Resources & Industries ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 63-67.
• RESOURCES MANAGEMENT • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Xiao-qi*, AN Hai-zhong, DING Ying-hui, HUANG Xuan
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
孙晓奇*,安海忠,丁颖辉,黄 暄
通讯作者:
基金资助:
Abstract: This paper compares their energy administrative organs in Australia, Japan and India from levels, specialization and departmentalization of energy administrative organ, and clarifies its generalization and specialty as administrative organ,and presents that energy organs must guarantee energy safety, boost economic growth, and protect environment.China,as a big energy consumer, abundant in resources and regional gaps, shall set up a higher level of energy administrative organ, unified, departmentalized and highly specialized.This paper,according to this theory,designs a corresponding energy administrative organ chart.
Key words: energy administrative organ, comparison, Australia, Japan, India
摘要: 总结了能源管理机构的主要结果,从能源机构的级别、能源机构的专门化、机构的部门化3个方面比较了澳大利亚、日本、印度三国的能源管理机构,明晰了能源管理机构的一般性和作为行政机构的特殊性,指出能源机构必须保障能源安全、促进经济增长、保护环境。在此基础上,认为一个能源消费大、资源丰富、地区差异大的国家应该设立一个高级别、统一的、行业集中部门化、高专门化程度的能源管理机构,并根据这个理论结果设计了一个与此相应的能源管理机构图。
关键词: 能源管理机构, 比较研究, 澳大利亚, 日本, 印度
CLC Number:
F206
SUN Xiao-qi, AN Hai-zhong, DING Ying-hui, HUANG Xuan. COMPARISON OF ENERGY ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANS IN AUSTRALIA, JAPAN AND INDIA[J]. Resources & Industries, 2013, 15(6): 63-67.
孙晓奇,安海忠,丁颖辉,黄 暄. 澳大利亚、日本、印度三国能源管理机构比较研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2013, 15(6): 63-67.
0 / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.resourcesindustries.net.cn/EN/
https://www.resourcesindustries.net.cn/EN/Y2013/V15/I6/63