Resources & Industries ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 149-159.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20250103.001

Previous Articles     Next Articles

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES POLICIES OF HEILONGJIANG PROVINCE

LIU Chennan1, WANG Chao2, LI Wenlong1, YANG Shuwang2, MA Tianyu1   

  1. (1.Heilongjiang Research Institute of Natural Resources, Harbin 150036, China;2.School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China)

  • Received:2024-10-12 Revised:2024-12-16 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-20

黑龙江省矿产资源管理政策实施效果分析

刘陈楠1,王超2,李文龙1,杨树旺2,马天宇1   

  1. (1.黑龙江省自然资源调查院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150036;2.中国地质大学(武汉)经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430078)

  • 通讯作者: 王超,博士生,主要从事矿业经济研究。E-mail:18790108839@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘陈楠,高级工程师,主要从事矿产资源管理研究。E-mail:1175709223@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质大学(武汉)与黑龙江省自然资源调查院合作项目(20230860466)。

Abstract: Mineral resources as a vital support to Heilongjiang's economy plays a critical role in local industrial and economic growth. To ensure their sustainability, Heilongjiang authorities have recently issued a series of mineral resource policies, which lacks a systematic assessment on their performances during execution. This paper uses multiple-dimensional data method to discuss the performance of mineral resources policies of Heilongjiang province. This study designed and dispatched questionnaires for different stakeholders, including mineral resource authorities, exploration units and mine entities with 489 pieces of valid returns. Questionnaires had been first validated with their reliabilities and effectiveness through confidence analysis which ensures their internal consistency, and through effectiveness analysis which verifies the accuracy and relativeness. This paper uses fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and importance-performance analysis (IPA) to process data for a better understanding of executing performances of different policies. Heilongjiang's mineral resource policies acquire a higher rate in their performance, particularly on policy framework stability, supervision and appropriate mineral resources development. However, some perform poorly, i.e., overlapped issuing mineral rights management on same mineral leads to a low execution efficiency. Regulations regarding “net ore” issue lacks a determined operation standard, increasing complexities and uncertainties in mineral resources management. This paper presents suggestions for Heilongjiang's further mineral resources policies, which provides references in coordinated development among mineral resources management reform, mineral resources development and eco-environmental protection.

Key words: mineral resources, administrative policies, effectiveness;FCE, IPA, Heilongjiang province

摘要: 矿产资源作为黑龙江省经济发展的重要支撑,在地方工业和经济增长中发挥着关键作用。为了确保资源的可持续开发与利用,黑龙江省近年来出台了一系列矿产资源管理政策。然而,政策在实施过程中是否达到了预期效果,仍然缺乏系统性的评估。因此,本研究通过多维度的数据分析和方法论应用,对黑龙江省现有矿产资源管理政策的实施效果进行了深入探讨。为获取第一手数据,本研究设计并发放了针对不同利益相关方的问卷调查,调查对象涵盖了矿产资源主管部门、地质勘查单位以及矿山企业。经过筛选和整理,共获得了489份有效问卷,数据为研究提供了丰富的信息来源。在数据分析阶段,首先通过信度和效度分析对问卷的可靠性和有效性进行检验,以确保研究结论的科学性。信度分析保证了问卷内部一致性,效度分析则验证了问卷测量结果的准确性与相关性。为了更深入地理解不同政策实施效果的具体表现,本研究采用了模糊综合评价法(fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, FCE)和重要性-表现分析法(importance-performance analysis, IPA)对数据进行处理和分析。研究结果表明,黑龙江省矿产资源管理政策总体上得到了较高的评价,特别是在政策框架的稳定性、监管力度和资源合理开发等方面表现良好。然而,部分政策在实际实施过程中仍存在显著不足,例如,同一矿种的矿权出让管理存在层级重叠的问题,导致政策执行效率受到一定限制。此外,关于‘净矿’出让的相关规定在实际操作中缺乏明确的执行标准,增加了资源管理的复杂性和不确定性。基于上述分析,本研究为黑龙江省未来的矿产资源管理政策提出了若干建议。研究成果为黑龙江省进一步深化矿产资源管理改革、推动资源开发与生态环境保护的协调发展提供了重要参考。

关键词: 矿产资源, 管理政策, 有效性, 模糊综合评价法, 重要性-表现分析, 黑龙江省

CLC Number: