基于网络SBM-DEA的辽宁沿海经济带港城效率与可持续发展研究

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20250217.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为强调港口与城市生产运营的连续性及其对港口城市可持续发展的重要性，本研究将港口城市构建成一个综合的复合系统。采用网络SBM-DEA模型，以绿色GDP为期望产出，纳入环境保护成本作为绿色投入考量，并选用二氧化碳排放量作为非预期产出，以此全面评估辽宁省各港口城市“港-城”复合系统的生产效率，进而深入探讨其可持续性发展水平。研究结果显示：1）观测辽宁港口城市全局的分阶段生产效率，发现城市的“投入-产出”的转化效率一直显著高于港口效率；2）不同港口城市在各个时间段内的生产效率呈现波动趋势，揭示“港-城”系统运行的复杂性和动态性；3）基于SBM-DEA模型的深入分析，揭示“港-城”系统内部协调性的不足。大连为城市可持续发展城市，营口和锦州为港口可持续发展城市，盘锦与葫芦岛为可持续发展一般城市，丹东为可持续性较差城市。提出针对各个港口城市特定情况的、具有实践可行性的策略建议，旨在促进整个辽宁省港口城市的均衡、绿色及可持续发展路径。

关键词: SBM-DEA模型, 效率评价, 可持续发展, 辽宁港口城市

Abstract: To stress the importance of continuity of ports and cities' operation on their sustainability, this paper establishes a comprehensive compound system of port city, and uses SBM-DEA model which takes green GDP as desired output, environmental protection costs as green inputs, carbon dioxide emission as non-desired output to systematically evaluate productivity of port-city compound system of port cities in Liaoning province, and discusses its sustainability. Phased productivities of the overall Liaoning port city show that urban inputs/outputs conversion rate is largely higher than port. Productivities of port cities show a waving trend in a time range, suggesting a complexity and dynamic of port-city operation. SBM-DEA model suggests an insufficient “port-city” internal coordination. Dalian is a city of sustainability, Yingkou and Jinzhou of port sustainability, Panjin and Huludao of average sustainability, and Dandong of poor sustainability. This paper presents suggestions for each port city with the purpose of promoting a balanced, green and sustainable path in Liaoning's port cities.

Key words: SBM-DEA model, efficiency evaluation, sustainable development, Liaoning's port cities

中图分类号:

F061.5

周宝刚, 颜雨晴, 冯欣宇. 基于网络SBM-DEA的辽宁沿海经济带港城效率与可持续发展研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(3): 66-76.

ZHOU Baogang, YAN Yuqing, FENG Xinyu. PORT-CITY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN LIAONING COASTAL ECONOMIC ZONE BASED ON NETWORK SBM-DEA[J]. Resources & Industries, 2025, 27(3): 66-76.

参考文献

陈春芳, 宗蓓华, 2008.基于SFA的上海港集装箱码头效率评价[J].上海海事大学学报, 29(3): 87-92.〔CHEN C F,ZONG B H,2008.Shanghai container terminal efficiency analysis based on SFA[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 29(3): 87-92.〕

邓玉勇, 秦俊平, 2022.基于超效率DEA和DEA-Malmquist指数模型的智慧港口效率评价[J].上海海事大学学报, 43(4): 83-90.〔DENG Y Y,QIN J P,2022.Evaluation on smart port efficiency based on super efficiency DEA and DEA-Malmquist index model[J].Journal of Shanghai Maritime University,43(4): 83-90.〕

高阳, 冯喆, 许学工, 2017.环渤海海洋产业绿色GDP核算[J].环境科学研究, 30(9): 1479-1488.〔GAO Y,FENG Z,XU X G,2017.Green GDP accounting of ocean industries along Bohai Rim[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,30(9):1479-1488.〕

郭建科, 杜小飞, 孙才志, 等, 2015.环渤海地区港口与城市关系的动态测度及驱动模式研究[J].地理研究, 34(4): 740-750.〔GUO J K,DU X F,SUN C Z, et al.,2015.Research on dynamic measurement and driving mode of harbor-city relationship in the Bohai Rim in China[J].Geographical Research, 34(4): 740-750.〕

郭宵, 孙胜元, 2022.基于非期望产出SBM-DEA的省级港口效率分析：以江苏省为例[J].物流技术, 41(3): 45-49.〔GUO X, SUN S Y, 2022.Analysis of provincial ports efficiency based on unexpected output SBM-DEA model: a case study of Jiangsu[J].Logistics Technology, 41(3): 45-49.〕

