绿色信贷政策、ESG表现与高污染企业资本结构调整

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20231219.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 绿色信贷政策作为结构性去杠杆的重要举措，对于高污染企业资本结构升级大有裨益。与此同时，ESG概念的提出明确了企业发展需着重考量环境(E)、社会(S)和公司治理(G)三方面的表现，即企业ESG表现也将作用于高污染企业资本结构调整。因此，论文以2011—2020年中国A股上市的高污染企业为研究样本，基于ESG表现视角，探究绿色信贷政策对高污染企业资本结构调整的作用效果。研究表明：1)绿色信贷政策显著促进高污染企业资本结构调整，区分企业负债水平后发现，相比于低负债企业，绿色信贷政策显著加快高负债污染企业的资本结构调整速度；2)绿色信贷政策会提升高污染企业的ESG表现，企业ESG表现会削弱绿色信贷政策对高污染企业资本结构调整的促进效果；3)在深入探讨企业融资约束和商业信用程度的异质性是否会影响绿色信贷政策的实施效果时，发现相较于面临弱融资约束和拥有高商业信用的企业，绿色信贷政策显著促进面临强融资约束和低商业信用的高污染企业调整资本结构。因此，探讨绿色信贷政策与高污染企业资本结构调整的关系对优化信贷资源配置、推动高污染企业绿色转型意义重大。

关键词: 绿色信贷政策, 资本结构调整, 企业ESG表现, 高污染企业

Abstract: Green credit policy as a vital means to remove structural leverage is much helpful for highly-polluting firms to upgrade their capital structures. ESG focusing on environment, social and governance can impact highly-polluting firms’ capital structure adjustment. This paper, based on China’s A-listed 2011 to 2020 highly-polluting firms’ ESG performance, studies the effects of green credit policy on capital structural adjustment of highly-polluting firms. Green credit policy largely promotes the capital structural adjustment of highly-polluting firms, more for high debit firms than low debit firms. Green credit policy can enhance highly-polluting firms’ ESG performances, which can weaken the effects of green credit policy on capital structural adjustment of highly-polluting firms. Implementing effects of heterogeneity of financing constraints and commercial credit on green credit policy show that green credit policy can largely boost their capital structural adjustment of highly-polluting firms with strong financing constraints and low commercial credits compared to with weak financing constraints and high commercial credits. Relation between green credit policy and capital structural adjustment of highly-polluting firms plays a big role in optimizing credit resource allocation and pushing green transformation of highly polluting firms.

Key words: green credit policy, capital structural adjustment, firm’s ESG performance, highly-polluting firms

中图分类号:

F270

董越, 潘海英. 绿色信贷政策、ESG表现与高污染企业资本结构调整[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 75-85.

DONG Yue, PAN Haiying. GREEN CREDIT POLICY, ESG PERFORMANCE AND CAPITAL STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT OF HIGHLY-POLLUTING FIRMS[J]. Resources & Industries, 2024, 26(1): 75-85.

参考文献

安素霞, 刘来会, 2020. 金融资产配置、商业信用融资与资本结构动态调整速度[J]. 现代财经: 天津财经大学学报, 40(4): 45-63. 〔AN S X, LIU L H, 2020. Allocation of financial assets, commercial credit and dynamic adjustment of capital structure[J]. Modern Finance and Economics: Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 40(4): 45-63.〕

陈琪, 2019. 中国绿色信贷政策落实了吗: 基于"两高一剩"企业贷款规模和成本的分析[J]. 当代财经(3): 118-129. 〔CHEN Q, 2019. Has China’s green credit policy been implemented?: an analysis of loan scale and costs based on “Two Highs and One Surplus” enterprises[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics(3): 118-129.〕

陈幸幸, 史亚雅, 宋献中, 2019. 绿色信贷约束、商业信用与企业环境治理[J]. 国际金融研究(12): 13-22.

耿晓媛, 喻芳群, 2022. 绿色信贷政策能否降低重污染企业的债务杠杆？: 基于绿色创新的遮掩效应[J]. 会计之友(24): 23-32.

顾研, 周强龙, 2018. 政策不确定性、财务柔性价值与资本结构动态调整[J]. 世界经济, 41(6): 102-126. 〔GU Y, ZHOU Q L, 2018. Policy uncertainty, value of financial flexibility and dynamic adjustment of capital structure[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 41(6): 102-126.〕

郭雪萌, 梁彭, 解子睿, 2019. 高管薪酬激励、资本结构动态调整与企业绩效[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 41(4): 78-91. 〔GUO X M, LIANG P, 2019. Executive compensation incentive, the dynamic adjustment of capital structure and firm performance [J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 41(4): 78-91.〕

胡建雄, 茅宁, 2014. 国外资本结构调整研究述评及展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 36(8): 62-72. 〔HU J X, MAO N, 2014. A review of foreign literature of capital structure adjustment and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 36(8): 62-72.〕

黄继承, 朱冰, 向东, 2014. 法律环境与资本结构动态调整[J]. 管理世界(5): 142-156.

