INTEGRATION EFFICIENCY OF GUANGXI'S CULTURAL AND TOURISM INDUSTRIES BASED ON DEA-MALMQUIST MODEL#br#

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20250702.003

Abstract

Abstract: To respond nation's call for a deep integration of culture and tourism and to promote their quality development, this paper treats cultural and tourism integration as key strategy, which plays a critical role in industrial upgrading and increasing comprehensive competitiveness. This paper, focusing on significance of cultural and tourism integration, uses Guangxi's 2010 to 2021 cultural and tourism data and DEA model and Malmquist Index to study their cultural and tourism integration efficiencies in Guangxi's 14 prefectures. Guangxi's comprehensive technical efficiency had been largely increased during 2010 to 2021 generally. Technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency are below 1 in Guangxi's 13 prefectures except Nanning, leaving room to improve. The total factor productivity efficiency of Guangxi's cultural and tourism integration is above 1 during 2010 to 2021 except 2019 to 2020, suggesting an intensifying integration between cultural and tourism resources. The total factor productivity efficiency of Guangxi's 14 prefectures is above 1, indicating a rising integration efficiency. Quality growth of Guangxi's cultural and tourism industries needs to boost quality and innovative capabilities of cultural and tourism products and to optimize their investment scales to ensure high efficient use of resources. This paper put forward suggestions on inter-regional cooperation, sharing resources and constructing localized cultural and tourism industrial chain for a sustainable, healthy and fast development of Guangxi's cultural and tourism industry.

Key words: efficiency analysis, Malmquist index, DEA model, cultural and tourism integration, Guangxi

摘要： 为了积极响应国家关于推进文化和旅游深度融合发展的号召，促进文化和旅游产业的高质量发展，将文旅融合作为关键战略来推进，对于实现产业转型升级、提升综合竞争力具有至关重要的作用。本研究聚焦文旅融合的重要性，并采用2010—2021年的广西文旅产业数据，通过DEA模型和Malmquist指数对广西及其14个地级市的文旅融合效率进行了深入评估。研究结果：1）整体上，2010—2021年广西的综合技术效率有显著提升；2）除南宁市外，广西其他13个地级市的技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率均小于1，尚有改进的空间；3）除2019—2020年之外，2010—2019年和2020—2021年广西的文旅产业融合全要素生产率均大于1，说明该地区文化和旅游资源之间的融合程度正在不断深化和加强；4）广西14个地级市的全要素生产效率均大于1，说明广西各地级市的文旅产业融合效率在不断提升。基于上述结果提出，为了促进广西文旅产业的高质量发展，需着重提升文旅产品的质量和创新能力，同时优化文旅产业的投资规模，确保资源高效利用。此外，加强跨地区合作，促进资源共享，构建具有鲜明地方特色的文旅产业链，这些综合措施对推动广西文旅产业的持续、健康、快速发展具有重要意义。

关键词: 效率分析, Malmquist 指数, DEA模型, 文旅融合, 广西

CLC Number:

F205
F590

LI Hui, HUANG Yanling, WANG Lu, LIANG Mingwei. INTEGRATION EFFICIENCY OF GUANGXI'S CULTURAL AND TOURISM INDUSTRIES BASED ON DEA-MALMQUIST MODEL#br#[J]. Resources & Industries, 2025, 27(4): 142-150.

李慧, 黄燕玲, 王路, 梁明伟. 基于DEA-Malmquist模型的广西文旅产业融合效率研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(4): 142-150.

References

卞之峣, 杨荔斌, 2020.少数民族地区旅游文化传播机制：以广西为例[J].社会科学家(12): 59-64.

