公益林补偿政策对森林生态效益持续提升的影响研究

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20241030.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 持续提高森林生态效益直指人与自然和谐共生的现代化。首先，论文通过梳理相关文献，系统总结了公益林补偿政策影响森林生态效益的理论基础，包括森林永续利用理论、多功能森林理论、近自然林业理论等，为后续分析提供了坚实的理论支撑。然后，论文详细梳理了已有文献中关于公益林补偿政策对林业生产和森林资源影响的研究现状，指出了现有研究存在的局限性，如多关注公益林而忽略整体森林生态效益、多采用农户层面的加总数据而忽视政策冲击对地块的影响等。最后，展望了公益林补偿政策对森林生态效益影响的研究动态，提出未来研究应重点关注以下几个方面：1)将公益林补偿政策、森林经营和森林生态效益变化放在统一分析框架内，揭示其复杂的影响路径和机理；2)考虑政策效果的非线性因素，分析公益林补偿政策对森林生态效益的长、短期影响及其异质性；3)借助地理信息技术提高森林生态效益测量的准确性，并检验营林行为在公益林补偿政策影响森林生态效益中的中介作用；4)基于林农受偿视角，设计选择实验，识别林农对不同优化方案的选择偏好，为政策制定提供科学依据。

关键词: 公益林补偿政策, 森林生态效益, 林业经营, 公益林

Abstract: Continuously raising forest ecological benefits suggests a modernized coexistence between human and nature. This paper systematically summarizes the theoretical basis of impacts of public welfare forest compensation policy on forest ecological benefits, including forest forever usable theory, multiple functional forest theory, near-natural forest theory, providing theoretical supports for further study. Research advances have been stated regarding the impacts of public welfare forest compensation policy on forest production and forest resources in the references with insufficient parts indicated, such as over attention on public welfare forest with ignoring the whole forest ecological benefits, most using farmer's household summarized data. This paper also outlooks the research dynamics of impacts of public welfare forest compensation policy on forest ecological benefits, and presents the four key aspects for future research. Place public welfare forest compensation policy, forest operation and forest ecological benefit changes into a united framework for the purpose of revealing the complicated impacting path and mechanism. Consider the non-linear factors of policy effectiveness to analyze the long-, short-term impacts and heterogeneity of public welfare forest compensation policy on forest ecological benefits. GIS can be used to measure the forest ecological benefits more accurately, and to verify the mediating role of forest management practices during public welfare forest compensation policy impacting forest ecological benefits. From forest farmers' benefits perspective, tests shall be designed to identify their preferred selection among different optimized plans, providing scientific evidence for making policies.

Key words: public welfare forest compensation policy, forest ecological benefits, forest management, public welfare forest

中图分类号:

F205
F326.2

徐畅, 程宝栋, 夏磊. 公益林补偿政策对森林生态效益持续提升的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(6): 62-70.

XU Chang, CHENG Baodong, XIA Lei. IMPACTS OF PUBLIC WELFARE FOREST COMPENSATION POLICY ON CONTINUOUS INCREMENT OF FOREST ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS[J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(6): 62-70.

参考文献

曹建华, 王红英, 2002. 商品林经营政策现状评价: 江西省商品林经营政策现状与问题研究[J].林业资源管理(6): 20-23.〔CAO J H, WANG H Y, 2002. Assessment of the policies for the commercial forest management: study on the situation and problems of commercial forest management policies in Jiangxi province[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research(6): 20-23.〕

曹兰芳, 尹少华, 曾玉林, 等, 2017. 资源异质性农户林业生产投入决策行为及差异研究: 以湖南省为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 37(12): 174-179.〔CAO L F, YIN S H, ZENG Y L, et al.，2017. Research on resource heterogeneity farmers' forestry production investment decision making behaviors and differences: a case of Hunan province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 37(12): 174-179.〕

陈钦, 黄巧龙, 游玲娜, 等, 2018. 基于DID模型的福建省生态公益林保护对林农的经济影响评估[J]. 中国林业经济(6): 1-4.〔CHEN Q, HUANG Q L, YOU L N, et al.，2018. The economic impact assessment of ecological public welfare forest protection for forest farmers in Fujian province based on DID model[J]. China Forestry Economics(6): 1-4.〕