何玉梅, 吴莎莎, 2017.基于资源价值损失法的绿色GDP核算体系构建[J].统计与决策(17): 5-10.〔HE Y M, WU S S, 2017.Construction of green GDP accounting system based on resource value loss method[J].Statistics and Decision(17): 5-10.〕

柯文岚, 李文慧, 闫晶晶, 2024.京津冀城市群高质量发展测度及时空分异特征研究[J].资源与产业, 26(1): 1-14.〔KE W L, LI W H, YAN J J, 2024.Measurement and temporal-spatial differentiation of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei city cluster‘s quality development[J].Resources & Industries, 26(1): 1-14.〕

廖绍栩, 赵丹, 李龙, 2022.基于DPSIR模型的宁波港绿色低碳评价[J].浙江万里学院学报, 35(4): 15-20.〔LIAO S X, ZHAO D, LI L, 2022. Green and low-carbon evaluation analysis of Ningbo port based on DPSIR model [J].Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University, 35(4): 15-20.〕

蔺向宇, 杨灿, 2022.基于网络SBM-DEA模型的中国省际生态效率评价[J].南方农业, 16(15): 51-59.〔LIN X Y, YANG C, 2022.Evaluation of inter-provincial eco-efficiency in China based on network SBM-DEA model[J].South China Agriculture, 16(15): 51-59.〕

鲁涛, 王悦, 马明, 2017.基于网络DEA的共享投入与(非）期望产出的两部门并行系统效率评价：以中国道路运输业为例[J].系统科学与数学, 37(9): 1976-1987.〔LU T, WANG Y, MA M, 2017.Efficiency evaluation of parallel systems with two components with shared input and (undesirable) desirable output based on DEA: a case study of road transportation industry in China[J].Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences.37(9): 1976-1987.〕

庞瑞芝, 李占平, 2005.港口绩效评价与分析探讨[J]. 港口经济(5): 43-44.

王燕, 刘邦凡, 郭立宏, 2021.基于SEEA-2012我国绿色GDP核算体系构建及时空格局分析[J].生态经济, 37(9): 136-145.〔WANG Y, LIU B F, GUO L H, 2021.Construction of China's green GDP accounting system and analysis of its spatial and temporal pattern based on SEEA-2012[J].Ecological Economy, 37(9): 136-145.〕

徐超波, 2022.绿色发展视角下的宁波舟山港港口效率评价[J].水运管理, 44(2): 8-10.

杨锋, 梁樑, 凌六一, 等, 2009.并联结构决策单元的DEA效率评价研究[J].中国管理科学, 17(6): 157-162.〔YANG F, LIANG L, LING L Y, et al., 2009.DEA efficiency evaluating models for DMUs with parallel structure[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science, 17(6): 157-162.〕

杨丽, 黄斯唯, 张特, 2023.工农业绿色生产效率与健康效率研究：基于并行两阶段SBM-DEA模型[J].经济与管理, 37(5): 45-54.〔YANG L, HUANG S W, ZHANG T, 2023.Research on industry and agricultural green production efficiency and health efficiency: based on the parallel two-stage SBM-DEA model[J].Economy and Management, 37(5): 45-54.〕

易燕, 2020.我国物流产业绿色效率及区域空间特征：基于非期望产出的SBM模型[J].商业经济研究(20): 104-107.

殷翔宇, 祝合良, 曲明辉, 2022.中国沿海港口港城关系发展及对城市经济增长作用[J].地理科学, 42(6): 984-992.〔YIN X Y, ZHU H L, QU M H, 2022.Development of port city relationship and its effect on urban economic growth in China's coastal ports[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica, 42(6): 984-992.〕

詹斌, 张艳秋, 苏健, 等, 2022.基于DEA模型的长江沿线主要内河港口效率评价[J].中国航海, 45(3): 39-46.〔ZHAN B, ZHANG Y Q, SU J, et al., 2022.Efficiency evaluation of major inland ports along the Yangtze River based on DEA model[J].Navigation of China, 45(3): 39-46.〕

张蒙, 2021.港口繁荣与区域经济发展的关系研究：基于面板向量自回归模型的实证分析[J].调研世界(9): 58-64.