陈红玲, 郑馨, 赵赞, 2022.我国文化和旅游产业融合效率的时空动态演化及其驱动机理[J].资源开发与市场, 38(1): 99-106.〔CHEN H L, ZHENG X, ZHAO Z, 2022.Spatial-temporal dynamic evolution and driving mechanism of the integration efficiency of culture and tourism industries in China[J].Resource Development & Market, 38(1): 99-106.〕

程晓丽, 史杜芳, 2017.皖南国际文化旅游示范区文化资源丰度评价[J].地理科学, 37(5): 766-772.〔CHENG X L, SHI D F, 2017.The evaluation of cultural resources abundance in international tourism culture demonstration zone of the southern Anhui Province[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(5): 766-772.〕

李会琴, 王林, 闫晓冉, 2016.基于DEA分析的湖北省旅游效率评价[J].统计与决策(2): 65-67.

李泽华, 2024.基于价值共创的公共图书馆文旅融合: 机理、形态与路径[J].图书馆学研究(11): 53-59.

梁明珠, 易婷婷, BIN L, 2013.基于DEA-MI模型的城市旅游效率演进模式研究[J].旅游学刊, 28(5): 53-62.〔LIANG M Z, YI T T, BIN L, 2013.Study on the evolutional model of tourism efficiency based on DEA-MI[J].Tourism Tribune, 28(5): 53-62.〕

刘玉杰, 黄韫慧, 2023.数字新基建对文化产业集聚的影响：基于准自然实验的研究[J].现代经济探讨(11): 54-64.

马波, 张越, 2020.文旅融合四象限模型及其应用[J].旅游学刊, 35(5): 15-21.〔MA B, ZHANG Y, 2020.Four quadrant model and its application of the integration of culture and tourism[J].Tourism Tribune, 35(5): 15-21.〕

孟霏, 鲁志国, 高粼彤, 2023.中国战略性新兴产业技术创新效率时空演化及驱动因素分析[J].统计与决策(16): 91-95.

穆学青, 明庆忠, 靳诚, 等, 2024.“本地—邻地”视角下长三角地区数字经济影响旅游创新效率的机理与空间效应[J].地理科学进展, 43(10): 1974-1989.〔MU X Q, MING Q Z, JIN C, et al., 2024. Mechanism and spatial effects of the digital economy affecting tourism innovation efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta region from the “local-neighboring area” perspective[J].Progress in Geography, 43(10): 1974-1989.〕

邵曦, 2024.基于ISM-AHP的流通产业竞争力影响因素分析[J].商业经济研究(23): 23-26.〔SHAO X, 2024.Analysis of influencing factors of circulation industry competitiveness based on ISM-AHP[J].Business Economics Research(23): 23-26.〕

粟路军, 叶成志, 何学欢, 2023.文旅融合发展促进共同富裕的理论逻辑与实现路径[J].经济地理, 43(11): 198-207.〔SU L J, YE C Z, HE X H, 2023.Theoretical logic and realization path of integrated development of culture and tourism promoting common prosperity[J].Economic Geography, 43(11): 198-207.〕

孙丽君, 孟宪伟, 李欣桐, 2023.产业升级背景下文化企业融资效率及影响因素研究[J].经济与管理评论, 39(4): 134-145.〔SUN L J, MENG X W, LI X T, 2023.Research of financing efficiency and influencing factors of cultural enterprises under the background of industrial upgrading[J].Economic and Management Review, 39(4): 134-145.〕

王思薇, 侯琳琳, 2024.产业升级视角下数字经济对实体零售业效率的影响[J].商业经济研究(21): 15-18.〔WANG S W, HOU L L, 2024.The impact of digital economy on the efficiency of physical retail industry from the perspective of industrial upgrading[J].Research of Business Economics(21): 15-18.〕

王兆峰, 李琴, 2022.长江经济带旅游产业效率评价及其时空动态演变[J].长江流域资源与环境, 31(9): 1895-1905.〔WANG Z F, LI Q, 2022.Evaluation and temporal-spatial dynamic evolution of tourism industry ecoefficiency in Yangtze River economic belt[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 31(9): 1895-1905.〕

王兆峰, 谢佳亮, 2023.中国旅游产业组织的时空耦合关系及影响因素[J].地理学报, 78(4): 961-979.〔WANG Z F, XIE J L, 2023.Spatiotemporal coupling relationship and influencing factors of China's tourism industry organization[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 78(4): 961-979.〕

邬志龙, 吴玮, 余进祥, 等, 2024.鄱阳湖流域水产养殖经济效率时空演变及其影响因素研究: 基于SBM-XTTobit-GWR模型[J].长江流域资源与环境, 33(10): 2191-2203.〔WU Z L, WU W, YU J X, et al., 2024.Spatial-temporal evolution of aquaculture economic efficiency and influencing factors in the poyang lake basin: based on the SBM-XTTobit-GWR model[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 33(10): 2191-2203.〕

吴丽, 梁皓, 虞华君, 等, 2021.中国文化和旅游融合发展空间分异及驱动因素[J].经济地理, 41(2): 214-221．〔WU L, LIANG H, YU H J, et al., 2021.Spatial differentiation and driving factors of the integrated development of culture and tourism in China[J].Economic Geography, 41(2): 214-221.〕

吴丽慧, 王诗龙, 2017.基于DEA模型的中部六省文化旅游产业效率评价[C]//中国旅游研究院.2017中国旅游科学年会论文集.武汉：243-248.〔WU L H, WANG S L, 2017.Efficiency evaluation of cultural tourism industry in six central provinces based on DEA model[C]//China Tourism Academy.Proceedings of the 2017 China tourism science annual conference.Wuhan: 243-248.〕

徐少癸, 方世巧, 甘永萍, 等, 2020.少数民族地区旅游扶贫效率与时空分异: 基于广西面板数据的实证[J].统计与决策, 36(21): 21-26.〔XU S G, FANG S Q, GAN Y P, et al., 2019.Efficiency of tourism poverty alleviation in ethnic minority areas: an empirical study based on panel data in Guangxi[J].Statistics and Decision, 36(21): 21-26.〕

晏雄, 郭菊梅, 普蔚, 2024.文旅融合对我国绿色全要素生产率的非线性影响及其作用机制[EB/OL].(2024-10-16)[2025-04-09].https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20241016.001.〕

袁丹, 雷宏振, 2013.我国西部地区文化旅游产业发展效率与产业集群研究[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 34(4): 158-162.〔YUAN D, LEI H Z, 2013.Research on development efficiency and industrial cluster of cultural tourism industry in western China[J].Inner Mongolia Social Sciences (Chinese Edition), 34(4): 158-162.〕

张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳, 等, 2023.文化和旅游产业融合发展成效评估研究综述：关系辨识、理论发展与体系重构[J].旅游科学, 37(4): 19-36.〔ZHANG X C, GAO N, WANG L Y, et al., 2023.A review of cultural and tourism industry integration development effectiveness evaluation: relation identification, theory development and system reconstruction[J].Tourism Science, 37(4): 19-36.〕

赵静, 郭佩云, 汪辉, 2024.黄河流域文化产业—旅游产业—生态环境耦合协调研究[J].人文地理, 39(5): 184-192.〔ZHAO J, GUO P Y, WANG H, 2024.Research on coupling coordination of the cultural industry, the tourism industry, and the ecological environment in the Yellow River basin[J].Human Geography, 39(5): 184-192.〕

周春波, 2018.文化旅游产业融合与产业升级:机理与路径[J].旅游论坛, 11(6): 12-21.〔ZHOU C B, 2018.Culture Tourism industry convergence and industrial upgrading: mechanism and path[J].Tourism Forum, 11(6): 12-21.〕

BARROS C P, MATIAS A, 2006.Assessing the efficiency of travel agencies with a stochastic cost frontier.a portuguese case study[J].International Journal of Tourism Research, 8(5): 367-379.

DE MELLO J C C B S, MEZA L A, DA SILVEIRA J Q, et al., 2013.About negative efficiencies in cross evaluation bcc input oriented models[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 229(3): 732-737.

FARE R, GROSSKOPF S, 2004.Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 157(1): 242-245.

