxism, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China; 3.School of Management, Wuhan University of Bioengineering, Wuhan 430415, China)

Received:2023-12-27 Revised:2024-06-07 Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 煤炭资源的过度开发使得中国煤炭资源型城市陷入“资源诅咒”困境，分析煤炭资源型城市生态足迹的空间特征及路径优化是破解该困境的关键。本文以35个煤炭资源型城市为研究对象，运用能值生态足迹模型及可持续性评价指标测算了煤炭资源型城市的能值生态足迹、生态盈亏、生态效率及生态可持续性，并利用STIRPAT模型对影响因素进行了具体分析。结果表明：1)煤炭资源型城市的能值生态足迹与能源消费量密切相关，且区域差异显著，其中东部地区的能值生态足迹值最大；2)目前多数煤炭资源型城市在生态供需方面具有不平衡性，但从生态效率来看，在技术优化和政策干预之下，资源利用效率逐渐提高；3)从STIRPAT模型的回归结果来看，经济因素和人口因素对煤炭资源型城市的能值生态足迹有显著的正向影响作用，技术水平的提高则抑制了能值生态足迹值的增长。基于以上结论，为煤炭资源型城市的转型和可持续发展提出对策与建议。

关键词: 煤炭资源型城市, 能值生态足迹, 可持续发展

Abstract: China's coal resource-based cities have been entrapped into plight due to their excessive mining activities, which can get resolved through studying the spatial distribution and path optimization of ecological footprints in coal resource-based cities. This paper, based on China's 35 coal resource-based cities, uses energy ecological footprint model and sustainability indicators to measure their energy ecological footprints, ecological deficit/remainder, ecological efficiency and ecological sustainability, and employs STIRPAT model to study their factors. Energy ecological footprints are closely related to energy consumption in coal resource-based cities, largely varying regionally, of which central to eastern China has the maximum energy ecological footprint. Most coal resource-based cities are loosing balance in ecological supply and demands, but their resources utilization efficiency can be gradually promoted under technical advances and supportive policies from perspective of ecological efficiency. Regression results of STIRPAT model shows a positive impact of economy and population on energy ecological footprints in coal resource-based cities, but negative from technical advances. This paper presents suggestions for coal resource-based cities in economic transformation and sustainable development.

Key words: coal resource-based cities, energy ecological footprint, sustainable development

中图分类号:

F205

罗正茂, 高红贵, 万华炜, 陈洋. 煤炭资源型城市生态足迹的空间分布及影响因素分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(5): 1-12.

LUO Zhengmao, GAO Honggui, WAN Huawei, CHEN Yang. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND FACTORS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS IN COAL RESOURCE BASED CITIES[J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(5): 1-12.

参考文献

2014. 国务院关于印发全国资源型城市可持续发展规划(2013—2020年)的通知[J]. 黑龙江省人民政府公报（1）: 8-26.〔2014. Notice of the State Council on printing and distributing the national sustainable development plan for resource-based cities (2013-2020)[J]. Gazette of the People's Government of HeiLongjiang Province, (1): 8-26.〕

陈美景, 王庆日, 白中科, 等, 2023. 黄河流域资源型城市土地利用转型及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 43（22）: 9459-9470.〔CHEN M J, WANG Q R, BAI Z K, et al.，2023. Land use transformation of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin and its impact on ecosystem service value[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(22): 9459-9470.〕

郭金, 2020. 资源型经济转型与煤炭产业提升研究[J]. 经济问题（6）: 118-123.〔GUO J, 2020. Research on the transformation of resource-based economy and the upgrading of coal industry[J]. Economic Issues (6): 118-123.〕

黄雪琴, 王婷婷, 2015. 资源型城市生态效率评价[J]. 科研管理, 36(7): 70-78.〔HUANG X Q, WANG T T, 2015. Evaluation of ecological efficiency of resource-based cities[J]. Research Management, 36(7): 70-78.〕

李嘉欣, 彭少明, 朱永楠, 等, 2023. 基于能值理论的河南省三维水生态足迹评价与预测[J]. 人民黄河, 45（12）: 76-82.〔LI J X, PENG S M, ZHU Y N, et al.，2023. Evaluation and prediction of three-dimensional water ecological footprint in Henan Province based on emergy theory[J]. Renmin Yellow River, 45(12): 76-82.〕

汪中华, 侯丹丹, 2023. 黑龙江省资源型城市三维生态足迹平衡性及影响因素研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, （5）: 56-61.〔WANG Z H, HOU D D, 2023. Research on the balance of three-dimensional ecological footprint and its influencing factors of resource-based cities in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Land and Natural Resources Research (5): 56-61.〕

王帮俊, 崔林玉, 2023. 城市人均能源消费时空差异及收敛性分析: 基于中国243个地级城市数据[J]. 资源与产业, 25（3）: 31-41.〔WANG B J, CUI L Y, 2023. Spatiotemporal differences and convergence analysis of urban per capita energy consumption: based on the data of 243 prefecture-level cities in China[J]. Resources and Industry, 25(3): 31-41.〕

王冠, 2018. 基于能值-生态足迹法的资源型城市生态安全演变研究: 以河南省焦作市为例[J]. 中国矿业, 27(4): 91-95.〔WANG G, 2018. Research on the evolution of ecological security of resource-based cities based on emergy-ecological footprint method: a case study of Jiaozuo City, Henan Province[J]. China Mining Journal, 27(4): 91-95.〕