程宝栋, 徐畅, 秦光远, 等, 2021.集体林区生态公益林建设对劳动力转移的影响: 以浙江省为例[J].农业技术经济(2): 40-49.〔CHENG B D, XU C, QIN G Y, et al.，2021. The impact of ecological public welfare forest construction in collective forest area on labor migration: taking Zhejiang province as an example[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics(2): 40-49.〕

杜娟, 胡亚平, 朱述斌, 2021. 集体生态公益林补偿政策对林农职业分化的影响研究: 以江西为例[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 20(6): 749-758.〔DU J, HU Y P, ZHU S B, 2021. Impact of eco-forest compensation policy on farmers' career differentiation in collective forest regions:a case study of Jiangxi province[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 20(6): 749-758.〕

杜娟, 2020. 生态公益林保护政策对集体林区林农经营决策行为与收入的影响研究: 以江西省为例[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学.〔DU J, 2020. Impacts of eco-forest protection policy on farmers' management decision-making behavior and income in collective forest areas: based on the survey of Jiangxi[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University.〕

樊星火, 葛红艳, 张参参, 等, 2018. 江西省生态公益林典型林分土壤肥力状况研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 40(11): 84-92.〔FAN X H, GE H Y, ZHANG C C, et al.，2018. Variations in soil fertility of typical non-commercial forest types in Jiangxi province of eastern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 40(11): 84-92.〕

国家林业和草原局, 2019. 中国森林资源报告(2014—2018) [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社.

何文剑, 赵秋雅, 张红霄, 2021. 林权改革的增收效应: 机制讨论与经验证据[J]. 中国农村经济(3): 46-67.〔HE W J, ZHAO Q Y, ZHANG H X, 2021. Income-increasing effect of the collective forest tenure reform: mechanism discussions and empirical evidences[J]. Chinese Rural Economy(3): 46-67.〕

洪燕真, 戴永务, 2019.福建省重点生态区位商品林赎买改革优化策略研究[J].林业经济, 41(1): 92-97.〔HONG Y Z, DAI Y W, 2019. Study on optimization strategy of redemption reform of commercial forest in key ecological areas of Fujian province[J]. Forestry Economics, 41(1): 92-97.〕

黄润霞, 徐明锋, 刘婷, 等, 2020.亚热带5种森林类型林下植物物种多样性及其环境解释[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),40(2): 53-62.〔HUANG R X, XU M F, LIU T, et al.，2020. Environmental interpretation and species diversity of understory vegetation in 5 subtropical forest types[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences), 40(2): 53-62.〕

金超, 李领寰, 吴初平, 等, 2021.浙江省公益林生物多样性和立地对生物量的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,38(6): 1083-1090.〔JIN C, LI L H, WU C P, et al.，2021. Impact of biodiversity and site factors on biomass of public welfare forests in Zhejiang province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 38(6): 1083-1090.〕

刘璨, 2018.森林生态效益补偿研究进展与我国政策实践发展[J].环境保护,46(14): 12-17.〔LIU C, 2018. Research progress of forest eco-compensation and development of policy practice in China[J]. Environmental Protection, 46(14): 12-17.〕

刘璨, 2020.改革开放以来集体林权制度改革的分权演化博弈分析[J].中国农村经济(5): 21-38.〔LIU C, 2020. The decentralization of collective forestland tenure reform in China since the reform and opening-up from the perspective of evolutionary game theory[J]. Chinese Rural Economy(5): 21-38.〕

刘璨, 张敏新, 2019. 森林生态补偿问题研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 43(5): 149-155.〔LIU C, ZHANG M X, 2019. Literature review and comments on forest ecological compensation[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 43(5): 149-155.〕

刘健, 项佳, 余坤勇, 等, 2018. 耦合林分结构的低密度生态风景林模拟补植优化[J].江西农业大学学报,40(6): 1125-1133.〔LIU J, XIANG J, YU K Y, et al.，2018. Simulation of replantation of low-density ecological landscape forest with coupled stand structure[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 40(6): 1125-1133.〕

梅浩, 佘宇晨, 陆翔, 2019.基于小班尺度的生态公益林质量评价指标筛选研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,39(11): 14-22.〔MEI H, SHE Y C, LU X, 2019. Study on the quality assessment index selection of ecological publicwelfare forests based on subcompartment scale[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 39(11): 14-22.〕

钱静, 聂影, 2018.公众参与森林可持续经营决策的法律维度分析[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),45(5): 128-137.〔QIAN J, NIE Y, 2018. Legal study of public participation in the administrative decisions on sustainable forest management[J]. Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science), 45(5): 128-137.〕