张荣佳, 付琳, 孙晓华, 2022.地理区位、经济区位与资源型城市产业转型[J].宏观经济研究(7): 88-104, 119.〔ZHANG R J, FU L, SUN X H, 2022.Geographical location, economic location and industrial transformation of resource-based cities[J].Macroeconomics(7): 88-104, 119.〕

赵叶, 2020.环渤海港口群物流效率评价研究[J].运输经理世界(18): 58-59. 〔ZHAO Y, 2020. Research on logistics efficiency evaluation of Bohai Rim Port Cluster [J]. Transport Business China, (18): 58-59.〕

郑琰, 巴文婷, 肖玉杰, 2023.考虑碳排放的长三角港口群动态效率测度[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 23(4): 34-46. 〔ZHENG Y, BA W T, XIAO Y J, 2023. Dynamic efficiency measure in Yangtze River Delta port cluster considering carbon emissions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 23(4): 34-46.〕

周文文, 刘名武, 林刚, 2023.长江经济带内河集装箱港口低碳运行效率研究[J].上海海事大学学报, 44(3): 48-54.〔ZHOU W W, LIU M W, LIN G, 2023.Study on low-carbon operation efficiency of inland container ports in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 44(3): 48-54.〕

CHEN C, LAM J S L, 2018.Sustainability and interactivity between cities and ports: a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach[J].Maritime Policy & Management, 45(7): 944-961.

CHEON S H, MALTZ A, DOOLEY K, 2017.The link between economic and environmental performance of the top 10 U.S. ports[J].Maritime Policy & Management, 44(2): 227-247.

KAO C, HWANG S N, 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1): 418-429.

CONG L Z, ZHANG D, WANG M L, et al., 2020.The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: panel evidence from China[J].Transport Policy, 90(C): 13-21.

CUI Q, 2017. Environmental efficiency measures for ports: an application of RAM-Tobit-RAM with undesirable outputs[J].Maritime Policy & Management, 44(5): 551-564.

KONG Y D, LIU J G, 2021.Sustainable port cities with coupling coordination and environmental efficiency[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 205:105534.

MA Q F, JIA P, SHE X R, et al., 2021.Port integration and regional economic development: lessons from China[J]. Transport Policy, 110(Suppl C): 430-439.

ROLL Y, HAYUTH Y, 1993.Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA)[J]. Maritime Policy and Management, 20(2): 153-161.

SUEYOSHI T, YUAN Y, 2018. Measuring energy usage and sustainability development in Asian nations by DEA intermediate approach[J]. Journal of Economic Structures, 7(1): 1-18.

TONE K, TSUTSUI M, 2009. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1): 243-252.

YIN C Z, KE Y D, CHEN J H, et al., 2021.Interrelations between sea hub ports and inland hinterlands: perspectives of multimodal freight transport organization and low carbon emissions[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 214:105919.

[1]	刘泽照, 翟云晶. 资源型城市可持续发展及DPSIR模型评价研究——以徐州市建设国家可持续发展议程创新示范区为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(2): 20-31.
[2]	张捷, 赵乡阳, 庞庆华, 张陈俊. 数字经济对省际绿色水资源利用效率的影响研究——基于系统GMM模型的检验[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(1): 11-21.
[3]	田鸣, 沈少奇, 严佳蕊. 气候变化风险对企业可持续发展绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(1): 146-162.
[4]	杨宁, 刘钢, 黄晨, 王颖, 杜辉, 张永成. 面向生态文明建设的城市韧性基础设施研究知识图谱与趋势分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(6): 48-61.
[5]	罗正茂, 高红贵, 万华炜, 陈洋. 煤炭资源型城市生态足迹的空间分布及影响因素分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(5): 1-12.
[6]	梁涵玮, 夏怀霞, 陈爽, 等. 省域尺度下新型城镇化与可持续发展的耦合协调研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(3): 97-113.
[7]	薛松, 赵静静, 杨涛. 知识共享、绿色创新与基础设施可持续发展协同关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(1): 109-121.
[8]	蒋榕湄, 陈贵松. 政府补贴、企业ESG表现与绿色创新[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(6): 90-102.
[9]	张云宁, 朱红艳, 欧阳红祥, 等. 长江经济带乡村人居环境可持续发展水平评价与空间格局研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(4): 42-54.
[10]	张海潮, 刘晓静, 马东来, 等. 吉林省粮食主产区农业生态可持续发展动态变化分析及对策研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 132-142.
[11]	马俊杰, 张建平, 刘晓鸿, 等. 中国世界地质公园管理模式与县域经济可持续发展关系研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(1): 1-7.
[12]	胡兰, 黄和平. 基于EKC的工业污染与经济发展的关系及驱动因素研究——以湖南省为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2021, 23(2): 11-22.
[13]	崔文婧, 闫晶晶, 沙景华, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的天津市海洋资源环境承载力评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2020, 22(6): 9-17.
[14]	吴景辉，王耕，于大涛，等. 基于能值-生态足迹模型的齐齐哈尔市可持续发展水平分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2019, 21(2): 17-23.
[15]	葛文峰. 可持续发展下资源型城市发展旅游业的优势与策略 [J]. 资源与产业, 2018, 20(6): 9-15.