黄艺翔, 姚铮, 2016. 企业社会责任报告、印象管理与企业业绩[J]. 经济管理, 38(1): 105-115. 〔HUANG Y X, YAO Z, 2016. Corporate social responsibility report, the impression management and accounting performance[J]. Economic Management, 38(1): 105-115.〕

姜付秀, 黄继承, 2011. 市场化进程与资本结构动态调整[J]. 管理世界(3): 124-134, 167.

蒋榕湄, 陈贵松, 2022. 政府补贴、企业ESG表现与绿色创新[J]. 资源与产业, 24(6): 90-102. 〔JIANG R M, CHEN G S, 2022. Governmental allowance, enterprise ESG and green innovation[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(6): 90-102.〕

况学文, 陈志锋, 金硕, 2017. 政治关联与资本结构调整速度[J]. 南开经济研究(2): 133-152. 〔KUANG X W, CHEN Z F, JIN S, 2017. Political connections and capital structure adjustment speed[J]. Nankai Economic Studies(2): 133-152.〕

李增福, 顾研, 连玉君, 2012. 税率变动、破产成本与资本结构非对称调整[J]. 金融研究(5): 136-150.

廉永辉, 黎梦瑶, 2020. 企业金融化与资本结构调整速度[J]. 财经科学(8): 1-12. 〔LIAN Y H, LI M Y, 2020. Corporate financialization and speed of capital structure adjustment[J]. Finance & Economics(8): 1-12.〕

刘姝雯, 刘建秋, 阳旸, 等, 2019. 企业社会责任与企业金融化: 金融工具还是管理工具?[J]. 会计研究(9): 57-64. 〔LIU S W, LIU J Q, YANG Y, et al.,2019. Corporate social responsibility and corporate financialization: a financial tool or management tool?[J]. Accounting Research(9): 57-64.〕

龙海明, 欧阳佳俊, 2022. 国内企业ESG绩效对资本结构动态调整的影响[J]. 南方金融(12): 33-44. 〔LONG H M, OUYANG J J, 2022. The impact of ESG performance of domestic enterprises on the dynamic adjustment of capital structure [J]. South China Finance(12): 33-44.〕

陆菁, 鄢云, 王韬璇, 2021. 绿色信贷政策的微观效应研究: 基于技术创新与资源再配置的视角[J]. 中国工业经济(1): 174-192. 〔LU J, YAN Y, WANG T X, 2021. The microeconomic effects of green credit policy: from the perspective of technological innovation and resource reallocation[J]. China Industrial Economics(1): 174-192.〕

宁金辉, 史方, 2021. 绿色信贷政策与资本结构动态调整[J]. 财会月刊(21): 44-53.

沈洪涛, 黄珍, 郭肪汝, 2014. 告白还是辩白: 企业环境表现与环境信息披露关系研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 17(2): 56-63, 73. 〔SHENG H T , HUANG Z, GUO F R, 2014. Confess or defense? a study on the relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure[J] Nankai Business Review, 17(2): 56-63, 73.〕

舒欢, 李妍, 2022. 房地产企业社会责任与融资约束关系的地区差异研究[J]. 资源与产业, 24(1): 126-135. 〔SHU H, LI Y, 2022. Regional difference of relation between real estate enterprise’s social responsibilities and financial constraints[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(1): 126-135.〕

斯丽娟, 曹昊煜, 2022. 绿色信贷政策能够改善企业环境社会责任吗: 基于外部约束和内部关注的视角[J]. 中国工业经济(4): 137-155. 〔SI L J, CAO H Y, 2022. Does green credit policies improve corporate environmental social responsibility: the perspective of external constraints and internal concerns[J]. China Industrial Economics(4): 137-155.〕

苏冬蔚, 连莉莉, 2018. 绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?[J]. 金融研究(12): 123-137. 〔SU D W, LIAN L L, 2018. Does green credit policy affect corporate financing and investment? evidence from publicly listed firms in pollution -intensive industries[J]. Journal of Financial Research(12): 123-137.〕

王保辉, 2019. 绿色信贷、企业社会责任披露与债务融资成本: 基于2011—2017年A股上市重污染企业的实证研究[J]. 金融理论与实践(7): 47-54. 〔WANG B H, 2019. Green credit, corporate social responsibility disclosure and debt financing cost: empirical study on heavy pollution enterprises listed in A-share market from 2011 to 2017 [J]. Financial Theory & Practice(7): 47-54.〕

王朝阳, 张雪兰, 包慧娜, 2018. 经济政策不确定性与企业资本结构动态调整及稳杠杆[J]. 中国工业经济(12): 134-151. 〔WANG C Y, ZHANG X L, BAO H N, 2018. Economic policy uncertainty, the dynamic adjustment of enterprises’ capital structure and stablizing leverage[J]. China Industrial Economics(12): 134-151.〕

王康仕, 孙旭然, 王凤荣, 2019. 绿色金融、融资约束与污染企业投资[J]. 当代经济管理, 41(12): 83-96. 〔WANG K S, SUN X R, WANG F R, 2019. Green finance, financing constrains and the investment of polluting enterprise[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 41(12): 83-96.〕