王见, 任秀峰, 夏凡, 等, 2021.产权强度对集体林区森林资源增长的影响: 基于云南省10县500户数据的实证[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),22(6): 21-28.〔WANG J, REN X F, XIA F, et al.，2021. The influence of property right intensity on collective forest resource growth: based on the data of 500 households in 10 counties of Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences), 22(6): 21-28.〕

王琼琳, 王文义, 林莎, 等, 2021. 青海东部人工生态公益林近自然经营的林分结构调整[J]. 生态学报, 41(12): 5004-5015.〔WANG Q L, WANG W Y, LIN S, et al.，2021. Stand structure adjustment based on the near-natural management of plantation ecological public forests in eastern Qinghai[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(12): 5004-5015.〕

温映雪, 宁满秀, 刘伟平, 2022.林地确权真的全面提高了农户营造林积极性吗[J]. 农业技术经济(3): 38-48.〔WEN Y X, NING M X, LIU W P, 2022. Are rural households' incentives on forest management actually motivated by the forest land tenure reform in an all-round way?[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,(3): 38-48.〕

吴乐, 靳乐山, 2018.生态补偿扶贫背景下农户生计资本影响因素研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版) (6): 55-61, 153-154.〔WU L, JIN L S, 2018. Study on influential factors of peasant households' livelihood capital under the policy of eco-compensation poverty alleviation[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)(6): 55-61, 153-154.〕

徐畅, 霍鑫鑫, 程宝栋, 等, 2023. 我国现行公益林政策与森林多种效益发挥的思考[J].世界林业研究,36(5): 126-131.〔XU C, HUO X X, CHENG B D, et al.，2023. Reflections on current ecological non-commercial forest policies in China and multiple forest benefits realization[J]. World Forestry Research, 36(5): 126-131.〕

徐秀英, 徐畅, 李朝柱, 2018. 关系网络对农户林地流入行为的影响: 基于浙江省的调查数据[J]. 中国农村经济(9): 62-78.〔XU X Y, XU C, LI C Z, 2018. The effect of relationship network on farmers' forestland inflow behavior: an analysis based on survey data from Zhejiang province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, (9): 62-78.〕

许时蕾, 张寒, 刘璨, 等, 2020.集体林权制度改革提高了农户营林积极性吗: 基于非农就业调节效应和内生性双重视角[J]. 农业技术经济(8): 117-129.〔XU S L, ZHANG H, LIU C, et al.，2020. Has the collective forest tenure reform stimulated farmers' investment incentives on forest management?: analysis of moderating effect of endogenous off-farm employment[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics(8): 117-129.〕

雍文涛, 1992. 林业分工论: 中国林业发展道路的研究[M].北京: 中国林业出版社.

余文梦, 苏时鹏, 沈大军, 2021. 福建集体林权制度改革对生态公益林水源涵养能力变化的影响: 基于723个村的实证研究[J]. 生态学报, 41(4): 1362-1372.〔YU W M, SU S P, SHEN D J, 2021. Effects of the reform of collective forest property rights system on the change of water conservation capacity of ecological public welfare forests: the empirical research of 723 villages in Fujian province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(4): 1362-1372.〕

詹学齐, 2018.马尾松林冠下套种阔叶树20年间土壤肥力变化[J].北京林业大学学报,40(6): 55-62.〔ZHAN X Q, 2018. Changes in soil fertility after interplanting pure Pinus massioniana plantations with broadleaved forest under the canopy during 20 years[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 40(6): 55-62.〕

张会儒, 雷相东, 李凤日, 2020. 中国森林经理学研究进展与展望[J]. 林业科学, 56(9): 130-142.〔ZHANG H R, LEI X D, LI F R, 2020. Research progress and prospects of forest management science in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 56(9): 130-142.〕

周婷, 张勇, 严力蛟, 2018. 生态公益林补偿政策对植被覆盖时空格局的影响: 以杭州市临安区为例[J]. 生态学报, 38(13): 4800-4808.〔ZHOU T, ZHANG Y, YAN L J, 2018. Effects of forest compensation policy for public welfare on the spatiotemporal patterns and dynamics of vegetation cover: a case study at Lin'an, Hangzhou City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(13): 4800-4808.〕

AQUILUE N, MESSIER C, MARTINS K T, et al.,2021. A simple-to-use management approach to boost adaptive capacity of forests to global uncertainty[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 481: 118692.