[1]	ZHOU Baogang, YAN Yuqing, FENG Xinyu. PORT-CITY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN LIAONING COASTAL ECONOMIC ZONE BASED ON NETWORK SBM-DEA [J]. Resources & Industries, 2025, 27(3): 66-76.
[2]	ZHANG Jie, ZHAO Xiangyang, PANG Qinghua, ZHANG Chenjun. IMPACTS OF DIGITAL ECONOMY ON PROVINCIAL GREEN WATER RESOURCES USE EFFICIENCY BASED ON SYSTEM GMM MODEL TESTS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2025, 27(1): 11-21.
[3]	MA Jun, GAO Huixian, SHI Yanqiu. CARBON COMPENSATION QUANTIFICATION AND TEMPORAL-SPATIAL PATTERN IN YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC ZONE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2023, 25(2): 52-64.
[4]	ZHOU Jing, HAN Jiqin. IMPACTS OF CHINA'S ENERGY TRADE COOPERATION WITH “THE BELT AND ROAD” NATIONS ON ENERGY SECURITY [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(6): 31-43.
[5]	ZHANG Haichao, LIU Xiaojing, MA Donglai, et al. DYNAMIC CHANGES OF AND APPROACHES TO AGRICULTURAL ECO-SUSTAINABILITY IN JILIN'S MAJOR CROP AREAS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(2): 132-142.
[6]	DONG Mei, WANG Yanying, YU Song, et al. QUALITY DEVELOPING PATH FOR WESTERN CHINA UNDER ECOLOGICAL WELFARE PERFORMANCE BASED ON TWO-STAGED DEA AND TOBIT MODELS [J]. Resources & Industries, 2021, 23(5): 61-71.
[7]	WANG Qin, LIU Donghui, MENG Lingjie. CHANGES AND FACTORS OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY OF PROVINCIAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY ALONG “THE BELT AND ROAD”: ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL DATA FROM 2006 TO 2016 [J]. Resources & Industries, 2021, 23(4): 70-77.
[8]	LIN Xiangyi, NIU Yi, LUO Hongyun, et al. ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT AND REGIONAL DIFFERENCE OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES IN HEILONGJIANG PROVINCE [J]. Resources & Industries, 2021, 23(2): 39-47.
[9]	SUN Kang, WANG Yannan, SU Zixiao. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DIFFERENTIATION OF ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF CHINA'S MARINE FISHING [J]. Resources & Industries, 2020, 22(2): 25-33.
[10]	HAN Danjie, DU Hongru, 2019. CONSTRUCTION LAND USE EFFICIENCY DIFFERENCE IN XINJIANG BASED ON DEA MODEL [J]. Resources & Industries, 2019, 21(4): 44-50.
[11]	WANG Qiao-li, HAN Li-hong. INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMING EFFICIENCY OF RESOURCES BASED CITIES BASED ON DEA MODEL: A CASE STUDY ON CHINA’S THREE NORTHEASTERN PROVINCES RESOURCES BASED CITIES [J]. Resources & Industries, 2017, 19(1): 10-16.
[12]	RUAN Dan-feng, HAN Li-hong. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF LISTED WATER UTILITIES ' COMPANIES BASED ON DEA MODEL [J]. Resources & Industries, 2016, 18(4): 103-109.
[13]	WU Yi-ding, LAI Cheng. OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED RARE EARTH COMPANIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDUSTRIAL CHAIN [J]. Resources & Industries, 2015, 17(1): 128-133.
[14]	Di Rang-li, Sha Jing-hua. DYNAMIC CASE STUDY OF TFP IN ORDOS BASIN CITIES BASED ON MALMQUIST INDEX AND DEA MODEL [J]. Resources & Industries, 2013, 15(3): 6-10.
[15]	ZHANG Li-ying,YAN Wen-bo, ZENG Zhao-zhi,LI Sheng-lian. INDEX SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF REE COMPETITIVENESS BASED ON MALMQUIST [J]. Resources & Industries, 2012, 14(5): 100-104.