王倩, 吴多文, 陈倩玉, 2019. 企业社会责任与杠杆调整速度: 基于中国上市企业的实证分析[J]. 金融论坛, 24(8): 67-80. 〔WANG Q, WU D W, CHEN Q Y, 2019. Corporate social responsibility and leverage adjustment speed an empirical analysis based on Chinese listed companies[J]. Finance Forum, 24(8): 67-80.〕

王艳丽, 类晓东, 龙如银, 2021. 绿色信贷政策提高了企业的投资效率吗?: 基于高污染企业金融资源配置的视角[J]. 中国人口∙

温忠麟, 叶宝娟, 2014. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 22(5): 731-745. 〔WEN Z L, YE B J, 2014. Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5): 731-745.〕

巫岑, 黎文飞, 唐清泉, 2019. 产业政策与企业资本结构调整速度[J]. 金融研究(4): 92-110.

吴红军, 刘啟仁, 吴世农, 2017. 公司环保信息披露与融资约束[J]. 世界经济, 40(5): 124-147. 〔WU H J, LIU Q R, WU S N, 2017. Corporate environmental disclosure and financing constraints[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 40(5): 124-147.〕

伍中信, 张娅, 张雯, 2013. 信贷政策与企业资本结构: 来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究(3): 51-58, 96. 〔WU Z X, ZHANG Y, ZHANG W, 2013. Credit policy and capital structure of corporation: evidence from listed firms in China[J]. Accounting Research(3): 51-58, 96.〕

杨强, 2022. 绿色信贷与企业ESG表现: 来自中国A股非金融上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融发展评论, 156(12): 26-39. 〔YANG Q, 2022. Green credit and enterprise esg performance empirical evidence from China’s a-share non -financial listed companies [J]. Financial Development Review, 156(12): 26-39.〕

钟献兵, 马福春, 魏妍, 等, 2022. 绿色信贷政策如何影响企业债务融资成本?: 兼论“碳泡沫”是否存在[J]. 金融与经济(9): 86-96.

BYOUN S, 2008. How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 63(6): 3069-3096.

DENIS D J, 2011. Financial flexibility and corporate liquidity[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(3): 667-674.

FATEMI A, GLAUM M, KAISER S, 2018. ESG performance and firm value: the moderating role of disclosure[J]. Global Finance Journal, 38(1): 45-64.

GILLAN S L, KOCH A, STARKS L T, 2021. Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66: 101889.

GOLDSTEIN R S , JU N J, LELAND H E, 2001. An ebit-based model of dynamic capital structure[J]. The Journal of Business, 74(4): 483-512.

STREBULAEV I A, 2007. Do tests of capital structure theory mean what they say?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 62(4): 1747-1787.

[1]	丁雄军, 王莉, 魏源, 等. 构建“山水林土河微”生命共同体促进酿酒行业高质量发展的思考与实践[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 124-132.
[2]	关伟, 王勇, 许淑婷. 中国工业碳排放的网络结构及影响因素研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(5): 40-49.
[3]	姜维. 生态系统美学服务评估方法研究进展[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(5): 96-106.
[4]	尹庆民, 靳婉婷. 科技创新对绿色全要素生产率的影响——基于产业集聚调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 1-10.
[5]	及添正, 黄巧龙, 张天铃, 等. 长江经济带生产性服务业的空间格局演变与影响因素研究——基于企业进入视角 [J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 37-51.
[6]	宋敏, 唐荣, 施凯杰. 交通基础设施、研发人员流动对制造业出口技术复杂度的影响[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 76-87.
[7]	高枝欣, 许纪校. 重污染企业社会责任、高管激励与绿色技术创新[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 88-100.
[8]	聂志萍, 汪艺文. 环境信息披露对资源型企业创新的影响——基于外部压力视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 79-96.
[9]	程铭, 闫峰, 杜廷霞, 等. 研发投入、创新绩效与经济增长的动态关系研究——基于山东省16个地市面板数据的PVAR实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 97-108.
[10]	聂志萍, 范晓雯. 战略差异对先进制造业企业研发投入的影响——基于商业信用融资的中介作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 122-131.
[11]	沈泓成, 罗婷, 叶骥 . 环境规制强度对浙江省工业绿色发展影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 61-69.
[12]	刘素荣, 谢笑潇, 霍江林. 补贴退坡对新能源企业研发投资的影响——基于市场预期调节视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 65-76.
[13]	周璇, 谭建华, 郭丕斌, 等. FDI水平溢出、自主研发对工业产出的影响——基于粤港澳大湾区面板数据的多维门槛效应检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 108-118.
[14]	舒欢, 徐艺尹. 建筑企业社会责任对企业价值的影响机制分析——冗余资源的调节效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 143-154.
[15]	陈欣远, 刘亚婷. 上市公司股权结构特征对企业社会责任影响的实证研究——基于两权分离度的调节作用[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 155-166.