BEGEMANN A, GIESSEN L, ROITSCH D, et al.,2021. Quo vadis global forest governance?: a transdisciplinary delphi study[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 123(5/6): 131-141.

BRAGG D C, HANBERRY B B, HUTCHINSON T F, et al.,2020. Silvicultural options for open forest management in eastern North America[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 474: 118383.

DAI L M, ZHAO F Q, SHAO G F, et al.,2009. China's classification: based forest management: procedures, problems, and prospects[J]. Environmental Management, 43(6): 1162-1173.

DRAGICEVIC A Z, 2019. Comparing forest governance models against invasive biological threats[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 462(1): 270-282.

DUVENECK M J, SCHELLER R M, 2015. Climate-suitable planting as a strategy for maintaining forest productivity and functional diversity[J]. Ecological applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 25(6): 1653-1668.

HOU J Y, YIN R S, WU W G, 2019. Intensifying forest management in China: what does it mean, why, and how? [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 98: 82-89.

KING C, 2023. The costs and benefits of conservation versus logging of old-growth native forest: a case history[J]. Ecological Economics, 204( Part A): 107632.

LIU S L, XIA J, 2021. Forest harvesting restrictions and forest restoration in China[J]. Forest Policy Economics, 129:102516.

MAIER C, HEBERMEHL W, GROSSMANN C M, et al.,2021. Innovations for securing forest ecosystem service provision in Europe: a systematic literature review[J]. Ecosystem Services, 52: 101374.

MANN C, LOFT L, HERNANDEZ-MORCILLO M, 2021. Assessing forest governance innovations in Europe: needs, challenges and ways forward for sustainable forest ecosystem service provision[J]. Ecosystem Services, 52: 101384.

MEYFROIDT P, LAMBIN E F, 2009. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(38): 16139-16144.

MO L D, ZOHNER C M, REICH P B, et al.,2023. Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential[J]. Nature, 624(7990): 92-101.

NAGAIKE T, 2020. Effects of heavy, repeated bark stripping by Cervus nippon on survival of Abies veitchii in a subalpine coniferous forest in central Japan[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 31(4): 1139-1145.

PATTANAYAK S K, WUNDER S, FERRARO P J, 2010. Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?[J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2): 254-274.

PAZOS-ALMADA B, BRAY D B, 2018. Community-based land sparing: territorial land-use zoning and forest management in the Sierra Norte of Oaxaca, Mexico[J]. Land Use Policy, 78: 219-226.

POUR M D, BARATI A A, AZADI H, et al.,2023. Analyzing forest residents?: perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 146: 102866.

SHANG R, CHEN M J, XU M Z, et al.,2023. China's current forest age structure will lead to weakened carbon sinks in the near future[J]. The Innovation, 4(6): 100515.

WANG Y, RICHARD E B, ZHANG Q, LI J, et al.,2019. Effects of payment for ecosystem services and agricultural subsidy programs on rural household land use decisions in China: synergy or trade-off?[J]. Land Use Policy, 81: 785-801.

XU C, CHENG B D, ZHANG M Z, 2022a. Classification-based forest management program and farmers' income: evidence from collective forest area in southern China[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 14(3): 646-659.

XU C, LI L C, CHENG B D, 2021. The impact of institutions on forestland transfer rents: the case of Zhejiang province in China[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 123: 102354.

XU C, LIN F L, LI C Z, CHENG B D, 2022b. Effects of designating non-public forests for ecological purposes on farmer's forestland investment: a quasi-experiment in southern China[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 143: 102804.

YIN R S, NEWMAN D H, 1997. Impacts of rural reforms: the case of the Chinese forest sector[J]. Environment and Development Economics, 2(3): 291-305.

YIN R S, 1998. Forestry and the environment in China: the current situation and strategic choices[J]. World Development, 26(12): 2153-2167.

ZHANG Q, BILSBORROW R E, SONG C, et al.,2019. Rural household income distribution and inequality in China: effects of payments for ecosystem services policies and other factors[J]. Ecological Economics, 160: 114-127.

ZHAO L, ZHANG J, DUAN R Q, et al.,2023. Development and challenges of Chin's ecological non-commercial forest certification policy[J]. Forests, 14: 214.