王珏, 李琳, 2023. 国家重大区域发展战略视角下资源型城市绿色转型绩效的地区差距及其政策启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 38（12）: 3041-3057.〔WANG J, LI L, 2023. Regional gaps in the green transformation performance of resource-based cities from the perspective of major national regional development strategies and their policy implications[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 38(12): 3041-3057.〕

魏柏浩, 阿里木江·卡斯木, 如克亚·热合曼, 等, 2023. 天山北坡城市群生态承载力演变与生态敏感性分析[J]. 生态学报, 43（4）: 1399-1411.〔WEI B H, KASIMU A, REHEMAN R, et al.，2023. The evolution and ecological sensitivity analysis of the ecological carrying capacity of urban agglomerations on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(4): 1399-1411.〕

赵愈, 马健, 李学锋, 等, 2022. 基于账户系统的能值生态足迹模型优化与应用: 以辽宁省为例[J]. 生态经济, 38（11）: 161-166, 208.〔ZHAO Y, MA J, LI X F, et al.，2022. Optimization and application of emergy ecological footprint model based on account system: a case study of Liaoning Province[J]. Ecological Economy, 38(11): 161-166, 208.〕

赵志强, 李双成, 高阳, 2008. 基于能值改进的开放系统生态足迹模型及其应用: 以深圳市为例[J]. 生态学报（5）: 2220-2231.〔ZHAO Z Q, LI S C, GAO Y, 2008. Ecological footprint model of open system based on emergy improvement and its application: a case study of Shenzhen[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology (5): 2220-2231.〕

郑辉, 孙晓华, 龙睿, 2022. 资源型城市经济转型的路径与模式[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版)（1）: 61-74.〔ZHENG H, SUN X H, LONG R, 2022. The path and mode of economic transformation of resource-based cities[J]. Fujian Forum (Humanities and Social Sciences) (1): 61-74.〕

支航, 金兆怀, 2016. 不同类型资源型城市转型的模式与路径探讨[J]. 经济纵横（11）: 34-37.〔ZHI H, JIN Z H, 2016. Discussion on the modes and paths of transformation of different types of resource-based cities[J]. Economic Review (11): 34-37.〕

EHRLICH P R, HOLDREN J P, 1971. Impact of population growth[J]. Science, 171(3977): 1212-1217.

GENG Y, ZHANG L M, CHEN X D, et al.，2014. Urban ecological footprint analysis: a comparative study between Shenyang in China and Kawasaki in Japan[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75: 130-142.

ODUM H T, BROWN M, BRANDT-WILLIAMS S L, 2000. Handbook of emergy evaluation folios 1: introduction and global budget[M]. Gainesville: University of Florida.

SONG Y, YEUNG G, ZHU D L, et al.，2022. Efficiency of urban land use in China's resource-based cities, 2000-2018[J]. Land Use Policy, 115: 106009.

ULGIATI S, ODUM H T, BASTIANONI S, 1994. Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability an emergy analysis of Italy[J]. Ecological Modelling, 73(3/4): 215-268.

[1]	梁涵玮, 夏怀霞, 陈爽, 等. 省域尺度下新型城镇化与可持续发展的耦合协调研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(3): 97-113.
[2]	薛松, 赵静静, 杨涛. 知识共享、绿色创新与基础设施可持续发展协同关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 109-121.
[3]	蒋榕湄, 陈贵松. 政府补贴、企业ESG表现与绿色创新[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 90-102.
[4]	张云宁, 朱红艳, 欧阳红祥, 等. 长江经济带乡村人居环境可持续发展水平评价与空间格局研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 42-54.
[5]	张海潮, 刘晓静, 马东来, 等. 吉林省粮食主产区农业生态可持续发展动态变化分析及对策研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 132-142.
[6]	马俊杰, 张建平, 刘晓鸿, 等. 中国世界地质公园管理模式与县域经济可持续发展关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 1-7.
[7]	胡兰, 黄和平. 基于EKC的工业污染与经济发展的关系及驱动因素研究——以湖南省为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(2): 11-22.
[8]	崔文婧, 闫晶晶, 沙景华, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的天津市海洋资源环境承载力评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 9-17.
[9]	常江，姬智，张心伦. 我国近现代煤炭资源型城市发展、问题及趋势初探[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(2): 3-11.
[10]	吴景辉，王耕，于大涛，等. 基于能值-生态足迹模型的齐齐哈尔市可持续发展水平分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(2): 17-23.
[11]	葛文峰. 可持续发展下资源型城市发展旅游业的优势与策略 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(6): 9-15.
[12]	曾伟，陈文璐，严思湘. 基于共生理论的鄱阳湖城市圈可持续发展研究 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(6): 78-85.
[13]	韩业斌. 再生资源产业可持续发展水平评价 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(2): 53-58.
[14]	王耕，董瑞. 太原市绿色转型中生态承载力动态评价与适应性管理对策 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(2): 71-79.
[15]	顾亚，王建平，王修，等. 我国铅资源开发现状和可持续发展建议[J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(1): 39-46.

煤炭资源型城市生态足迹的空间分布及影响因素分析

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND FACTORS OF ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS IN COAL RESOURCE BASED CITIES

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics